Just Accepted Manuscripts
Original Research Article

Debating wine health-warning labels using Q methodology

PDF (Just accepted)
  • Francesco Solfanelli,
  • Serena Mandolesi,
  • Ileana Silvestri,
  • Simona Naspetti,
  • Raffaele Zanoli
Francesco Solfanelli
Università Politecnica delle Marche
Bio
Serena Mandolesi
Università Politecnica delle Marche
Bio
Simona Naspetti
Università Politecnica delle Marche
Bio
Raffaele Zanoli
Università Politecnica delle Marche
Bio
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/wep-17056

Published 2025-02-11

Keywords

  • health-warning labels,
  • labelling,
  • wine,
  • attitudes,
  • Q methodology

How to Cite

Solfanelli, F., Mandolesi, S., Silvestri, I., Naspetti, S., & Zanoli, R. (2025). Debating wine health-warning labels using Q methodology. Wine Economics and Policy. https://doi.org/10.36253/wep-17056

Copyright (c) 2024 Francesco Solfanelli, Serena Mandolesi, Ileana Silvestri, Simona Naspetti, Raffaele Zanoli

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

In Europe, alcohol-related diseases have an increasingly high impact on healthcare costs every year. Hence, rising consumer consciousness regarding the risks and harms of drinking alcohol is a primary goal of the EU Commission. Recently, the Commission has been discussing the mandatory adoption of health-warning labels (HWLs) on all alcoholic beverages, including wine. This study investigated expert and non-expert perceptions of adopting health-warning labels on wine bottles. The research used Q methodology, a mixed-method approach to explore subjective viewpoints regarding adopting health-warning labels for the wine sector. Respondents were evenly distributed among wine experts and consumers. The results provided four different views based on participants’ perceptions of HWLs. Factor 1 (the “Nationalism” view) strongly opposes the proposal, which is considered extremely dangerous for the entire wine market. Factor 2 (the “Market-oriented” view) believes that health warnings will increase transparency in the market and help consumers make informed choices. Factor 3 (the “Health-first” view) strongly believes that informing consumers through health labels on all alcoholic beverages is necessary to protect public health. Lastly, Factor 4 (the “Keep Us Alive” view) underestimates warning labels' effectiveness in promoting the right behaviours. The findings highlight different “sides” of this debating topic and provide valuable insight into how policymakers can investigate new strategies.

PDF (Just accepted)

