Just Accepted Manuscripts
Full Research Articles

From creepy to crispy: species-specific acceptance of insect flours in crackers through a discrete choice experiment on young consumer preferences

PDF(Just Accepted)
Supplementary materials
  • Giuseppe Di Vita,
  • Manal Hamam,
  • Daniela Spina,
  • Giovanbattista Califano,
  • Vincenzo Morreale,
  • Mario D’Amico,
  • Raffaele Zanchini
Manal Hamam
Research Centre for Agricultural Policies and Bioeconomy, CREA
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/bae-19651

Published 2026-05-19

Keywords

  • insect-based food,
  • neophobia,
  • packaging,
  • colour,
  • discrete choice experiment

How to Cite

Di Vita, G., Hamam, M., Spina, D., Califano, G., Morreale, V., D’Amico, M., & Zanchini, R. (2026). From creepy to crispy: species-specific acceptance of insect flours in crackers through a discrete choice experiment on young consumer preferences. Bio-Based and Applied Economics. https://doi.org/10.36253/bae-19651

Copyright (c) 2023 Giuseppe Di Vita, Manal Hamam, Daniela Spina, Giovanbattista Califano, Vincenzo Morreale, Mario D’Amico, Raffaele Zanchini

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

This study aims to investigate Italian consumers’ interest and their willingness to pay (WTP) for crackers containing Tenebrio and cricket flour. Through a discrete choice experiment this study estimated consumers’ utility and WTP of a stratified sample of young consumers for different combinations of extrinsic attributes—such as flour type, extrinsic characteristics, and packaging— while incorporating psychometric scales to capture trade-offs across product alternatives. Results indicate that insect flours generate lower utility compared to wheat flour. However, when socio-demographic and psychological interactions are considered, substantial variability in WTP emerges. This heterogeneity is largely driven by gender, age, and food neophobia. For cricket flour, female respondents and late Millennials exhibit lower WTP, whereas mealworm flour acceptance is more strongly influenced by psychometric traits, with older and more neophobic consumers showing greater resistance. Overall, acceptance declines with age and varies within generational cohorts, highlighting the importance of intra-generational differences in shaping consumer responses.

