Vol. 18 No. 1 (2023)
Articles

Diet and trophic niche overlap of four syntopic species of Physalaemus (Anura: Leptodactylidae) in southern Brazil

Renata K. Farina
Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos – UNISINOS, Laboratório de Ecologia de Vertebrados Terrestres, São Leopoldo, Rio Grande do Sul
Camila F. Moser
Universidade Federal do Pará - UFPA, Departamento de Zoologia, Belém, Pará
Stefano Scali
Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Milano, Corso Venezia, 55, I-20121 – Milano
Mateus de Oliveira
Sintrópica Consultoria Ambiental, Capela de Santana, Rio Grande do Sul
Patricia Witt
Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos – UNISINOS, Laboratório de Biologia Molecular, São Leopoldo, Rio Grande do Sul
Alexandro Marques Tozetti
Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos – UNISINOS, Laboratório de Ecologia de Vertebrados Terrestres, São Leopoldo, Rio Grande do Sul

Published 2023-07-01

Keywords

  • Foraging,
  • trophic niche,
  • amphibians,
  • behavior

How to Cite

Farina, R. K., Moser, C. F., Scali, S., de Oliveira, M., Witt, P., & Marques Tozetti, A. (2023). Diet and trophic niche overlap of four syntopic species of Physalaemus (Anura: Leptodactylidae) in southern Brazil. Acta Herpetologica, 18(1), 37–43. https://doi.org/10.36253/a_h-11294

Abstract

Despite the current increase in studies on the diet of neotropical anurans, few of them take a comparative approach between syntopic species. The objective of this study was to compare the diet of four syntopic species of the genus Physalaemus. The collections occurred between November 2014 and January 2016 in a preserved area of the subtropical Atlantic Forest in southern Brazil. We compared the gastrointestinal content of 109 individuals distributed in the species Physalaemus biligonigerus, P. cuvieri, P. gracilis and P. henselii. We measured the Index of Relative Importance of each prey category and calculated trophic niche breadth using the Levins’ index (Bsta) and trophic niche overlap using the Pianka’s index (Ojk). We also applied compositional analysis to evaluate feeding specializations. Formicidae was the most important prey category for P. biligonigerus (IRI = 88.5%) and P. gracilis (IRI = 39.1%). For P. henselii and P. cuvieri, the most important category was Isopoda (IRI = 51.7% and 57.9%, respectively), followed by Formicidae (IRI = 34.9% and 24.8%). Isopoda was also important in the diet of P. gracilis (IIR = 28.6%), followed by Araneae (IIR = 22.6%). The trophic niche breadth of the four species was narrow, all smaller than 0.32, and the lowest was recorded for P. biligonigerus (0.04). The trophic niche overlap was higher between P. biligonigerus and P. cuvieri (96%), and between P. gracilis and P. henselii (95%). Only P. gracilis presented a significant level of feeding specialization. The differences in their diets suggest different uses of the resources, which could relate to different ways of exploring the microhabitat.