References

  1. European Parliament The EU Wine Sector; 2023;
  2. Fiorio, E. Wine, Italy: Despite a Growing Consumer Base, Italy’s Overall Wine Consumption Is Declining Available online: https://www.winemeridian.com/english-news/wine_italy_despite_a_growing_consumer_base_italy_s_overall_wine_consumption_is_declining/#:~:text=The number of people who,half a liter per day.
  3. Lanfranchi, M.; Alibrandi, A.; Zirilli, A.; Sakka, G.; Giannetto, C. Analysis of the Wine Consumer’s Behavior: An Inferential Statistics Approach. British Food Journal 2020, 122, 884–895, doi:10.1108/BFJ-08-2019-0581.
  4. European Commission EU Agricultural Outlook for Markets, Income and Environment, 2021-2031; DG Agriculture and Rural Development, Brussels, 2021; ISBN 978-92-76-43003-2.
  5. Annunziata, A.; Agnoli, L.; Vecchio, R.; Charters, S.; Mariani, A. Health Warnings on Wine Labels: A Discrete Choice Analysis of Italian and French Generation Y Consumers. Wine Economics and Policy 2019, 8, 81–90, doi:10.1016/j.wep.2019.03.001.
  6. WHO Global Status Report on Alcohol and Health 2018; 2018; Vol. 65; ISBN 978-92-4-156563-9.
  7. WHO Global Strategy to Reduce the Harmful Use of Alcohol. 2010, 1–38.
  8. Annunziata, A.; Agnoli, L.; Vecchio, R.; Charters, S.; Mariani, A. The Influence of Alcohol Warning Labels on Consumers’ Choices of Wine and Beer. Wine Economics and Policy 2020, 9, 3–21, doi:10.36253/web-8189.
  9. Vallance, K.; Stockwell, T.; Zhao, J.; Shokar, S.; Schoueri-Mychasiw, N.; Hammond, D.; Greenfield, T.K.; McGavock, J.; Weerasinghe, A.; Hobin, E. Baseline Assessment of Alcohol-Related Knowledge of and Support for Alcohol Warning Labels among Alcohol Consumers in Northern Canada and Associations with Key Sociodemographic Characteristics. J Stud Alcohol Drugs 2020, 81, 238–248, doi:10.15288/JSAD.2020.81.238.
  10. Ramlo, S. Mixed Method Lessons Learned From 80 Years of Q Methodology. J Mix Methods Res 2016, 10, 28–45, doi:10.1177/1558689815610998.
  11. Staub, C.; Siegrist, M. How Health Warning Labels on Wine and Vodka Bottles Influence Perceived Risk, Rejection, and Acceptance. BMC Public Health 2022, 22, 1–13, doi:10.1186/s12889-022-12564-8.
  12. Staub, C.; Fuchs, C.; Siegrist, M. Risk Perception and Acceptance of Health Warning Labels on Wine. Food Qual Prefer 2022, 96, 104435, doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104435.
  13. European Parliament and of the Council Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013; 2013;
  14. European Parliament and of the Council Regulation (EU) 2021/2117; 2021;
  15. Minister for Health S.I. No 249/2023 - Public Health (Alcohol) (Labelling) Regulations; 2023;
  16. FoodNavigator Should Alcohol Health Warnings and Ingredient Lists Appear On-Label, off-Label, or Not at All? Available online: https://www.foodnavigator.com/Article/2022/04/12/New-alcohol-labelling-on-label-off-label-via-QR-codes-or-not-at-all.
  17. Minzer, S.; Estruch, R.; Casas, R. Wine Intake in the Framework of a Mediterranean Diet and Chronic Non-Communicable Diseases: A Short Literature Review of the Last 5 Years. Molecules 2020, 25, doi:10.3390/molecules25215045.
  18. Stephenson, W. The Study of Behavior: Q-Technique and Its Methodology; University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, US, 1953;
  19. Stephenson, W. Technique of Factor Analysis. Nature 1935, 136, 297–297.
  20. Brown, S.R. Political Subjectivity: Applications of Q Methodology in Political Science; New Haven, C.Y.U.P., Ed.; 1980; ISBN 0300023634.
  21. Stephenson, W. The Inverted Factor Technique. British Journal of Psychology. General Section 1936, 26, 344–361, doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1936.tb00803.x.