PDF(Just Accepted)
Supplementary materials

References

  1. Akullo, J., Nakimbugwe, D., Obaa, B.B., Okwee-Acai, J., Agea, J.G. (2018). Development and quality evaluation of crackers enriched with edible insects. International Food Research Journal, 25(4): 1592–1599.
  2. Alemu, M.H., Olsen, S.B. (2019). Linking consumers’ food choice motives to their preferences for insect-based food products: An application of integrated choice and latent variable model in an African context. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 70(1): 241–258.
  3. Alqahtani, N.S., Alanazi, S., Almuhayd, R., Alanazi, E., Alanazi, J. (2025). Generational differences in dietary behaviours: a cross-sectional study of generations X, Y, and Z. F1000Research, 14:858. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.167810.1
  4. Arama, D., Kinyuru, J., Kiage-Mokua, B., Ochieng, B.O., Tanga, C.M. (2023). Unraveling the physicochemical attributes of three cricket (Gryllus bimaculatus)-enriched biscuit products and implications on consumers’ preference and willingness to pay. LWT – Food Science and Technology, 185: 115171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2023.115171
  5. Ardoin, R., Prinyawiwatkul, W. (2020). Product appropriateness, willingness to try and perceived risks of foods containing insect protein powder: A survey of US consumers. International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 55(9): 3215–3226. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.14612
  6. Bae, Y., Choi, J. (2021). Consumer acceptance of edible insect foods: An application of the extended theory of planned behavior. Nutrition Research and Practice, 15(1): 122–135. https://doi.org/10.4162/nrp.2021.15.1.122
  7. Berggren, Å., Jansson, A., Low, M. (2019). Approaching ecological sustainability in the emerging insects-as-food industry. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 34(2): 132–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2018.11.005
  8. Bonaiuto, F., De Dominicis, S., Ganucci Cancellieri, U., Crano, W.D., Ma, J., Bonaiuto, M. (2021). Italian food? Sounds good! Made in Italy and Italian sounding effects on food products’ assessment by consumers. Frontiers in Psychology, 12: 581492. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.581492
  9. Brazil, N., Candipan, J. (2025). Millennials as a demographic bridge to diversity? Segregation and diversity of young adult neighborhoods. Population Research and Policy Review, 44(3):32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-025-09954-2
  10. Califano, G., Spence, C. (2024). Consumer preference and willingness to pay for 3D-printed chocolates: A discrete choice experiment. Future Foods, 9: 100378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fufo.2024.100378
  11. Caparros Megido, R., Sablon, L., Geuens, M., Brostaux, Y., Alabi, T., Blecker, C., Francis, F. (2014). Edible insects acceptance by Belgian consumers: Promising attitude for entomophagy development. Journal of Sensory Studies, 29(1): 14–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/joss.12077
  12. Carlsson, F., Martinsson, P. (2003). Design techniques for stated preference methods in health economics. Health Economics, 12(4): 281–294. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.729
  13. Castro-Alija, M.J., Zolfaghari, G., Fernandez, C.G., Álvarez, C., Ramón-Carreira, L.C., Jiménez, J.M., Albertos, I. (2024). Elderly resistance vs. youthful acceptance: A study on insect consumption across age groups. Foods, 13(16): 2641. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13162641
  14. Cerroni, S., Watson, V., Macdiarmid, J.I. (2019). Consumers’ rationality and home-grown values for healthy and environmentally sustainable food. Bio-Based Applied Economics, 8(2):101-132. https://doi.org/10.13128/bae-8927
  15. Charbonnier, L., Van Der Laan, L.N., Viergever, M.A., Smeets, P.A. (2015). Functional MRI of challenging food choices: forced choice between equally liked high-and low-calorie foods in the absence of hunger. PLoS One, 10(7):e0131727. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131727
  16. Cicatiello, C., De Rosa, B., Franco, S., Lacetera, N. (2016). Consumer approach to insects as food: Barriers and potential for consumption in Italy. British Food Journal, 118(9): 2271–2286. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-01-2016-0015
  17. Codină, G.G., Voinea, A., Dabija, A. (2021). Strategies for reducing sodium intake in bakery products: A review. Applied Sciences, 11(7): 3093. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11073093
  18. Dagevos, H. (2021). A literature review of consumer research on edible insects: recent evidence and new vistas from 2019 studies. Journal of Insects as Food and Feed, 7(3): 249-260. https://doi.org/10.3920/JIFF2020.0052
  19. De Pascale, A., Lanfranchi, M., Zanchini, R., Giannetto, C., D’Amico, M., Di Vita, G. (2024). Craft beer preferences among digitarians in Italy. International Journal of Wine Business Research, 36(2):207-229. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWBR-04-2023-0022
