Vol. 14 No. 2 (2023): MEDIA EDUCATION – Studi, ricerche e buone pratiche
Articles

10 Facilitators of sense of belonging through Digital Competences: a qualitative study with educational science students

PDF
  • Laura Fernández-Rodrigo,
  • Arnau Erta-Majó,
  • Simona Tirocchi
Laura Fernández-Rodrigo
Complutense University of Madrid
Arnau Erta-Majó
Universitat de Lleida
Simona Tirocchi
Università di Torino
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/me-14885

Published 2023-12-31

Keywords

  • digital competences,
  • digital technologies,
  • inclusive education,
  • sense of belonging,
  • social inclusion

Copyright (c) 2023 Laura Fernández-Rodrigo, Arnau Erta-Majó, Università di Torino

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Funding data

Abstract

This study explores how digital competences (DC) can contribute to fostering the sense of belonging in social groups. It examines the factors that shape belonging agency, trust, and social capital, while considering the potential of digital technologies to promote it and the role of DC in enhancing social inclusion, also in an intersectional perspective. This research uses qualitative methods and peer-research following the last version of the DigComp model developed by European Commission. A total of 108 participants from two universities from the European context were involved. The results identified 10 facilitators of sense of belonging: common interest, learning and engagement, voice and empowering, communication, interculturality, leisure activities, shared emotions, being informed, freedom of speech, and group values and norms. The findings highlight the ways in which DC, such as content creation, problem-solving, and communication and collaboration, contribute to fostering a sense of belonging into social groups. Finally, the study points out that digital technologies can be a tool to support the facilitators of belonging rather than being the central focus. The research underscores the importance of considering actions and abilities rather than specific tools in promoting social belonging in the digital era.

