Vol. 14 No. 2 (2023): MEDIA EDUCATION – Studi, ricerche e buone pratiche
Articles

(Re)thinking gender in cyber-violence. Insights from awareness-raising campaigns on online violence against women and girls in Italy

PDF
  • Chiara Gius
Chiara Gius
Dipartimento di Scienze politiche e sociali, Università di Bologna
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/me-14896

Published 2023-12-31

Keywords

  • cyber-WAVG,
  • online violence,
  • gender,
  • social representation,
  • awareness-raising campaign,
  • sexting
    • ...More
    Less

Copyright (c) 2023 Chiara Gius

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Online violence against women and girls, known as cyber-VAWG, is a phenomenon that exacerbates dynamics of discrimination, marginalization, and exclusion of women from society. This is recognized as a form of violence with profound social, cultural, and economic consequences (EIGE, 2017; EU Parliament, 2021; Goulds et al., 2020). Rather than being an isolated phenomenon, cyber-violence is part of the continuum of violence, emphasizing how its various manifestations stem from a common cultural root and are inherently connected to each other. This study, by analyzing various Italian awareness campaigns focused on cyber-violence against women and girls, highlights the essentiality of a media-educational approach that integrates a gender perspective into the creation of media literacy pathways specifically aimed at digital environments. This integration proves fundamental in promoting media-educational strategies that do not just focus on developing skills but also consider the social and cultural context in which digital practices take shape (Cho, 2022; Taddeo & Tirocchi, 2014; Tirocchi, 2013).

