No. 28 (2024): Public works, common value
Research and Experimentation

Unfinished works in Sardinia: deepening knowledge of in between public buildings

PDF
  • Antonello Monsù Scolaro
Antonello Monsù Scolaro
Dipartimento di Architettura, Design ed Urbanistica, Università di Sassari
Bio
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/techne-15879

Published 2024-10-29

Keywords

  • Unfinished public works,
  • Common good,
  • Technical Obsolescence,
  • Re-design,
  • Sustainability

How to Cite

Monsù Scolaro A. (2024). Unfinished works in Sardinia: deepening knowledge of in between public buildings. TECHNE - Journal of Technology for Architecture and Environment, (28), 242–250. https://doi.org/10.36253/techne-15879

Copyright (c) 2024 antonello monsù scolaro

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

Unfinished public works question us about their possible future, while contradicting every dimension of sustainability: social, economic, and environmental, just like abandoned building stock. The proposed methodology investigates unfinished works beyond the mere economic data of the national registry by helping to define a ranking of interventions according to social utility, state of degradation and obsolescence resulting from non-use and non-completion. The ranking serves as the initial step towards implementations concerning the related costs and environmental impacts. The goal is to make the most of material and economic resources currently tied up in unfinished public works, and to give them back to society as valuable common goods.

PDF

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Alterazioni Video, Fosbury Architecture (2018), Incompiuto. La nascita di uno stile/The birth of a style, Humboldt, Milano.
  2. Augé, M. (2004), Rovine e macerie. Il senso del tempo, A. Serafini, A., Bollati Boringhieri, Torino.
  3. Berger, A. (2007), Drosscape: Wasting Land Urban America, Princeton Architectural Press, New York.
  4. Cantone, R. and Caringella, F. (2017), La corruzione spuzza, Mondadori Editore, Milano.
  5. Crespi, L. (2018), Manifesto del design del non-finito, Postmedia Books, Milano.
  6. Crespi, L. (2023), Design del non-finito. L’interior design nella rigenerazione degli «avanzi», Postmedia books, Milano.
  7. Firrone, T. (2017), Prologo alla Progettazione Ambientale: l’impatto dell’attività edilizia sull’equilibrio ecosistemico del pianeta, Aracne, Roma.
  8. Forte, F. (2019), “Qualità architettonica e valutazione: una lettura nel quadro europeo”, Valori e valutazione, Vol. 23, pp. 37-45. Available at: https://siev.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/23_07-_-FORTE.pdf.
  9. Fraschili, A. (2015), Grandi e Inutili, Einaudi, Torino.
  10. Fregonara, E. and Coscia, C. (2019), “Analisi Multi Criteria, approcci Life Cycle e Delphi Method: una proposta metodologica per valutare scenari di progetto”, Valori e valutazioni, Vol. 23, pp. 107-117. Available at: https://siev.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/23_13-_-FREGONARA-COSCIA.pdf (Accessed on 20/03/2024).
  11. Giancotti, A. (2018), Incompiute, o dei ruderi della contemporaneità, Quodlibet, Macerata.
  12. Gilardoni, A., Clerici, S. and Garzarella, A. (2018), Dai Costi del Non Fare al fare meglio. Valutazione e digitalizzazione delle infrastrutture per rilanciare gli investimenti, Agici Publishing.
  13. Licata, G. (2014), Maifinito, Quodlibet Studio, Macerata.
  14. Purini, F. (2014), Comporre l’architettura, Laterza, Bari.
  15. Raiden, A. and King A. (2023), Social Value in Practice, Routledge, London.
  16. Settis, S. (2010), Paesaggio Costituzione cemento. La battaglia per l’ambiente contro il degrado civile, Einaudi, Torino.
  17. Treu, T (2023), “PNRR, politiche pubbliche e partecipazione sociale”, LavoroDirittiEuropa, Vol. 1, pp.2-23. Available at: https://www.lavorodirittieuropa.it/images/treu.pdf (Accessed on 15/03/2024).