Published 2024-05-02
Keywords
- e-commerce,
- wine marketing,
- hedonistic cue,
- utilitarian cue,
- eye tracking.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2024 Associate Professor , Urszula Garczarek, Professor
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abstract
With the projected growth in the global wine market, the ongoing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, and the increasing prevalence of e-commerce, a pressing need arises to devise unique and engaging ways to present product offerings. While prior research has shed light on the potential of online sales platforms for wineries and the role of wine bottle labels in influencing consumer purchasing behavior, scant attention has been given to the presentation of wine products in the realm of e-commerce. Therefore, the primary objective of this study is to examine the impact of including visual cues (symbols) in online product displays on individuals’ perceptions of the product and their likelihood to make a purchase. Specifically, we aim to investigate how the placement of elements related to wine consumption, such as a ‘Glass’, and the representation of the product’s raw materials, such as a bunch of ‘Grapes’, affect consumer purchasing choices. The results from a simulated online wine store demonstrate the substantial influence of including a ‘Glass’ symbol on consumers’ selections. Furthermore, a series of eye-tracking laboratory experiments conducted in Poland, involving a total of 140 participants, provides deeper insight into underlying mechanisms. These findings reveal that augmenting a wine product with a hedonic symbol, such as a ‘Glass’, significantly enhances consumer perception of the product. Additionally, it exerts influence on their ‘Product Attitude’ and ‘Product Taste’ assessment, both of which are integral components of product perception. This study has the potential to offer valuable insights for wine marketers, e-commerce retailers and researchers specializing in the field of consumer behavior and marketing. Beyond the wine industry, the implications of this research extend to other sectors that rely on e-commerce platforms for sales.
References
- R. Oyekunle, O. Bello, Q. Jubril, I. Sikiru, A. Balogun, Usability evaluation using eye-tracking on e-commerce and education domains, J. Inf. Technol. Comput. 1 (2020) 1-13. https://doi.org/10.48185/jitc.v1i1.43
- J. N. Sari, L. E. Nugroho, P. I. Santosa, R. Ferdiana, Product Recommendation Based on Eye Tracking Data Using Fixation Duration, IJITEE (Int. J. Inf. Technol. Electr. Eng.) 5 (2021) 109-116. https://doi.org/10.22146/ijitee.58693
- M. Eftimov, G. Popovski, M. Petković, B. Koroušić Seljak, D. Kocev, COVID-19 pandemic changes the food consumption patterns, Trends Food Sci. Technol. 104 (2020) 268-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2020.08.017
- European Commission (EC), Short-term outlook for EU agricultural markets. https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/food-farming-fisheries/farming/documents/short-term-outlook-spring-2020_en.pdf, 2022 (accessed 21 January 2022).
- B. Harfmann, Online sales drive 55% of wine growth. https://www.bevindustry.com/articles/93851-online-sales-drive-55-of-wine-growth, 2022 (accessed 3 February 2022).
- N. Cobelli, G. Wilkinson, Online wine purchasing: a comparison between South Africa and Italy, The TQM J. 32 (2020) 837-847. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-10-2019-0242
- D. Vergamini, F. Bartolini, G. Brunori, Wine after the pandemic? All the doubts in a glass, Bio-based Appl. Econ. 10 (2021) 51-71. https://doi.org/10.36253/bae-9017
- L. Thach, Overview of 2020 US Wine Market Stats and 10 Hot Wine Trends for 2021. https://lizthachmw.com/winestars/overview-of-2020-us-wine-market-stats-and-10-hot-wine-trends-for-2021, 2021 (accessed 21 January 2022).
- F. Huq, V. Jones, D.A. Hensler, A time series projection model of online seasonal demand for American wine and potential disruption in the supply channels due to COVID-19, Int. J. Wine Bus. Res. 34 (2022) 349-372. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWBR-03-2021-0015
- Z. Jiang, I. Benbasat, Investigating the Influence of the Functional Mechanisms of Online Product Presentations, Inf. Syst. Res. 18 (2007) 367-475. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1070.0124
- J. Pavlič, T. Tomažič, The (In)effectiveness of Attention Guidance Methods for Enhancing Brand Memory in 360° Video, Sensors 22 (2022) 8809. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22228809
- J. Park, S. J. Lennon, L. Stoel, Online product presentation: effects on mood, perceived risk, and purchase intention, Psychol. & Mark. 22 (2005) 695-719. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20080
- A. Risius, B. O. Klann, S. G. Meyerding, Choosing a lifestyle? Reflection of consumer extrinsic product preferences and views on important wine characteristics in Germany, Wine Econ. Policy 8 (2019) 141-154. https://doi.org/10.14601/web-8204
- D. C. Petrescu, I. Vermeir, P. Burny, R. M. Petrescu-Mag, Consumer evaluation of food quality and the role of environmental cues, Eur. Res. on Manag. and Bus. Econ. 28 (2022) 100178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2021.100178
- J.C. Olson, J. Jacoby, Cue utilization in the quality perception process, ACR Special Volumes (1972).