  22. Delprato, D.J.; Brown, S.R. Q Methodology and the Operant Construct. Operant Subjectivity 2002, 25, 139–147, doi:10.22488/okstate.02.100599.
  23. Steelman, T.A.; Maguire, L.A. Understanding Participant Perspectives: Q-Methodology in National Forest Management. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 1999, 18, 361–388, doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6688(199922)18:3<361::AID-PAM3>3.0.CO;2-K.
  24. Skinner, B.F. Science and Human Behavior; Co, M.P., Ed.; 1953;
  25. Stirling, A. “Opening Up” and “Closing Down.” Sci Technol Human Values 2008, 33, 262–294, doi:10.1177/0162243907311265.
  26. Wolf, A. Many Minds, Common Sense and Genetically Modified Food: A Role for Q Methodology. East Asian Sci Technol Soc 2010, 4, 565–583, doi:10.1007/s12280-010-9142-1.
  27. Stanton, J. V.; Guion, D.T. Consumer Attitudes toward Organic Foods: An Exploration of U.S. Market Segments; Elsevier, 2010; Vol. 12; ISBN 9780857244437.
  28. Naspetti, S.; Mandolesi, S.; Zanoli, R. Using Visual Q Sorting to Determine the Impact of Photovoltaic Applications on the Landscape. Land use policy 2016, 57, 564–573, doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.06.021.
  29. Hall, C. Identifying Farmer Attitudes towards Genetically Modified (GM) Crops in Scotland: Are They pro- or Anti-GM? Geoforum 2008, 39, 204–212, doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.06.003.
  30. Mandolesi, S.; Naspetti, S.; Zanoli, R. Exploring Edible Insects’ Acceptance through Subjective Perceptions: A Visual Q Study. J Insects Food Feed 2022, 8, 565–577, doi:10.3920/jiff2021.0016.
  31. Walder, P.; Kantelhardt, J. The Environmental Behaviour of Farmers – Capturing the Diversity of Perspectives with a Q Methodological Approach. Ecological Economics 2018, 143, 55–63, doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.018.
  32. Song, K.B.; Lê, S.; Kim, H.R.; Yoo, S.M.; Kang, M.S.; Chu, H.N.; Hwang, I.S.; Hong, J.H. Consumer-Driven Characterization of Healing Foods Using Q Methodology and Q Based Sorting. Food Qual Prefer 2024, 117, doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105181.
  33. Goodluck, A.; Otieno, D.J.; Oluoch-Kosura, W. Understanding Farmers’ Perceptions on Advisory Services in Tanzania: Comparative Insights from Principal Component Analysis and Q-Methodology. Heliyon 2024, 10, e34541, doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34541.
  34. Zagata, L.; Uhnak, T.; Hrabák, J. Moderately Radical? Stakeholders’ Perspectives on Societal Roles and Transformative Potential of Organic Agriculture. Ecological Economics 2021, 190, doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107208.
  35. Yarar, N.; Orth, U.R. Consumer Lay Theories on Healthy Nutrition: A Q Methodology Application in Germany. Appetite 2018, 120, 145–157, doi:10.1016/j.appet.2017.08.026.
  36. Svanidze, A.; Costa-Font, M. Revealing the Challenges Facing Georgia’s Wine Industry from a Natural Winemaker Perspective Using Q-Methodology; 2023; Vol. 35; ISBN 0620210036.
  37. Jakšić, L.; Ivanjko, E.; Njavro, M. Q-Methodology: Theoretical Framework for Policy Making in the Croatian Wine Sector. International Journal of Wine Business Research 2018, 30, 428–445, doi:10.1108/IJWBR-07-2017-0046.
  38. Winkler, K.J.; Nicholas, K.A. More than Wine: Cultural Ecosystem Services in Vineyard Landscapes in England and California. Ecological Economics 2016, 124, 86–98, doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.01.013.