PDF

References

  1. Abbatecola, E. 2021. Revenge Porn o D.I.V.I.S.E? Proposta per cambiare un’etichetta sessista. AG About gender, 10(19), 401-4013. https://doi.org/10.15167/2279-5057/AG2021.10.19.1325
  2. Almenar, R. (2021). Cyberviolence against Women and Girls: Gender-based Violence in the Digital Age and Future Challenges as a Consequence of Covid-19. Trento Student Law Review, 3(1),167-230. https://doi.org/10.15168/tslr.v3i1.757
  3. Amnesty International. (2020). Barometro dell’odio: sessismo da tastiera. Available at:
  4. https://www.amnesty.it/barometro-dellodio-sessismo-da-tastiera/ (accessed 10 October 2021)
  5. Bainotti, L., Semenzin, S. (2021). Donne tutte puttane: Revenge porn e maschilità egemone. Andria: Durango.
  6. Barak, A. (2005). Sexual Harassment on the Internet. Social Science Computer Review, 23(1), 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439304271540 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439304271540
  7. Benedict, H. (1992). Virgin or Vamp: How the Press Covers Sex Crimes. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195066807.001.0001
  8. Belluati, M. (2018). Hate or Hateful? L’uso del linguaggio d’offesa nelle discussioni politiche. Comunicazione politica, 19(3), 373-392.
  9. Belluati, M. (2021). Femminicidio. Una lettura tra realtà e rappresentazione. Roma: Carocci
  10. Blumer, H. (1979). Social Problems as Collective Behavior. Social problems, 18(3), 298-306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.1971.18.3.03a00020
  11. Botto, M., & Gottzén, L. (2023). Swallowing and Spitting out the Red Pill: Young Men, Vulnerability, and Radicalization Pathways in the Manosphere. Journal of Gender Studies, 1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2023.2260318
  12. Buckingham, D. (2007). Digital Media Literacies: Rethinking Media education in the Age of the Internet. Research in comparative and international education, 2(1), 43-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2304/rcie.2007.2.1.43
  13. Bourdieu, P. (1998). La domination masculine. Paris: Editions du Seuils (trad. it. La dominiazione maschile. Milano: Feltrinelli, 1999)
  14. Caletti, G. M. (2019). “Revenge porn” e tutela penale. Prime riflessioni sulla criminalizzazione specifica della pornografia non consensuale alla luce delle esperienze angloamericane. Diritto penale contemporaneo, 3, 63-100.
  15. Cannito, M., Crowhurst, I., Camoletto, R. F., Mercuri, E., & Quaglia, V. 2021. Fare maschilità online: definire e indagare la manosphere. AG About Gender-Rivista internazionale di studi di genere, 10(19).
  16. Capecchi, S. (2021). Le campagne di femvertising e le reazioni delle audience online. Le contraddizioni del femminismo pop. Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia, 62(1), 131-163.
  17. Chayn Italia. (2022). Prevenire la violenza digitale nei confronti di ragazze e adolescenti. Available at: https://chaynitalia.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/REPORT-TeEN_2022_web.pdf (accessed 15 February 2022)
  18. Cho, H., Cannon, J., Lopez, R., & Li, W. (2022). Social Media Literacy: A Conceptual Framework. New media & society, 14614448211068530. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211068530
  19. Citron, D. K., Franks, M. A. (2014). Criminalizing Revenge Porn. Wake Forest.
  20. Cockburn, C. (2004). The Continuum of ViolenceA Gender Perspective on War and Peace (pp. 24–44). https://doi.org/10.1525/ california/9780520230729.003.0002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520230729.003.0002
  21. Connell, R. W. (1987). Gender and Power: Society, the Person and Sexual Politics. Sydney Boston: Allen & Unwin.
  22. Corradi, C., Baldry, A. C., Buran, S., Kouta, C., Schröttle, M., Stevkovic, L. (2018). Exploring the Data on Femicide across Europe. In Femicide across Europe (pp. 93-166). Policy Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv8xnfq2.11
  23. Council of Europe. (2018). Mapping Study on Cyberviolence with Recommendations adopted by the T-CY on 9 July 2018, Cybercrime Convention Committee (T-CY). Working Group on cyberbullying and other forms of online violence, especially against women and children (T-CY (2017)10). https://rm.coe.int/t-cy-mapping-study-on-cyberviolence-final/1680a1307c.
  24. Cuenca-Piqueras, C., Fernández-Prados, J. S., & González-Moreno, M. J. (2020). Face-to-face versus Online Harassment of European women: Importance of Date and Place of Birth. Sexuality & Culture, 24(1), 157-173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-019-09632-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-019-09632-4
  25. CYBERSAFE project. (2020). Cyber Violence against Women & Girls Report: Changing Attitudes among teenagers on Cyber-VAWG. Available at: https://www.stoponlineviolence.eu/wpcontent/uploads/2020/06/Cybersafe_Report_200623_web.pdf (accessed 15 November 2022)
  26. D’Ambrosi, L., Polci, V. (2017). Social Media and Gender-Based Violence. Social Media and Gender-Based Violence, 334-343.
