Vol. 14 No. 2 (2023): MEDIA EDUCATION – Studi, ricerche e buone pratiche
Articles

La competenza digitale degli educatori: teorie, modelli, prospettive di sviluppo

PDF
  • Elena Gabbi,
  • Ilaria Ancillotti,
  • Maria Ranieri
Elena Gabbi
Università degli studi di Firenze
Ilaria Ancillotti
Università degli studi di Firenze
Maria Ranieri
Università degli studi di Firenze
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/me-14742

Published 2023-06-05

Keywords

  • teachers' digital competences,
  • DigCompEdu,
  • teacher education,
  • digital literacy

Copyright (c) 2023 Elena Gabbi, Ilaria Ancillotti, Maria Ranieri

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Abstract

The Covid-19 pandemic has had a strong impact on teaching, highlighting the challenges related to the transition to distance and online teaching and in particular emphasising the difficulties of addressing through digital practices the students’ engagement and meeting their relational and emotional needs. This contribution proposes an analysis of the DigCompEdu (Redecker, 2017), the European framework for teachers’ digital competence, through a comparison with other operational models in order to hypothesise some possible integrations, in the light of the most relevant theories and evidence from the past period. The proposed integration includes dimensions related to communication and socio-relational skills, as well as elements related to digital well-being and awareness of local and global policies for a critical viewpoint at teaching practices with the educational technologies in use in different contexts.