  39. Watts, S.; Stenner, P. Doing Q Methodology: Theory, Method and Interpretation. Qual Res Psychol 2005, 2, 67–91, doi:10.1191/1478088705qp022oa.
  40. McKeown, B.; Thomas, D.B. Q Methodology (Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences Book 66); Newbury Park, Ed.; 2nd ed.; Sage Publications, 2013;
  41. Davis, C.H.; Michelle, C. Q Methodology in Audience Research : Bridging the Qualitative / Quantitative ‘ Divide ’? Journal of Audience & Reception Studies 2011, 8, 559–593.
  42. Zabala, A.; Sandbrook, C.; Mukherjee, N. When and How to Use Q Methodology to Understand Perspectives in Conservation Research. Conservation Biology 2018, 32, 1185–1194, doi:10.1111/cobi.13123.
  43. Brown, S.R. Q Technique and Questionnaires. Operant Subjectivity 2002, 25, doi:10.22488/okstate.02.100594.
  44. Stephenson, W. Protoconcursus: The Concourse Theory of Communication*. Operant Subjectivity 1986, 37–58.
  45. Brown, S.R. A Primer on Q Methodology. Operant subjectivity 1993, 16, 91–138, doi:10.1177/104973239600600408.
  46. Sneegas, G.; Beckner, S.; Brannstrom, C.; Jepson, W.; Lee, K.; Seghezzo, L. Using Q-Methodology in Environmental Sustainability Research: A Bibliometric Analysis and Systematic Review. Ecological Economics 2021, 180, 106864, doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106864.
  47. Mandolesi, S.; Cubero Dudinskaya, E.; Naspetti, S.; Solfanelli, F.; Zanoli, R. Freedom of Choice - Organic Consumers’ Discourses on New Plant Breeding Techniques. Sustainability 2022, 14, 8718, doi:10.3390/SU14148718.
  48. Fisher, R.A. The Design of Experiments; 1960;
  49. Dryzek, J.S.; Berejikian, J. Reconstructive Democratic Theory. American Political Science Review 1993, 87.
  50. Toulmin, S.E. The Uses of Argument; Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, 1958;
  51. Watts, S.; Stenner, P. Doing Q Methodological Research: Theory, Method and Interpretation; 2012; Vol. 2; ISBN 14780887.
  52. Kline, P. An Easy Guide to Factor Analysis; 1st Editio.; Routledge, London: London, UK, 1994;
  53. Eden, S.; Donaldson, A.; Walker, G. Structuring Subjectivities? Using Q Methodology in Human Geography. Area 2005, 37, 413–422, doi:10.1111/j.1475-4762.2005.00641.x.
  54. Banasick, S. KADE: A Desktop Application for Q Methodology. J Open Source Softw 2019, 4, 1360, doi:10.21105/joss.01360.
  55. Fisher, J.; Brown, K. Wind Energy on the Isle of Lewis: Implications for Deliberative Planning. Environ Plan A 2009, 41, 2516–2536, doi:10.1068/a41129.
  56. Lundborg, P.; Lindgren, B. Risk Perceptions and Alcohol Consumption among Young People. J Risk Uncertain 2002, 25, 165–183, doi:10.1023/A:1020695730192.
  57. Siegrist, M.; Árvai, J. Risk Perception: Reflections on 40 Years of Research. Risk Analysis 2020, 40, 2191–2206, doi:10.1111/risa.13599.
  58. Joyce, K.M.; Davidson, M.; Manly, E.; Stewart, S.H.; Al-Hamdani, M. A Systematic Review on the Impact of Alcohol Warning Labels. J Addict Dis 2024, 42, 170–193, doi:10.1080/10550887.2023.2210020.
  59. Rehm, J.; Lachenmeier, D.W.; Room, R. Why Does Society Accept a Higher Risk for Alcohol than for Other Voluntary or Involuntary Risks? BMC Med 2014, 12, 1–6, doi:10.1186/s12916-014-0189-z.
  60. Gold, N.; Egan, M.; Londakova, K.; Mottershaw, A.; Harper, H.; Burton, R.; Henn, C.; Smolar, M.; Walmsley, M.; Arambepola, R.; et al. Effect of Alcohol Label Designs with Different Pictorial Representations of Alcohol Content and Health Warnings on Knowledge and Understanding of Low-Risk Drinking Guidelines: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Addiction 2021, 116, 1443–1459, doi:10.1111/add.15327.
