Vol. 12 No. 2 (2023)
Original Research Article

The competitiveness of Romagna wineries. An exploratory analysis of the impact of different strategic approaches on business performance

Lorenzo Bandieri
Department of agro-food sciences and technologies, University of Bologna, Via Zamboni, 33 - 40126 Bologna
Alessandra Castellini
Department of agro-food sciences and technologies, University of Bologna, Via Zamboni, 33 - 40126 Bologna

Published 2023-12-31

Keywords

  • Competitive advantage,
  • Strategic orientation,
  • Resource-based theory,
  • Romagna wineries

How to Cite

Bandieri, L., & Castellini, A. (2023). The competitiveness of Romagna wineries. An exploratory analysis of the impact of different strategic approaches on business performance. Wine Economics and Policy, 12(2), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.36253/wep-12025

Abstract

This paper proposes an exploratory study of the competitiveness of Romagna wineries. A double approach has been adopted to analyse it, as both Porter’s Theory of Competitive Advantage and Barney’s Resource-based Theory have been considered. The final purposes are to uncover which categories of resources and capabilities are related to firm performance and to investigate the main strategic orientations of the most successful Romagna wineries. To conduct the research, an online questionnaire was sent to 115 wineries located in the Romagna territory, achieving a response rate of about 24.35%. According to the preliminary results, it has been found that the most successful wineries in this area do not follow a cost leadership strategy, while they perform a differentiation strategy. These firms put a lot of effort into building a reputation in the market. On the other hand, managerial and technological capabilities seem to be not positively related to firm performance, while marketing capabilities exert a stronger impact. This study would give an input to the strategic and managerial studies in the wine business sector, and adopt an innovative theoretical approach in the analysis of competitive advantage. Moreover, this work focuses on the Romagna territory, fulfilling the need for research that considers the local wine industry and its competitiveness, to open the way to further studies.