  20. De Salvo, M., Scarpa, R., Capitello, R., Begalli, D. (2020). Multi-country stated preferences choice analysis for fresh tomatoes. Bio-based and Applied Economics, 9(3): 241-262. https://doi.org/10.13128/bae-7928
  21. Di Santo, N., Califano, G., Sisto, R., Caracciolo, F., Pilone, V. (2024). Are university students really hungry for sustainability? A choice experiment on new food products from circular economy. Agricultural and Food Economics, 12(1):21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40100-024-00315-9
  22. Di Vita, G., D’Amico, M., Lombardi, A., Pecorino, B. (2016). Evaluating trends of low sodium content in food: The willingness to pay for salt-reduced bread. Agricultural Economics Review, 17(2): 82–99.
  23. Di Vita, G., Zanchini, R., De Cianni, R., Pippinato, L., Mancuso, T., Brun, F. (2024a). Sustainable livestock farming in the European Union: A study on beef farms in nuts 2 regions. Sustainability, 16(3):1098. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031098
  24. Di Vita, G., Zanchini, R., Spina, D., Vastola, A., D’Amico, M., Caracciolo, F. (2024b). Simply red? The effects of distinct colours and sustainable production methods on consumers’ preferences for healthier sweet peppers. Heliyon, 10(8): e28661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28661
  25. Djouadi, A., Sales, J.R., Carvalho, M.O., Raymundo, A. (2022). Development of healthy protein-rich crackers using Tenebrio molitor flour. Foods, 11(5): 702. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11050702
  26. Farkas, V.I., Máté, M., Takács, K., Jánosi, A. (2025). The house cricket (Acheta domesticus Linnaeus) in food industry: Farming, technological challenges, and sustainability considerations. Applied Sciences, 15(17): 9494. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15179494
  27. Fischer, A.R., Steenbekkers, L.P.A. (2018). All insects are equal, but some insects are more equal than others. British food journal, 120(4): 852-863. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-05-2017-0267
  28. García-Rodríguez, F.J., Gutiérrez-Taño, D., Ruiz-Rosa, I., Baute-Díaz, N. (2022). New models for collaborative consumption: The role of consumer attitudes among millennials. Sage Open, 12(4), 21582440221140389. https://doi.org/10.1177/215824402211403
  29. Ghali-Zinoubi, Z. (2022). Examining drivers of environmentally conscious consumer behavior: Theory of planned behavior extended with cultural factors. Sustainability, 14(13): 8072. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14138072
  30. Gmuer, A., Guth, J.N., Hartmann, C., Siegrist, M. (2016). Effects of the degree of processing of insect ingredients in snacks on expected emotional experiences and willingness to eat. Food Quality and Preference, 54: 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.07.003
  31. Guillot-Soulez, C., Soulez, S. (2014). On the heterogeneity of Generation Y job preferences. Employee Relations, 36(4):319-332. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-07-2013-0073
  32. Güney, O.I., Giraldo, L. (2020). Consumers’ attitudes and willingness to pay for organic eggs: A discrete choice experiment study in Turkey. British Food Journal, 122(2): 678–692. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-04-2019-0297
  33. Hamam, M., D’Amico, M., Di Vita, G. (2024). Advances in the insect industry within a circular bioeconomy context: A research agenda. Environmental Sciences Europe, 36(1): 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-024-00861-5
  34. Hamam, M., Lähteenmäki, L., Spina, D., Pergamo, R., D’Amico, M., Di Vita, G. (2025). Exploring the buzz: The mediating role of entomophagy attitudes among younger generations towards pork from pigs fed with insect flour. Food Quality and Preference, 127: 105469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105469
  35. Hartmann, C., Shi, J., Giusto, A., Siegrist, M. (2015). The psychology of eating insects: A cross-cultural comparison between Germany and China. Food Quality and Preference, 44: 148–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.04.013
  36. Hartmann, C., Siegrist, M. (2016). Becoming an insectivore: Results of an experiment. Food Quality and Preference, 51: 118–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.03.003
  37. Hensher, D.A., Rose, J.M., Greene, W.H. (2015). Applied Choice Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  38. Hurst, K.E., Hewson, L., Fisk, I.D. (2022). Sensory perception and consumer acceptance of commercial and salt-reduced potato crisps formulated using salt reduction design rules. Food Research International, 155: 111022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111022
  39. Iannuzzi, E., Sisto, R., Nigro, C. (2019). The willingness to consume insect-based food: An empirical research on Italian consumers. Agricultural Economics – Czech, 65(10): 454–462. https://doi.org/10.17221/87/2019-AGRICECON
  40. ISTAT, (2025).
  41. Jager, J., Putnick, D.L., Bornstein, M.H. (2017). More than just convenient: The scientific merits of homogeneous convenience samples. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 82(2): 13–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/mono.12296
