Just Accepted Manuscripts
Original Research Article

Climate in the Glass: Metaphor Drift and Language-as-Signal in Wine Value Chains: Special Issue "Transforming wine value chains – Adapting to a changing world"

(Just Accepted)
  • Allison Creed
Allison Creed
The University of Melbourne
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/wep-19490

Published 2026-06-16

Keywords

  • wine communication,
  • value chains,
  • sensory linguistics,
  • climate adaption,
  • metaphor drift,
  • digital transformation
    • ...More
    Less

How to Cite

Creed, A. (2026). Climate in the Glass: Metaphor Drift and Language-as-Signal in Wine Value Chains: Special Issue "Transforming wine value chains – Adapting to a changing world". Wine Economics and Policy. https://doi.org/10.36253/wep-19490

Copyright (c) 2024 Allison Creed

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Climate variability is reshaping the global wine sector by altering the sensory profiles that underpin regional reputation and price at a time when producers, distributors, and retailers also face structural headwinds from shifting demand and digital disruption along the value chain. While the agronomic effects of warming are well documented, the downstream consequences for how wines are described, signaled, and sold across increasingly digital channels remain under-analyzed. This article introduces “metaphor drift”: the systematic misalignment between climate-shifted sensory reality and the entrenched metaphors and descriptors (e.g., “body”, “balance”, “elegant”, “minerality”) that consumers and intermediaries use to anticipate it. Drawing on Conceptual Metaphor Theory and the economics of information and signaling, the article develops a Language-as-Signal framework in which wine descriptors are treated as seasonally sensitive economic signals that reduce search costs, coordinate expectations, and sustain hedonic premiums along the value chain. A conceptual, toolkit-oriented design combines a synthesis of climate and wine evidence, analysis of six descriptor families, and two qualitative vignettes of a warm-vintage Pinot Noir and a smoke-affected Shiraz, with targeted applications to the low- and no-alcohol (NOLO) category. The resulting practitioner toolkit comprises a Swap-and-Scaffold lexicon and a human-in-the-loop large language model (LLM) protocol for auditing and updating high-volume digital copy and is used to formulate four propositions about how value-chain actors can govern sensory language as part of climate adaptation. The analysis suggests that transparent, linguistics-led recalibration of descriptors offers a low-cost, high-impact strategy for preserving trust, maintaining expectation fit, and supporting the economic resilience of wine value chains under climate pressure.

(Just Accepted)

