A Bibliometric and Thematic Analysis of Crisis Research in the Wine Industry: Trends and Future Perspectives

Aybike Tuba Özden

Samsun Vocational School, Department of Marketing and Advertising, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Türkiye

Email: aybike.ozden@omu.edu.tr

Abstract. This study systematically maps the academic literature on crises in the wine industry and reveals the field’s intellectual structure. Simultaneously, it identifies the dominant themes, trends, and future research directions in crisis-focused studies within the wine industry, thereby providing a reference framework for academics and industry stakeholders. A total of 470 articles published between 1991 and 2026 in the WoS and Scopus databases were included in this analysis. Performance analysis, science mapping, and thematic analysis were conducted using Biblioshiny, an R-based tool. In addition, the types of crises addressed in crisis-focused research in the wine industry and their areas of impact were evaluated using content analysis. The findings indicate that climate crises and pandemics are the most extensively studied crises. Furthermore, based on an evaluation of 146 sampled publications, it is observed that these crises are primarily examined in terms of their impacts on organizational/managerial and production domains. These findings suggest the need to evaluate the interactions between sudden and unexpected crises and slow-onset, long-term crises, such as climate change, as well as the broad impacts of marketing activities across different domains. This study is the first bibliometric analysis of crises in the wine industry. It provides an integrated perspective of the field and offers an original contribution by outlining potential directions for future research.

Keywords: wine industry, wine business, crisis management, bibliometric analysis, research trends.

Index

1. Introduction

2. Research methodology

2.1 Research questions

2.2 Database

2.3 Screening criteria

2.4 Data analysis

3. Results

3.1 Performance evaluation

3.2 Science mapping

3.3 Content analysis

3.3.1 Types of crises in the wine industry

3.3.2 Impact areas of crises

4. Thematic framework for future research directions

5. Discussion, implications, and limitations

References

Appendix

1. Introduction

The wine industry is a sector with deeply rooted traditions that have been largely preserved in grape cultivation and wine production processes [1]. Therefore, wine is a product closely intertwined with culture and has high economic value [1–2]. Nevertheless, the wine industry, like all sectors, is affected by crises, global threats, and a challenging competitive environment [3].

In this context, understanding the nature of the crises faced by the wine industry is important. A crisis is a multidimensional and complex phenomenon [4]. In general, crises are urgent, uncertain, and high-risk problems that need to be overcome [5] and can potentially lead to severe operational, financial, and social consequences [6]. Factors such as climate change, population growth, and digitalization indicate that more frequent, intense, and harmful crises will occur than ever before [7-8]. The wine industry, owing to its unique structure, is more vulnerable to natural events such as extreme weather conditions, earthquakes, and volcanic disasters [9]. For example, grapes used in wine production require suitable environmental conditions [10], and issues such as climate change negatively affect the harvest quantity and quality [11]. Moreover, pandemics, economic shocks, and energy crises highlight the need for adaptive strategies in the wine industry.

Crises in the wine industry typically affect both production and market dynamics of wine. Market-related crises generally arise from declining wine consumption in traditional countries, increasing international competition, a lack of global regulation, and insufficient policies in the wine industry [12]. In particular, small businesses are more vulnerable to crises, and their resilience often depends on cooperation between public and private sector actors [9]. These characteristics make the wine industry an important example for examining crisis dynamics, management strategies and sectoral resilience.

Despite the increasing interest in crises in the wine sector, the literature is fragmented. Existing studies have focused on specific types of crises, regional impacts, and particular business strategies. This situation prevents a systematic understanding of the relevant literature on the topic. In particular, no study has been found that comprehensively mapped the evolution of academic research on crises in the wine industry and identified underexplored areas. Addressing this gap is important for both theoretical knowledge and practical guidance for future research. In addition, this gap must be addressed to support stakeholders in developing effective crisis preparedness and response strategies.

To address this gap, the present study is the first to conduct a bibliometric analysis of 470 articles published between 1991 and 2026 and indexed in the Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus databases. In addition, crisis impact areas were comparatively examined based on a selected sample of the identified publications. In this context, trends, thematic clusters, and temporal developments of research on crises in the wine sector were identified. In addition, recommendations for academics and practitioners are provided. This study makes a unique contribution to enhancing the wine industry’s capacity to anticipate, respond to, and recover from crises and serves as a guide for future academic research.

2. Research methodology

This study employs a bibliometric approach to examine crises in the wine industry, with crisis types systematically classified through content analysis. Bibliometric analysis, when conducted using a validated database, allows a comprehensive and objective evaluation of relevant literature, encompassing both performance analysis and science mapping [13–14].

Performance analysis evaluates productivity within a research field, using outputs such as the number of publications by authors, journals, or years, while science mapping visualizes the intellectual structure of the field, facilitating understanding of its evolution and emerging trends [15–16].

2.1 Research questions

This study addresses the following research questions:

RQ1. What is the bibliometric performance of publications on crises in the wine industry in terms of annual publication trends, core journals identified through Bradford’s Law, and the most influential articles based on local citation values?

RQ2. How are the keyword networks structured in these publications?

RQ3. Which types of crises are addressed in the literature, and how are their impacts distributed across the main functional areas of the wine industry?

RQ4. What are the future research trends in the wine industry crisis literature?

2.2 Database

The Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus databases were selected because of their comprehensive coverage of publications related to the wine industry. Both databases serve as primary sources for bibliometric research and continue to evolve while maintaining their leading positions in academic indexing [17].

2.3 Screening criteria

In this study, keywords were selected based on a thorough review of the literature. The initial search was conducted on October 2, 2025. In the WoS database, a comprehensive search was performed using the keywords (wine* AND crisis*) in all fields. The search was subsequently updated on February 25, 2026, in both WoS and Scopus databases. In both databases, the search was applied to the title, abstract, and keywords using the following query:

(“wine industry” OR “wine sector” OR “winery” OR “wine business” OR “wine tourism”) AND (crisis OR Covid-19 OR pandemic OR “climate change” OR shock*)

These keywords were chosen to capture crises occurring within the wine industry and their impact on the sector, in line with the objectives of this study. The asterisk (*) at the end of a word enables the capture of multiple variants of that term (e.g., crises, shocks, shocking, shockwave, and shocked). These terms were included to ensure the retrieval of studies referring to more specific types of disruptions (e.g., financial crises, political crises, economic crises, or internal and external shocks).

