Vol. 17 No. 1 (2026): MEDIA EDUCATION – Studi, ricerche e buone pratiche
Articles

Who gets to teach the past? Colonial narratives, pedagogical authority, and platformized vernacular memories

PDF
  • Micol Meghnagi,
  • Camilla Folena
Micol Meghnagi
Università di Bologna, Italy
Camilla Folena
Università di Urbino Carlo Bo, Italy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/me-19897

Published 2026-05-30

Keywords

  • education,
  • collective memory,
  • identity,
  • italian colonialism,
  • platform society

Copyright (c) 2026 Micol Meghnagi, Camilla Folena

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

This exploratory article examines how Italian colonialism is narrated through short-form vernaculars on TikTok and argues that these narratives intervene in public memory and identity formation by making visible what has been institutionally stabilized, downplayed, or left unsaid in Italy’s dominant historical grammars. Situating the Italian case within the broader European imperial project and its afterlives, the article links contemporary platform discourse to longer trajectories of selective remembrance and to the marginalization of colonialism in educational transmission. Methodologically, it draws on a qualitative content analysis of forty TikTok videos to reconstruct the interpretive repertoires through which the nexus between colonialism and schooling becomes speakable in everyday digital publics. Two recurrent tendencies structure this contested field: first, a critical current that challenges curricular silences and the sanitization of colonial violence in school teaching and public institutions, thereby questioning the pedagogical authority of Italian educational systems; and second, an ongoing symbolic struggle over the cultural and historical borders that define Italian identity. The article argues that short-form platforms operate as arenas of mnemonic dispute in which historical authority, national identity, and educational legitimacy are negotiated in real time. Tracing how critique and denial circulate within the same media ecology shows how platformed publics reshape understandings of Italian colonial pasts and their contemporary ramifications.

