Vol. 16 No. 2 (2025): MEDIA EDUCATION – Studi, ricerche e buone pratiche
Articles

Social media, power, and control: Addressing digital gender-based violence among adolescents:

PDF
  • Brunella Fiore,
  • Chiara Bruttomesso
Brunella Fiore
Università degli studi di Milano Bicocca, Italy
Chiara Bruttomesso
Università degli studi di Milano Bicocca, Italy
Bio
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/me-17497

Published 2025-12-30

Keywords

  • Digital gender violence,
  • Social media,
  • Cyberstalking,
  • Sextortion,
  • Digital literacy

Copyright (c) 2025 Brunella Fiore, Chiara Bruttomesso

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Digital gender-based violence (DGBV) is a pressing issue that disproportionately affects adolescents, particularly young women. This study examines how digital platforms show gender-based violence, exploring adolescents’ perceptions, experiences, and coping mechanisms. Drawing on a mixed-methods approach, data were collected from 242 students (94 males and 148 females) aged 16 from upper secondary schools in Italy. Findings reveal that digital violence, including cyberstalking, sextortion, and non-consensual sharing of intimate images, is normalized among adolescents. Boys are more likely to justify or minimize the impact of digital abuse, while girls experience heightened vulnerability and distress. The research also highlights the normalization of controlling behaviors in adolescent relationships, with over 50% of boys and 25% of girls considering phone surveillance by a partner as acceptable. Additionally, perceptions of online abuse differ significantly by gender: while 63.5% of girls equate digital abuse with physical-world violence, only 44.7% of boys share this view. These findings underscore the urgent need for gender-sensitive digital literacy programs in educational institutions. Schools, policymakers, and digital platforms must work together to implement interventions that challenge harmful gender norms, enhance digital safety, and promote respectful online interactions. Addressing DGBV requires a multifaceted approach, integrating education, regulatory policies, and community engagement to foster a safer and more equitable digital environment for adolescents.