Non-English publications, book chapters, editorials, abstracts, and book reviews were excluded, leaving only English-language journal articles on crises in the wine industry. Early access articles with DOI citations were also included.

2.4 Data analysis

Duplicate publications were removed using EndNote, and author names, journal titles, and keywords were standardized. Synonymous keywords, alternative spellings, and singular/plural forms were consolidated to ensure consistency.

Performance analysis and science mapping were conducted with Biblioshiny v.5.2.0, a web interface for the R package Bibliometrix, providing bibliometric functionalities such as network analysis and thematic mapping [18].

In the performance analysis, research trends were evaluated using publication years, the most-cited journals, most-cited authors, and keyword networks. The conceptual structure of crisis-focused publications in the wine industry was mapped using thematic mapping.

A two-stage approach was followed in the content analysis, with Microsoft Excel 2016 used in both stages of the analysis. In the first stage, all reviewed publications were classified according to the type of crisis addressed. In the second stage, for the selected sample, the impact of crises on specific areas of the wine industry was identified using a functional classification of the wine industry based on key operational and managerial areas. Following these steps, the findings were assessed within a comparative and synthesizing framework. The titles, abstracts, and keywords of the publications were examined for both stages.

3. Results

The reporting of this study follows the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines [19]. PRISMA provides researchers with a structured framework to ensure transparent and comprehensive reporting of findings (Figure 1).

A total of 306 publications from the WoS database and 480 from the Scopus database remained after excluding non-English publications and non-article document types. Subsequently, 87 publications identified through the literature review and the first WoS search were manually added. After combining all records, duplicate publications (n = 282) were removed, leaving 591 articles. The titles, abstracts, and keywords of these articles were screened. At this stage, one publication was found to be non-English and four publications were not articles; these were excluded from the analysis. Subsequently, 116 publications were excluded because they were not related to the wine industry or did not address a crisis situation in the wine industry, leaving 470 articles for the final assessment.

3.1 Performance evaluation

The annual distribution of publications included in this bibliometric analysis is presented in Figure 2.

Figure 2 shows the annual number of scientific publications on crises in the wine industry from 1991 to March 2026, which is increasing. The highest number of publications was recorded in 2023 (n = 65), 2024 (n = 62), and 2025 (n = 56). The number of publications has increased noticeably since 2013. Given that the present study includes publications up to March 2026, the number of articles for the full year may be higher. Each publication has received an average of 22.87 citations, indicating a relatively good average citation value.

Using Bradford’s Law of Scattering [21], core journals were identified. Zone 1 includes the most frequently cited journals, and the top five journals are listed in Table 1. The findings highlight the central role of these journals in the wine industry.

The authors with the highest number of publications in the dataset are listed in Table 2. These authors can be considered the most productive researchers in this field. Simultaneously, they play an important role in the development of literature on the wine industry and crisis-related studies.

The local citation value shown in the table indicates the number of times a publication was cited by other documents within the analyzed dataset. This value reflects a publication’s influence and significance within a specific research field. The “articles fractionalized” indicator distributes each publication among the authors according to the number of co-authors, providing a more balanced measure of individual research contribution. The most productive authors in the dataset are Abel Duarte Alonso, Hélder Fraga, and João A. Santos, each with 10 publications. However, Fraga and Santos had the highest impact within the dataset, with 258 local citations for their most-cited collaborative publication. This highlights their central role in the wine industry crisis literature.

3.2 Science mapping

The keyword co-occurrence network of the 470 publications included in this bibliometric analysis is presented in Figure 3.

Figure 3 shows the four main thematic keyword clusters identified in the literature on wine industry crises. In the first cluster, the keywords climate crisis, viticulture, Vitis, impact, and quality had the highest connections with other keywords. The climate crisis emerged as the most central term. In the second cluster, wine, wine industry, vineyard, article, and Spain were the most connected keywords. This indicates a focus on the wine industry and shows that wine is a central term linking multiple topics. In the third cluster, sustainability, pandemic, wine tourism, performance and innovation were the keywords with the highest connectivity. This reflects the significant influence of the pandemic and wine tourism in the literature. Finally, in the fourth cluster, adaptation, agriculture, vulnerability, perception, and resilience were the most influential keywords. These terms emphasize adaptive strategies and resilience in agriculture.

3.3 Content analysis

3.3.1 Types of crises in the wine industry

This section examines the most frequently studied crisis types in the literature and highlights their relative importance distribution.

The crisis types used in the content analysis were determined based on the nature of the crises frequently addressed in the literature and their impact on the wine industry. To better understand the impact and management of crises, they are commonly classified according to their causes (e.g., pandemics, external shocks, wars, political crises, financial crises, climate change, energy crises, and natural disasters) [14] and their effects (e.g., production shutdowns, demand shocks, and logistical disruptions) [15]. Depending on their causes, crises can be internal or external. External shocks, such as pandemics or rapid technological transitions, occur beyond the control of firms [16]. Internal shocks, including excessive risk-taking, lack of preventive policies, and deficiencies in crisis management, may also lead to crises [17].

Each publication was classified according to the primary crisis type. The classification criteria were as follows:

– Climate change refers to the long-term impact of weather patterns.

– A pandemic refers to an infectious disease outbreak that directly affects human health and society.

– Financial and economic crises encompass economic downturns, financial disruptions, and market contractions.

– Disasters refer to natural events such as earthquakes, floods, wildfires, and epidemic diseases.

– Political crises encompass political instability, elections, protests, and decision-making deadlocks arising from political disputes.

– War refers to national or international armed conflict.

– Internal shocks include management failures originating within organizations, risky decisions, and deficiencies in crisis management processes.

– Terrorism refers to violent acts.

– Multiple crises include publications addressing more than one type of crisis in a single study.

Each article was categorized based on its title, abstract, and keywords. In cases of ambiguity, the full texts were examined to ensure accurate classification. This approach enhanced the reproducibility of the classification process and ensured the methodological transparency.

Table 3 presents the classification of the publications included in the bibliometric analysis according to the types of crises.