- N.C. Lago, A. Marcon, J.L.D. Ribeiro, J.F. de Medeiros, V.B. Brião, V.L. Antoni, Determinant attributes and the compensatory judgement rules applied by young consumers to purchase environmentally sustainable food products, Sustain. Prod. Consum. 23 (2020) 256–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.06.003
- J. Jacoby, Stimulus‐organism‐response reconsidered: an evolutionary step in modeling (consumer) behavior, J. Consum. Psychol. 12 (2002) 51-57. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327663JCP1201_05
- A. d’Astous, R. Legoux, F. Colbert, Consumer perceptions of promotional offers in the performing arts: An experimental approach, Can. J. Adm. Sci. 21 (2004) 242–254. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1936-4490.2004.tb00339.x
- R. Batra, O. Ahtola, Measuring the Hedonic and Utilitarian Sources of Consumer Attitudes, Market. Lett. 2 (1990) 159-170. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00436035
- G. Mallapragada, S. R. Chandukala, Q. Liu, Exploring the effects of “What” (product) and “Where” (website) characteristics on online shopping behavior, J. Mark. 80 (2016) 21-38. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.15.0138
- C. Liao, P.-L. To, Y.-C. Wong, M. D. Kakhki, The impact of presentation mode and product type on online impulse buying decisions, J. Electron. Commer. Res. 17 (2016) 153-168.
- D. Bettiga, A. M. Bianchi, L. Lamberti, G. Noci, Consumers’ Emotional Responses to Functional and Hedonic Products: A Neuroscience Research, Front. Psychol. 11 (2020) 559779. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.559779
- K. Basso, C. D. Duschitz, C. M. Giacomazzi, M. Sonego, C. A. V. Rossi, D. Reck, Purchase decision and purchase delay of hedonic and utilitarian products in the face of time pressure and multiplicity of options, Rev. Gestão 26 (2019) 112-125. https://doi.org/10.1108/REGE-01-2018-0022
- X. Wang, A. R. Ashraf, N. Thongpapanl, K. Y. Wang, Perceived deception and online repurchase intention: The moderating effect of product type and consumer regulatory orientation, J. Consum. Behav. 21 (2022) 1522-1539. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.2109
- A. Kronrod, A. Grinstein, L. Wathieu, Enjoy! Hedonic consumption and compliance with assertive messages, J. Consum. Res. 39 (2012) 51-61. https://doi.org/10.1086/661933
- R. G. Dugan, J. J. Clarkson, J. T. Beck, When cause‐marketing backfires: differential effects of one‐for‐one promotions on hedonic and utilitarian products, J. Consum. Psychol. 31 (2021) 532-550. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1229
- A. Galati, S. Tinervia, A. Tulone, M. Crescimanno, G. Rizzo, Label Style and Color Contribution to Explain Market Price Difference in Italian Red Wines Sold in the Chinese Wine Market, J. Int. Food & Agribusiness Mark. 30 (2018) 175-190. https://doi.org/10.1080/08974438.2017.1402728
- F. Celhay, H. Remaud, What does your wine label mean to consumers? A semiotic investigation of Bordeaux wine visual codes, Food Qual. Prefer. 65 (2018) 129–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.10.015
- D. Escandon-Barbosa, J. Rialp-Criado, The Impact of the Content of the Label on the Buying Intention of a Wine Consumer, Front. Psychol. 9 (2019) 2761. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02761
- C. Ferreira, L. Lourenço-Gomes, L. M. C. Pinto, A. P. Silva, Is there a gender effect on wine choice in Portugal? – A qualitative approach, Int. J. Wine Bus. Res. 31 (2019) 618-639. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWBR-08-2018-0040
- I. M. Chaney, External Search Effort for Wine, Int. J. Wine Mark. 12 (2000) 5-21. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb008706
- A. Thomas, G. Pickering, The importance of wine label information, Int. J. Wine Mark. 15 (2003) 58-74. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb008757
- D. Kokole, P. Anderson, E. Jané-Llopis, Nature and potential impact of alcohol health warning labels: a scoping review, Nutrients 13 (2021) 3065. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13093065
- A. Annunziata, L. Agnoli, R. Vecchio, S. Charters, A. Mariani, The influence of alcohol warning labels on consumers’ choices of wine and beer, Wine Econ. Policy 9 (2020) 3-21. https://doi.org/10.36253/web-8189
- C. Staub, C. Fuchs, M. Siegrist, Risk perception and acceptance of health warning labels on wine, Food Qual. Prefer. 96 (2022) 104435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104435
- O. Jorge, A. Pons, J. Rius, C. Vintró, J. Mateo, J. Vilaplana, Increasing online shop revenues with web scraping: a case study for the wine sector, British Food J. 122 (2020) 3383-3401. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-07-2019-0522
- A. P. Kieling, R. Tezza, G. L. Vargas, Website stage model for Brazilian wineries: an analysis of presence in digital and mobile media, Int. J. Wine Bus. Res. 35 (2023) 45-65. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWBR-05-2021-0032
- Wine Market Council (WMC), Wine Market Council Webinar: A Look at Online & Direct Wine Purchasing in a New Reality, April 3, 2020.
