2024: Just Accepted
Original Research Article

Enriching Wine Exposure in E-commerce Through a Hedonistic and Utilitarian Cue

Urszula Garczarek
UEP
Armand Faganel
University of Primorska

Published 2024-05-02

Keywords

  • Wine marketing,
  • online experience,
  • Wine labelling

How to Cite

Szymkowiak, A., Garczarek, U., & Faganel, A. (2024). Enriching Wine Exposure in E-commerce Through a Hedonistic and Utilitarian Cue. Wine Economics and Policy. Retrieved from https://oaj.fupress.net/index.php/wep/article/view/15067

Abstract

In light of the projected growth in the global wine market, the ongoing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, and the increasing prevalence of e-commerce, there arises a pressing need to devise unique and engaging ways to present product offerings. While prior research has shed light on the potential of online sales platforms for wineries and the role of wine bottle labels in influencing consumer purchasing behavior, scant attention has been given to the presentation of wine products in the realm of e-commerce. Therefore, the primary objective of this study is to examine the impact of including visual cues, specifically symbols, in online product displays on individuals' perceptions of the product and their likelihood to make a purchase. Specifically, we aim to investigate how the placement of elements related to wine consumption, such as a glass, and the representation of the product's raw materials, such as a bunch of grapes, affect consumer purchasing choices. The results from a simulated online wine store demonstrate the substantial influence of including a glass symbol on consumers' selections. Furthermore, a series of eye-tracking laboratory experiments, involving a total of 140 participants, provides deeper insights into the underlying mechanisms. These findings reveal that augmenting a wine product with a hedonic symbol, such as a glass, significantly enhances consumers' perception of the product. Additionally, it exerts an influence on their product attitude and taste assessment, both of which are integral components of product perception. This study has the potential to offer valuable insights for wine marketers, e-commerce retailers, and researchers specializing in the field of consumer behavior and marketing. Beyond the wine industry, the implications of this research extend to other sectors that rely on e-commerce platforms for sales.

