Vol. 12 No. 2 (2023)
Original Research Article

Social or environmental consciousness? Exploring the consumption of cooperative wines among European citizens

PDF
  • Stefania Troiano,
  • Laura Rizzi,
  • Francesco Marangon
Stefania Troiano
University of Udine, Department of Economics and Statistics, Via Tomadini 30/A - 33100 Udine
Laura Rizzi
University of Udine, Department of Economics and Statistics, Via Tomadini 30/A - 33100 Udine
Francesco Marangon
University of Udine, Department of Economics and Statistics, Via Tomadini 30/A - 33100 Udine
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/wep-14241

Published 2023-12-31

Keywords

  • cooperative wine,
  • sustainability,
  • wine consumption

How to Cite

Troiano, S., Rizzi, L., & Marangon, F. (2023). Social or environmental consciousness? Exploring the consumption of cooperative wines among European citizens. Wine Economics and Policy, 12(2), 69–84. https://doi.org/10.36253/wep-14241

Copyright (c) 2023 Stefania Troiano, Laura Rizzi, Francesco Marangon

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Although the role of wine cooperatives in supporting sustainability has been deeply analysed on the supply side, the study of consumers’ perception and behaviour when choosing these wines is still scarce. This paper analyses the attitudes, preferences and the willingness to pay (WTP) of European consumers, both when they purchase cooperative-produced wines and in their attitude to consuming these wines. Their preferences between cooperative-produced and organic wines were compared with the aim of understanding whether they prioritise the social aspects of the cooperatives or the environmentally friendly aspects of organic production. A survey among 3,295 individuals in different European countries was carried out. The data were firstly analysed by means of univariate tests to assess consumers’ heterogeneity and by a bivariate probit model to explore the drivers of attitude and behaviour; then a multinomial logit and a random parameters logit framework were adopted. We found an association between familiarity with cooperative and organic wines and thus the propensity to buy these products and a higher WTP for organic than cooperative wines. Our findings suggest that producing organic wines might be a strategy for wine cooperatives to better target the market.