  27. Daniels, J. (2009). Rethinking cyberfeminism(s): Race, Gender, and Embodiment. Women’s Studies Quarterly, 37(1/2), 101-124 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/wsq.0.0158
  28. Davies, S. E., True, J. (2015). Reframing Conflict-related Sexual and Genderbased Violence: Bringing Gender Analysis Back in. Security Dialogue, 46(6), 495–512. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010615601389. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010615601389
  29. Dunn, S. (2020). Technology-Facilitated Gender-Based Violence: An Overview. Supporting a Safer Internet Paper No. 1. Centre for International Governance Innovation. Retrieved October 2, 2023: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3772042
  30. EIGE. (2017). Cyber Violence against Women and Girls. Available at: https://eige.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/cyber_violence_against_women_and_girls.pdf (accessed 18 February 2022)
  31. EIGE. (2019). Understanding Intimate Partner Violence in the EU: the Role of Data. Available at: https://eige.europa.eu/publications/understanding-intimate-partner-violence-eu-role-data (accessed 18 February 2022)
  32. Eikren, E., Ingram-Waters, M. (2016). Dismantling ‘You Get what you Deserve’: Towards a Feminist Sociology of Revenge Porn. Ada: A Journal of Gender, New Media, and Technology, 10, 1–18.
  33. Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of communication, 43(4), 51-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
  34. European Parliament. (2021). Combating Gender-based Violence: Cyber violence. Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2021/662621/EPRS_STU(2021)662621_EN.pdf (accessed 07 March 2022)
  35. ElSherief, M., Belding, E., & Nguyen, D. (2017). #notokay: Understanding Gender-Based Violence in Social Media. In Eleventh international AAAI conference on web and social media. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v11i1.14877
  36. Faith, B. (2018). Gender, Mobile, and Mobile Internet| Maintenance Affordances, Capabilities and Structural Inequalities: Mobile Phone Use By Low-Income Women. Information Technologies & International Development, 14.
  37. Faith, B., Fraser, E., (2018). What Works to Prevent Cyber Violence against Women and Girls ?. https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/bitstream/handle/20.500.12413/14764/vawg-helpdesk-report-212-what-works-cybervawg.pdf?sequence=1 (accessed 6 October 2023)
  38. Fansher, A. K., & Randa, R. (2019). Risky Social Media Behaviors and the Potential for Victimization: A Descriptive Look at College Students Victimized by Someone Met Online. Violence and Gender, 6 , 115–123. https://doi.org/10.1089/vio.2017.0073 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/vio.2017.0073
  39. Faucher, C., Cassidy, W., & Jackson, M. (2020). Awareness, Policy, Privacy, and More: Post-secondary Students Voice their Solutions to Cyberbullying. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 10(3), 795-815. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe10030058
  40. Floridi, L. (2015). The ONLIFE MANIFESTO: Being Human in a Hyperconnected Era. Springer Nature: New York. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04093-6
  41. Foucault, M. 1971. L’Ordre du discours. Paris: Gallimard (ed. it. L’ordine del discorso e altri interventi. Torino: Einaudi, 2004)
  42. FRA. (2018). Fundamental Rights Report 2018. Available at: https://fra.europa.eu/en/publication/2018/fundamental-rights-report-2018 (accessed 18 February 2022)
  43. Garrido, M. (2022). Mapping Online Gender-Based Violence. UPEACE Press: San Josè
  44. Genta, M. L. (2017). Bullismo e cyberbullismo: Comprenderli per combatterli. Strategie operative per psicologi, educatori ed insegnanti. FrancoAngeli: Milano.
  45. Giomi, E., Magaraggia, S. (2017). Relazioni Brutali. Genere e violenza nella cultura mediale. Bologna: il Mulino.
  46. Giungi, L. et al. (2019). Part 1: Digital Gender-Based Violence: the State of the Art. Available at: https://gen-pol.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/When-Technology-Meets-Misogyny-GenPol-Policy-Paper-2.pdf (accessed 10 October 2023)
  47. Gius, C. (2022). Addressing the Blurred Question of ‘Responsibility’: insights from Online News Comments on a Case of Non-Consensual Pornography. Journal of Gender Studies,31(2), 193-203. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2021.1892610 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2021.1892610
  48. Goffman, E. 1974. Frame Analysis. An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
  49. Goulds et al. (2020). Free to be Online? Girls’ and Young Women’s Experiences of Online Harassment. Available at: https://plan-international.org/publications/freetobeonline (accessed 10 October 2021)
  50. Hall, S. (1973). Encoding and Decoding in the Television Discourse. Available at: http://epapers.bham.ac.uk/2962/1/Hall%2C_1973%2C_Encoding_and_Decoding_in_the_Television_Discourse.pdf (accessed 10 October 2017)