PDF

References

  1. Aguilar, S., & Barroso, J. (2015). La triangulación de datos como estrategia en investigación educativa. Píxel-Bit, Revista de Medios y Educación, 47, 73–88. https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.2015.i47.05
  2. Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  3. Bautista, A., Iruela, M. J., Limón, M. R., & Llorens, M. (2023). Smartphones, photo-elicitation and teacher professional development in the digital transformation of universities. Profesorado, 27(1), 447–469. https://doi.org/10.30827/profesorado.v27i1.22677
  4. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood.
  5. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1987). La ecologia del desarrollo humano. Paidós.
  6. Coleman, J.S. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA/London: Belknap Press of Harvard Univ. Press.
  7. Creenshaw, K. W. (2017). On Intersectionality: Essential Writings. New Press.
  8. Drusian, M., Magaudda, P., & Scarcelli, C. M. (2022). Young People and the Smartphone: Everyday Life on the Small Screen. Springer Nature.
  9. Elias, A., & Mansouri, F. (2020). A Systematic Review of Studies on Interculturalism and Intercultural Dialogue. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 41(4), 490–523. https://doi.org/10.1080/07256868.2020.1782861
  10. Erta-Majó, A., Ainoa, M., Urrea-Monclús, A., & Balsell, M. À. (2022). Producción colaborativa de recursos educativos transmedia: diseño de una experiencia con adolescentes. EDUTEC 2022 EDUCACIÓN TRANSFORMADORA EN UN MUNDO DIGITAL: CONECTANDO PAISAJES DE APRENDIZAJE, 375–377.
  11. Erta-Majó, A., & Vaquero, E. (2023). Designing a transmedia educational process in non-formal education: Considerations from families, children, adolescents, and practitioners. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(3). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13338
  12. European Commission. (2019). Key Competences for Lifelong Learning. Directorate-General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture. Publications Office. https://doi.org/10.2766/291008
  13. European Commission, Vuorikari, R., Kluzer, S., & Punie, Y. (2022). DigComp 2.2, The Digital Competence framework for citizens : with new examples of knowledge, skills and attitudes. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/doi/10.2760/115376
  14. Fernández-Rodrigo, L. (2016). El uso didáctico y metodológico de las tabletas digitales en aulas de educación primaria y secundaria de Cataluña. Píxel-Bit, Revista de Medios y Educación, 48, 9–25. https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.2016.i48.01
  15. Fernández-Rodrigo, L., Erta-Majó, A., & Vaquero, E. (in press). Diseño y producción interdisciplinar de un Objeto Educativo Transmedia en abierto para la formación permanente de profesionales de la educación. Edutec. Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa.
  16. Fernández-Rodrigo, L., Vaquero, E., & Balsells, M. Á. (2019). La percepción de los profesionales sobre el uso de un entorno virtual como medio de soporte en el programa socioeducativo ‘Caminar en Familia.’ Píxel-BIT Revista de Medios y Educación , 56, 129–148. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.2019.i56.07
  17. Gaušas, S., Daminov, I., Jašinskaitė, E., Čop, D., Mileiko, I., Gudauskaité, G., Leaton Gray, S., Pukallus, S., & Bulwer, J. (2022). Research for CULT Committee – The European Schools System: State of Play, Challenges and Perspectives. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=IPOL_STU(2022)699647
  18. Giancola, O., & Salmieri, L. (2020). Family background, school-track and macro-area: The complex chains of education inequalities in Italy. Sapienza, University of Rome Working Papers, 4, 20.
  19. Gibbs, G. (2012). El análisi de datos cualitativos en Investigación Cualitativa. Ediciones Morata.
  20. Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Polity press.
  21. Giddens, A. (2023). Modernity and self-identity. In Social Theory Re-Wired (pp. 477-484). Routledge.
  22. Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004
  23. Hardin R. (2002). Trust and Trustworthiness. New York: Russell Sage Found.
  24. Jakobsson, P., & Stiernstedt, F. (2023). Trust and the Media: Arguments for the (Irr) elevance of a Concept. Journalism Studies, 24(4), 479-495.
  25. Joint Research Centre, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, Punie, Y., Ferrari, A., & Brečko, B. (2013). DIGCOMP: a framework for developing and understanding digital competence in Europe (Y. Punie & B. Brečko, Eds.). Publications Office. https://doi.org/doi/10.2788/52966
  26. Julien, C. (2015). Bourdieu, Social Capital and Online Interaction. Sociology, 49(2), 356–373. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038514535862
  27. Lai, J. W. M., & Bower, M. (2019). How is the use of technology in education evaluated? A systematic review. Computers and Education, 133, 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.010
  28. López-Meneses, E., Manuel Sirignano, F., Vázquez-Cano, E., & Ramírez-Hurtado, J. M. (2020). University students’ digital competence in three areas of the DigComp 2.1 model: A comparative study at three European universities. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 36.
  29. Luhmann, N. (1968). Vertrauen: Ein Mechanismus der Reduktion Sozialer Komplexität. Stuttgart: UTB.
  30. Lushey, C. (2017). ‘Peer Research Methodology: Challenges and Solutions’ [online]. SAGE Research Methods Cases. https://dx-doi-org.ezproxy.is.ed.ac.uk/10.4135/9781473994614
  31. Mateos, A., Vaquero, E., Urrea-Monclús, A., & Parra, B. (2020). Contar con la infancia en situación de riesgo en los procesos de investigación: pasos hacia la coproducción. Sociedad e Infancias, 4, 87–98. https://doi.org/10.5209/soci.67687
  32. Rako, S., & Softic, S. K. (2020). Development and usage of open educational resources among teachers. Conference Name: 12th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies, 3849–3854. https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2020.1053
  33. Rangel Romero, M. Á., Íñiguez Carrillo, A. L., & López Villalvazo, A. J. (2021). Valoración de la herramienta Google Drive durante el trabajo colaborativo universitario. RIDE Revista Iberoamericana Para La Investigación y El Desarrollo Educativo, 11(22). https://doi.org/10.23913/ride.v11i22.944
  34. Riley, K. (2019). Agency and belonging: What transformative actions can schools take to help create a sense of place and belonging? Educational and Child Psychology, 36(4), 91–104. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsecp.2019.36.4.91
  35. Runchina, C., Fauth, F., & González-Martínez, J. (2022). Adolescents Facing Transmedia Learning: Reflections on What They Can Do, What They Think and What They Feel. Behavioral Sciences, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/bs12040112
  36. Scolari, C. A. (ed.). (2018). Teens, media and collaborative cultures. Exploiting teens’ transmedia skills in the classroom. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
  37. Seifert, A., Cotten, S. R., & Xie, B. (2021). A double burden of exclusion? Digital and social exclusion of older adults in times of COVID-19. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 76(3), e99-e103.
  38. Siemens, G. (2004). Conectivismo: Una teoría de aprendizaje para la era digital.
  39. Silver, H., & Miller, S. M. (2003). Social Exclusion. Indicators, 2(2), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/15357449.2003.11069166
  40. Simmel, G. (1950). The sociology of georg simmel (Vol. 92892). Simon and Schuster.
  41. Smith, A. (1776). The wealth of nations. W. Strahan and T. Cadell, London.
  42. Swanson, L. A., & Leader, J. (2023). The Case for Using an Intergenerational Multi-Methods Approach in Community-Based Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231184823
  43. Taddeo, G., & Tirocchi, S. (2021). Transmedia teens: the creative transmedia skills of Italian students. Information, communication & society, 24(2), 241-257. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1645193
  44. UNESCO. (2017). Guía para asegurar la inclusión y la equidad en la educación. www.unesco.org/
  45. Urrea-Monclús, A., Balsells, M.A., Forné, M.A., Fernández-Rodrigo, L. (2023). Adolescències: reptes, propostes i orientacions per a les polítiques municipals. Àrea d’igualtat de la Diputació de Barcelona.
  46. Urrea-Monclús, A., Mateos, A., & Fernández-Rodrigo, L. (2021). Pasos hacia la coproducción con la infancia: un recurso participativo para comprender el ejercicio de la parentalidad. CIPE 2021. X CONGRESO INTERNACIONAL DE PSICOLOGÍA Y EDUCACIÓN: De La Red Neuronal a La Red Social: Bienestar y Convivencia, 469–469.
  47. Van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & de Waal, M. (2018). The platform society. Public values in a connective world. Oxford University Press.
  48. Vuorikari, R., Kluzer, S., Punie, Y. & DigComp 2.2. (2022). The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens – With new examples of knowledge, skills and attitudes. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. https://dx.doi.org/10.2760/115376