No. 30 (2025): TECHNOLOGICAL TRANSFER AND NEW RESEARCH HORIZON. Connecting university, industry and communities to innovate and transform society
Research and Experimentation

Code4Risk: co-design as a knowledge-sharing practice for the resilient city

PDF
  • Maria Vittoria Arnetoli,
  • Marina Block,
  • Anna Elisa Bandecchi,
  • Giulia Maraviglia
Maria Vittoria Arnetoli
Dipartimento di Architettura, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Italia
Marina Block
Dipartimento di Architettura, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Italia
Anna Elisa Bandecchi
Centro per la Protezione Civile, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Italia
Giulia Maraviglia
Cooperativa e Impresa Sociale Sociolab, Firenze, Italia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/techne-17407

Published 2025-11-07

Keywords

  • Public engagement,
  • Citizen design science,
  • Multi-actor network,
  • Scenario co-construction,
  • Multi-risk approach

How to Cite

Arnetoli, M. V., Block, M., Bandecchi, A. E., & Maraviglia, G. (2025). Code4Risk: co-design as a knowledge-sharing practice for the resilient city. TECHNE - Journal of Technology for Architecture and Environment, (30), 161–174. https://doi.org/10.36253/techne-17407

Copyright (c) 2025 Maria Vittoria Arnetoli, Marina Block, Elisa Bandecchi, Giulia Maraviglia

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

The climate crisis and hydrogeological fragilities make it necessary to raise public awareness and empower local administrations on the issues of natural hazards and urban resilience. With the aim of triggering synergies between circular and biophilic city regeneration and emergency prevention, the public engagement project ‘Code4Risk’ uses co-design as an interdisciplinary and multi-actor practice embedded in the Third Mission objectives. The article presents the first phase of the project, a workshop developed in sessions of knowledge sharing and co-design through thematic tables that investigated the relationships between urban spaces and multi-hazard conditions, envisioning transformative scenarios aimed at disaster resilience.

PDF

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Abastante, F., Lami, I.M., Lombradi, P. and Toniolo, J. (2019), “District energy choices: more than a monetary problem. A SDSS approach to define urban energy scenarios”, Valori e Valutazioni, Vol. 22, pp. 109-120. Available at: https://siev.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/22_08-ABASTANTE-LAMI_eng.pdf (Accessed on 27/02/2025).
  2. Abastante, F. (2016), “Multicriteria decision methodologies supporting decision processes: empirical examples”, Geoingegneria ambientale e mineraria, vol. 149, n.3, pp. 5-18. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318701815_Multicriteria_decision_methodologies_supporting_decision_processes_Empirical_examples (Accessed on 26/02/2025).
  3. ASVIS (2022), Le buone pratiche dei territori. I territori e gli Obiettivi di sviluppo sostenibile. Available at: https://asvis.it/public/asvis2/files/Pubblicazioni/ASviS_241209Buone_Pratiche_Territoriali_2023.pdf (Accessed on 27/02/2025).
  4. André, K., Järnberg, L. and Swarling, Å.G. (2020), Co-designing climate services to support adaptation to natural hazard: Two case studies from Sweden. Report. Stockholm Environment Institute. Available at: https://weadapt.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/co-designing-climate-services-two-swedish-case-studies.pdf (Accessed on 27/02/2025).
  5. Burdett, R. (2015), “Infrastrutture, spazio pubblico ed edilizia di alta qualità nei processi di rigenerazione urbana a Londra”, TECHNE – Journal of Technology for Architecture and Environment, No. 10, pp. 19-23. Available at: https://oaj.fupress.net/index.php/techne/article/download/4460/4460/4425 (Accessed on 27/02/2025).
  6. Carayannis, E. G. and Campbell, D. F. J. (2012), Mode 3 knowledge production in quadruple helix innovation systems, Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2062-0
  7. Claudi de Saint Mihiel, A. (2019), “La Terza Missione tra dimensione innovativa e funzione di public engagement”, TECHNE – Journal of Technology for Architecture and Environment, n. 18, pp. 341–344. Available at: https://doi.org/10.13128/techne-7550 (Accessed on 27/02/2025).
  8. Cravero, S. (2020), “Methods, strategies and tools to improve citizens’ engagement in the smart cities’ context: A Serious Games classification”, Valori e Valutazioni, No. 24, pp. 45-60. Available at: https://siev.org/5-24-2020/ (Accessed: 05/03/2025).
  9. Fattinnanzi, E. (2018), “La qualità della città. Il ruolo della valutazione nelle metodologie di redazione di piani e progetti”, Valori e Valutazioni, n. 20, pp. 3-12. Available at: https://siev.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/20_02_Fattinnanzi.pdf (Accessed on 26/02/2025).
  10. Forsyth, T. (2013), “Community‐based adaptation: a review of past and future challenges”, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, Vol. 4(5), pp. 439-446. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.231 (Accessed on 26/02/2025). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.231
  11. Fraschini, F., Franciosi, C., Giambelli, M., Gioia, A. and Morando, M. (2024), “Approcci Basati sulla Comunità (ABC) per definire misure e strategie di adattamento al cambiamento climatico e di riduzione del rischio da disastri: un’analisi di letteratura grigia”, in Finardi, U. (Ed.). Cambiamento climatico e sostenibilità: una visione multidisciplinare, Quaderni IRCrES 21. CNR-IRCrES, pp. 123-140. Available at: https://doi.org/10.23760/2499-6661.2024.21.06 (Accessed on 26/02/2025).
  12. Guazzo, G. (2004), “Progettare la mutevole immensità della vita”, in Perriccioli M. (Ed.), Incontri dell’Annunziata – Giornate di studio sull’innovazione tecnologica – IV edizione – Atti di convegno – Facoltà di Architettura di Ascoli Piceno, 3-4 luglio 2002, Edizioni Simple, Macerata pp.7-10.
  13. Irwin, A. (1995), Citizen science: A study of people, expertise, and sustainable development, Routledge.
  14. Losasso, M. (2021), “La ricerca. Mario Losasso intervista Roberto Pagani”, in Romano, R., Setola, N. and Marzi, L. (Eds.). La Tecnologia dell’Architettura in una società che cambia. DIDALABS, Firenze, pp.143-157. Available at: https://issuu.com/dida-unifi/docs/la_tecnologia_dell_architettura_in_una_societa_che/s/12428144 (Accessed on 15/03/2025)
  15. Mancuso, S. (2023), Fitopolis. La città vivente. Laterza Edizioni, Bari.
  16. Mueller, J., Lu, H., Chirkin, A., Klein, B. and Schmitt, G. (2018), “Citizen Design Science: A strategy for crowd-creative urban design”, Cities, Vol. 72, pp. 181-188. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.08.018 (Accessed on 26/02/2025). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.08.018