PDF

References

  1. Candemir, A., Duvaleix, S., & Latruffe, L. (2021). Agricultural cooperatives and farm sustainability–A literature review. Journal of Economic Surveys, 35(4): 1118-1144.
  2. Dessart, F.J., Barreiro-Hurlé, J. and van Bavel, R. (2019) Behavioural factors affecting the adoption of sustainable farming practices: a policy-oriented review. European Review of Agricultural Economics 46(3): 417-471.
  3. Helmberger, P. and Hoos, S. (1962) Cooperative enterprise and organization theory. Journal of Farm Economics 44: 275.
  4. Cook, M.L., Chaddad, F.R. and Iliopoulos, C. (2004) Advances in cooperative theory since 1990: a review of agricultural economics literature. In George W. J. Hendrikse, In Restructuring Agricultural Cooperatives (pp. 65-90). Rotterdam: Erasmus University Rotterdam.
  5. Hueth, B. and Marcoul, P. (2015) Agents monitoring their manager: a hard-times theory of producer cooperation: agents monitoring their manager. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 24: 92-109.
  6. Carletti, A.M.P., Hanisch, M., Rommel, J. and Fulton, M. (2018) Farm gate prices for non-varietal wine in Argentina: a multilevel comparison of the prices paid by cooperatives and investor-oriented firms. Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization 16: 1-14.
  7. Mérel, P., Saitone, T.L. and Sexton, R.J. (2015) Cooperative stability under stochastic quality and farmer heterogeneity. European Review of Agricultural Economics 42: 765-795.
  8. Hirsch, S., Mishra, A., Möhring, N., & Finger, R. (2020). Revisiting firm flexibility and efficiency: evidence from the EU dairy processing industry. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 47(3): 971-1008.
  9. Giannakas, K., Fulton, M. and Sesmero, J. (2016) Horizon and free-rider problems in cooperative organizations. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 41: 372-292.
  10. Bontems, P. and Fulton, M. (2009) Organizational structure, redistribution and the endogeneity of cost: cooperatives, investor-owned firms and the cost of procurement. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 72: 322-343.
  11. D’Amato, A., Festa, G., Dhir, A., & Rossi, M. (2022). Cooperatives’ performance relative to investor-owned firms: a non-distorted approach for the wine sector. British Food Journal 124(13): 35-52.
  12. Kumar, A., Saroj, S., Joshi, P. and Takeshima, H. (2018) Does cooperative membership improve household welfare? Evidence from a panel data analysis of smallholder dairy farmers in Bihar. India. Food Policy 75: 24-36.
  13. Gonzalez, R.A. (2018) Farmers’ Cooperatives and Sustainable Food Systems in Europe. London: Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Farmers-Cooperatives-and-Sustainable-Food-Systems-in-Europe/Gonzalez/p/book/9780367510947.
  14. Ji, C., Jin, S., Wang, H. and Ye, C. (2019) Estimating effects of cooperative membership on farmers’ safe production behaviors: evidence from pig sector in China. Food Policy 83: 231-245.
  15. Bono, F., & Loopmans, M. (2021). Spatializing solidarity: Agricultural cooperatives as solidarity transformers in Cuba. Rural Sociology 86(4): 809-836.
  16. Rahimi, H., Mohamadi, A., & Haghighatian, M. (2021). Sociological Explanation of the Relationship Between Member Participation’and ‘Success’ of Agricultural Cooperatives (Case Study: Agricultural Cooperatives of Lorestan Prov-ince). Journal of Rural Research 12(2): 388-403.
  17. Bareille, F., Bonnet-Beaugrand, F. and Duvaleix-Treguer, S. (2017) Objectives’ alignment between members and agricultural cooperatives. Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies 98: 75-91.
  18. Nilsson, J., Svendsen, G. L., & Svendsen, G. T. (2012). Are large and complex agricultural cooperatives losing their social capital?. Agribusiness, 28(2): 187-204.
  19. Figueiredo, V., & Franco, M. (2018). Factors influencing cooperator satisfaction: A study applied to wine cooperatives in Portugal. Journal of Cleaner Production 191: 15-25.
  20. ISMEA (2022), Vino, Scheda di settore, https://www.ismeamercati.it/flex/files/1/2/4/D.3c3fab2db3ec5c6dda33/SchedaVino_2022_Ottobre_1_.pdf
  21. Mozas-Moral, A., Fernández-Uclés, D., Medina-Viruel, M. J., & Bernal-Jurado, E. (2021). The role of the SDGs as enhancers of the performance of Spanish wine cooperatives. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 173: 121176.
  22. Richter, B., & Hanf, J. H. (2021). Cooperatives in the wine industry: Sustainable management practices and digitalisation. Sustainability 13(10): 5543.
  23. Nazzaro, C., Stanco, M., Uliano, A., Lerro, M., & Marotta, G. (2022). Collective smart innovations and corporate governance models in Italian wine cooperatives: the opportunities of the farm-to-fork strategy. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 1-14.
  24. Tudisca, S., Di Trapani, A. M., Sgroi, F., & Testa, R. (2013). The cost advantage of Sicilian wine farms. American Journal of Applied Sciences 10(12): 1529.
  25. Brucks, M. (1985). The effects of product class knowledge on information search behavior. Journal of consumer research, 12(1), 1-16.
  26. Lockshin, L., & Corsi, A. M. (2012). Consumer behaviour for wine 2.0: A review since 2003 and future directions. Wine Economics and Policy, 1(1), 2-23.
