No. 13 (2017): Norm: What Is It? Ontological and Pragmatical Perspectives
Section 4. Logical and Epistemological Dimensions of Norms

The Challenge of the K-Principle in Deontic Logic (and Well Beyond)

Wojciech Żełaniec
Uniwersytet Gdański
Published December 30, 2017
Keywords
  • K-principle,
  • deontic logic,
  • possible worlds,
  • deontic discourse
How to Cite
Żełaniec, W. (2017). The Challenge of the K-Principle in Deontic Logic (and Well Beyond). Phenomenology and Mind, (13), 138-149. https://doi.org/10.13128/Phe_Mi-22436

Abstract

I go through various arguments why the K-principle (aka Distributivity Axiom), O(p→q)→(Op→Oq), a cornerstone of all deontic logic as the latter is standardly conceived, is of little use for the logical analysis of real-life deontic discourse. It is empirically false, I argue. Then I proceed to the question why it is so attractive, and I submit the hypothesis that to blame is Kripke semantics, making use of the imagery of possible worlds, accepted as a de facto standard in deontic logic. This semantics, however, is not attuned to the needs of controlling real-life deontic discourse, as the latter is mostly about things entirely this-worldly. For this-worldly relations possibly founding the deontic modalities the K-principle stands poor chance of working, I argue.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...