Vol. 16 No. 31 (2026): (Upcoming) Beyond measurement: discourses, politics and process of construction of Learning Outcomes in education
Monographic Section

From Brussels to the Classroom: : The Multi-Level Translation of Learning Outcomes in a Small-State Higher Education System

Dariush Rahiminia
Università Niccolò Cusano

Published 2026-10-02

Keywords

  • learning outcomes,
  • qualifications frameworks,
  • small-state higher education,
  • policy translation,
  • malta

How to Cite

Rahiminia, D., & Abela, G. (2026). From Brussels to the Classroom: : The Multi-Level Translation of Learning Outcomes in a Small-State Higher Education System. Cambio. Rivista Sulle Trasformazioni Sociali, 16(31). Retrieved from https://oaj.fupress.net/index.php/cambio/article/view/20131

Abstract

Learning Outcomes (LOs) are a foundational instrument of European higher education policy. Since the Bologna Process and the establishment of the European Qualifications Framework (EQF), they have been promoted as transparent, portable, and measurable statements of what learners know and can do. Yet this paper argues that LOs are not fixed technical objects transmitted unchanged through governance chains: they undergo successive and substantive transformation — translation, not implementation — as they travel from supranational EU policy through national qualifications frameworks, national quality assurance processes, and institutional programme design to classroom delivery. Drawing on a qualitative institutional case study of a small private Higher Education Institution (HEI) in Malta, the paper traces this chain across four levels: the EQF, the Malta Qualifications Framework (MQF), the Malta Further and Higher Education Authority (MFHEA) accreditation process, and institutional practice. Theoretical resources are drawn from Ball, Maguire and Braun's policy enactment framework, Bernstein's concept of recontextualization, and the comparative literature on small-state education systems. The paper introduces "compressed governance" to describe how the structural features of small states — concentrated institutions, overlapping roles, abbreviated governance chains — shape LO translation dynamics. Key findings include the MQF's amplification of EQF descriptors; the institutionally discretionary character of MFHEA accreditation; "LO bricolage" produced by dual accreditation requirements; and the partial evaporation of formal LO specifications in classroom practice. The paper argues these are structural features of multi-level LO governance particularly visible in small-state contexts, and calls for comparative education research to treat governance scale as a primary analytical variable.