References

  1. G.V. Jones, M.A. White, O.R. Cooper, K. Storchmann, Climate change and global wine quality, Clim. Change 73 (2005) 319–343. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-005-4704-2
  2. O. Ashenfelter, K. Storchmann, Climate change and wine: A review of the economic implications, J. Wine Econ. 11 (2016) 105–138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/jwe.2016.5
  3. M.R. Mozell, L. Thach, The impact of climate change on the global wine industry: Challenges & solutions, Wine Econ. Policy 3 (2014) 81–89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wep.2014.08.001
  4. G.V. Jones, R. Reid, A. Vilks, Climate, grapes, and wine: Structure and suitability in a variable and changing climate, in: P.H. Dougherty (Ed.), The Geography of Wine: Regions, Terroir and Techniques, Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 2012, pp. 109–133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0464-0_7
  5. J.P. Tiefenbacher, C. Townsend, The semiofoodscape of wine: The changing global landscape of wine culture and the language of making, selling, and drinking wine, in: S.D. Brunn, R. Kehrein (Eds.), Handbook of the Changing World Language Map, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2020, pp. 4103–4145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02438-3_213
  6. L.C. Windsor et al., The language of wine reviews, J. Wine Res. 34 (2023) 81–100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09571264.2023.2205116
  7. C. Paradis, M. Eeg-Olofsson, Describing sensory experience: The genre of wine reviews, Metaphor Symb. 28 (2013) 22–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2013.742838
  8. L. Danner et al., “I like the sound of that!” Wine descriptions influence consumers' expectations, liking, emotions and willingness to pay for Australian white wines, Food Res. Int. 99 (2017) 263–274. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2017.05.019
  9. T. Onuma, Verbal descriptions modulate flavour perception and evaluation of wine: An exploratory study using Riesling and Muscat Bailey A wines, OENO One 58 (2024). DOI: https://doi.org/10.20870/oeno-one.2024.58.2.8002
  10. C. Spence, Cognitive influence on the evaluation of wine: The impact and assessment of price, Food Res. Int. 187 (2024). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2024.114411
  11. M. Hirche et al., Distribution velocity in wine retailing, Wine Econ. Policy 12 (2023) 31–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/wep-14190
  12. E. Lamonaca, A. Seccia, F.G. Santeramo, Climate cha(lle)nges in global wine production and trade patterns, Wine Econ. Policy 12 (2023) 85–102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/wep-13852
  13. J.M. Balogh, Z.M. Maró, Impacts of climate change on the global wine sector: The case of cool-climate countries, Amfiteatru Econ. 27 (2025) 571–586. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24818/EA/2025/69/571
  14. H. Rodrigues, Y. Seier Christensen, A. Creed, Wine and conversation: Tracing innovation in wine metaphors, Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 66 (2025) 101362. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cofs.2025.101362
  15. J. Meyer, T. Schwartz, The metaphor matrix: Improving metaphor usage in management education, J. Am. Bus. Rev. 13 (2008) 37–44.
  16. R. Caballero, Sensory experiences, meaning and metaphor, in: L.J. Speed et al. (Eds.), Perception Metaphors, John Benjamins Publishing, Amsterdam, NL, 2019, pp. 127–143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.19.07cab
  17. A. Lehrer, Talking about wine, Language 51 (1975) 901–923. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/412700
  18. C. Paradis, C. Hommerberg, We drink with our eyes first: The web of sensory perceptions, aesthetic experiences and mixed imagery in wine reviews, in: R.W. Gibbs (Ed.), Mixing Metaphor, John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam, NL, 2016, pp. 179–202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/milcc.6.09par
  19. J. Niimi, L. Danner, S.E.P. Bastian, Wine leads us by our heart not our head: Emotions and the wine consumer, Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 27 (2019) 23–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cofs.2019.04.008
  20. A. Stelick, R. Dando, Thinking outside the booth—the eating environment, context and ecological validity in sensory and consumer research, Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 21 (2018) 26–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cofs.2018.05.005
  21. A.P. Silva et al., Functional or emotional? How Dutch and Portuguese conceptualise beer, wine and non-alcoholic beer consumption, Food Qual. Prefer. 49 (2016) 54–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.11.007
  22. A. Carbone, L. Quici, L. Cacchiarelli, The grapes in Italian wines: Assessing their value, Wine Econ. Policy 12 (2023) 55–67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/wep-14593
  23. M.A. Pedroza, R. Herrell, Exploring emotions as a new quality parameter in wine, Wine Bus. J. 5 (2022) 6–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26813/001c.31663
  24. S. Sillani, A. Miccoli, F. Nassivera, Different preferences for wine communication, Wine Econ. Policy 6 (2017) 28–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wep.2017.03.002
  25. D. Geeraerts, G. Kristiansen, Cognitive linguistics and language variation, in: J. Littlemore, J. Taylor (Eds.), The Bloomsbury Companion to Cognitive Linguistics, Continuum, London, UK, 2014, pp. 202–217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472593689.ch-012
  26. Z. Kövecses, Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614408
  27. R.W. Gibbs Jr., The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding, Cambridge University Press, 1994.
  28. A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought, 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, 1993. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865
  29. G. Lakoff, M. Johnson, Metaphors We Live By, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1980.
  30. R. Caballero, Manner-of-motion verbs in wine description, J. Pragmat. 39 (2007) 2095–2114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.07.005