  27. Mueller, S., Lockshin, L., Saltman, Y., & Blanford, J. (2010). Message on a bottle: The relative influence of wine back label information on wine choice. Food Quality and Preference, 21(1), 22-32.
  28. Lockshin, L., Jarvis, W., d’Hauteville, F., & Perrouty, J. P. (2006). Using simulations from discrete choice experiments to measure consumer sensitivity to brand, region, price, and awards in wine choice. Food quality and preference, 17(3-4), 166-178.
  29. Marangon F., (2022), Wine cooperatives and quality clues: a choice experiment on European consumers, Book of Abstracts of 1st Conference of the EuAWE, May 2022 (18 - 21), UTAD, Vila Real (Douro), Portugal.
  30. Elster, J. (1989). From here to there; or, if cooperative ownership is so desirable, why are there so few cooperatives?. Social Philosophy and Policy, 6(2), 93-111. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052500000650
  31. Garrido, S. (2022). Cooperatives, opportunism and quality product: Why the early Spanish cooperative wineries produced ordinary wine. Business History, 64(1), 118-133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00076791.2019.1685504
  32. Schamel, G. H. (2015). Can German wine cooperatives compete on quality?. BIO Web of Conferences 5, 03003. DOI: 10.1051/bioconf/20150503003
  33. Botonaki, A., & Tsakiridou*, E. (2004). Consumer response evaluation of a Greek quality wine. Food Economics-Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section C, 1(2), 91-98.
  34. Đurić, K., Prodanović, R., & Jahić, M. (2021). Experiences of European Union countries in the field of agricultural cooperatives. Journal of Agronomy, Technology and Engineering Management, 4(3), 583-590.
  35. Vaquero Piñeiro, M., Tedeschi, P., & Maffi, L. (2022). Winemakers. In A History of Italian Wine (pp. 91-134). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
  36. Pennerstorfer, D., & Weiss, C. R. (2013). Product quality in the agri-food chain: Do cooperatives offer high-quality wine?. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 40(1), 143-162. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbs008
  37. Sáenz-Navajas, M. P., Campo, E., Sutan, A., Ballester, J., & Valentin, D. (2013). Perception of wine quality according to extrinsic cues: The case of Burgundy wine consumers. Food Quality and Preference, 27(1), 44-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.06.006
  38. Bonroy, O., Garapin, A., Hamilton, S. F., & Souza Monteiro, D. M. (2019). Free-riding on Product Quality in Cooperatives: Lessons from an Experiment. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 101(1), 89-108. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aay025
  39. Grashuis, J. (2019). The impact of brand equity on the financial performance of marketing cooperatives. Agribusiness, 35(2), 234-248. https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.21574
  40. Carbone, A. (2021). From Flasks to Fine Glasses: Recent Trends in Wine Economics. Italian Economic Journal, 7(2), 187-198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40797-021-00151-6
  41. Rebelo, J., Lourenço-Gomes, L., Gonçalves, T., & Caldas, J. (2019). A hedonic price analysis for the Portuguese wine market: Does the distribution channel matter?. Journal of Applied Economics, 22(1), 40-59. https://doi.org/10.1080/15140326.2018.1550596
  42. Aiassa, P., Baltes, M., Danner, S., Frischengruber, H., Horvath, R., Klotz, W., & Vacca, A. (2018). Successful wine cooperatives: Field reports from cooperative managers in Austria, Italy, and Germany. Journal of Wine Economics, 13(3), 243-259.
  43. Dreyer, A. (2019). Wine Plus Tourism Offers: It Is Not All About Wine—Wine Tourism in Germany. In M. Sigala, R.N.S.Robinson (Eds.), Wine Tourism Destination Management and Marketing (pp. 399-421). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
  44. Schamel, G. H. (2014). Wine quality, reputation, denominations: How cooperatives and private wineries compete?. BIO Web of Conferences 3, 03008. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20140303008
  45. Bernal-Jurado, E., Mozas-Moral, A., Fernández-Uclés, D., & Medina-Viruel, M. J. (2021). Online popularity as a development factor for cooperatives in the winegrowing sector. Journal of Business Research, 123, 79-85.
  46. Di Vita, G., Caracciolo, F., Brun, F., & D’Amico, M. (2019). Picking out a wine: Consumer motivation behind different quality wines choice. Wine Economics and Policy, 8(1), 16-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wep.2019.02.002
  47. Raza, S., & Thomas, A. (2018). Is there complementarity between certified labels and brands? Evidence from small French cooperatives. Review of Industrial Organization, 53(2), 367-395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-018-9618-z
  48. Ball, H. L. (2019). Conducting online surveys. Journal of human lactation, 35(3), 413-417.
  49. Topp, N. W., & Pawloski, B. (2002). Online data collection. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 11(2), 173-178.