- Q. Wang, X. Cui, L. Huang, Y. Dai, Seller reputation or product presentation? An empirical investigation from cue utilization perspective, Int. J. Inf. Manag. 36 (2016) 271-283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.12.006
- C. Flavián Blanco, R. Gurrea Sarasa, C. Orús Sanclemente, Effects of visual and textual information in online product presentations: looking for the best combination in website design, Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 19 (2010) 668-686. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2010.42
- J.-E. Pelet, F. Durrieu, E. Lick, Label design of wines sold online: Effects of perceived authenticity on purchase intentions, J. Retailing and Consum. Serv. 55 (2020) 102087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102087
- M. Cho, M. A. Bonn, S. Kang, Wine attributes, perceived risk and online wine repurchase intention: The cross-level interaction effects of website quality, Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 43 (2014) 108-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2014.09.002
- I. Onur, J. Bruwer, L. Lockshin, Reducing information asymmetry in the auctioning of non-perishable experience goods: The case of online wine auctions, J. Retailing and Consum. Serv. 54 (2020) 102060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102060
- M. A. Bonn, W. G. Kim, S. Kang, M. Cho, Purchasing Wine Online: The Effects of Social Influence, Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and Wine Involvement, J. Hosp. Mark. & Manag. 25 (2016) 841-869. https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2016.1115382
- S. Sohn, B. Seegebarth, M. Kissling, T. Sippel, Social Cues and the Online Purchase Intentions of Organic Wine, Foods 9 (2020) 643. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9050643
- T. Tomažič, The importance of social media from the wine marketing perspective, Lex localis 15 (2017) 827-844. https://doi.org/10.4335/15.4.827-844(2017)
- D. Hölle, S. Aufschnaiter, J. Bogon, C. Pfeuffer, A. Kiesel, R. Thomaschke, Quality ratings of wine bottles in e-commerce: the influence of time delays and spatial arrangement, J. Wine Res. 5 (2020) 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571264.2020.1723067
- S. Chironi, L. Altamore, P. Columba, S. Bacarella, M. Ingrassia, Study of Wine Producers’ Marketing Communication in Extreme Territories–Application of the AGIL Scheme to Wineries’ Website Features, Agronomy 10 (2020) 721. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10050721
- J. E. Hwang, Y. S. Yang, Y. M. Oh, S. Y. Lee, J. E. Lee, S. I. Cho, Differences in visual fixation duration according to the position of graphic health warning labels: An eye-tracking approach, Tob Induc Dis 16 (2018) 39. https://doi.org/10.18332/tid/94327
- N. Maehle, N. Iversen, L. Hem, C. Otnes, Exploring consumer preferences for hedonic and utilitarian food attributes, Brit. Food J. 117 (2015) 3039-3063. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-04-2015-0148
- N. Spears, S. N. Singh, Measuring Attitude toward the Brand and Purchase Intentions, J. Curr. Issues & Res. in Advert. 26 (2004) 53–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641734.2004.10505164
- G. Sun, S. D’Alessandro, L. W. Johnson, Exploring luxury value perceptions in China: Direct and indirect effects, Int. J. Mark. Res. 58 (2016) 711-731. https://doi.org/10.2501/IJMR-2016-021
- A. Gasiński, J. Kawa-Rygielska, A. Szumny, J. Gąsior, A. Głowacki, Assessment of volatiles and polyphenol content, physicochemical parameters and antioxidant activity in beers with dotted hawthorn (Crataegus punctata), Foods 9 (2020) 775. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9060775
- A. Szymkowiak, B. Borusiak, B. Pierański, P. Kotyza, L. Smutka, Household Food Waste: The Meaning of Product’s Attributes and Food-Related Lifestyle, Front. Environ. Sci. 10 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.918485
- H.-J. Lee, Z.-S. Yun, Consumers’ perceptions of organic food attributes and cognitive and affective attitudes as determinants of their purchase intentions toward organic food, Food Qual. Prefer. 39 (2015) 259-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.06.002
- E. Fernandes, H. Semuel, M. Adiwijaya, The influence of social media advertising on purchase intention through utilitarian and hedonic shopping motivation: a study at beauty care and anti-aging clinic service in Surabaya, Petra Int. J. Bus. Stud. 3 (2020) 23-36. https://doi.org/10.9744/ijbs.3.1.23-36
- F. Habann, C. Zerres, L. Zaworski, Investigating the segment-specific preferences for hedonic and utilitarian online-shop characteristics: the case of German online wine shops, Int. J. Internet Mark. Advert. 12 (2018) 255-269.