Table 3 provides a systematic overview of the scope and impact of the different types of crises in the wine industry. According to the literature, the most frequently addressed crises are climate-related, pandemics, and financial crises, whereas war, terrorism, and internal shocks have been examined less extensively. This pattern reflects the prioritization of crises with broad and global impacts as the primary risks for the sector. Wine producers have developed strategic responses to these crises, focusing on resilience and adopting sustainability-oriented practices. Conversely, less frequently studied crisis types tend to have localized or specific effects, representing potential research gaps for future studies. Furthermore, political and cultural crises affect the industry beyond economic dimensions, influencing labor rights, migration, and cultural identity, thereby highlighting the multi-layered nature of crises in the wine industry.

3.3.2 Impact areas of crises

This section focuses on the main areas affected by crises within the wine industry. A stratified sampling approach was used to assess which areas of the wine industry were affected by crises in the publications examined. Stratified sampling involves dividing the population into categories based on a variable relevant to the research and then randomly selecting units from each category [38]. During content analysis, the analytical framework can be narrowed depending on the study objectives and the theoretical foundations of the presumed effects [39]. In this study, care was taken to ensure that the number of units selected from the subgroups was proportional to the population and that no subgroup was overrepresented compared to the others [40].

Following Olson [39], a stratified random sampling approach was employed. Publications were grouped by crisis type and time period (1991–1999, 2000–2019, and 2020–2026). For each group containing eight or more publications, a random number was assigned to each publication. The publications were then sorted in ascending order according to these numbers, and the first 25% were selected. Groups with fewer than eight publications were fully included to avoid disproportionate sampling in very small groups and to preserve the representation of less frequently studied crisis types. This procedure ensured that the sample represented both the diversity of crisis types and their temporal distribution while also guaranteeing the inclusion of smaller subgroups. Applying this procedure resulted in the selection of 146 publications, representing approximately 31% of the total 470 publications.

The impact levels of crises were coded using a functional categorization of the wine industry, covering key stages such as production, distribution, marketing, tourism, management, and policy. This categorization was informed by prior studies that describe the wine industry as a set of interconnected activities [41-43]. This framework allows for the objective coding of how different crises affect various areas of the wine industry.

Six core categories were defined for the analysis:

– Production encompasses grape cultivation and wine-making. Within this scope, viticulture, grape yield, and quality control processes are included.

– Processing and supply refers to the distribution and logistics processes in the wine industry.

– Marketing and sales include retailing and consumer behaviors. This scope covers brand management, sales channels and customer demand.

– Wine tourism and hospitality involve festival participation, tastings, vineyard tours and tourist experiences.

– The organizational/managerial category includes management strategies and crisis management.

– Finally, policy and regulation encompass regulatory frameworks, policy interventions, and certification requirements.

This classification aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of how crises affect the different dimensions of the wine industry.

Table 4 presents the classification of the publications included in the bibliometric analysis according to the impact areas of crises in the wine industry.

In general, crises affecting the wine industry have the potential to impact all functional areas of the sector, from production to consumption. According to Table 4, the publications included in the current research sample indicate that the crises they address affect the production, processing, and supply, marketing and sales, wine tourism and hospitality, organizational/managerial, and policy and regulatory areas. Operational crises, particularly those related to climate change, have emerged as the most influential factors affecting production processes. This highlights the critical risk posed by climate change to grape cultivation and winemaking processes and reflects the efforts of researchers to implement preventive measures in this area. In contrast, global crises, such as pandemics, have significant effects on marketing, tourism, and organizational resilience. Political and war-related crises predominantly impact the organizational/managerial domain. For instance, climate change predominantly affects production (50 out of 80 articles), whereas pandemic crises primarily impact wine “tourism and hospitality” and “organizational management” (6 and 9 out of 20 articles, respectively), highlighting the differential patterns of crisis impact across functional areas. These findings provide a comprehensive understanding of how crises propagate across functional areas in the wine industry and identify critical areas for risk management and future research.

Finally, when examining the impact areas of crises, it is evident that the organizational/managerial and production domains are the most affected areas (out of 146 publications, 52 address organizational/managerial aspects and 51 focus on production). These findings highlight the need for targeted risk management strategies that address both operational vulnerabilities and managerial resilience in the wine industry. The publications sampled within the scope of the current study are presented in Appendix.

The findings presented in Table 3 and Table 4 enable a holistic evaluation of crises in the wine industry and their impacts. Long-term crises, such as the climate crisis, which develop beyond the control of businesses and generally progress slowly, and sudden shock-inducing crises, such as pandemics or war, share the common feature of producing uncertain effects in terms of their local and temporal impacts. Nevertheless, considering the prior effects of crises, they contain effective foresight for strategic approaches that require preparedness. Although they differ in their forms of emergence, these crises can directly or indirectly affect the fundamental areas of the wine industry, such as production processes, market demand, supply chains, management structures, and working conditions. These crises may emerge simultaneously or in overlapping periods, creating cascading effects that trigger each other.

In this context, the effects of crises on the wine industry should not be evaluated only as singular and independent events but as a multilayered structure that is in mutual interaction. For example, production problems arising from the climate crisis can create cascading effects in different areas of the wine industry, from supply chain disruptions to pricing mechanisms and market imbalances to consumer behavior. These findings show that crises in the wine industry can be conceptually grouped according to their internal and external characteristics and areas of impact. However, new approaches are needed to evaluate them within a more holistic framework. Thus, the effects of crises can be evaluated not only as separate outcomes of each individual event but also within a set of processes that feed and transform each other. For example, the impact of climate change on the wine industry can be addressed not only through production loss but also by analyzing the reciprocal relationships between supply chains, prices, and consumer behavior. Indeed, different types of crises can create interconnected effects in the wine industry and generate a systemic risk based on mutual interaction.

4. Thematic framework for future research directions

Figure 4 presents a thematic mapping aimed at understanding the future research agenda related to crises in the wine industry.

Figure 4 presents a thematic map with two axes: X represents theme significance, and Y represents development level [44]. Clusters form based on keyword co-occurrence or density, creating motor, basic, niche, and emerging/declining themes [45].

The dotted lines divide the thematic map into four quadrants based on the density and centrality [46]:

– Motor Themes (High Density, High Centrality);

– The Niche Themes (High Density, Low Centrality);

– Emerging or Declining Themes (Low Density, Low Centrality);

– The Basic Themes (Low Density, High Centrality).