  51. Hasinoff, A.A. (2012). Sexting as Media Production: Rethinking Social Media and Sexuality, New Media and Society, 15(4), 449-465. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812459171 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812459171
  52. Hellsten, L.-a., Crespi, I., Hendry, B., & Fermani, A. (2021). Extending the Current Theorisation on Cyberbullying: Importance of Including Socio-Psychological Perspectives. Italian Journal of Sociology of Education, 13/3, 85–110. https://doi.org/10.14658/pupj-ijse-2021-3-5
  53. Hilgartner, S. Bosk, C.L. (1988). The Rise and Fall of Social Problems: A Public Arena’s Model. American Journal of Sociology, (94): 53-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/228951
  54. Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2017). Cultivating Youth Resilience to Prevent Bullying and Cyberbullying Victimization. Child abuse & neglect, 73, 51-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.09.010
  55. Jane, E. A. (2016). Misogyny Online. A Short (and brutish) History. London: Sage DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473916029
  56. Jane, E. A. (2017). ‘Dude… Stop the Spread’: Antagonism, Agonism, and# manspreading on Social Media. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 20(5), 459-475. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877916637151 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877916637151
  57. Jansen, B. J., & Spink, A. (2006). How are We Searching the World Wide Web? A Comparison of Nine Search Engine Transaction logs. Information Processing & Management, 42(1), 248-263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2004.10.007
  58. Jenkins, H., Ford, S., & Green, J. (2013). Spreadable Media: Creating Value and Meaning in a Networked Culture. New York: NYU Press.
  59. Khan, I. (2022). Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Promotion and Protection of the Right to Freedom of Opinion and Expression. New York: United Nation. Available at: https://undocs.org/Home/Mobile?FinalSymbol=A%2F76%2F258&Language=E&DeviceType=Desktop&LangRequested=False (accessed 01 September 2022)
  60. Lalli, P. (2021). L’amore non uccide. Femminicidio e discorso pubblico: cronaca, tribunali, politiche. Bologna: Il Mulino.
  61. Lalli, P., Capelli, C. (2021). Serious Games and non-Formal Learning in the Classroom: The Experience of Sicuri si diventa. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference of the Journal Scuola Democratica: Reinventing Education, vol. 2, 1293-1306.
  62. Lee, N.R., Kotler, P. (2019) Social Marketing: Behavior Change for Social Good. Sage,: London
  63. Lefebvre, R. C. (2012). Transformative Social Marketing: Co‐creating the Social Marketing Discipline and Brand. Journal of Social Marketing, 2(2), 118-129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/20426761211243955
  64. Lumsden, K., Morgan, H. M. (2018). Cyber-trolling as Symbolic Violence. In N. Lombard (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Gender and Violence (pp. 121-132). London and New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315612997-10
  65. Macchioni, E., Santoni, C. (2022). The Youth On-line Life: Risks, Violence and Support Networks. International Review of Sociology, 32(3), 463-482. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2022.2133409
  66. Menesini, E., Nocentini, A., Palladino, B. E. (2017). Prevenire e contrastare il bullismo e il cyberbullismo (pp. 1-192). Il mulino.
  67. Morahan-Martin, J. (2000). Women and the Internet: Promise and perils. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 3(5),683–691. https://doi.org/10.1089/10949310050191683PDF/EPUB DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/10949310050191683
  68. Moscovici, S. (1984). The Phenomenon of Social Representations. In R. Farr, S. Moscovici (eds.), Social Representations, 3-69. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  69. Navarro, R. (2016). Gender Issues and Cyberbullying in Children and Adolescents: From Gender Differences to Gender Identity Measures. In Cyberbullying across the globe (pp. 35-61). Springer Cham. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25552-1_2
  70. Pavan, E. (2017). “Internet Intermediaries and Online Gender-based Violence. In M. Segrave & L. Vitis (eds). Gender, technology and violence. London: Routledge, 62-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315441160-5
  71. Pavan, E., Lavorgna, A. (2021). Promises and Pitfalls of Legal Responses to Image-Based Sexual Abuse: Critical Insights from the Italian Case. In The palgrave handbook of gendered violence and technology, 545-564. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83734-1_27
  72. Powell, A. (2021). ‘Intimate Intrusions’: Technology Facilitated Dating and Intimate Partner Violence. In A. Flynn, A. Powell, & L. Sugiura (eds.). The Palgrave Handbook of Gendered Violence and Technology, 157-179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83734-1_9