PDF

References

  1. Abbott, K., Weckesser, A., & Egan, H. (2021). ‘Everyone knows someone in an unhealthy relationship’: young people’s talk about intimate heterosexual relationships in England. Sex Education, 21(3), 304-318. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2020.1801407 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2020.1801407
  2. Alonso-Ruido, P., Sande-Muñiz, M., & Regueiro, B. (2022). ¿ Pornografía al alcance de un clic? Una revisión de la literatura reciente sobre adolescentes españoles. Revista de estudios e investigación en psicología y educación, 9(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.17979/reipe.2022.9.1.8653 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17979/reipe.2022.9.1.8653
  3. Andrade, T. A., Sampaio, M. A., & Donard, V. (2024). Applying digital technologies to tackle teen dating violence: A systematic review. Trends in Psychology, 32(2), 356-374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43076-022-00180-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43076-022-00180-9
  4. Auriemma, V., Iorio, G., Roberti, G., & Morese, R. (2020). Cyberbullying and empathy in the age of hyperconnection: an interdisciplinary approach. Frontiers in Sociology, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2020.551881 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2020.551881
  5. Blatterer, H. (2022) Friendship and solidarity. European Journal of Social Theory, 25(2): 217–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431020982499 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431020982499
  6. Bailey, L., Hulley, J., Gomersall, T. Kirkman, G., Gibbs, G., & Jones, A. (2023). The Networking of Abuse: Intimate Partner Violence and the Use of Social Technologies. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 51. https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548231206827. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548231206827
  7. Castells, M. (2009). Communication Power. Oxford University Press.
  8. Castells, M. (2012). Networks of outrage and hope – social movements in the Internet age. 2nd Edition · E-Book.
  9. Chassiakos, Y. L. R., & Stager, M. (2020). Current trends in digital media: How and why teens use technology. In Technology and adolescent health (pp 25-56). Academic Press. Doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-817319-0.00002-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-817319-0.00002-5
  10. Chesters, J. (Ed.). (2024). Research Handbook on Transitions Into Adulthood. Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839106972
  11. Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage publications.
  12. Creswell, J.W., & Creswell, J.D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, Sage publications.
  13. Decataldo, A., Russo, C. (2022). Metodologia e tecniche partecipative. La ricerca sociologica nel tempo della complessità. Pearson Italia.
  14. DeCook, J. R., Cotter, K., Kanthawala, S., & Foyle, K. (2022). Safe from ‘harm’: The governance of violence by platforms. Policy & Internet, 14(1), 63-78. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.290
  15. De Leeuw, E. D., & Hox, J. J. (2012). Self-administered questionnaires: mail surveys and other applications. In International handbook of survey methodology (pp 239-263), Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203843123
  16. Dragiewicz, M., Burgess, J., Matamoros-Fernández, A., Salter, M., Suzor, N. P., Woodlock, D., & Harris, B. (2018). Technology facilitated coercive control: Domestic violence and the competing roles of digital media platforms. Feminist Media Studies, 18(4), 609-625. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2018.1447341. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2018.1447341
  17. Dubois, E., & Reepschlager, A. (2024). How harassment and hate speech policies have changed over time: Comparing Facebook, Twitter and Reddit (2005–2020). Policy & Internet. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.387 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.387
  18. Fitzpatrick, C., Harvey, E., Lopes Almeida, M., Binet, MA., Wakeham-Lewis, R., Garon-Carrier, G. (2024). Preschoolers, Parents, and the Pandemic: Family Media Use During the COVID-19 Crisis and Child Development. In: Frizzo, G.B. (eds) Digital Media and Early Child Development. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-69224-6_12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-69224-6_12
  19. Flynn, A., & Henry, N. (2021). Image-based sexual abuse: An Australian reflection. Women & criminal justice, 31(4), 313-326. https://doi.org/10.1080/08974454.2019.1646190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08974454.2019.1646190
  20. Grignoli, D., Barba, D., D’Ambrosio M. (2022). Rethinking violence against women from real to online teen violence. Sociology & Social Work Review, 6, 20-36. https://doi.org/10.58179/SSWR6202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58179/SSWR6202
  21. Haidt, J. (2024). The anxious generation: how the great rewiring of childhood is causing an epidemic of mental illness. Penguin Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56315/PSCF9-25Haidt
  22. Jamieson L. (2013). Personal relationships, intimacy and the self in a mediated and global digital age. In: Orton-Johnson K, Prior N (eds) Digital Sociology: Critical Perspectives. Palgrave Macmillan (pp 13–33). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137297792_2
  23. Jane, E. (2017). Gendered cyberhate: A new digital divide? In Jane E. (Eds), Theorizing digital divides (pp 186-198), Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315455334-15
  24. Jones, L. M., Mitchell, K. J., & Finkelhor, D. (2013). Online harassment in context: Trends from three youth internet safety surveys (2000, 2005, 2010). Psychology of violence, 3(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030309 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030309
  25. Kaarakainen, S.S., Helenius, J., & Laakso, Mari (2025). Exploring Loneliness Among Young People: Thematic Analysis of Loneliness Experiences on Finnish YouthNet Discussion Forum. Youth & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X241313475. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X241313475
  26. Kostyk, A., Zhou, W., Hyman, M. R., & Paas, L. (2021). Securing higher-quality data from self-administered questionnaires. International Journal of Market Research, 63(6), 685-692. https://doi.org/10.1177/14707853211057172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14707853211057172
  27. Lajnef, K. (2023). The effect of social media influencers’ on teenagers behavior: An empirical study using cognitive map technique. Current Psychology, 42(22), 19364-19377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04273-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04273-1
  28. Leavy, P. (2022). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, arts-based, and community-based participatory research approaches. Guilford publications.