Motor themes such as wine, vitis, and grapes are highly developed and central, serving as the foundational pillars of the field. In contrast, themes related to the climate crisis, viticulture, and its impact were classified as basic themes. These are central but relatively underdeveloped, indicating a critical area that requires deeper analytical engagement in the future. Niche themes, such as grapes, water, and consumption, represent specialized topics. They exhibit strong internal coherence but are poorly integrated into the broader research network. Emerging or declining themes, such as the wine industry, vineyards, and Spain, reflect areas in transition, gaining attention or losing prominence.

Topics such as pandemics, sustainability, and wine tourism are positioned on the thematic map at the intersection of basic themes and emerging or declining themes along the point where the X and Y axes meet. This placement indicates that these areas are both central and not fully developed. In other words, these themes are gaining importance in the literature while simultaneously requiring more in-depth analyses.

This distribution reveals a literature landscape in which fundamental concepts are well-established. This approach would provide a more comprehensive and cross-cutting understanding of crises in the wine industry. It would also help address existing gaps and support more effective risk management and policy development.

5. Discussion, implications, and limitations

Overall, this study identifies the most influential scientific output outlets through performance evaluation and scientific mapping. Bibliometric analyses generally construct a framework of the existing literature using quantitative methods [47]. In contrast, this study develops a map of the current literature through qualitative and interpretive analyses, while also providing a thematic framework for future research. Furthermore, a comparative and holistic literature framework is established by evaluating the types of crises addressed and their impact domains in these publications through content analysis.

Wine scholarship reflects the evolution of the industry. Research in this domain has progressed from the foundational inquiries of the 1990s to more complex and multidimensional themes, including the rise of e-commerce and wine tourism, an increasing focus on sustainability, and recent global crises [48]. The findings of the present study also indicate that, by its nature, the wine industry is exposed to multiple interacting crises, including climate change, market fluctuations, pandemics, and terrorism. However, despite this progression, the relevant literature appears to focus on specific types of crises, particularly more prominent ones, such as climate crises and pandemics. Indeed, previous research on crises in the wine industry has focused primarily on adaptive responses to climate crises [49]. This suggests that the multiple and interacting crisis structures faced by the industry have not been sufficiently addressed.

When these findings are evaluated theoretically, it is observed that the literature does not display a balanced distribution. This study reveals this imbalance by comparatively examining which types of crises are addressed by crisis-focused publications in the wine industry and in which impact domains these crises are concentrated in. This imbalance may result from sudden and highly visible crises attracting academic attention more rapidly or from certain impact domains that are more difficult to measure. Future research should address different types of crises and impact domains using more integrated theoretical approaches. Additionally, studies should be conducted in this direction to establish a more explanatory and in-depth theoretical foundation.

The findings also have important implications for practitioners. In the present study, it is shown that the crises in the publications included in the analysis focus on their effects on production and organization/management. Therefore, when evaluated in terms of publications within the sample, these publications do not sufficiently address the impact domains of processing and supply, marketing and sales, wine tourism and hospitality, and policy and regulation. Moreover, there is a distinct concentration on certain impact domains for some types of crises. For example, studies addressing the climate crisis clearly focus on its effects on production. These findings reveal that crises produce structural effects specific to the sectoral context while indicating that the comprehensive and multidimensional nature of crises is neglected. Therefore, wine businesses must develop multi-layered and integrated crisis management models that consider crisis type–impact domain matches.

Future research should develop a comparative and integrated perspective that examines the interactive effects of different types of crises. The current literature emphasizes that organizational resilience should be considered a multistage and interactive process involving learning before, during, and after a crisis [50]. Therefore, resilience to crises is fueled by the interaction between the internal and external environments. This perspective supports the view that crisis management research remains fragmented and requires a more integrated theoretical approach that connects the different phases of crisis response.

Second, it should be taken into account that digital technologies such as artificial intelligence, augmented reality, and virtual reality create not only opportunities but also new areas of vulnerability. Indeed, the potential of these technologies to generate crises or deepen existing crises should be examined. Finally, it was observed that more structural and systemic themes, such as the viticulture ecosystem, water resource constraints, and consumption dynamics, are relatively neglected in the crisis literature of the wine industry.

Although this study included a detailed and comprehensive analysis, it had some limitations. First, the inclusion of different databases, such as PubMed or Google Scholar, in addition to WoS and Scopus, would allow for a more comprehensive literature review. Second, examining only English-language publications and excluding non-article publications led to the omission of studies of different types. This study not only maps the existing literature but also provides a basis for deeper and more multidimensional research by making the current limitations of the field visible.

References

[1] C. Lamoureux, Crisis in the wine industry: The high stakes of cultural intelligence in lending decision-making, Qualitative Research in Financial Markets. ahead-of-print(2025). https://doi.org/10.1108/qrfm-10-2024-0291

[2] S. Charters, M. Demossier, J. Dutton, G. Harding, J.S. Maguire, D. Marks, P. Unwin, The routledge handbook of wine and culture: Routledge London, 2022.

[3] R.M. Castaldi, S. Cholette, A. Frederick, Globalization and the emergence of new business models in the wine industry, International Business & Economics Research Journal (IBER). 4(2005).

[4] J. Bundy, M.D. Pfarrer, C.E. Short, W.T. Coombs, Crises and crisis management: Integration, interpretation, and research development, Journal of management. 43(2017). 1661-1692

[5] E.H. James, L.P. Wooten, K. Dushek, Crisis management: Informing a new leadership research agenda, Academy of management Annals. 5(2011). 455-493 https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2011.589594

[6] C. Perrow, Fukushima and the inevitability of accidents, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 67(2011). 44-52

[7] M.D. Collins, M.T. Dasborough, H.R. Gregg, C. Xu, C.M. Deen, Y. He, S.L.D. Restubog, Traversing the storm: An interdisciplinary review of crisis leadership, The Leadership Quarterly. 34(2023). 101661 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2022.101661

[8] G. Szolnoki, S. Bail, M. Tafel, A. Feher, C. Veith, A cross-cultural comparison of new implemented sustainable wine tourism strategies during the covid-19 crisis, Sustainability. 14(2022). 1-16 https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084688

[9] P.J. Woodfield, E. Rasmussen, Weathering the storm: Wine, tourism, and hospitality resilience in the face of extreme events, International Journal of Wine Business Research. 37(2025). 764-789 https://doi.org/10.1108/ijwbr-12-2024-0088

[10] K.L. Christ, R.L. Burritt, Critical environmental concerns in wine production: An integrative review, Journal of Cleaner Production. 53(2013). 232-242 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.04.007