  31. I.N. Alousque, Wine discourse in the French language, RAEL: Rev. Electrónica Lingüíst. Apl. (2012) 1–12.
  32. E. Suárez-Toste, Metaphor inside the wine cellar: On the ubiquity of personification schemas in winespeak, Metaphorik.de 12 (2007) 53–64.
  33. M.B. López Arroyo, R. Roberts, Metaphors in wine-tasting notes in English and Spanish, Hermēneus. Rev. Trad. Interpret. (2017) 139–163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24197/her.19.2017.139-163
  34. A. Ţenescu, A subtle grasp of the five senses: Cognitive metaphors in wine media discourse, Identities in Metamorphosis: Literature, Discourse, and Multicultural Dialogue, 2014, p. 334.
  35. C. Spence, Crossmodal correspondences: A tutorial review, Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 73 (2011) 971–995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-010-0073-7
  36. A. Crichton-Fock, C. Spence, N. Pettersson, Using crossmodal correspondences as a tool in wine communication, Front. Psychol. 14 (2023) 1190364. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1190364
  37. R. Caballero, E. Suárez-Toste, Translating the senses: Teaching the metaphors in winespeak, in: F. Boers, S. Lindstromberg (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistic Approaches to Teaching Vocabulary and Phraseology, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, New York, 2008, pp. 241–259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199161.3.241
  38. A. Joy et al., A multi-sensory and embodied understanding of wine consumption, J. Wine Res. 31 (2020) 247–264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09571264.2020.1854700
  39. E. Manca, Investigating the language of red wine tasting notes across the US, the Australian and the Italian cultures, Lingue e Linguaggi 39 (2020).
  40. S. Molina-Plaza, Multimodal metaphors on the Spanish technical discourse of wine: An overview, Beyond the Universe of Languages for Specific Purposes: The 21st Century Perspective, 2016, p. 111.
  41. W.L. Hamilton, J. Leskovec, D. Jurafsky, Cultural shift or linguistic drift? Comparing two computational measures of semantic change, in: Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Association for Computational Linguistics, Austin, Texas, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D16-1229
  42. C. van Leeuwen, P. Darriet, The impact of climate change on viticulture and wine quality, J. Wine Econ. 11 (2016) 150–167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/jwe.2015.21
  43. S. Whitnall, J. Alston, Climate, weather, and collective reputation: Implications for California's wine prices and quality, J. Wine Econ. 20 (2025) 122–167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/jwe.2025.8
  44. D. Dubois, How words for sensory experiences become terms, Terminology 23 (2017) 9–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/term.23.1.01dub
  45. L. Moreno-Pérez, B. López-Arroyo, Wine and translation: An analysis of phraseological units in English and Spanish wine technical sheets, Perspectives (2023) 1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2023.2268115
  46. A.C. Noble et al., Progress towards a standardized system of wine aroma terminology, Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 35 (1984) 107–109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5344/ajev.1984.35.2.107
  47. I.N. Alousque, Visual wine metaphor and metonymy in ads, Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 173 (2015) 125–131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.041
  48. M. Hristova, Wine metaphors in advertising: A linguistic corpus analysis, Snapshot (2022).
  49. E. Lefever et al., Discovering the language of wine reviews: A text mining account, in: N. Calzolari et al. (Eds.), Eleventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2018), European Language Resources Association, Miyazaki, Japan, 2018, pp. 3297–3302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.63317/4fwq7gsn5byt
  50. V. Diaconita et al., Decoding wine narratives with Hierarchical Attention: Classification, visual prompts, and emerging e-commerce possibilities, J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 20 (2025) 212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer20030212
  51. D. Kaimann, C.L.M. Spiess Bru, Sounds too feminine? Blind tastings, phonetic gender scores, and the impact on professional critics, J. Wine Econ. 19 (2024) 113–132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/jwe.2024.8
  52. H. Scander, Performing taste: A narrative review of the sommelier's embodied, aesthetic expertise, Int. J. Gastron. Food Sci. 41 (2025) 101252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgfs.2025.101252
  53. I. Bianchi et al., Non experts’ understanding of terms frequently used by experts to describe the sensory properties of wine: An investigation based on opposites, Food Qual. Prefer. 92 (2021) 104215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104215
  54. C. Honoré-Chedozeau, M. Otheguy, D. Valentin, Tell us how you taste wine, and we will tell you what kind of expert you are! Food Res. Int. 178 (2024) 113899. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2023.113899
  55. S. Mueller et al., Message on a bottle: The relative influence of wine back label information on wine choice, Food Qual. Prefer. 21 (2010) 22–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2009.07.004
  56. J.A. Fryer et al., Consumer responses to smoke-impacted pinot noir wine and the influence of label concepts on perception, Food Res. Int. 203 (2025) 115881. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2025.115881
  57. O. Gokcekus, The extent of “deceptive” advertising by wine retailers: Caveat venditor, Int. J. Wine Bus. Res. 36 (2023) 122–140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWBR-06-2023-0033
  58. C. Liao, Y. Luo, W. Zhu, Food safety trust, risk perception, and consumers’ response to company trust repair actions in food recall crises, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17 (2020) 1270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041270
  59. G. Ruggeri, S. Corsi, C. Mazzocchi, A bibliometric analysis of wine economics and business research: insights, trends, and future directions, Int. J. Wine Bus. Res. 36 (2023) 14–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWBR-06-2023-0032