PDF

References

  1. Abidin, C. (2025). TikTok and youth cultures. Emerald Publishing Limited.
  2. Andall, J., & Duncan, D. (Eds.). (2005). Italian colonialism: Legacy and memory. Peter Lang.
  3. Assmann, A. (2013). Cultural memory and Western civilization: Functions, media, archives. Cambridge University Press.
  4. Bartoletti, R. (2011), Memory and Social Media: New Forms of Remembering and Forgetting, in Pirani, B. (Eds). Learning from Memory: Body, Memory and Technology in a Globalizing World, (pp. 82-111), Newcastle UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  5. Boccia Artieri, G. & Bartoletti, R. (2023). Algoritmi e vita quotidiana: un approccio socio-comunicativo critico, in Sociologia della comunicazione, 66, 5–20.
  6. Boccia Artieri G. (2025). Mediatizzazione, in Balbi G., Comunello, F., Pasquali, F., Sorice, M. (Eds.), Studiare i media. Prospettive disciplinari e parole chiave. Roma: Carocci, 141-152.
  7. Ben-Ghiat, R., & Fuller, M. (Eds.). (2005). Italian colonialism. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  8. Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661
  9. Calchi Novati, G. (2011). L’Africa d’Italia. Una storia coloniale e postcoloniale. Roma: Carocci.
  10. Consonni, M. (2015). L’eclisse dell’antifascismo: Resistenza, questione ebraica e cultura politica in Italia dal 1943 al 1989. Bari-Roma: Laterza.
  11. Del Boca, A. (2005). Italiani, brava gente? Un mito duro a morire. Milano: Neri Pozza.
  12. Deplano, V., & Pes, A. (Eds.). (2014). Quel che resta dell’impero: la cultura coloniale degli italiani. Sesto San Giovanni: Mimesis.
  13. Erll, A. (2011). Memory in culture. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  14. Fanon, F. (2007). I dannati della terra. Torino: Einaudi. (Originally published in 1961).
  15. Focardi, F. (2020). Nel cantiere della memoria. Roma: Viella.
  16. Gilroy, P. (1987). There ain’t no Black in the Union Jack. London: Hutchinson.
  17. Goffman, E. (1970). Stigma. L’identità negata. Torino: Einaudi.
  18. Grechi, G. (2021). Decolonizzare il museo. Mostrazioni, pratiche artistiche, sguardi incarnati. Sesto San Giovanni: Mimesis.
  19. Halbwachs, M. (2024). La memoria collettiva (L. Migliorati & T. Grande, Eds.). Sesto San Giovanni: Meltemi. (Originally published in 1950).
  20. Hoskins, A. (Eds.). (2017). Digital memory studies. Media Past in Transition. London: Routledge.
  21. Judt, T. (2005). Postwar: A history of Europe since 1945. London: Penguin.
  22. Labanca, N. (2002). Oltremare. Storia dell’espansione coloniale italiana. Bologna: Il Mulino.
  23. Leone, G. (2023). Breaking the Silence: Contemporary History Teaching About Italian Colonial Crimes. In Cendagortagalarza, A.D., Mycock, A., (Eds.), Conflicts in History Education in Europe: Political Context, History, Teaching, and National Identity. Charlotte, North Carolina: Information Age Publishing.
  24. Lombardi-Diop, C., & Romeo, C. (Eds.). (2012). Postcolonial Italy. Challenging National Homogeneity. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  25. Marwick, A. E., & Boyd, D. (2014). Networked privacy: How teenagers negotiate context in social media. In New media & society, 16(7): 1051–1067.
  26. Migliorati, L. (2012). L’esperienza del ricordo. Milano: Franco Angeli.
  27. Migliorati, L. (2023). L’impronta della memoria: per un’archeologia degli usi politici del passato. SocietàMutamentoPolitica, 13(26), 103–110. https://doi.org/10.36253/smp-14022
  28. Nora, P. (1989). Between memory and history: Les Lieux de Mémoire. Representations. 26, 7–24. https://doi.org/10.2307/2928520 (Originally published in 1984).
  29. Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective Publics. New York: Oxford University Press.
  30. Pesarini, A., & Panico, C. (2021). From Colston to Montanelli: Public memory and counter-monuments in the era of Black Lives Matter. From the European South, 9(2), 99–113.
  31. Pisanty, V. (2012). Abusi di memoria. Milano: Mondadori.
  32. Said, E. W. (1978). Orientalism. New York: Pantheon Books.
  33. Said, E. W. (1993). Culture and imperialism. New York: Knopf.
  34. Schellewald, A. (2021). Communicative forms on TikTok: Perspectives from digital ethnography. In International Journal of Communication, 15: 1437-1457.
  35. Taddia, I. (2005). Colonialism in Italian textbooks. In R. Ben-Ghiat & M. Fuller (Eds.), Italian colonialism (pp. 190–208). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  36. van Dijck, J. (2013). The culture of connectivity. Oxford University Press.
  37. Vázquez-Herrero, J., & Negreira-Rey, M. C. (2025). TikTok Journalism: A Methodological Approach to Content Analysis on the Short-Video Platform. In Hendrickx, J., Opgenhaffen, M. (Eds). Research Methods for Social Media Journalism (pp. 80–93). London: Routledge.
  38. Wurzer, C. (2023). (Counter-)Narratives of Violence. Colonial Legacies and Activism in Italy’s Public Spaces. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Geschichtswissenschaften, 34(1), 232–255. https://doi.org/10.25365/oezg-2023-34-1-11
  39. Zurovac, E. (2023). Balla il rock’n’roll in Jugoslavia su Tiktok: Analisi qualitativa dei contenuti online tra ricordo e reframing, Mediascapes Journal, 21, 205–223.
  40. Zurovac, E., Boccia Artieri, G., & Donato, V. (2023). Tales of visibility in TikTok: The algorithmic imaginary and digital skills in young users. In Radovanović, D. (Eds). Digital Literacy and Inclusion: Stories, Platforms, Communities (pp. 113–126). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  41. Zurovac, E. (2025). Specchio riflesso! Un’esperienza etnografica con TikTok, Sociologia della Comunicazione, 68/2024, pp. 83–101.