Articoli
Published 2015-09-10
Keywords
- Petronius,
- Horace,
- parody
Abstract
Textual criticism of 82.5 must take into account Petronius’ model, i.e. Hor. Sat. 1.1.68-99; 83.10 draws on Hor. c. 1.1; 108.13-14 is parodic; 126.18 should probably be ascribed to the narrator (Encolpius), and the passage may be affected by a lacuna. Further notes on 132.15, discussed in a previous article.Metrics
Metrics Loading ...