Just Accepted Manuscripts
Original Research Article

Circular economy implementation as the cornerstone of green competitive advantage in the wine industry: A PLS-SEM and IPMA Analysis: Special Issue "Transforming wine value chains – Adapting to a changing world"

(Just Accepted)
  • Javier Martínez-Falcó,
  • Eduardo Sánchez-García,
  • Bartolomé Marco-Lajara,
  • Carmen Einsle,
  • Elena Toribio-Gómez
Javier Martínez-Falcó
University of Alicante
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/wep-18977

Published 2026-02-11

Keywords

  • circular economy implementation,
  • green competitive advantage,
  • green shared vision,
  • green mindfulness,
  • wine industry,
  • Spain
    • ...More
    Less

How to Cite

Martínez-Falcó, J., Sánchez-García, E., Marco-Lajara, B., Einsle, C., & Toribio-Gómez, E. (2026). Circular economy implementation as the cornerstone of green competitive advantage in the wine industry: A PLS-SEM and IPMA Analysis: Special Issue "Transforming wine value chains – Adapting to a changing world". Wine Economics and Policy. https://doi.org/10.36253/wep-18977

Copyright (c) 2024 Javier Martínez-Falcó, Eduardo Sánchez-García, Bartolomé Marco-Lajara, Carmen Einsle, Elena Toribio-Gómez

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

The present study investigates how the implementation of Circular Economy (CE) practices enhances Green Competitive Advantage (GCA) in the wine industry, examining the mediating influence of Green Shared Vision (GSV) and Green Mindfulness (GM). Despite the strategic relevance of sustainability, empirical evidence remains limited on how cognitive and behavioral dimensions promote the transition toward circular production models in resource-intensive sectors such as wine production. Grounded in the Natural Resource-Based View (NRBV), a structural model was estimated using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) and Importance–Performance Map Analysis (IPMA). Based on survey data from 207 Spanish wineries, the analysis evaluates both direct and mediated relationships and identifies the relative importance and performance of CEI in shaping GCA. The findings demonstrate that CEI acts as the central mechanism connecting cognitive orientation and environmental awareness with competitive outcomes, reinforcing GCA by channeling the influence of GSV and GM through circular practices that exhibit the highest levels of importance and performance. Building on these results, the study offers three main contributions. First, it extends the NRBV by conceptualizing CEI as a dynamic process through which wineries transform environmental knowledge, shared vision, and mindful awareness into sustained competitive advantage. Second, it develops an empirical model that demonstrates how GSV and GM strengthen GCA through the effective implementation of CEI. Third, it offers evidence-based implications for winery managers, underscoring that reinforcing cognitive alignment and proactive environmental awareness enhances the adoption of circular practices.

(Just Accepted)

