Vol. 14 No. 1 (2025)
Original Research Article

Competitiveness of wine cooperatives in light of pricing strategies and marketing channels: Evidence from Germany

PDF
  • Rebecca Hansen,
  • Sebastian Hess
Rebecca Hansen
Institute of Agricultural Policy and Markets, Research Centre of Cooperatives, University of Hohenheim, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany
Sebastian Hess
Institute of Agricultural Policy and Markets, Research Centre of Cooperatives, University of Hohenheim, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/wep-16253

Published 2025-03-11

Keywords

  • Hausman-Taylor estimation,
  • Competitiveness of cooperatives,
  • wine cooperatives,
  • quantile regression,
  • hedonic price analysis

How to Cite

Hansen, R., & Hess, S. (2025). Competitiveness of wine cooperatives in light of pricing strategies and marketing channels: Evidence from Germany. Wine Economics and Policy, 14(1), 63–81. https://doi.org/10.36253/wep-16253

Copyright (c) 2025 Rebecca Hansen, Sebastian Hess

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

For decades, the literature has engaged in a robust debate regarding the competitiveness of wine cooperatives. Many studies suggest that these cooperatives may exhibit lower pricing competitiveness compared to other enterprise forms, while others have found the opposite. To clarify these conflicting findings, this study employs two datasets focused on German winegrowers’ cooperatives to compare their competitiveness across various price segments of the wine market through hedonic price analyses. The first dataset encompasses the premium wine segment, comprising 1,320 observations derived from wine guide data. The second dataset, which includes 18,740 observations, reflects the broader market characterized by lower average wine prices. The results reveal that the heterogeneity in cooperative sizes influences diverse marketing strategies within the German wine market. Especially larger cooperatives operating in the broader market at lower price segments tend to achieve relatively lower prices compared to other enterprise types. However, this competitive disadvantage dissipates within the high-price, high-quality segment, particularly for wines recognized in wine guides. The findings indicate that the organizational structure of cooperatives in the wine sector does not inherently confer a competitive disadvantage relative to other enterprise forms; rather, it is the heterogeneity among cooperatives that explains the variability in competitiveness. Furthermore, the findings suggest that wine prices in the lower price segments are particularly sensitive to signalling of quality attributes. Thus, cooperatives may enhance their competitiveness by emphasizing the quality attributes of their wines to offset any pricing disadvantages.