References

  1. Annunziata, A., Agnoli, L., Vecchio, R., Charters, S., & Mariani, A. (2020). The influence of alcohol warning labels on consumers’ choices of wine and beer. Wine Economics and Policy, 9(2), 3-21.
  2. Baldoni, J. (2011). Using Stories to Persuade. Harvard Business Review, 24 March. Retrieved from: https://hbr.org/2011/03/using-stories-as-a-tool-of-per. Accessed January 28, 2022
  3. Basso, K., Duschitz, C. d. C., Giacomazzi, C. M., Sonego, M., Rossi, C. A. V., & Reck, D. (2019). Purchase decision and purchase delay of hedonic and utilitarian products in the face of time pressure and multiplicity of options. Revista de Gestão, 26(2), 112-125. https://doi.org/10.1108/REGE-01-2018-0022
  4. Batra, R., & Ahtola, O. (1990). Measuring the Hedonic and Utilitarian Sources of
  5. Consumer Attitudes. Marketing Letters, 2(2), 159-170.
  6. Bettiga, D., Bianchi, A. M., Lamberti, L., & Noci, G. (2020). Consumers Emotional Responses to Functional and Hedonic Products: A Neuroscience Research. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 559779. https://doi.org/3389/fpsyg.2020.559779
  7. Bonn, M. A., Kim, W. G., Kang, S., & Cho, M. (2016). Purchasing Wine Online: The Effects of Social Influence, Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and Wine Involvement. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 25(7), 841-869. https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2016.1115382
  8. Capitello, R., Agnoli, L., Charters, S., & Begalli, D. (2021). Labelling environmental and terroir attributes: Young Italian consumers’ wine preferences. Journal of Cleaner Production, 304. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126991
  9. Celhay, F., & Remaud, H. (2018). What does your wine label mean to consumers? A semiotic investigation of Bordeaux wine visual codes. Food Quality and Preference, 65, 129–145. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.10.02
  10. Chaney, I. M. (2000). External Search Effort for Wine. International Journal of Wine Marketing, 12(2), 5-21. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb008706
  11. Changbao, L., & Peishan, H. (2018). A Literature Review of the Consumer Cognitive Miserliness Behavior and Its Marketing Implications: Based on the Framework of the Cue Utilization Theory. Foreign Economics & Management, 40(08), 58-70.
  12. Chironi, S., Altamore, L., Columba, P., Bacarella, S., Ingrassia, M. (2020). Study of Wine Producers’ Marketing Communication in Extreme Territories–Application of the AGIL Scheme to Wineries’ Website Features. Agronomy, 10(5), 721. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10050721
  13. Cobelli, N., & Wilkinson, G. (2020). Online wine purchasing: a comparison between South Africa and Italy. The TQM Journal, 32(4), 837-847. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-10-2019-0242
  14. d’Astous, A., Legoux, R., & Colbert, F. (2004). Consumer perceptions of promotional offers in the performing arts: An experimental approach. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 21, 242–254. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1936-4490.2004.tb00339.x
  15. Delmas, M. A., & Lessem, N. (2017). Eco-premium or eco-penalty? Eco-labels and quality in the organic wine market. Business & Society, 56(2), 318-356.
  16. Dugan, R. G., Clarkson, J. J., & Beck, J. T. (2021). When cause‐marketing backfires:
  17. differential effects of one‐for‐one promotions on hedonic and utilitarian products. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 31(3), 532-550.
  18. EC (European Commission). (2020). Short-term outlook for EU agricultural markets, April. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/food-farming-fisheries/farming/documents/short-term-outlook-spring-2020_en.pdf. Accessed January 21, 2022
  19. Eftimov, M., Popovski, G., Petković, M., Koroušić Seljak, B., & Kocev, D. (2020). COVID-19 pandemic changes the food consumption patterns. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 104, 268-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2020.08.017.
  20. Escandon-Barbosa, D., Rialp-Criado, J. (2019). The Impact of the Content of the Label on the Buying Intention of a Wine Consumer. Frontiers in Psychology 9, 2761 https://doi.org/U10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02761
  21. Fenko, A., Kersten, L., & Bialkova, S. (2016). Overcoming consumer scepticism toward food
  22. labels: The role of multisensory experience. Food Quality and Preference, 48, 81-92.
  23. Fernandes, E., Semuel, H. and Adiwijaya, M. (2020), The influence of social media
  24. advertising on purchase intention through utilitarian and hedonic shopping motivation: a study at beauty care and anti-aging clinic service in Surabaya, Petra International Journal of Business Studies, 3(1), 23-36.
  25. Ferreira, C., Lourenço-Gomes, L., Pinto, L. M. C., & Silva, A. P. (2019). Is there a gender effect on wine choice in Portugal? – A qualitative approach. International Journal of Wine Business Research, 31(4), 618-639. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWBR-08-2018-0040
  26. Flavián Blanco, C., Gurrea Sarasa, R., & Orús Sanclemente, C. (2010). Effects of visual and textual information in online product presentations: looking for the best combination in website design. European Journal of Information Systems, 19(6), 668-686. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2010.42