[11] C. van Leeuwen, P. Darriet, The impact of climate change on viticulture and wine quality, Journal of Wine Economics. 11(2016). 150-167 https://doi.org/10.1017/jwe.2015.21

[12] F. Duquesnois, C. Gurau, F. Le Roy, Wine producers’ strategic response to a crisis situation, International Journal of Wine Business Research. 22(2010). 251 https://doi.org/10.1108/17511061011075383

[13] H. Kim, K.K.F. So, Two decades of customer experience research in hospitality and tourism: A bibliometric analysis and thematic content analysis, International Journal of Hospitality Management. 100(2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2021.103082

[14] I. Passas, Bibliometric analysis: The main steps, Encyclopedia. 4(2024). 1014-10285 https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia4020065

[15] O.J. de Oliveira, F.F. da Silva, F. Juliani, L.C.F.M. Barbosa, T.V. Nunhes,Scientometrics recent advances, in: S. Kunosic and E. Zerem (Eds.), Bibliometric method for mapping the state-of-the-art and identifying research gaps and trends in literature: An essential instrument to support the development of scientific projects, IntechOpen, 2019.

[16] N. Donthu, S. Kumar, D. Mukherjee, N. Pandey, W.M. Lim, How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines, Journal of Business Research. 133(2021). 285-296 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070

[17] A.D. Sánchez, M. de la Cruz Del Río Rama, J.Á. García, Bibliometric analysis of publications on wine tourism in the databases scopus and wos, European Research on Management and Business Economics. 23(2017). 8-15 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2016.02.001

[18] M. Aria, C. Cuccurullo, Bibliometrix: An r-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis, Journal of informetrics. 11(2017). 959-975 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007

[19] D. Moher, A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, D.G. Altman, Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The prisma statement, BMJ. 339(2009). b2535 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535

[20] M.J. Page, J.E. McKenzie, P.M. Bossuyt, I. Boutron, T.C. Hoffmann, C.D. Mulrow, L. Shamseer, J.M. Tetzlaff, E.A. Akl, S.E. Brennan, R. Chou, J. Glanville, J.M. Grimshaw, A. Hróbjartsson, M.M. Lalu, T. Li, E.W. Loder, E. Mayo-Wilson, S. McDonald, L.A. McGuinness, L.A. Stewart, J. Thomas, A.C. Tricco, V.A. Welch, P. Whiting, D. Moher, The prisma 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews, BMJ. 372(2021). n71 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

[21] B.C. Vickery, Bradford’s law of scattering, Journal of Documentation. 4(1948). 198-203

[22] L. Hannah, P.R. Roehrdanz, M. Ikegami, A.V. Shepard, M.R. Shaw, G. Tabor, L. Zhi, P.A. Marquet, R.J. Hijmans, Climate change, wine, and conservation, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 110(2013). 6907-6912 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1210127110

[23] S.E. Park, N.A. Marshall, E. Jakku, A.M. Dowd, S.M. Howden, E. Mendham, A. Fleming, Informing adaptation responses to climate change through theories of transformation, Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions. 22(2012). 115-126 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.10.003

[24] M. Alebaki, M. Psimouli, S. Kladou, F. Anastasiadis, Digital winescape and online wine tourism: Comparative insights from crete and santorini, Sustainability. 14(2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148396

[25] J.A.C. Jimenez, M. De la Torre, M.G.D. Millán, Enotourism in southern spain: The montilla-moriles pdo, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 19(2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063393

[26] J. Rebelo, R. Compés, S. Faria, T. Gonçalves, V. Pinilla, K. Simón-Elorz, Covid-19 lockdown and wine consumption frequency in portugal and spain, Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research. 19(2021). https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2021192-17697

[27] A.D. Alonso, A. Bressan, Resilience in the context of italian micro and small wineries: An empirical study, International Journal of Wine Business Research. 27(2015). 40-60 https://doi.org/10.1108/ijwbr-08-2014-0035

[28] J.M. Balogh, A. Jámbor, The global competitiveness of european wine producers, British Food Journal. 119(2017). 2076-2088 https://doi.org/10.1108/bfj-12-2016-0609

[29] K. Simon-Elorz, J.S. Castillo-Valero, M.C. Garcia-Cortijo, Economic performance and the crisis: Strategies adopted by the wineries of castilla-la mancha (spain), Agribusiness. 31(2015). 107-131 https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.21392

[30] D. Marín, J. Armengol, P. Carbonell-Bejerano, J.M. Escalona, D. Gramaje, E. Hernandez-Montes, D.S. Intrigliolo, J.M. Martinez-Zapater, H. Medrano, J.M. Mirás-Avalos, J.E. Palomares-Rius, P. Romero-Azorín, R. Savé, L.G. Santesteban, F. de Herralde, Challenges of viticulture adaptation to global change: Tackling the issue from the roots, Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research. 27(2021). 8-25 https://doi.org/10.1111/ajgw.12463

[31] J. Tardaguila, M. Stoll, S. Gutiérrez, T. Proffitt, M.P. Diago, Smart applications and digital technologies in viticulture: A review, Smart Agricultural Technology. 1(2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2021.100005

[32] N.A. Cradock-Henry, J. Fountain, Characterising resilience in the wine industry: Insights and evidence from marlborough, new zealand, Environmental Science & Policy. 94(2019). 182-190 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.01.015

[33] J. Tello, R. Mammerler, M. Cajic, A. Forneck, Major outbreaks in the nineteenth century shaped grape phylloxera contemporary genetic structure in europe, Scientific Reports. 9(2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-54122-0

[34] R. Dubey, Z.L. Yang, S. Puri, The role of geopolitical uncertainty on shaping carbon neutrality policy: Moderating influence of digital transformation, Journal of Environmental Management. 398(2026). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.128498

[35] L.K. Häfner, Winegrowing and winemaking in russia: The late nineteenth century to october 1917, Journal of Modern Russian History and Historiography. 15(2022). 5-38 https://doi.org/10.30965/22102388-12340010

[36] J. Valette, P. Amadieu, P. Sentis, Cooperatives versus corporations: Survival in the french wine industry, Journal of Wine Economics. 13(2018). 328-354 https://doi.org/10.1017/jwe.2017.1

[37] H. Song, F. Livat, S. Ye, Effects of terrorist attacks on tourist flows to france: Is wine tourism a substitute for urban tourism?, Journal of Destination Marketing & Management. 14(2019). 1-10 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2019.100385

[38] N. Gheyle, T. Jacobs, Content analysis: A short overview, Internal research note. 10(2017). 1-17

[39] A.B. Jordan, J. Manganello,Media messages and public health, in: A. Jordan, et al. (Eds.), Sampling and content analysis: An overview of the issues, 2010.