PDF

References

  1. J.H. Hanf, E. Schweickert, Cooperatives in the balance between retail and member interests: the challenges of the German cooperative sector, Journal of Wine Research 25 (2014) 32–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571264.2014.871122.
  2. M. Härle, J.H. Hanf, Wirkung von Einflussstrategien auf das Verhalten von Mitgliedern am Beispiel von Winzergenossenschaften, Mainz, Germany, 2015.
  3. S. Troiano, L. Rizzi, F. Marangon, Social or environmental consciousness? Exploring the consumption of cooperative wines among European citizens, WEP 12 (2023) 69–84. https://doi.org/10.36253/wep-14241.
  4. B. Frick, Does Ownership Matter? Empirical Evidence from the German Wine Industry, Kyklos 57 (2004) 357–386. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-5962.2004.00258.x.
  5. A. Dilger, Prinzipal-Agenten-Probleme im deutschen Weinbau, Zeitschrift für das gesamte Genossenschaftswesen 55 (2005) 179–189. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfgg-2005-0126.
  6. G. Schamel, Can German Wine Cooperatives Compete on Quality?, Mainz, Germany, 2015.
  7. I. Schäufele, R. Herrmann, G. Szolnoki, Erzielen Weine mit höherer Qualität höhere Preise? Eine hedonische Preisanalyse zur DLG-Bundesweinprämierung, German Journal of Agricultural Economics 65 (2016) 132–150. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.284975.
  8. M. Dressler, Strategic winery reputation management – exploring German wine guides, International Journal of Wine Business Research 28 (2016) 4–21. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWBR-10-2014-0046.
  9. G.H. Schamel, Structure, organization and a vision: Reasons for the success of wine cooperatives?, Punta del Este, Uruguay, 2019.
  10. D. Pennerstorfer, C.R. Weiss, Product quality in the agri-food chain: do cooperatives offer high-quality wine?, European Review of Agricultural Economics 40 (2012) 143–162. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbs008.
  11. B. Richter, J. Hanf, Competitive Strategies for Wine Cooperatives in the German Wine Industry, WEP 9 (2020) 83–98. https://doi: 10.36253/web-8872.
  12. Deutsches Weininstitut, Wines of Germany: Statistics ‘22 / ‘23, Bodenheim, 2022.
  13. G. Szolnoki, D. Hoffmann, Consumer segmentation based on usage of sales channels in the German wine market, International Journal of Wine Business Research 26 (2014) 27–44. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWBR-10-2012-0028.
  14. M. Minnici, Multidimensionale Erfolgsbewertung fusionierter Winzergenossenschaften in Deutschland. Dissertation, 2019.
  15. S. Castriota, D. Curzi, M. Delmastro, Tasters’ bias in wine guides’ quality evaluations, Applied Economics Letters 20 (2013) 1174–1177. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2013.797552.
  16. G. Schamel, A. Ros, Indicators of Individual Wine Reputation for Friuli Venezia Giulia, Italian Economic Journal 7 (2021) 323–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40797-020-00138-9.
  17. D. Kaimann, Spiess Bru, Clarissa Laura Maria, B. Frick, Ratings meet prices: The dynamic relationship of quality signals, Journal of Wine Economics (2023) 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1017/jwe.2023.14.
  18. D. Marks, Seeking the Veritas about the Vino: fine wine ratings as wine knowledge, Journal of Wine Research 26 (2015) 319–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571264.2015.1083953.
  19. S. Landon, C.E. Smith, Quality Expectations, Reputation, and Price, Southern Economic Journal 3 (1998) 628–647. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789813232754_0001.
  20. C. Krieger, J.H. Hanf, V. Belaya, Markenbildung und -führung bei Winzergenossenschaften: Ergebnisse einer Unternehmensbefragung, Berichte über Landwirtschaft - Zeitschrift für Agrarpolitik und Landwirtschaft 92 (2014). https://doi.org/10.12767/buel.v92i3.56.
  21. J. Höhler, R. Kühl, Dimensions of member heterogeneity in cooperatives and their impact on organization - a literature review, Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics 89 (2018) 697–712. https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.12177.
  22. J.-P. Couderc, A. Marchini, Governance, commercial strategies and performances of wine cooperatives: An analysis of Italian and French wine producing regions, International Journal of Wine Business Research 23 (2011) 235–257. https://doi.org/10.1108/17511061111163069.
  23. G. Schamel, Coordinating for Quality: How Cooperatives can beat Private Wineries on Quality and Reputation, St. Catherines, 2013.
  24. J. Valette, P. Amadieu, P. Sentis, Cooperatives versus Corporations: Survival in the French Wine Industry, Journal of Wine Economics 13 (2018) 328–354. https://doi.org/10.1017/jwe.2017.1.
