Vol. 15 No. 30 (2025): Teoria queer e scienze sociali: tra sfide e prospettive
Monographic Section

Teoria queer e scienze sociali: tra sfide e prospettive

Luca Guizzardi
Università di Bologna, Italia
Salvatore Monaco
Università di Napoli Federico II, Italia
Mara Sanfelici
Università di Milano Bicocca, Italia

Published 2026-02-11

How to Cite

Guizzardi, L., Monaco, S., & Sanfelici, M. (2026). Teoria queer e scienze sociali: tra sfide e prospettive. Cambio. Rivista Sulle Trasformazioni Sociali, 15(30), 5–8. https://doi.org/10.36253/cambio-19831

References

  1. Butler J. (2011), Questioni di genere. Il femminismo e la sovversione dell’identità, Bari-Roma: Laterza.
  2. Bernini L. (2017), Le teorie queer. Un’introduzione, Milano: Mimesis.
  3. Browne K., Nash C.J. (2010), Queer methods and methodologies: an introduction, in Browne K., Nash C.J. (eds.), Queer methods and methodologies. Intersecting queer theories and social science research, New York: Routledge, 1-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315603223-1
  4. Compton D’.L., Meadow T., Schilt K. (2018), Other, Please Specify. Queer Methods in Sociology, Oakland: University of California Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520963993
  5. Corbisiero F., Monaco S. (2024), Manuale di studi LGBTQIA+, Torino: UTET.
  6. de Lauretis T. (1991), Queer theory: lesbian and gay sexualities. An introduction, in «differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies», 3(2), v-xvii. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/10407391-3-2-iii
  7. Gilley B.J., Masullo G. (2023), Non-Binary Family Configurations: Intersections of Queerness and Homonormativity, Cham, SW: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05367-2
  8. Hammack P.L., Frost D.M., Hughes S.D. (2018), Queer intimacies: a new paradigm for the study of relationship diversity, in «The Journal of Sex Research», 56(4-5): 556-592. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2018.1531281
  9. Halley J., Halley I. (2009), Queer theory by men, in Fineman M.A., Jackson J.E., Romeo A.P. (eds.), Feminist and Queer Legal Theory (Intimate Encouters, Uncomfortable Conversations), Farnham: Ashgate, 9-28.
  10. Marella M.R. (2017), Queer Eye for Straight Guy. Sulle possibilità di un’analisi giuridica queer, in «Politica del diritto», 3, 383-414.
  11. Marvel S. (2013), Polymorphous reproductivity and the critique of futurity: toward a queer legal analytic for fertility law, in «Jindal Global Law Review», 4(2), 294-312.
  12. Meyer S.J., Dale E.J., Willis K.K.M. (2022), “Where My Gays At?” The Status of LGBTQ People and Queer (LGQ) Parent Families, in «Non-profit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly», 51, 3, 556-586. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640211021497
  13. Muñoz J.E. (2022), Cruising Utopia. L’orizzonte della futurità queer, Roma: Nero.
  14. Prearo M. (2012), Le radici rimosse della queer theory. Una genealogia da ricostruire, in «Genesi», XI, 1-2, 95-114.
  15. Pustianaz M. (2011), Queer in Italia. Differenze in movimento, Pisa: ETS.
  16. Sedgwick E.K. (2011), Stanze private. Epistemologia e politica della sessualità, Carocci: Roma.
  17. Seidman S. (1993), Identity and politics in ‘postmodern’ gay culture: some historical and conceptual notes, in Warner M. (ed.), Fear of a queer planet: queer politics and social theory, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 105-142.
  18. Turner W.B. (2000), A genealogy of queer theory, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
  19. Valdes F. (1995), Queers, Sissies, Dykes, And Tomboys: Deconstructing the Conflation of ‘Sex’, ‘Gender’, and ‘Sexual Orientation’ in Europe and American Law and Society, in «California Law Review», 83, 1, 344-377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3480882
  20. Valentini F. (2018), Genealogie queer. Teorie critiche delle identità sessuali e di genere, Verona: ombre corte.