  61. Renaud, S.; de Lorgeril, M. Wine, Alcohol, Platelets, and the French Paradox for Coronary Heart Disease. The Lancet 1992, 339, 1523–1526, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-6736(92)91277-F.
  62. Nieddu, A.; Vindas, L.; Errigo, A.; Vindas, J.; Pes, G.M.; Dore, M.P. Dietary Habits, Anthropometric Features and Daily Performance in Two Independent Long-Lived Populations from Nicoya Peninsula (Costa Rica) and Ogliastra (Sardinia). Nutrients 2020, 6, 1621, doi:10.3390/nu12061621.
  63. Benedetto, G.; Carboni, D. The Health Effects of Wine: The Case of Longevity in Sardinia. BIO Web Conf 2023, 56, 1–9, doi:10.1051/bioconf/20235604004.
  64. O’Brien, P.; Gleeson, D.; Room, R.; Wilkinson, C. Marginalising Health Information: Implications of the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement for Alcohol Labelling; 2017; Vol. 41; ISBN 9789241506236.
  65. WHO Global Alcohol Action Plan; 2024;
  66. Siegfried, N.; Pienaar, D.C.; Ataguba, J.E.; Volmink, J.; Kredo, T.; Jere, M.; Parry, C.D.H. Restricting or Banning of Alcohol Advertising to Reduce Alcohol Consumption in Adults and Adolescents. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, 2013, doi:10.1002/14651858.CD010704.
  67. Hennessy, E.A.; Tanner-Smith, E.E. Effectiveness of Brief School-Based Interventions for Adolescents: A Meta-Analysis of Alcohol Use Prevention Programs. Prev Sci. 2015, 16, 463–474, doi:10.1007/s11121-014-0512-0.
  68. Strøm, K.K.; Adolfsen, F.; Fossum, S.; Kaiser, S.; Martinussen, M. Effectiveness of School-Based Preventive Interventions on Adolescent Alcohol Use: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy 2014, 9, 1–11, doi:10.1186/1747-597X-9-48.
  69. UNESCO What Is Intangible Cultural Heritage? Available online: https://ich.unesco.org/en/what-is-intangible-heritage-00003.
  70. Trichopoulou, A. Mediterranean Diet as Intangible Heritage of Humanity: 10 Years On. Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases 2021, 31, 1943–1948, doi:10.1016/j.numecd.2021.04.011.
  71. Pomarici, E.; Corsi, A.; Mazzarino, S.; Sardone, R. The Italian Wine Sector: Evolution, Structure, Competitiveness and Future Challenges of an Enduring Leader; Springer International Publishing, 2021; Vol. 7; ISBN 0123456789.
  72. ISMEA Vino - I Numeri Del Settore.
  73. Clingeleffer, P. Terroir: The Application of an Old Concept in Modern Viticulture. In Encyclopedia of Agriculture and Food Systems; Alfen, N.K. Van, Ed.; Academic Press, 2014; pp. 277–288.
  74. Johnson, H. The World Atlas of Wine: A Complete Guide to the Wines Spirits of the World; First Edit.; Mitchell Beazley, 1971; ISBN 0855330023.
  75. Doran, C.M.; Jainullabudeen, T.A. Economic Efficiency of Alcohol Policy. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2010, 8, 351–354, doi:10.2165/11584830-000000000-00000.
  76. Fradera, U.; Fritella, N.; Gonzalez, D.; Sandeman, G.; de Diego, E.; Terrien, C. Digital Online Training for Wine Professionals: From Responsible Service to a Sustainable Consumption of Wine. BIO Web Conf 2023, 68, 3–6, doi:10.1051/bioconf/20236804011.
  77. WHO Health Taxes Policy and Practice; Laurer, J.A., Sassi, F., Soucat, A., Vigo, A., Eds.; 2022;
  78. Griffith, R.; O’Connell, M.; Smith, K. Tax Design in the Alcohol Market. J Public Econ 2019, 172, 20–35, doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2018.12.005.
  79. Anderson, K.; Wittwer, G. Proposed Alcohol Tax Reform in the United Kingdom: Implications for Wine-Exporting Countries. Journal of Wine Economics 2022, 17, 117–126, doi:10.1017/jwe.2022.19.
  80. Bucher, T.; Deroover, K.; Stockley, C. Production and Marketing of Low-Alcohol Wine. In Advances in Grape and Wine Biotechnology; 2019.