[40] A. Koçak, Ö. Arun, İçerik analizi çalışmalarında örneklem sorunu, [The sampling problem in content analysis studies]. Journal of Selcuk Communication. 4(2013). 21-28 https://doi.org/10.18094/si.51496

[41] A.G. Goncharuk, Wine value chains: Challenges and prospects, Journal of Applied Management and Investments. 6(2017). 11-27

[42] G. Lapčević, Value chain model in wine production, The Journal of Bio-based Marketing. 3(2020). 50-61

[43] E. Sanchez-Garcia, J. Martinez-Falco, B. Marco-Lajara, N. Georgantzis, Value creation in the wine industry – a bibliometric analysis, European Food Research and Technology. 250(2024). 1135-1148 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-023-04451-2

[44] M. Callon, J.P. Courtial, F. Laville, Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: The case of polymer chemistry, Scientometrics. 22(1991). 155-205 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02019280

[45] M.J. Cobo, M.A. Martínez, M. Gutiérrez-Salcedo, H. Fujita, E. Herrera-Viedma, 25 years at knowledge-based systems: A bibliometric analysis, Knowledge-based Systems. 80(2015). 3-13 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2014.12.035

[46] A. Rejeb, K. Rejeb, A. Abdollahi, H. Treiblmaier, The big picture on instagram research: Insights from a bibliometric analysis, Telematics and Informatics. 73(2022). 101876 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2022.101876

[47] I. Passas, Bibliometric analysis: The main steps, Encyclopedia. 4(2024). 1014-1025

[48] G. Ruggeri, S. Corsi, C. Mazzocchi, A bibliometric analysis of wine economics and business research: Insights, trends, and future directions, International Journal of Wine Business Research. 36(2024). 14-39

[49] E. Merloni, L. Camanzi, L. Mulazzani, G. Malorgio, Adaptive capacity to climate change in the wine industry: A bayesian network approach, Wine Economics and Policy. 7(2018). 165-177 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wep.2018.11.002

[50] A. Gilinsky Jr, A. Sen, J. Ford, S.C. de la Torre, S.K. Newton, Us wine industry preparedness for unforeseen crises and disasters: An empirical test, Wine Economics and Policy. 9(2020). 5-18 https://doi.org/10.14601/web-8054

Appendix

Table A. Publications included in the sample.