  42. Khalil, R., Baba, Y., Kallas, Z., Haddarah, A., Pujolà, M. (2025). Preferences of consumers engaged in sports towards high-protein snacks with cricket flour and carob: Determinant factors and hedonic evaluation. Journal of Insects as Food and Feed, 11(12): 2131-2145. https://doi.org/10.1163/23524588-00001210
  43. Kim, M.A., Yoo, H.J., Ares, G., Lee, H.S. (2020). Effect of thinking style and consumption purpose on food choice: A case study with yogurt using a discrete choice experiment and eye-tracking. Food Quality and Preference, 86: 104025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.104025
  44. Kuff, R.F., Cheung, T.L., Quevedo-Silva, F., Giordani, A.M. (2023). The country-of-origin label impact on intention to consume insect-based food. Appetite, 180: 106355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2022.106355
  45. La Barbera, F., Verneau, F., Amato, M., Grunert, K. (2018). Understanding Westerners’ disgust for the eating of insects: The role of food neophobia and implicit associations. Food Quality and Preference, 64:120–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.10.002
  46. Lancaster, K.J. (1966). A new approach to consumer theory. Journal of Political Economy, 74(2): 132–157.
  47. Lanfranchi, M., Calabrò, G., De Pascale, A., Fazio, A., Giannetto, C. (2016). Household food waste and eating behavior: empirical survey. British Food Journal, 118(12):3059-3072. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-01-2016-0001
  48. Laureati, M., Proserpio, C., Jucker, C., Savoldelli, S. (2016). New sustainable protein sources: Consumers’ willingness to adopt insects as feed and food. Italian Journal of Food Science, 28(4).
  49. Liu, Y., Kim, S. (2024). Exploring insect-based food consumption experiences and their consequences in a mature entomophagous community. British Food Journal, 126(7): 2686-2713. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-09-2023-0800
  50. Lombardi, A., Vecchio, R., Borrello, M., Caracciolo, F., Cembalo, L. (2019). Willingness to pay for insect-based food: The role of information and carrier. Food Quality and Preference, 72:177–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2018.10.001
  51. Mancini, S., Moruzzo, R., Riccioli, F., Paci, G. (2019). European consumers’ readiness to adopt insects as food: A review. Food Research International, 122: 661–678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2019.01.041
  52. Manipis, K., Mulhern, B., Haywood, P., Viney, R., Goodall, S. (2023). Estimating the willingness-to-pay to avoid the consequences of foodborne illnesses: a discrete choice experiment. The European Journal of Health Economics, 24(5):831-852. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-022-01512-3
  53. Mariani, A., & Annunziata, A. (2025). Young consumers’ intention to consume innovative food products: the case of alternative proteins. Sustainability, 17(13):6116. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17136116
  54. Marshall, D., Stuart, M., Bell, R. (2006). Examining the relationship between product package colour and product selection in preschoolers. Food Quality and Preference, 17(7–8): 615–621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2006.05.007
  55. McFadden, D. (2001). Economic choices. American Economic Review, 91(3): 351–378. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.3.351
  56. Megido, R.C., Gierts, C., Blecker, C., Brostaux, Y., Haubruge, É., Alabi, T., Francis, F. (2016). Consumer acceptance of insect-based alternative meat products in Western countries. Food Quality and Preference, 52: 237–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.05.004
  57. Michel, P., Begho, T. (2023). Paying for sustainable food choices: The role of environmental considerations in consumer valuation of insect-based foods. Food Quality and Preference, 106. Doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.104816
  58. Mitterer-Daltoé, M.L., Baroni, K.C., Oldoni, T.C., Kaushik, N., Choudhary, S., Bilck, A.P. (2024). Biodegradable packaging with natural colorants added to increase the consumption of eco-friendly packaging. Journal of Cleaner Production, 477: 143894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143894
  59. Moruzzo, R., Riccioli, F., Espinosa Diaz, S., Secci, C., Poli, G., Mancini, S. (2021). Mealworm (Tenebrio molitor): Potential and challenges to promote circular economy. Animals, 11(9): 2568. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11092568
  60. Naranjo-Guevara, N., Stroh, B., Floto-Stammen, S. (2023). Packaging communication as a tool to reduce disgust with insect-based foods: Effect of informative and visual elements. Foods, 12(19): 3606. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12193606
  61. Nazzaro, C., Stanco, M., Uliano, A., Marotta, G. (2024). Consumers’ acceptance and willingness to pay for enriched foods: Evidence from a choice experiment in Italy. Future Foods, 10: 100405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fufo.2024.100405