References

  1. Adam, S. (2004). Using Learning Outcomes: A Consideration of the Nature, Role, Application and Implications for European Education of Employing Learning Outcomes at the Local, National and International Levels. Edinburgh: Heriot-Watt University/Bologna Process Secretariat.
  2. Adam, S. (2008). Learning outcomes current developments in Europe: update on the issues and applications of learning outcomes associated with the Bologna Process. In Edinburgh Seminar Background Report. Edinburgh: EUA/Scottish Executive.
  3. Allais, S. (2012). Claims vs. practicalities: Lessons about using learning outcomes. Journal of Education and Work, 25(3), 331–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2012.687570
  4. Allais, S. (2014). Selling Out Education: National Qualifications Frameworks and the Abandonment of Knowledge. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  5. Ball, S.J., Maguire, M., & Braun, A. (2012). How Schools Do Policy: Policy Enactments in the Secondary School. London: Routledge.
  6. Berlin Communiqué (2003). Realising the European Higher Education Area: Communiqué of the Conference of Ministers responsible for Higher Education. Berlin, 19 September 2003. Berlin: EHEA.
  7. Bergen Communiqué (2005). The European Higher Education Area — Achieving the Goals: Communiqué of the Conference of European Ministers responsible for Higher Education. Bergen, 19–20 May 2005. Bergen: EHEA.
  8. Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity: Theory, Research, Critique (revised edition). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
  9. Biesta, G. (2009). Good education in an age of measurement: on the need to reconnect with the question of purpose in education. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9064-9
  10. Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for Quality Learning at University: What the Student Does (4th edition). Maidenhead: Open University Press/McGraw-Hill.
  11. Bohlinger, S. (2019). Ten years after: the 'success story' of the European qualifications framework. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 71(4), 501–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2019.1646413
  12. Braun, A., Maguire, M., & Ball, S.J. (2010). Policy enactments in the UK secondary school: examining policy, practice and school positioning. Journal of Education Policy, 25(4), 547–560. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680931003698544
  13. Bray, M., & Packer, S. (1993). Education in Small States: Concepts, Challenges, and Strategies. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
  14. Brock, C., & Crossley, M. (2013). Revisiting scale, comparative research and education in small states. Comparative Education, 49(3), 388–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2013.803782
  15. Caspersen, J., Smeby, J.-C., & Aamodt, P.O. (2017). Measuring learning outcomes. European Journal of Education, 52(1), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12205
  16. Cedefop (2008). The Shift to Learning Outcomes: Conceptual, Political and Practical Developments in Europe. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://www.cedefop.europa.eu/files/4079_en.pdf
  17. Cedefop (2024). Learning Outcomes Going Global: A Multifaceted Phenomenon. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://www.cedefop.europa.eu/files/9193_en.pdf
  18. Cedefop (2025). The Influence of Learning Outcomes-Based Curricula on Teaching Practices in VET Schools. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://www.cedefop.europa.eu/files/5611_en.pdf
  19. Cort, P. (2010). Stating the obvious: the European qualifications framework is not a neutral evidence-based policy tool. European Educational Research Journal, 9(3), 304–316. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2010.9.3.304
  20. Council of the European Union (2017). Council Recommendation of 22 May 2017 on the European Qualifications Framework for Lifelong Learning (2017/C 189/03). Official Journal of the European Union, C 189/15.
  21. Crossley, M. (2010). Context matters in educational research and international development: Learning from the small states experience. Prospects, 40(4), 421–429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-010-9172-4
  22. Crossley, M., & Holmes, K. (2001). Challenges for educational research: international development, partnerships and capacity building in small states. Oxford Review of Education, 27(3), 395–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054980120067429
  23. Darmanin, M. (2009). Further and higher education markets' cushions: portability of policy and potential to pay. Journal of Education Policy, 24(5), 523–544. https://doi.org/10.1080/09620210903424477
  24. ENQA (2024). External Review Report of the Malta Further and Higher Education Authority (MFHEA). Brussels: ENQA. https://doi.org/ENQA/MFHEA2024
  25. EQAR (2025). Rejection Decision: Application of Malta Further and Higher Education Authority (MFHEA) for Registration on the European Quality Assurance Register for Higher Education. Brussels: EQAR Register Committee. https://www.eqar.eu/register/home/
  26. European Parliament and Council (2008). Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 on the establishment of the European Qualifications Framework for Lifelong Learning (2008/C 111/01). Official Journal of the European Union, C 111/1.
  27. Harwood, M. (2012). Malta's Europeanization experience: How smallness enables a state to minimise the monitoring of its implementation of EU policy by third parties. Journal of Public Administration and Policy Research, 4(8), 183–192. https://doi.org/10.5897/JPAPR12.026
  28. Horrod, S. (2020). Investigating Policy Processes and Discourses in Higher Education: The Theoretical Complementarities of Bernstein's Pedagogic Device and Critical Discourse Studies. In Researching Higher Education (Chapter 10). Bingley: Emerald Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/s2056-375220200000006010
  29. Hussey, T., & Smith, P. (2002). The trouble with learning outcomes. Active Learning in Higher Education, 3(3), 220–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787402003003003
  30. Hussey, T., & Smith, P. (2008). Learning outcomes: a conceptual analysis. Teaching in Higher Education, 13(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510701794159
  31. Kennedy, D., Hyland, A., & Ryan, N. (2006). Writing and using learning outcomes: a practical guide. In E. Froment et al. (Eds.), EUA Bologna Handbook: Implementing Bologna in Your Institution, C3.4-1. Brussels: EUA.
  32. MFHEA (2024). Malta Qualifications Framework for Lifelong Learning: 5th Referencing Report. Msida: Malta Further and Higher Education Authority. https://mfhea.mt/referencing-report/
  33. MFHEA (2025). Malta Qualifications Framework: April 2025 Update. Msida: Malta Further and Higher Education Authority. https://mfhea.mt/referencing-report/
  34. Mikulec, B., & Ermenc, K.S. (2016). Qualifications frameworks between global and European pressures and local responses. SAGE Open, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016644948
  35. McCloat, A., & Caraher, M. (2021). Teachers' experiences of enacting curriculum policy at the micro level using Bernstein's theory of the pedagogic device. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 27(1–4), 205–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2020.1863210
  36. Republic of Malta (2012, as amended). Malta Qualifications Framework for Lifelong Learning Regulations, Subsidiary Legislation 327.431. Valletta: Department of Information, Government of Malta. https://legislation.mt/eli/sl/327.431/eng/pdf
  37. Republic of Malta (2012, as amended). Further and Higher Education (Licensing, Accreditation and Quality Assurance) Regulations, Subsidiary Legislation 607.03. Valletta: Department of Information, Government of Malta. https://legislation.mt/eli/sl/607.3/eng
  38. Scandurra, R., Kelly, D., Fusaro, S., Cefalo, R., & Hermannson, K. (2023). Do employability programmes in higher education improve skills and labour market outcomes? A systematic review of academic literature. Studies in Higher Education, 49(5), 845–862. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2023.2265425
  39. Schön, D.A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.
  40. Stenersen, C.R., & Prøitz, T. (2020). Just a buzzword? The use of concepts and ideas in educational governance. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 65(5), 762–775. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2020.1788153
  41. Tikkanen, J., Parreira do Amaral, M., Järvinen, T., & Alves, N. (Eds.) (2025). Constructing Learning Outcomes: Problematizing (Under)Achievement in Europe. London: Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350445918
  42. Winch, C. (2021). Learning outcomes: the long goodbye. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 74(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/14749041211043669
  43. Zelinka, J., Parreira do Amaral, M., König, J., Neves, T., Ferraz, D., Benasso, S., Filippi, M., & Pandolfini, V. (2024). CLEAR Deliverable D2.2: State-of-the-Art Report — Framework for the Analyses of Learning Outcomes in Europe. Münster: Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität / CLEAR Consortium. https://clear-horizon.eu