- J. Mundel, P. Huddleston, B. Behe, L. Sage, C. Latona, An eye tracking study of minimally branded products: hedonism and branding as predictors of purchase intentions, J. Prod. & Brand Manag. 27 (2018) 146-157. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-07-2016-1282
- P. Oyinseye, A. Suárez, E. Saldaña, P. Fernández-Zurbano, D. Valentin, M.-P. Sáenz-Navajas, Multidimensional representation of wine drinking experience: Effects of the level of consumers’ expertise and involvement, Food Qual. Prefer. 98 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2022.104536
- A. Fenko, L. Kersten, S. Bialkova, Overcoming consumer scepticism toward food labels: The role of multisensory experience, Food Qual. Prefer. 48 (2016) 81-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.08.013
- M. A. Delmas, N. Lessem, Eco-premium or eco-penalty? Eco-labels and quality in the organic wine market, Bus. & Soc. 56 (2017) 318-356. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650315576119
- L. Pérez y Pérez, A. Gracia, J. Barreiro-Hurlé, Not Seeing the Forest for the Trees: The Impact of Multiple Labelling on Consumer Choices for Olive Oil, Foods 9 (2020) 186. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9020186
- S. S. Samant, P. G. Crandall, H.-S. Seo, The effect of varying educational intervention on consumers’ understanding and attitude toward sustainability and process-related labels found on chicken meat products, Food Qual. Prefer. 48 (2016) 146-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.09.005
- L. Changbao, H. Peishan, A Literature Review of the Consumer Cognitive Miserliness Behavior and Its Marketing Implications: Based on the Framework of the Cue Utilization Theory, Foreign Econ. & Manag. 40 (2018) 58-70. https://doi.org/10.16538/j.cnki.fem.2018.08.005
- J. Baldoni, Using Stories to Persuade, Harvard Bus. Rev. https://hbr.org/2011/03/using-stories-as-a-tool-of-persuasion, 2021 (accessed 28 January 2022).
- Á. Veszelszki, Persuasion Strategies on Instagram in Wine Communication and Branding, Acta Univ. Sapientiae, Communication 6 (2019) 83−104. https://doi.org/10.2478/auscom-2019-0005
- T. Drugova, K. R. Curtis, S. B. Akhundjanov, Are multiple labels on food products beneficial or simply ignored? Can. J. Agric. Econ./Rev. Can. d’agroecon. 68 (2020) 411-427. https://doi.org/10.1111/cjag.12259
- P. Roca, R. Symoneaux, D. Ugalde, F. Jourjon, Analysis of the perceptions of wine consumers toward environmental approaches: Support for the management of environmental strategy, BIO Web of Conferences 15 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20191503020
- A. Rihn, X. Wei, H. Khachatryan, Text vs. logo: Does eco-label format influence consumers’ visual attention and willingness-to-pay for fruit plants? An experimental auction approach, J. Behav. and Exp. Econ. 82 (2019) 101452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2019.101452
- T.P. Titova, V.G. Nachev, C.I. Damyanov, Food quality evaluation according to their color characteristics, Facta Univ., Series: Automatic Control and Robotics 14 (2015) 1-10.
- R. Capitello, L. Agnoli, S. Charters, D. Begalli, Labelling environmental and terroir attributes: Young Italian consumers’ wine preferences, J. Cleaner Prod. 304 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126991
- L. Hu, R. Filieri, F. Acikgoz, L. Zollo, R. Rialti, The effect of utilitarian and hedonic motivations on mobile shopping outcomes: A cross‐cultural analysis, Int. J. Consum. Stud. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12868
- C. Longoni, L. Cian, Artificial intelligence in utilitarian vs. hedonic contexts: The “word-of-machine” effect, J. Mark. 86 (2022) 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224292095734
- E. Wang, Creating Utilitarian and Hedonic Value from Website Quality an Online Retail Performance, J. Electron. Commerce in Organ. 15 (2017) 1-13. https://doi.org/10.4018/JECO.2017070101