  62. Orkusz, A., Dymińska, L., Banaś, K., Harasym, J. (2023). Chemical and nutritional fat profile of Acheta domesticus, Gryllus bimaculatus, Tenebrio molitor and Rhynchophorus ferrugineus. Foods, 13(1): 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13010032
  63. Pliner, P., Hobden, K. (1992). Development of a scale to measure the trait of food neophobia in humans. Appetite, 19(2): 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/0195-6663(92)90014-W
  64. Puteri, B., Oehlmann, M., Jahnke, B. (2024). Who has an appetite for insects? Identifying segments of early adopters of insect-based food and their product attribute preferences. Food Research International, 196: 114994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2024.114994
  65. Ren, L., Yang, F., Gu, C. (2023). A study of the purchase intention of insect protein food as alternative foods for fitness proteins. Heliyon, 9(9). 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20239.
  66. Roccatello, R., Cerroni, S., Dabbou, S. (2024). Sustainability of insect-based feed and consumer willingness to pay for novel food: A stated preference study. Future Foods, 9:100336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fufo.2024.100336
  67. Schäufele, I., Barrera Albores, E., Hamm, U. (2019). The role of species for the acceptance of edible insects: Evidence from a consumer survey. British Food Journal, 121(9): 2190–2204. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-01-2019-0017
  68. Skouw, S., Chow, C.Y., Sørensen, H., Bech, A.C., Laureati, M., Olsen, A., Bredie, W.L. (2023). A forced-choice pictographic method to measure food texture preferences among schoolchildren. Food Quality and Preference, 105: 104783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2022.104783
  69. Sogari, G., Menozzi, D., Mora, C. (2019). The food neophobia scale and young adults’ intention to eat insect products. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 43(1): 68–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12485
  70. Sogari, G., Riccioli, F., Moruzzo, R., Menozzi, D., Sosa, D.A.T., Li, J., Mancini, S. (2023). Engaging in entomophagy: The role of food neophobia and disgust between insect and non-insect eaters. Food Quality and Preference, 104: 104764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2022.104764
  71. Sogari, G., Wongprawmas, R., Andreani, G., Lefebvre, M., Pellegrini, N., Gómez, M. I., Mora, C., Menozzi, D. (2024). Intention and behavior toward eating whole grain pasta on a college dining campus: Theory of Planned Behavior and message framing. Bio-based and Applied Economics, 13(3): 301-316. https://doi.org/10.36253/bae-15456
  72. Spada, E., De Cianni, R., Di Vita, G., Mancuso, T. (2024). Balancing freshness and sustainability: Charting a course for meat industry innovation and consumer acceptance. Foods, 13(7): 1092. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13071092
  73. Spina, D., Hamam, M., Morreale, V., La Via, G., Di Vita, G. (2026). Beliefs versus environmental awareness: an extension of the theory of planned behavior to explore young consumers’ intentions toward insect flour-based pasta. Food Quality and Preference, 105896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2026.105896
  74. Sucapane, D., Roux, C., Sobol, K. (2021). Exploring how product descriptors and packaging colors impact consumers’ perceptions of plant-based meat alternative products. Appetite, 167: 105590.
  75. Tan, H.S.G., Fischer, A.R., van Trijp, H.C., Stieger, M. (2016). Tasty but nasty? Exploring the role of sensory-liking and food appropriateness in the willingness to eat unusual novel foods like insects. Food Quality and Preference, 48: 293–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.11.001
  76. van Huis, A. (2022). Edible insects: Challenges and prospects. Entomological Research, 52(4): 161–177.
  77. van Huis, A., Oonincx, D.G.A.B. (2017). The environmental sustainability of insects as food and feed: A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 37(5): 43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-017-0452-8
  78. Verbeke, W. (2015). Profiling consumers who are ready to adopt insects as a meat substitute in a Western society. Food Quality and Preference, 39: 147–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.07.008
  79. Wassmann, B., Siegrist, M., Hartmann, C. (2021). Correlates of the willingness to consume insects: a meta-analysis. Journal of Insects as Food and Feed, 7(5): 909-922. https://doi.org/10.3920/JIFF2020.0130
  80. Wilkinson, K., Muhlhausler, B., Motley, C., Crump, A., Bray, H., Ankeny, R. (2018). Australian consumers’ awareness and acceptance of insects as food. Insects, 9(2):44. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects9020044
  81. Zanchini, R., Blanc, S., Theodorakis, S., Di Vita, G., Merlino, V. M., Brun, F., Massaglia, S. (2025). How European consumers value wine credence attributes: a cross-country comparison of France, Greece and Italy. Wine Economics and Policy, 14(1):3-15. https://doi.org/10.36253/wep-15235