  27. Galati, A., Tinervia, S., Tulone, A., Crescimanno, M., & Rizzo, G. (2018). Label Style and Color Contribution to Explain Market Price Difference in Italian Red Wines Sold in the Chinese Wine Market, Journal of International Food & Agribusiness Marketing, 30(2), 175-190, https://doi.org/10.1080/08974438.2017.1402728
  28. Habann, F., Zerres, C., & Zaworski, L ,. (2018). Investigating the segment specific preferences for hedonic and utilitarian online-shop characteristics: the case of German online wine shops. International Journal of Internet Marketing and Advertising, 12(3), 255-269.
  29. Harfmann, B. (2021). Online sales drive 55% of wine growth. Retrieved from: https://www.bevindustry.com/articles/93851-online-sales-drive-55-of-wine-growth. Accessed February 3, 2022
  30. Higgins, L. M., Wolf, M. M., Wolf, M. J. (2016). Wine on Facebook: A Look at Millennials’ Wine Information Search. In G. Szolnoki, L. Thach, & D. Kolb (Eds.) Successful Social Media and Ecommerce Strategies in the Wine Industry (pp. 13-29). Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
  31. Hölle, D., Aufschnaiter, S., Bogon, J., Pfeuffer, C., Kiesel, A., & Thomaschke, R. (2020). Quality ratings of wine bottles in e-commerce: the influence of time delays and spatial arrangement, Journal of Wine Research, 5, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571264.2020.1723067
  32. Hu, L., Filieri, R., Acikgoz, F., Zollo, L., & Rialti, R. (2022). The effect of utilitarian and hedonic motivations on mobile shopping outcomes. A cross‐cultural analysis. International Journal of Consumer Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12868
  33. Huq, F., Jones, V. and Hensler, D.A. (2022). A time series projection model of online seasonal demand for American wine and potential disruption in the supply channels due to COVID-19. International Journal of Wine Business Research, 34(3), 349-372. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWBR-03-2021-0015
  34. Hwang JE, Yang YS, Oh YM, Lee SY, Lee JE, Cho SI. Differences in visual fixation duration according to the position of graphic health warning labels: An eye-tracking approach. Tob Induc Dis. 2018 Sep 4;16:39. doi: 10.18332/tid/94327. PMID: 31516438; PMCID: PMC6659495.
  35. Jacoby, J. (2002). Stimulus‐organism‐response reconsidered: an evolutionary step in modeling (consumer) behavior. Journal of consumer psychology, 12(1), 51-57.
  36. Jiang, Z., & Benbasat, I. (2007). Research Note—Investigating the Influence of the Functional Mechanisms of Online Product Presentations. Information Systems Research, 18(4), 367-475. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1070.0124
  37. Jorge, O., Pons, A., Rius, J., Vintró, C., Mateo, J., & Vilaplana, J. (2020). Increasing online shop revenues with web scraping: a case study for the wine sector. British Food Journal, 122(11), 3383-3401.
  38. Kieling, A. P., Tezza, R., & Vargas, G. L. (2023). Website stage model for Brazilian wineries: an analysis of presence in digital and mobile media. International Journal of Wine Business Research, 35(1), 45-65.
  39. Kokole, D., Anderson, P., & Jané-Llopis, E. (2021). Nature and potential impact of alcohol health warning labels: a scoping review. Nutrients, 13(9), 3065.
  40. Kronrod, A., Grinstein, A., & Wathieu, L. (2012). Enjoy! Hedonic consumption and compliance with assertive messages. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(1), 51-61.
  41. Lago, N.C., .Marcon, A., Ribeiro, J.L.D., de Medeiros, J.F., .Brião, V.B., & Antoni, V.L. (.2020). Determinant attributes and the compensatory judgement rules applied by young consumers to purchase environmentally sustainable food products. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 23, 256–273.
  42. Lee, H.-J., & Yun, Z.-S. (2015). Consumers’ perceptions of organic food attributes and cognitive and affective attitudes as determinants of their purchase intentions toward organic food. Food Quality and Preference, 39, 259-267. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.06.002
  43. Liao, C., To, P.-L., Wong, Y.-C., & Kakhki, M. D. (2016). The impact of presentation mode and product type on online impulse buying decisions. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research 17(2), 153-168.
  44. Maehle, N., Iversen, N., Hem, L., &Otnes, C. (2015). Exploring consumer preferences for hedonic and utilitarian food attributes. British Food Journal, 117 (12), 3039-3063
  45. Mallapragada, G., Chandukala, S. R., & Liu, Q. (2016). Exploring the effects of “What”(product) and “Where”(website) characteristics on online shopping behavior. Journal of Marketing, 80(2), 21-38.
  46. Mundel, J., Huddleston, P., Behe, B., Sage, L., & Latona, C. (2018). An eye tracking study of minimally branded products: hedonism and branding as predictors of purchase intentions. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 27(2), 146-157.
  47. Olson, J.C., & Jacoby, J. (1972). Cue utilization in the quality perception process. ACR Special Volumes.
  48. Onur, I., Bruwer, J., & Lockshin, L. (2020). Reducing information asymmetry in the auctioning of non-perishable experience goods: The case of online wine auctions. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 54, 102060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102060
  49. Oyinseye, P., Suárez, A., Saldaña, E., Fernández-Zurbano, P., Valentin, D., & Sáenz-Navajas, M.-P. (2022). Multidimensional representation of wine drinking experience: Effects of the level of consumers’ expertise and involvement. Food Quality and Preference, 98. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2022.104536