References

  1. Marques, C., Güneş, S., Vilela, A., & Gomes, R., Life-cycle assessment in agri-food systems and the wine industry—A circular economy perspective, Foods 14 (9) (2025) 1553.
  2. OIV (International Organisation of Vine and Wine), State of the World Vine and Wine Sector 2025, Paris: OIV, 2025. https://www.oiv.int/
  3. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report, Geneva: IPCC, 2023. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6-syr
  4. European Commission, A New Circular Economy Action Plan for a Cleaner and More Competitive Europe, Brussels: European Commission, 2020. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0098
  5. Stockl, A., Moscovici, D., Tischler, S., Eitle, M., & Dolezal, C., Consumer knowledge and preferences for organic and sustainably certified wines: Lessons from the DACH Region—Germany, Austria, and Switzerland, Sustainability 16 (11) (2024) 4464.
  6. Martínez-Falcó, J., Sánchez-García, E., Marco-Lajara, B., & Georgantzis, N., The interplay between competitive advantage and sustainability in the wine industry: a bibliometric and systematic review, Discover Sustainability 5 (1) (2024) 13.
  7. Moreira, S., Carvalho, L., & Travassos, R., Circular economy business model—Let’s wine about it: An exploratory research applied to Portuguese wineries, in: Entrepreneurship, Technological Change and Circular Economy for a Green Transition: Research Contributions for a More Productive Environment, Springer Nature, Cham, 2024, pp. 245–274.
  8. Hart, S., A natural-resource-based view of the firm, Acad. Manag. Rev. 20 (4) (1995) 986–1014.
  9. Younas, N., Hossain, M., Syed, A., Ejaz, S., Ejaz, F., Jagirani, T., & Dunay, A., Green shared vision: A bridge between responsible leadership and green behavior under individual green values, Heliyon 9 (11) (2023) 1-19.
  10. Ho, Y., Wang, C., & Lin, C., Antecedents and consequences of green mindfulness: A conceptual model, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 19 (11) (2022) 6367.
  11. Galati, A., Crescimanno, M., Tinervia, S., Iliopoulos, C., & Theodorakopoulou, I., Internal resources as tools to increase global competition: The Italian wine industry case, Br. Food J. 119 (11) (2017) 2406–2420.
  12. Martínez-Falcó, J., Marco-Lajara, B., Zaragoza-Saez, P., & Millan-Tudela, L., Do circular economy practices moderate the wine tourism–green performance relationship? A structural analysis applied to the Spanish wine industry, Br. Food J. 126 (1) (2024) 134–155.
  13. Sehnem, S., Ndubisi, N., Preschlak, D., Bernardy, R., & Santos Junior, S., Circular economy in the wine chain production: maturity, challenges, and lessons from an emerging economy perspective, Prod. Plan. Control 31 (11–12) (2020) 1014–1034.
  14. Cavicchi, C., & Vagnoni, E., The role of performance measurement in assessing the contribution of circular economy to the sustainability of a wine value chain, Br. Food J. 124 (5) (2022) 1551–1568.
  15. Chen, Y., Chang, C., Yeh, S., & Cheng, H., Green shared vision and green creativity: The mediation roles of green mindfulness and green self-efficacy, Qual. Quant. 49 (3) (2015) 1169–1184.
  16. Knight, H., Megicks, P., Agarwal, S., & Leenders, M., Firm resources and the development of environmental sustainability among small and medium-sized enterprises: Evidence from the Australian wine industry, Bus. Strategy Environ. 28 (1) (2019) 25–39.
  17. Carrillo-Higueras, F., Prajogo, D., & Smith, L., Environmental commitment and its drivers in the Australian wine industry: A behavioural approach, Australas. J. Environ. Manag. 25 (4) (2018) 439–458.
  18. Sánchez-García, E., Martínez-Falcó, J., Marco-Lajara, B., & Abraham, L., Leading the way towards greener business models in the wine industry, Bus. Strategy Environ. (2025) 1-21.
  19. Martínez-Falcó, J., Sánchez-García, E., Marco-Lajara, B., & Akram, U., Digital transformation and green innovation performance: Unraveling the role of green knowledge sharing and top management environmental awareness, Internet Res. (2024) 1-27.
  20. Kalyar, M., Ali, F., & Shafique, I., Green mindfulness and green creativity nexus in the hospitality industry: Examining the effects of green process engagement and CSR, Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 33 (8) (2021) 2653–2675.
  21. Trigo, A., Fragoso, R., & Marta-Costa, A., Sustainability awareness in the Portuguese wine industry: A grounded theory approach, Int. J. Agric. Sustain. 20 (7) (2022) 1437–1453.
  22. Mastroberardino, P., Calabrese, G., Cortese, F., & Petracca, M., Sustainability in the wine sector: An empirical analysis of the level of awareness and perception among Italian consumers, Br. Food J. 122 (8) (2020) 2497–2511.
  23. MAPA (Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación), Vitivinicultura, 2024. https://www.mapa.gob.es/es/agricultura/temas/producciones-agricolas/vitivinicultura/
  24. Jansen, J., Van den Bosch, F., & Volberda, H.W., Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators, Manag. Sci. 52 (11) (2008) 1661–1674. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0576
  25. Williams, J.J., & Seaman, A.E., Corporate governance and mindfulness: The impact of management accounting systems change, J. Appl. Bus. Res. 26 (5) (2010) 1–10.
  26. Singh, J., & Ordoñez, I., Resource recovery from post-consumer waste: Important lessons for the upcoming circular economy, J. Clean. Prod. 134 (2016) 342–353.
  27. Lin, Y., & Chen, Y., Determinants of green competitive advantage: The roles of green knowledge sharing, green dynamic capabilities, and green service innovation, Qual. Quant. 51 (4) (2017) 1663–1685.
  28. OECD, Measuring Entrepreneurship: A Collection of Indicators, OECD Publishing, Paris, 2009.
  29. Dash, G., & Paul, J., CB–SEM vs PLS–SEM methods for research in social sciences and technology forecasting, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 173 (2021) 121092.
  30. Cepeda-Carrión, G., Hair, J., Ringle, C., Roldán, J., & Cepeda, J., Advanced Issues in Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 2019.
  31. Reinartz, W., Haenlein, M., & Henseler, J., An empirical comparison of the efficacy of covariance-based and variance-based SEM, Int. J. Res. Mark. 26 (4) (2009) 332–344.
  32. Montalvo-Falcón, J., Sánchez-García, E., Marco-Lajara, B., & Martínez-Falcó, J., Green human resource management and economic, social and environmental performance: Evidence from the Spanish wine industry, Heliyon 9 (10) (2023) e20826.
  33. Hair, J., Risher, J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C., When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM, Eur. Bus. Rev. 31 (1) (2019) 2–24.
  34. Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P., Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification, Psychol. Methods 3 (4) (1998) 424–453.
  35. Carmines, E., & Zeller, R., Reliability and Validity Assessment, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA, 1979.
  36. Dijkstra, T., & Henseler, J., Consistent partial least squares path modeling, MIS Q. 39 (2) (2015) 297–316.
  37. Henseler, J., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M., A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling, J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 43 (1) (2015) 115–135.
  38. Mura, R., Vicentini, F., Botti, L., & Chiriacò, M., Achieving the circular economy through environmental policies: Packaging strategies for more sustainable business models in the wine industry, Bus. Strategy Environ. 33 (2) (2024) 1497–1514.
  39. Mora, D., Moral-Cuadra, S., Lopez-Guzman, T., & Aguilar-Rivero, M., Circular economy practices in wine tourism: Environmental policies and strategies for the development of wine routes in Spain, Int. J. Gastron. Food Sci. 39 (2025) 101122.
  40. Wolfaardt, F., Chikande, A., Zietsman, A., Vivier, M., & Chimphango, A., A review of circular economy definitions and measurement frameworks for an agrifood system: A South African wine perspective, Clean. Circ. Bioecon. 12 (2025) 100169.
  41. Agnusdei, G., Abbate, S., del Vecchio, P., & Miglietta, P., Unveiling circular ecosystems in the wine sector: A design science application, Bus. Strategy Environ. (2025) 1-17.