  29. Lloyd, J. (2018). Abuse through sexual image sharing in schools: Response and responsibility. Gender and Education, 32(6), 784–802. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2018.1513456 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2018.1513456
  30. Mainardi, A., Magaraggia, S. (2024). Young women, dating apps, and affective assemblages in the time of pandemic: no relationship is a linear transition to a fixed point. European Journal of woman’s studies, 31(3), 325-339. https://doi.org/10.1177/13505068241262128 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13505068241262128
  31. Mainardi, A., & Voli, S. (2024). Gender and sexuality in the political experience of young people in Italy. In Research Handbook on Transitions into Adulthood (pp 153-163). Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839106972.00023
  32. McInroy, L.B., & Beer, O. W. (2022). Adapting vignettes for internet-based research: Eliciting realistic responses to the digital milieu. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 25(3), 335-347. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2021.1901440 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2021.1901440
  33. Narayani, A. (2024). Women’s Safety in Digital Space. Indian Journal of Public Administration, 70(3), 546-561. https://doi.org/10.1177/00195561241271513 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00195561241271513
  34. Nyamwesa, A. M. (2024). Mastering Digital Personas: Balancing Social Connectivity and Privacy for Tanzanian Adolescents’ Well-Being. Indonesian Journal of Social Research (IJSR), 6(3), 236-249. Doi:10.30997/ijsr.v6i3.508 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30997/ijsr.v6i3.508
  35. Orton-Johnson, K., & Prior, N. (Eds.) (2013). Digital sociology: Critical perspectives. Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137297792
  36. Patton, D. U., Leonard, P., Elaesser, C., Eschmann, R. D., Patel, S., & Crosby, S. (2019). What’s a Threat on Social Media? How Black and Latino Chicago Young Men Define and Navigate Threats Online. Youth & Society, 51(6), 756-772. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X17720325 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X17720325
  37. Pérez-Marco, A., Soares, P., Davó-Blanes, M. C., & Vives-Cases, C. (2020). Identifying types of dating violence and protective factors among adolescents in Spain: A qualitative analysis of Lights4Violence materials. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(7), 2443. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17072443 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17072443
  38. Perry, J., Devore, S. K., Pellegrino, C., & Salce, A. J. (2023). Social media usage and its effects on the psychological health of adolescents. NASN School Nurse, 38(6), 292-296. https://doi.org/10.1177/1942602X231159901 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1942602X231159901
  39. Powell, A., & Henry, N. (2017). Sexual violence in a digital age. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58047-4
  40. Recuero, R. (2024). The Platformization of violence: toward a concept of discursive toxicity on social media. Social Media Society, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/205630512312242 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231224264
  41. Rideout V., Robb M.B. (2018). Social media, social life: Teens reveal their experiences. Common Sense Media.
  42. Sardá, T., Natale, S., Sotirakopoulos, N., & Monaghan, M. (2019). Understanding online anonymity. Media, Culture & Society, 41(4), 557-564. https://doi.org/10.1177/016344371984207 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443719842074
  43. Save the Children (2023), Atlante dell’infanzia a rischio, Report https://www.savethechildren.it/cosa-facciamo/pubblicazioni/14-atlante-dell-infanzia-a-rischio-tempi-digitali
  44. Scott, C. F., Bay-Cheng, L. Y., Nochajski, T. H., & Collins, R. L. (2024). Emerging adults’ social media engagement & alcohol misuse: A multidimensional, person-centered analysis of risk. Children and Youth Services Review, 159, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2024.107511 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2024.107511
  45. Sevón, E., Mustola, M., Siippainen, A., & Vlasov, J. (2023). Participatory research methods with young children: A systematic literature review. Educational review, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2023.2215465 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2023.2215465
  46. Storer, H., Nyerges, E., & Hamby, S. (2022). Technology “Feels Less Threatening”: The processes by which digital technologies facilitate youths’ access to services at intimate partner violence organizations. Children and Youth Services Review, 139(C). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2022.106573. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2022.106573
  47. Sundaram, V. (2013). Violence as understandable, deserved or unacceptable? Listening for gender in teenagers’ talk about violence. Gender and education, 25(7), 889-906. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2013.858110 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2013.858110
  48. Tintori, A., Ciancimino, G., & Cerbara, L. (2024). How Screen Time and Social Media Hyperconnection Have Harmed Adolescents’ Relational and Psychological Well-Being since the COVID-19 Pandemic. Social Sciences, 13(9), 470. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13090470 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13090470
  49. Torp Løkkeberg S, Ihlebæk C, Brottveit G, Del Busso L. (2024), Digital Violence and Abuse: A Scoping Review of Adverse Experiences Within Adolescent Intimate Partner Relationships. Trauma Violence Abuse, 25(3), 1954-1965. https://doi.org/10.1177/152483802312018162 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380231201816
  50. Valls, R., Puigvert, L., & Duque, E. (2008). Gender violence among teenagers: Socialization and prevention. Violence against women, 14(7), 759-785. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801208320 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801208320365
  51. Vickery, J. R. (2017). Worried about the wrong things: Youth, risk, and opportunity in the digital world. MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/10653.001.0001
  52. Women, U. N. (2015). Cyber Violence Against Women and Girls: A World-wide Wake-up Call. UN WOMEN. https://www.unwomen.org/en/news/stories/2015/9/cyber-violence-report-press-release
  53. WHO World Health Organization (2021). Violence against women prevalence estimates, 2018: global, regional and national prevalence estimates for intimate partner violence against women and global and regional prevalence estimates for non-partner sexual violence against women. Ginevra, https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240022256
  54. Ybarra, M. L., Diener-West, M., & Leaf, P. J. (2007). Examining the overlap in Internet harassment and school bullying: Implications for school intervention. Journal of Adolescent health, 41(6), S42-S50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.09.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.09.004