  50. Oyekunle, R., Bello, O., Jubril, Q., Sikiru, I., & Balogun, A. (2020). Usability evaluation using eye-tracking on e-commerce and education domains. Journal of Information Technology and Computing, 1(1), 1-13.
  51. Park, J., Lennon, S. J., & Stoel, L. (2005). Online product presentation: effects on mood, perceived risk, and purchase intention. Psychology & Marketing, 22(9), 695-719. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20080
  52. Pavlič J, Tomažič T. The (In)effectiveness of Attention Guidance Methods for Enhancing Brand Memory in 360° Video. Sensors. 2022; 22(22):8809. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22228809
  53. Pelet, J.-E., Durrieu, F., & Lick, E. (2020). Label design of wines sold online: Effects of perceived authenticity on purchase intentions. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 55, 102087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102087
  54. Petrescu, D. C., Vermeir, I., Burny, P., & Petrescu-Mag, R. M. (2022). Consumer evaluation of food quality and the role of environmental cues. A comprehensive cross-country study. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 28(2), 100178.
  55. Pérez y Pérez, L.; Gracia, A.; Barreiro-Hurlé, J. (2020). Not Seeing the Forest for the Trees: The Impact of Multiple Labelling on Consumer Choices for Olive Oil. Foods 9(2), 186.
  56. Rihn, A., Wei, X., & Khachatryan, H. (2019). Text vs. logo: Does eco-label format influence consumers’ visual attention and willingness-to-pay for fruit plants? An experimental auction approach. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 82, 101452.
  57. Risius, A., Klann, B. O., & Meyerding, S. G. (2019). Choosing a lifestyle? Reflection of consumer extrinsic product preferences and views on important wine characteristics in Germany. Wine Economics and Policy, 8(2), 141-154.
  58. Roca, P., Symoneaux, R., Ugalde, D., & Jourjon, F. (2019). Analysis of the perceptions of wine consumers toward environmental approaches: Support for the management of environmental strategy. BIO Web of Conferences, 15. doi:10.1051/bioconf/20191503020
  59. Samant, S. S., Crandall, P. G., & Seo, H.-S. (2016). The effect of varying educational intervention on consumers’ understanding and attitude toward sustainability and process-related labels found on chicken meat products. Food Quality and Preference, 48, 146-155. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.09.005
  60. Sari, J. N., Nugroho, L. E., Santosa, P. I., & Ferdiana, R. (2021). Product Recommendation Based on Eye Tracking Data Using Fixation Duration. IJITEE (International Journal of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering), 5(4), 109-116.
  61. Sohn, S., Seegebarth, B., Kissling, M., & Sippel, T. (2020). Social Cues and the Online Purchase Intentions of Organic Wine. Foods, 9(5), 643. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9050643
  62. Sözer, E. G., & İşeri Uzunoğlu, M. (2020). Do hedonic cues on product packages influence consumer behavior? A study on utilitarian retail food products.
  63. Staub, C., Fuchs, C., & Siegrist, M. (2022). Risk perception and acceptance of health warning labels on wine. Food Quality and Preference, 96, 104435.
  64. Szymkowiak, A., Borusiak, B., Pierański, B., Kotyza, P., & Smutka, L. (2022). Household Food Waste: The Meaning of Product’s Attributes and Food-Related Lifestyle. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 918485.
  65. Titova, T.P., Nachev, V.G. and Damyanov, C.I. (2015). Food quality evaluation according to their color characteristics, Facta Universitatis, Series: Automatic Control and Robotics, 14(1), 1-10
  66. Thach, L. (2021). Overview of 2020 US Wine Market Stats and 10 Hot Wine Trends for 2021. Retrieved from: https://lizthachmw.com/winestars/overview-of-2020-us-wine-market-stats-and-10-hot-wine-trends-for-2021/. Accessed January 21, 2022
  67. Thomas, A., & Pickering, G. (2003). The importance of wine label information. International Journal of Wine Marketing, 15(2), 58-74. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb008757
  68. Tomažič, T. (2017). The importance of social media from the wine marketing perspective. Lex localis, 15(4), 827-844. https://doi.org/10.4335/15.4.827-844(2017)
  69. Vergamini, D., Bartolini, F., & Brunori, G. (2021).Wine after the pandemic? All the doubts in a glass. Bio-based and Applied Economics 10(1), 51-71. https://doi.org/10.36253/bae-9017
  70. Veszelszki, Á. (2019). Persuasion Strategies on Instagram in Wine Communication and Branding. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Communicatio, 6, 83−104. https://doi.org/10.2478/auscom-2019-0005
  71. Wang, Q., Cui, X., Huang, L., & Dai, Y. (2016). Seller reputation or product presentation? An empirical investigation from cue utilization perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 36(3), 271-283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.12.006
  72. Wang, E. (2017). Creating Utilitarian and Hedonic Value from Website Quality an Online Retail Performance. Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organization, 15(3), 1-13.
  73. Wang, X., Ashraf, A. R., Thongpapanl, N., & Wang, K. Y. (2022). Perceived deception and online repurchase intention: The moderating effect of product type and consumer regulatory orientation. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 21(6), 1522-1539.
  74. WMC (Wine Market Council). (2020, April 3). Wine Market Council Webinar: A Look at Online & Direct Wine Purchasing in a New Reality. April 3, 2020.