Studi Slavistici XXI (2024) 1
Blocco tematico

Italian Studies on Slavic Verbal Aspect

PDF (Italian) Supplementary File
  • Luisa Ruvoletto,
  • Svetlana Slavkova
Luisa Ruvoletto
Ca’ Foscari University of Venice
Bio
Svetlana Slavkova
University of Bologna
Bio
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/Studi_Slavis-15853

Published 2024-07-11

How to Cite

Ruvoletto, L., & Slavkova, S. (2024). Italian Studies on Slavic Verbal Aspect. Studi Slavistici, 21(1), 133–145. https://doi.org/10.36253/Studi_Slavis-15853

Copyright (c) 2024 Luisa Ruvoletto, Svetlana Slavkova

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

The aim of this article is to present the Italian studies on Slavic verbal aspect published between the years 1990-2020. Issues analyzed in this survey include (but are not limited to) the meanings of the perfective and imperfective aspects, actionality, the role of prefixes and suffixes in the grammaticalization of aspect, the interaction between aspect and other verbal categories, and the pragmatic uses of aspect. Moreover, the diachronic and typological perspectives are considered as well as the acquisitional perspective. Verbal aspect is explored in a group of Slavic languages, including Russian, Czech, Polish, Bulgarian, Serbian, Croatian, Slovenian, and Resian. It is argued that further research on verbal aspect in other Slavic languages can shed a new light on this issue.
PDF (Italian) Supplementary File

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. Benacchio 2010: R. Benacchio, Vid i kategorija vežlivosti v slavjanskom imperative. Sravnitel’nyj analiz, München 2010 (= Slavistische Beitrage, 472).
  2. Benacchio, Steenwijk 2017: R. Benacchio, J.J. Steenwijk, Grammatikalizacija glagol’nogo vida v rez’janskom dialekte: iskonno slavjanskaja i romanskaja leksika, v: R. Benacchio, A. Muro, S. Slavkova (eds.), The role of prefixes in the formation of aspectuality. Issues of grammaticalization, Firenze 2017 (= Biblioteca di Studi Slavistici, 39), pp. 23-39.
  3. Esvan 2007b: F. Esvan, Vidová morfologie českého slovesa, Studie z korpusové lingvistiky, v, Praha 2007.
  4. Esvan 2016c: F. Esvan, Tempo e aspetto nella narrazione in ceco in una prospettiva diacronica, in: V. Benigni, L. Gebert, J. Nikolaeva (a cura di), Le lingue slave tra struttura e uso, Firenze 2016, pp. 93-110.
  5. Fici Giusti 1997b: F. Fici Giusti, Vidovye otnošenija v buduščem vremeni (v russkom i drugich slavjanskich jazykach), v: Trudy aspektologičeskogo seminara filologičeskogo fakul’teta MGU im. M.V Lomonosova, ii, Moskva 1997, pp. 115-127.
  6. Gebert 2014a: L. Gebert, Scelta aspettuale “oggettiva” e “soggettiva” e l’imperfettivo fattivo, in: A. Bonola, P. Cotta Ramusino, L. Goletiani (a cura di), Studi italiani di linguistica slava. Strutture, uso e acquisizione, Firenze 2014, pp. 319-333.
  7. Gebert 2020: L. Gebert, Prefixed Verbs in po- in Polish as an Expression of a Negative, Positive and Distributive Intensity, “Studi Slavistici”, xvii, 2020, 2, pp. 99-116.
  8. Tomelleri 2008: V. S. Tomelleri, L’aspetto verbale slavo tra tipologia e diacronia, in: A. Alberti, S. Garzonio, N. Marcialis (a cura di), Contributi italiani al xiv Congresso internazionale degli slavisti, Ohrid, 10-16 settembre 2008, Firenze 2008, pp. 11-61.