  25. B. Frick, Some Cooperatives Produce Great Wines but the Majority Does Not: Complementary Institutional Mechanisms to Improve the Performance of an Indispensable Organizational Form, J Wine Econ 12 (2017) 386–394. https://doi.org/10.1017/jwe.2017.33.
  26. R. Soboh, A. Oude Lansink, G. van Dijk, Efficiency of Cooperatives and Investor Owned Firms Revisited, Journal of Agricultural Economics 63 (2012) 142–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.2011.00324.x.
  27. M. Costanigro, J.J. McCluskey, Hedonic price analysis in food markets, in: J.L. Lusk, J. Roosen, J.F. Shogren (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the economics of food consumption and policy, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2011, pp. 152–180.
  28. S. Rosen, Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition, Journal of Political Economy 82 (1974) 34–55. https://doi.org/10.1086/260169.
  29. S. Lecocq, M. Visser, What Determines Wine Prices: Objective vs. Sensory Characteristics, Journal of Wine Economics 1 (2006) 42–56. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1931436100000080.
  30. F. Livat, N.G. Vaillant, Expert opinion and brand reputation: an analysis from a French Cuban cigars guidebook, Applied Economics Letters 13 (2006) 97–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504850500390564.
  31. E. Oczkowski, Hedonic Wine Price Functions and Measurement Error, Economic Record 77 (2001) 374–382. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-4932.00030.
  32. M. Algner, A. Fritsch, R. Reichel, Winzergenossenschaften im Wettbewerb, Zeitschrift für das gesamte Genossenschaftswesen 57 (2007) 167–177. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfgg-2007-0302.
  33. Gault&Millau, Gault&Millau Weinguide Deutschland 2020, ZS Verlag, 2019.
  34. G. Eichelmann, Eichelmann 2020 Deutschlands Weine, MONDO Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Neckar, 2019.
  35. Weinwirtschaft, LEH verkauft erneut weniger Wein, 2024. https://www.meininger.de/wein/handel/leh-verkauft-erneut-weniger-wein (accessed 29 October 2024).
  36. FWA, Bundesweinprämierung. https://www.dlg-bwp.de/de/, 2024 (accessed 15 April 2024).
  37. G. Schamel, German Wine: Measurement and Evaluation of Product Quality, in: K. Hagedorn (Ed.), Umwelt- und Produktqualität im Agrarbereich, Landwirtschaftsverl., Münster-Hiltrup, 2005, pp. 143–151.
  38. P. Fanasch, B. Frick, What Makes Cooperatives Successful? Identifying the Determinants of Their Organizational Performance, Journal of Wine Economics 13 (2018) 282–308. https://doi.org/10.1017/jwe.2018.28.
  39. J.A. Hausman, W.E. Taylor, Panel Data and Unobservable Individual Effects, Econometrica 49 (1981) 1377. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911406.
  40. B.H. Baltagi, Essays in Honor of Jerry Hausman, Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley, 2012.
  41. C. Cornwell, P. Schmidt, D. Wyhowski, Simultaneous equations and panel data, Journal of Econometrics 51 (1992) 151–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(92)90033-N.
  42. B.H. Baltagi, Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, sixth ed., Springer, Cham, 2021.
  43. B.H. Baltagi, G. Bresson, A. Pirotte, Fixed effects, random effects or Hausman–Taylor?: A pretest estimator, Economics Letters 79 (2003) 361–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1765(03)00007-7.
  44. B.H. Baltagi, Simultaneous equations with error components, Journal of Econometrics 17 (1981) 189–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(81)90026-9.
  45. R Core Team, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2021. https://www.R-project.org/.
  46. R. Koenker, G. Bassett, Regression Quantiles, Econometrica 46 (1978) 33–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913643.
  47. R. Koenker, J.A.F. Machado, Goodness of Fit and Related Inference Processes for Quantile Regression, Journal of the American Statistical Association 94 (1999) 1296–1310. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1999.10473882.
  48. J. Rebelo, L. Lourenço-Gomes, T. Gonçalves, J. Caldas, A hedonic price analysis for the Portuguese wine market: Does the distribution channel matter?, Journal of Applied Economics 22 (2019) 40–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/15140326.2018.1550596.
  49. H. White, A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity, Econometrica 48 (1980) 817–838. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912934.
  50. V. Chernozhukov, C. Hansen, The Effects of 401(K) Participation on the Wealth Distribution: An Instrumental Quantile Regression Analysis, Review of Economics and Statistics 86 (2004) 735–751. https://doi.org/10.1162/0034653041811734.
  51. R. Del Rey, S. Loose, State of the International Wine Market in 2022: New market trends for wines require new strategies, WEP 12 (2023) 3–18. https://doi.org/10.36253/wep-14758.