  50. Loureiro, M.L., Umberger, W.J., 2007. A choice experiment model for beef: What US consumer responses tell us about relative preferences for food safety, country-of-origin labeling and traceability. Food Policy 32 (4), 496-514.
  51. Mullahy J. (2016). Estimation of multivariate probit models via bivariate probit. The Stata Journal, 16, Number 1, pp. 37-51.
  52. Greene, W. (2003). Econometric analysis (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
  53. Masiero L. and Zoltan J. (2013). Tourists Intra-Destination Visits and Transport Mode: a Bivariate Probit Model. Annals of Tourism Research. Vol. 43, pp. 529-546.
  54. Castillo-Manzano, J. I. (2010). Determinants of commercial revenues at airports: Lessons learned from Spanish regional airports. Tourism Management, 31(6), 788–796.
  55. Lancaster, K. J. (1966). A new approach to consumer theory. Journal of political economy, 74(2), 132-157. https://doi.org/10.1086/259131
  56. Anderson, N. H. (1971). Integration theory and attitude change. Psychological review, 78(3), 171.
  57. McFadden D. (1974). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour. In P. Zarembka (Ed.), Frontiers in econometrics (pp. 105-142). New York: Academic Press.
  58. Gil, J. M., & Sánchez, M. (1997). Consumer preferences for wine attributes: a conjoint approach. British Food Journal.
  59. Quintal, V. A., Thomas, B., & Phau, I. (2015). Incorporating the winescape into the theory of planned behaviour: Examining ‘new world’wineries. Tourism Management, 46, 596-609.
  60. Quintal, V. A., Thomas, B., Phau, I., & Soldat, Z. (2021). Segmenting hedonic wine tourists using push–pull Winescape attributes. Australasian Marketing Journal, 1839334921999478.
  61. Gallenti, G., Troiano, S., Marangon, F., Bogoni, P., Campisi, B., & Cosmina, M. (2019). Environmentally sustainable versus aesthetic values motivating millennials’ preferences for wine purchasing: evidence from an experimental analysis in Italy. Agricultural and Food Economics, 7(1), 1-16.
  62. Williams, K. M. (2021). Wine Tourism: From Winescape to Cellardoorscape. Tourism Analysis, 26(2-3), 245-248.
  63. Tempesta, T., Giancristofaro, R. A., Corain, L., Salmaso, L., Tomasi, D., & Boatto, V. (2010). The importance of landscape in wine quality perception: An integrated approach using choice-based conjoint analysis and combination-based permutation tests. Food Quality and Preference, 21(7), 827-836.
  64. Bourassa, S. C. (1990). A paradigm for landscape aesthetics. Environment and behavior, 22(6), 787-812.
  65. Torrisi, F., Stefani, G., & Seghieri, C. (2006). Use of scanner data to analyze the table wine demand in the Italian major retailing trade. Agribusiness: An International Journal, 22(3), 391-403.
  66. Stasi, A., Nardone, G., Viscecchia, R., & Seccia, A. (2011). Italian wine demand and differentiation effect of geographical indications. International Journal of Wine Business Research.
  67. Boncinelli, F., Dominici, A., Gerini, F., & Marone, E. (2021). Insights into organic wine consumption: behaviour, segmentation and attribute non-attendance. Agricultural and Food Economics, 9(1), 1-16.
  68. Panico, T., Del Giudice, T., & Caracciolo, F. (2014). Quality dimensions and consumer preferences: A choice experiment in the Italian extra-virgin olive oil market. Agricultural Economics Review, 15(389-2016-23511), 100-112.
  69. Bliemer, M. C., Rose, J. M., & Chorus, C. G. (2017). Detecting dominance in stated choice data and accounting for dominance-based scale differences in logit models. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 102, 83-104.
  70. Scarpa, R., Ferrini, S., & Willis, K. (2005). Performance of error component models for status-quo effects in choice experiments. Applications of simulation methods in environmental and resource economics, 247-273.
  71. Hensher, D. A., Rose, J. M., & Greene, W. H. (2005). Applied choice analysis: a primer. Cambridge university press.
  72. Staub, C., & Siegrist, M. (2022). Rethinking the wine list: restaurant customers’ preference for listing wines according to wine style. International Journal of Wine Business Research.
  73. Robinson (Eds.), Wine Tourism Destination Management and Marketing (pp. 399-421). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
  74. Hauck, K., Szolnoki, G., & Pabst, E. (2021). Motivation factors for organic wines. An analysis from the perspective of German producers and retailers. Wine Economics and Policy, 10(2), 61-74.
  75. Vecchio, R. (2023). Does anyone read my papers? The gap between academic consumer research and the real (wine) world: The gap between academic consumer research and the real (wine) world. Wine Economics and Policy.
  76. Demossier, M., & Viecelli, C. (2022). Anthropology, wine and culture. In The Routledge Handbook of Wine and Culture (pp. 15-19). Routledge.
  77. Gastaldello, G., Giampietri, E., Zaghini, E., & Rossetto, L. (2022). Virtual Wine Experiences: Is Covid Extending the Boundaries of Wine Tourism?. Wine Economics and Policy.
  78. Niklas, B., Cardebat, J. M., Back, R. M., Gaeta, D., Pinilla, V., Rebelo, J., … & Schamel, G. (2022). Wine industry perceptions and reactions to the COVID‐19 crisis in the Old and New Worlds: Do business models make a difference?. Agribusiness.