Author(s)	Year	Title
Eisinger	1991	Early consumer-protection legislation - a 17th-century law prohibiting lead adulteration of Wines
Beverland and Bretherton	1998	The evolution of strategy in medium and large Auckland (New Zealand)–based wineries
Landsteiner	1999	The crisis of wine production in late sixteenth-century Central Europe: Climatic causes and economic consequences
Pinilla and Ayuda	2002	The political economy of the wine trade: Spanish exports and the international market, 1890-1935
Jones	2005	Climate change in the Western United States grape growing regions
Pérez-Torrado et al.	2005	Monitoring stress-related genes during the process of biomass propagation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains used for wine making
Kingsbury and Hayter	2006	Business associations and local development: The Okanagan wine industry’s response to NAFTA
White et al.	2006	Extreme heat reduces and shifts United States premium wine production in the 21st century
Belliveau et al.	2006	Multiple exposures and dynamic vulnerability: Evidence from the grape industry in the Okanagan Valley, Canada
Beer and Thomas	2007	The politics and policy of economic restructuring in Australia: Understanding government responses to the closure of an automotive plant
Strachan	2007	The colonial identity of wine: The Leakey Affair” and the Franco-Algerian order of things”
Webb et al.	2008	Modelling the relationship between climate, winegrape price and winegrape quality in Australia
Webb et al.	2008	Climate change and winegrape quality in Australia
Cardebat and Figuet	2009	Estimation of a hedonic price equation for Alsace, Beaujolais and Provence wines
Costa-Font et al.	2009	Explaining low farm-gate prices in the Catalan wine sector
Duquesnois et al.	2010	Wine producers’ strategic response to a crisis situation
Holland and Smit	2010	Climate change and the wine industry: Current research themes and new directions
Cavicchi and Santini	2011	Brunellopoli: A wine scandal under the tuscan sun
Sǎseanu et al.	2011	Benchmark models for the wine industry. Recommendations for Republic of Moldova
Neacşu and Bobeicǎ	2011	Sustainable development of the wine industry on climate changes
Duarte Alonso and Liu	2012	Coping with changes in a sector in crisis: The case of small Spanish wineries
Castillo and García	2013	Analysis of international competitive positioning of quality wine from Spain
Viers et al.	2013	Vinecology: pairing wine with nature
Bellia and Pilato	2014	Competitiveness of wine business within green economy: Sicilian case
Pickering et al.	2014	Determining adaptive capacity to climate change in the grape and wine industry
Mozell and Thachn	2014	The impact of climate change on the global wine industry: Challenges & solutions
Holland and Smit	2014	Recent climate change in the Prince Edward County winegrowing region, Ontario, Canada: implications for adaptation in a fledgling wine industry
Duarte Alonso	2015	Resilience in the context of two traditional Spanish rural sectors: an exploratory study
De Salvo et al.	2015	A spatial micro-econometric approach to estimating climate change impacts on wine firm performance: A case study from Moldavia region, Romania
Sánchez-Monedero et al.	2015	Strategies to transform organic residues from olive and wine industries: Greenhouse gas emissions and climate change
Longbottom and Petrie	2015	Role of vineyard practices in generating and mitigating greenhouse gas emissions
Fabbrizzi et al.	2015	Coping with the economic crisis in agriculture: an analysis of the Tuscany (Italy) premium quality wine area and strategies for impact mitigation
Castex et al.	2015	Water availability, use and governance in the wine producing region of Mendoza, Argentina
Ferrise et al.	2016	Climate change and grapevines: A simulation study for the Mediterranean basin
Röcker et al.	2016	The use of glucose oxidase and catalase for the enzymatic reduction of the potential ethanol content in wine
Mosedale et al.	2016	Climate change impacts and adaptive strategies: lessons from the grapevine
Ashenfelter and Storchmann	2016	The economics of wine, weather, and climate change
Schultz	2016	Global climate change, sustainability, and some challenges for grape and wine production
Tissot et al.	2017	Modeling environmental impacts on viticultural ecosystems: A first case study in a regulated wine producing area
Sacchelli et al.	2017	A mix-method model for adaptation to climate change in the agricultural sector: A case study for Italian wine farms
Li and Bardají	2017	A new wine superpower? An analysis of the Chinese wine industry
Zabaniotou et al.	2018	Sustainable bioeconomy transitions: Targeting value capture by integrating pyrolysis in a winery waste biorefinery
Chen and Juvenal	2018	Quality and the Great Trade Collapse
Escobar et al.	2018	Consumers’ wine preferences in a changing scenario
Kool et al.	2018	The influence of institutions on the climate change adaptive capacity of winegrowers in Utiel-Requena
Lazoglou et al.	2018	Climate change projections for Greek viticulture as simulated by a regional climate model
Kwon and Constantinides	2018	Ideology and moral reasoning: How wine was saved from the 19th century phylloxera epidemic
Moreno et al.	2018	Climate reconstruction for the Entre-Douro-e-Minho region (NW Portugal) between AD 1626 and AD 1820: synthesis of viticulture data and foraminiferal evidence
Garcia-Casarejos et al.	2018	Introduction of renewable energy in the Spanish wine sector
Valette et al.	2018	Cooperatives versus corporations: Survival in the French wine industry
Bacenetti	2019	Heat and cold production for winemaking using pruning residues: Environmental impact assessment
Leitao	2019	Branding Port: Crisis, transformation and the advent of modern brands in the Port Wine Trade (1945-1975)
Brandano et al.	2019	Comparative efficiency of agricultural cooperatives and conventional firms in a sample of quasi-twin companies
Cradock-Henry and Fountain	2019	Characterising resilience in the wine industry: Insights and evidence from Marlborough, New Zealand
Song et al.	2019	Effects of terrorist attacks on tourist flows to France: Is wine tourism a substitute for urban tourism?
Tello et al.	2019	Major outbreaks in the nineteenth century shaped grape phylloxera contemporary genetic structure in Europe
Di Giuseppe et al.	2020	A natural organic coating to control and minimize late frost damages on wine shoots
Gilinsky et al.	2020	US wine industry preparedness for unforeseen crises and disasters: An empirical test
Saraiva et al.	2020	Water footprint sustainability as a tool to address climate change in the wine sector: A methodological approach applied to a Portuguese case study
Ben Ameur and Le Fur	2020	Volatility transmission to the fine wine market
Calle et al.	2020	Social economy, environmental proactivity, eco-ınnovation and performance in the Spanish wine sector
Ferrer-Alos	2020	Commercial structures and the globalisation of viticulture in Catalonia: From brandy to wine and cava (eighteenth-twentieth centuries)
Migliaccio and Tucci	2020	Economic assets and financial performance of Italian wine companies
Ruiz Estrada et al.	2020	Measuring wine industry efficiency with wine industry network evaluation model (Wine-model)
Králiková et al.	2021	Visitors’ happiness and loyalty in the moravian wine region
Kudryashova and Casetti	2021	The Internet of Things - the nearest future of viticulture
Bunting et al.	2021	Vitis vinifera production in Michigan: Factors and trends driving cultivation Patterns
Szolnoki et al.	2021	A cross-cultural analysis of the motivation factors and profitability of online wine tastings during Covid-19 pandemic
Pickering et al.	2021	Prevalence and management of alkyl-methoxypyrazines in a changing climate: Viticultural and oenological considerations
Carrasco Monteagudo et al.	2021	Greening wine exports? Changes in the carbon footprint of spanish wine exports
Hewer and Gough	2021	Climate change impact assessment on grape growth and wine production in the Okanagan Valley (Canada)
Zhang and Carboni	2021	The sustainable project management utilization in French wineries while adapting to climate change
Sottini et al.	2021	Impact of climate change on wine tourism: An approach through social media data
Cameron et al.	2021	Is advancement of grapevine maturity explained by an increase in the rate of ripening or advancement of veraison?
Wittwer and Anderson	2021	COVID-19 and global beverage markets: Implications for wine
Mirabelli-Montan et al.	2021	Techniques for mitigating the effects of smoke taint while maintaining quality in wine production: A review