PDF

References

  1. Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2009). Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT–TPCK: Advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Computers & education, 52(1), 154-168.
  2. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1994). Ecological models of human development. International encyclopedia of education, 3(2), 37-43.
  3. Butcher, N. (2018). UNESCO ICT Skills Framework. UNESCO.
  4. Caena, F., & Redecker, C. (2019). Aligning teacher competence frameworks to 21st century challenges: The case for the European Digital Competence Framework for Educators (Digcompedu). European Journal of Education, 54(3), 356-369.
  5. Carretero Gomez, S., Napierala, J., Bessios, A., Mägi, E., Pugacewicz, A., Ranieri, M., Triquet, K., Lombaerts, K., Robledo Bottcher, N., Montanari, M. & Gonzalez Vazquez, I. (2021). What did we learn from schooling practices during the COVID-19 lockdown? Insights from five EU countries. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. doi:10.2760/135208, JRC123654.
  6. Carretero Gomez, S., Vuorikari, R. & Punie, Y., (2017). DigComp 2.1: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens with eight proficiency levels and examples of use. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. http://dx.doi.org/10.2760/38842
  7. Carretero, S., Napierała, J., Bessios, A., Magi, E., Pugacewicz, A., Ranieri, M., … & Gonzalez Vazquez, I. (2021). What did we learn from schooling practices during the covid-19 lockdown? Insights from five EU countries (No. JRC123654). Joint Research Centre (Seville site).
  8. Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2011). Exploring the Factor Structure of the Constructs of Technological, Pedagogical, Content Knowledge (TPACK). Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 20(3).
  9. Commissione europea (2013). Supporting teacher competence development for better learning outcomes. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.
  10. Commissione europea (2019a). Education and training monitor. Directorate-General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture. Retrieved from https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2766/442033
  11. Commissione europea (2019b). 2nd Survey of Schools: ICT in Education. Directorate-General for Communications Networks, Content and Technology. Retrieved from http://data.europa.eu/88u/dataset/2nd-survey-of-schools-ict-in-education
  12. Commissione europea (2022). Education and training monitor: comparative report. Directorate-General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture. Retrieved from https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2766/117416
  13. EdDiCo (2021). Learning Maturity Model for Digital Education Competence. Retrieved from https://eddico.eu/wp-content/uploads/sites/24/2022/01/content/learning-maturity-model-for-digitaleducation-competence.html#/
  14. Education and Training Foundation (2019). Digital Teaching Professional Framework. Retrieved from https://www.et-foundation.co.uk/
  15. Ellerani, P. (2016). Sviluppo di contesti capacitanti nella formazione in servizio dei docenti. Cooperazione, agentività, empowerment. Formazione & insegnamento, 14(3), 117-134.
  16. Fabbri, M. (2020). Preadolescenti onlife: educare alla cittadinanza digitale. MeTis-Mondi educativi. Temi indagini suggestioni, 10(1), 139-161.
  17. Falloon, G. (2020). From digital literacy to digital competence: the teacher digital competency (TDC) framework. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 2449-2472. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11423-020-09767-4
  18. Fernández-Batanero, J. M., Montenegro-Rueda, M., Fernández-Cerero, J., & García-Martínez, I. (2022). Digital competences for teacher professional development. Systematic review. European Journal of Teacher Education, 45(4), 513-531.
  19. Floridi, L. (2015). The onlife manifesto: Being human in a hyperconnected era. Springer Nature.
  20. From, J. (2017). Pedagogical Digital Competence--Between Values, Knowledge and Skills. Higher Education Studies, 7(2), 43-50.
  21. Generalitat de Catalunya (2018). Teachers’ Digital Competence in Catalonia. Departament d’Ensenyament. Retrieved from https://repositori.educacio.gencat.cat/bitstream/handle/20.500.12694/229/teachers_digital_competence _in_catalonia_2018.pdf
  22. Gouseti, A., Bruni, I., Ilomäki, L., Lakkala, M., Mundy, D., Raffaghelli, J., Ranieri, M., Roffi, A., Romero, M. & Romeu, T. (2021). Critical Digital Literacies framework for educators – DETECT project Report 1. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5070329.
  23. Gouseti, A., Lakkala, M., Raffaghelli, J., Ranieri, M., Roffi, A., & Ilomäki, L. (2023). Exploring teachers’ perceptions of critical digital literacies and how these are manifested in their teaching practices. EDUCATIONAL REVIEW, 1-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2022.2159933
  24. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the Wild. MIT press.
  25. Instefjord, E., & Munthe, E. (2016). Preparing pre-service teachers to integrate technology: an analysis of the emphasis on digital competence in teacher education curricula. European Journal of Teacher Education, 39(1), 77-93.
  26. Kelentrić, M., Helland, K., & Arstorp, A. T. (2017). Professional digital competence framework for teachers. The Norwegian Centre for ICT in education, 1-74.
  27. Krumsvik, R. J. (2008). Situated learning and teachers’ digital competence. Education and information technologies, 13(4), 279-290.
  28. Krumsvik, R. J. (2011). Digital competence in the Norwegian teacher education and schools. Högre utbildning, 1(1), 39-51.
  29. Krumsvik, R. J. (2014). Teacher educators’ digital competence. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 58(3), 269-280.
  30. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge university press.
  31. Mattar, J., Ramos, D. K., & Lucas, M. R. (2022). DigComp-based digital competence assessment tools: literature review and instrument analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 27(8), 1084310867.
  32. McDonagh, A., Camilleri, P., Engen, B. K., & McGarr, O. (2021). Introducing the PEAT model to frame professional digital competence in teacher education. Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education (NJCIE), 5(4), 5-17. https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.4226
  33. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers college record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
  34. OCSE (2019). TALIS 2018 Results (Volume I): Teachers and School Leaders as Lifelong Learners. TALIS, OECD Publishing, Paris. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1787/1d0bc92a-en.
  35. OCSE (2021a). Supporting young people’s mental health through the COVID-19 crisis. Tackling coronavirus (COVID-19) – Browse OECD contributions. Retrieved from https://read.oecdilibrary.org/view/?ref=1094_1094452-vvnq8dqm9u&title=Supporting-young-people-s-mental-healththrough-the-COVID-19-crisis
  36. OCSE (2021b). The state of school education: one year into the COVID pandemic. OECD Publishing, Paris. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1787/201dde84-en
  37. Ranieri, M. (2020). La Scuola dopo la DaD. Riflessioni intorno alle sfide del digitale in educazione. Studi sulla Formazione, 23(2), 69-76. https://doi.org/10.13128/ssf-12316
  38. Ranieri, M. (2022). Competenze digitali per insegnare: modelli e proposte operative. Roma: Carocci.
  39. Ranieri, M., & Ancillotti, I. (2021). A scuola da casa. Uno studio esplorativo sulle relazioni educative al tempo del Covid-19. In RICERCA E DIDATTICA per promuovere intelligenza comprensione e partecipazione, Atti del X Convegno SIRD 9-10 aprile 2021 – II TOMO (p. 68-83). Pensa MultiMedia.
  40. Ranieri, M., Gaggioli, C., & Borges, M. K. (2020). La didattica alla prova del Covid-19 in Italia: uno studio sulla Scuola Primaria. A Didática posta à prova pelo Covid-19 na Itália: um estudo sobre os Anos Iniciais do Ensino Fundamental Didactics put to the test by Covid-19 in Italy. Praxis educativa, 15, 1-20.
  41. Redecker, C. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu (JRC107466). Seville, Spain: Joint Research Centre. Retrieved from http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/ha
  42. Redecker, C., & Punie, Y. (2017). European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators: DigCompEdu. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg., doi:10.2760/159770, JRC107466
  43. Rivoltella, P. C., & Rossi, P. G. (2019). Tecnologie per l’educazione. Torino: Pearson.
  44. Santagati, M., & Barabanti, P. (2020). (Dis)connessi? Alunni, genitori e insegnanti di fronte all’emergenza Covid-19. Media Education, 11(2), 109-125. https://doi.org/10.36253/me-9646
  45. School Education Gateway (2020a, 08 june). Survey on online and distance learning – Results. Retrieved from https://www.schooleducationgateway.eu/en/pub/viewpoints/surveys/survey-on-onlineteaching.htm
  46. School Education Gateway (2020b, 29 october). Survey on the start of the school year after school closures – Results. Retrieved from https://www.schooleducationgateway.eu/en/pub/viewpoints/surveys/surveyon-school-year-2020.htm
  47. Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: Learning as network-creation. ASTD Learning News, 10(1), 1-28.
  48. Skantz-Åberg, E., Lantz-Andersson, A., Lundin, M., & Williams, P. (2022). Teachers’ professional digital competence: an overview of conceptualisations in the literature. Cogent Education, 9(1), 2063224. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2063224
  49. Trust, T., & Whalen, J. (2021). K-12 Teachers’experiences and Challenges with Using Technology for Emergency Remote Teaching During the Covid-19 Pandemic. Italian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(2), 10-25. https://doi.org/10.17471/2499-4324/1192
  50. UNESCO (2018). UNESCO ICT competency framework for teachers version 3. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000265721
  51. Vuorikari, R., Kluzer, S. & Punie, Y., (2022). DigComp 2.2: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens – With new examples of knowledge, skills and attitudes. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. http://dx.doi.org/10.2760/115376
  52. Zhao, Y., Pugh, K., Sheldon, S., & Byers, J. L. (2002). Conditions for classroom technology innovations. Teachers college record, 104(3), 482-515.