  73. Pietropaoli, S. (2017). La rete non dimentica. Una riflessione sul diritto all’oblio. Ars interpretandi, 22(1), https://doi.org/67-80. 10.7382/86671
  74. Project deSHAME. (2017). Young People’s Experiences of Online Sexual Harassment. Available at: https://www.childnet.com/what-we-do/our-projects/project-deshame/research/ (accessed 10 October 2023)
  75. Reynolds, L. & Merritt, R. (2010). Scoping. In J. French, et al. (2010). Social Marketing and Public Health: Theory and practice (pp. 161-191). Oxford University Press: Oxford. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199550692.003.11
  76. Ringrose, J., Harvey, L., Gill, R., & Livingstone, S. (2013). Teen Girls, Sexual Double Standards and ‘Sexting’: Gendered Value in Digital Image Exchange. Feminist theory, 14(3), 305-323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700113499853
  77. Salter, M., Crofts, T. (2015). “Responding to Revenge Porn: Challenges To Online Legal Impunity”. In L. Comella, S. Tarrant (Eds.). New Views on Pornography: Sexuality, Politics, and the Law, 233–256. Westport: Praeger Publisher. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9798400691317.ch-012
  78. Saltz, S.B., Rozon, M., Pogge, D.L., & Harvey, P.D. (2020). Cyberbullying and its Relationship to Current Symptoms and History of Early Life Trauma: A study of adolescents in an acute inpatient psychiatric unit. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, (8), 81-81. https://doi.org/10.4088/jcp.18m12170 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.18m12170
  79. Scarcelli, C. M. (2021). Manosphere periferiche. Ragazzi, omosocialità e pratiche digitali. AG About Gender-Rivista internazionale di studi di genere, 10(19). https://doi.org/10.15167/2279-5057/AG2021.10.19.1278
  80. Simonovic, D. (2018). Report of the Special Rapporteur on Violence against Women, its causes and consequences on online violence against women and girls from a human rights perspective (A/HRC/38/47). 108 Mohamed E. Atta Geneva. United Nations Human Rights Council. https://digitallibrary. un.org/record/1641160?ln=en accessed 10 October 2023)
  81. Stokes, B. (2005). Video Games Have Changed: Time to Consider ‘Serious Games’. The Development Education Journal, 11, 108-116.
  82. Swidler, A. (1986). Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies. American sociological review, 273-286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2095521
  83. Taddeo, G., & Tirocchi, S. (2014). Networked families: Media e social nelle relazioni familiari. In G. Greco (a cura di) (Ed.), Pubbliche intimità. L’affettivo quotidiano nei siti di social network (pp. 203–219). Milano: Franco Angeli.
  84. Tirocchi, S. (2019). Il cyberbullismo tra emergenza e normalizzazione. In Dal bullismo al cyberbullismo. Strategie socio-educative (pp. 49-61). Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  85. Tirocchi, S., Scocco, M., & Crespi, I. (2022). Generation Z and Cyberviolence: between Digital Platforms Use and Risk Awareness. International Review of Sociology, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2022.2133408 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2022.2133408
  86. Vakhitova, Z. I., Alston-Knox, C. L., Reeves, E., Mawby, R. I. (2021). Explaining Victim Impact from Cyber Abuse: An Exploratory Mixed Methods Analysis. Deviant Behaviour. Advance online publication. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2021.1921558
  87. Vox. (2021). La nuova mappa dell’intolleranza 6. Available at: http://www.voxdiritti.it/la-nuova-mappa-dellintolleranza-6/ (accessed 19 February 2022)
  88. Wibben, A. T. R. (2019). Everyday Security, Feminism, and the Continuum of Violence. Journal of Global Security Studies, 5(1), 115. https://doi. org/10.1093/jogss/ogz056 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogz056
  89. Van Dijk J.A.G.M., van Deursen A.J.A.M. (2014). Digital Skills: Unlocking the Information Society (Digital Education and Learning). Pelgrave Macmilian: New York DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137437037
  90. Wakefield, M. A., Loken, B., & Hornik, R. C. (2010). Use of Mass Media Campaigns to Change Health Behaviour. The Lancet, 376(9748), 1261-1271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60809-4
  91. World Wide Web Foundation. (2014). Web Index Report 2014-15. Available at: https://webfoundation.org/research/the-2014-15-web-index/ (accessed 10 October 2021)
  92. Ziccardi, G. (2017). La soluzione c’è: Si chiama censura. il Mulino, 66(2), 226-234. https://doi.org/10.1402/86032
  93. Zhonggen, Y. (2019). A Meta-Analysis of Use of Serious Games in Education over a Decade. International Journal of Computer Games Technology, 2019, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4797032 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4797032