Bressan et al.	2021	Confronting the unprecedented: micro and small businesses in the age of coronavirus disease 2019
Agnoli and Charters	2022	The alcohol consumption of wine drinkers with the onset of Covid-19
Monteiro et al.	2022	The role of biostimulants as alleviators of biotic and abiotic stresses in grapevine: A review
Sgroi and Sciancalepore	2022	Climate change and risk management policies in viticulture
Vinci et al.	2022	Environmental impact assessment of an organic wine production in central Italy: Case study from Lazio
Häfner	2022	Winegrowing and winemaking in Russia: The late nineteenth century to October 1917
Vicente et al.	2022	Biological management of acidity in wine industry: A review
Cava Jimenez et al.	2022	Enotourism in Southern Spain: The Montilla-Moriles PDO
Galbreath and Tisch	2022	Sustainable development in the wine industry: The impact of the natural environment and gender-diverse leadership
Curtis and Slocum	2022	Firm resiliency post-economic shock: A case study of rural wineries during the COVID-19 Pandemic
Simon-Elorz and Castillo-Valero	2022	Resilience and performance of wine cooperatives in Castilla La-Mancha (Spain) during a period of financial crisis
Davis and Gomez	2022	The COVID-19 pandemic, customer satisfaction and sales performance in wine tasting rooms in the Finger Lakes region of New York State
Duarte Alonso et al.	2022	COVID-19: Impacts and implications for hospitality, tourism and community. The case of Mendoza
Ducman et al.	2023	Government oversight and economic impacts: sustainability in the vineyard and the evolution of wine regulations, trade and production
Bressan et al.	2023	Exploring key factors sustaining micro and small food, wine and hospitality firms through the COVID-19 crisis
Karalis and Kanakoudis	2023	Carbon footprint of products and services: The case of a winery in Greece
Miccichè et al.	2023	Effects of artificial canopy shading on vegetative growth and ripening processes of cv. Nero d’Avola (Vitis vinifera L.)
Modina et al.	2023	Alpine viticulture and climate change: Environmental resources and limitations for grapevine ripening in Valtellina, Italy
Gaitan et al.	2023	Using bioclimatic indicators to assess climate change impacts on the Spanish wine sector
Synák	2023	Problems and opportunities within the wine industry in terms of the COVID-19 Pandemic
Gastaldello et al.	2023	Glass half-full? A comprehensive PLS-SEM approach to explore the pandemic’s effect on wine tourism intentions
Fraga et al.	2023	Vintage Port prediction and climate change scenarios
Long et al.	2023	Australian red wines made from non-traditional, emerging red grape varieties: distinguishing sensory profiles and consumer perceptions
García et al.	2023	Feasibility of photovoltaic systems for the agrifood industry in the new energy and climate change context
Vicente et al.	2023	Microsatellite typing of Lachancea thermotolerans for wine fermentation monitoring
Fraboni et al.	2023	Outsourcing corporate heritage marketing in the omnichannel context: a process perspective of a small winery
Masset et al.	2023	Fine wine pricing in a small and highly competitive market
Faria et al.	2023	Fractional responses with spatial dependence of Portuguese wineries’ domestic market sales to an exogenous shock (Covid-19)
Franzoni and Pelizzari	2023	Assessment of rainfall risk in a financial perspective: An application to the wine industry
Zito et al.	2023	Projected impacts of climate change on viticulture over French wine regions using downscaled CMIP6 multi-model data
Cruz-Ruiz et al.	2023	Managing digital presence in wineries practicing heroic agriculture: The cases of Ribeira Sacra and Lanzarote (Spain)
Bitakou et al.	2024	Evaluating social media marketing in the Greek winery ındustry
Giménez-Romero et al.	2024	Global warming significantly increases the risk of Pierce’s disease epidemics in European vineyards
Hamon et al.	2024	Identification of the best viticultural areas by spatial optimisation. Application in New Zealand South Island in the context of climate change
Pascoal et al.	2024	A technical survey on practical applications and guidelines for IoT sensors in precision agriculture and viticulture
Toma et al.	2024	Grapevine plant waste utilization in nanotechnology
Micu et al.	2024	The development of a brand strategy for the romanian wine industry - a perspective from Romanian wine exporters
Tavilli et al.	2024	Effective Ethyl Carbamate Prevention in Red Wines by Treatment with Immobilized Acid Urease
Banuta et al.	2024	The effects of climate change on vines in the main growing countries in Europe
Praveen et al.	2024	Emergy Analysis and Life Cycle Assessment for Evaluating the Sustainability of Solar-Integrated Ecotechnologies in Winery Wastewater Treatment
Dinis et al.	2024	Canopy and soil management strategies: Insights to overcome abiotic stresses in grapevine
García-Cortijo et al.	2024	The proactive role played by sustainable wineries at times of economic crisis
Mahdi et al.	2024	Entrepreneurial marketing practices and rural wine producers’ performance: The moderating role of competitive intensity in an immediate post crisis period
Sujood	2024	Uncorking the potential of wine: an empirical prediction of consumers’ intention to visit wine tourism destinations (WTDs) post-COVID-19
Faria et al.	2024	Impact of an exogenous shock (COVID-19) on the performance of Portuguese wine firms: a structural break analysis
Abinandan et al.	2024	Eco-innovation minimizes the carbon footprint of wine production
Loose and Del Rey	2024	State of the International Wine Markets in 2023. The wine market at a crossroads: Temporary or structural challenges?
Gastaldello et al.	2024	Consumer behavior toward virtual wine experiences as a technology-based sustainable transformation
Martínez-Moreno et al.	2025	Medium-term impacts of saline water deficit irrigation on soil, vine nutrient status, yield and grape composition of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Monastrell
Honoré-Chedozeau and Valentin	2025	Back to the future: will today’s new varietal and free-from” wines shape the wine experience of tomorrow?”
Sequeira and Leal	2025	Crisis and intervention: the impact of liberal legislation on portwine sector, 1870-1900
Szmania et al.	2025	Investigating abiotic stress-ınduced off-flavor in different white wine varieties (Vitis vinifera L.) using a complementary approach of sensory analysis and nontargeted gas chromatography mass spectrometry analysis
Bilen et al.	2025	Detecting new emerging viruses and phytoplasmas of grapevine in Lebanon for developing future adaptation strategies to climate change
Liles et al.	2025	Assessment of spatial and temporal trends influencing the occurrence of frost after budburst
Chitwood et al.	2025	Sí se puede: The enduring legacy of Mexico on wine and politics
Grazia et al.	2025	Too hot to profit? Climatic stress and farm-level performance in Italian viticulture
St Pierre	2025	An optimist’s view on the future of wine
Tria et al.	2025	Sustainability and quality in wine pricing: Insights from the primitivo e-commerce market
Alfieri et al.	2025	Feasibility assessment of a low-cost near-infrared spectroscopy-based prototype for monitoring polyphenol extraction in fermenting musts
Balogh and Maró	2025	Impacts of climate change on the global wine sector: the case of cool-climate countries
Kingston et al.	2025	The potential of integrating biochar and stable isotope technologies for regenerative viticulture under climate change
Tymchenko	2025	The crisis phenomena of the grape and wine industry under Martial Law
Maphosa	2025	Phylloxera and the development of rural financial networks in the cape colony
Bulled	2025	Occupational syndemics in farmworkers in the Cape Winelands, South Africa
Santos et al.	2025	Crop modelling applied to Portuguese viticulture: a brief overview
Pettenuzzo et al.	2025	QTL mapping and underlying genes for heat tolerance in grapevine (Rhine Riesling x Cabernet Sauvignon) under field conditions
Brinkmann	2025	Quality regulation in the global “wine periphery”: The case of late imperial Rio de Janeiro (1880–1889)
Gerbi and De Paolis	2025	The effects of climate change on wine composition and winemaking processes
Dubey et al.	2026	The role of geopolitical uncertainty on shaping carbon neutrality policy: Moderating influence of digital transformation
Bellanger et al.	2026	Biofilm of Oenococcus oeni on yeast derivatives: An innovation to trigger malolactic fermentation and modulate the molecular fingerprint of wines