References

  1. Amadieu, P., & Viviani, J.-L. (2010). Intangible effort and performance: the case of the French wine industry. Agribusiness, 26(2), 280–306. https://doi.org/10.1002/agr DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.20226
  2. Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
  3. Barney, J. B., Ketchen, D. J., & Wright, M. (2011). The future of resource-based theory: Revitalization or decline? Journal of Management, 37(5), 1299–1315. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310391805 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310391805
  4. Baruch, Y., & Holtom, B. C. (2008). Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research. Human Relations, 61(8), 1139–1160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726708094863 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726708094863
  5. Coff, R., & Kryscynski, D. (2011). Drilling for micro-foundations of human capital-based competitive advantages. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1429–1443. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310397772 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310397772
  6. Day, G. S. (1994). The capabilities of market-driven organisation. Journal of Marketing, 58(4), 37–52. Retrieved from https://tutcat.linneanet.fi/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?v2=1&ti=1,1&SEQ=20151206185005&SC=Title&SA=Market driven strategy: processes for creating value: with a new introduction /&PID=UKWgm-5lx0VVZAsxWDCvvPcVjM4z&SID=4%5Cnftp://ftp.repec.org/opt/ReDIF/RePEc/sy DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299405800404
  7. Dess, G. G., & Davis, P. S. (1984). Porter’s (1980) Generic Strategies as Determinants of Strategic Group Membership and Organizational Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 27(3), 467–488. https://doi.org/10.5465/256040 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/256040
  8. Di Toma, P., Lazzini, A., & Montanari, S. (2012). Entrepreneurial strategies and corporate governance: experiences from the Italian wine industry. Corporate Board: Role, Duties & Composition, 8(2), 44–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22495/cbv8i2art4
  9. Duarte Alonso, A., & Bressan, A. (2016). A resource-based view of the firm and micro and small Italian wine firms. International Journal of Wine Business Research, 28(4), 349–368. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWBR-12-2015-0051 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWBR-12-2015-0051
  10. Ferrer Lorenzo, J. R., Maza Rubio, M. T., & Abella Garcés, S. (2018). The competitive advantage in business, capabilities and strategy. What general performance factors are found in the Spanish wine industry? Wine Economics and Policy, 7(2), 94–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wep.2018.04.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wep.2018.04.001
  11. Galati, A., Tulone, A., Tinervia, S., & Crescimanno, M. (2019). The role of internal resources in the competitive positioning of Sicilian wine cooperatives. International Journal of Globalisation and Small Business, 10(4), 324–337. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijgsb.2019.103582 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJGSB.2019.103582
  12. Galletto, L., & Barisan, L. (2019). Carbon Footprint as a Lever for Sustained Competitive Strategy in Developing a Smart Oenology: Evidence from an Exploratory Study in Italy. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11051483 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11051483
  13. Hooley, G. J., Greenley, G. E., Cadogan, J. W., & Fahy, J. (2005). The performance impact of marketing resources. Journal of Business Research, 58(1 SPEC.ISS), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(03)00109-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(03)00109-7
  14. ISMEA. (2020a). Scambi con l’estero. La bilancia agroalimentare nazionale nel 2019.
  15. ISMEA. (2020b). Scheda di settore: Vino.
  16. Julien, P. A. (1995). New technologies and technological information in small businesses. Journal of Business Venturing, 10(6), 459–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(95)00084-L DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(95)00084-L
  17. Kelliher, F., & Reinl, L. (2009). A resource-based view of micro-firm management practice. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 16(3), 521–532. https://doi.org/10.1108/14626000910977206 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14626000910977206
  18. Kraaijenbrink, J., Spender, J. C., & Groen, A. J. (2010). The Resource-based view: A review and assessment of its critiques. Journal of Management, 36(1), 349–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309350775 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309350775
  19. Martinez-Canas, R., & Ruiz-Palomino, P. (2013). A resource-based view of wine quality in the Spanish region of Castilla-La Mancha. Actual Problems of Economics, 145(7), 378–387.
  20. Mu, J. (2015). Marketing capability, organizational adaptation and new product development performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 49, 151–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.05.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.05.003
  21. Nathans, L. L., Oswald, F. L., & Nimon, K. (2012). Interpreting multiple linear regression: A guidebook of variable importance. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 17(9), 1–19.
  22. Neill, S. (2014). Technology and Marketing Capabilities in a Developing Economic Context: Assessing the Resource-Based View within a Boundary Condition. International Journal of Business and Economics, 13(1), 75–92.
  23. Nonaka, I. (1994). A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.1.14 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.1.14
  24. OIV. (2020). State of the World Vitivinicultural Sector in 2019.
  25. Ortega, M. J. (2010). Competitive strategies and firm performance: Technological capabilities’ moderating roles. Journal of Business Research, 63(12), 1273–1281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.09.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.09.007
  26. Peteraf, M. A. (1993). The Cornerstones of Competitive Advantage: A Resource-Based View. Strategic Management Journal, 14(3), 179–191. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250140303 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250140303
  27. Pickett, L. (1998). Competencies and Managerial Effectiveness: Putting Competencies to Work. Public Personnel Management, 27(1), 103–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/009102609802700110 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/009102609802700110
  28. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competition. New York. Free Press.
  29. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York. Free Press.
  30. Priem, R. L., & Butler, J. E. (2001). Is the Resource-Based “View” a Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Research? The Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 22–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4011928
  31. Rivard, S., Raymond, L., & Verreault, D. (2006). Resource-based view and competitive strategy: An integrated model of the contribution of information technology to firm performance. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 15(1), 29–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2005.06.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2005.06.003
  32. Robinson, R. B., & Pearce, J. A. (1988). Planned Patterns of Strategic Behavior and Their Relationship to Business- Unit Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 9(1), 43–60. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/2486001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250090105
  33. Sgroi, F., Di Trapani, M. A., Testa, R., & Tudisca, S. (2014). Strategy to increase the farm competitiveness. American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Sciences, 9(3), 394–400. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajabssp.2014.394.400 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3844/ajabssp.2014.394.400
  34. Simon-Elorz, K., Castillo-Valero, J. S., & Garcia-Cortijo, M. C. (2015). Economic performance and the crisis: strategies adopted by the wineries of Castilla-La Mancha (Spain). Agribusiness, 31(1), 107–131. https://doi.org/10.1002/agr DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.21392
  35. Sirmon, D. G., Hitt, M. A., Arregle, J.-L., & Campbell, J. T. (2010). The dynamic interplay of capability strengths and weaknesses: investigating the bases of temporary competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 1409(June 2008), 1386–1409. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.893
  36. Spanos, Y. E., & Lioukas, S. (2001). An examination into the causal logic of rent generation: contrasting Porter’s competitive strategy framework and the resource-based perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 22(10), 907–934. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.174 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.174
  37. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Knowledge and Strategy, 18(March), 77–116. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812796929_0004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
  38. Villanueva, E. C., & Ferrer Lorenzo, J. R. (2020). Rhode Island and Connecticut wineries business strategy, performance, and management capabilities: a survey of managerial practices. Journal of Wine Research, 31(2), 124–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571264.2020.1780574 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09571264.2020.1780574
  39. Wall, T. D., Michie, J., Patterson, M., Wood, S. J., Sheehan, M., Clegg, C. W., & West, M. (2004). On the validity of subjective measures of company performance. Personnel Psychology, 95–118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2004.tb02485.x
  40. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A Resource-Based View of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/2486175 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050207
  41. https://aida.bvdinfo.com/ (accessed January 2020)
  42. https://www.consorziovinidiromagna.it/ (accessed January 2020)
  43. https://www.enotecaemiliaromagna.it/it/ (accessed January 2020)
  44. http://www.inumeridelvino.it/ (accessed November 2023)
  45. https://www.italianfoodexcellence.com/ (accessed November 2023)
  46. https://www.quattrocalici.it/ (accessed January 2020)