Just Accepted Manuscripts
Case Study Article

Designing for People and Place A Case Study of Packaging Development for Local Winemakers in Lower Silesia: Special Issue "Transforming wine value chains – Adapting to a changing world"

Mariusz Wszołek
Uniwersytet SWPS

Published 2026-04-23

Keywords

  • Value Chain,
  • wine,
  • wine packaging,
  • Local wines,
  • Sustainability

How to Cite

Wszołek, M., & Gąsiorowska, A. (2026). Designing for People and Place A Case Study of Packaging Development for Local Winemakers in Lower Silesia: Special Issue "Transforming wine value chains – Adapting to a changing world". Wine Economics and Policy. https://doi.org/10.36253/wep-19773

Abstract

This paper presents an in-depth case study of a packaging development process carried out with local winemakers in Lower Silesia, an emerging wine region in Poland. The study examines packaging not only as a branding or communication tool, but as an integral component of local wine value chains, shaping how value is created, communicated, and captured under conditions of structural change in the wine sector. Using a design-led and participatory research approach [1,2], the paper documents a collaborative process involving designers and small-scale wine producers, including workshops, interviews, and iterative prototyping. The analysis focuses on how packaging choices are shaped by producers’ economic constraints, sustainability considerations, market positioning, and attachment to place.

The findings show that packaging development supports the transformation of local wine value chains by strengthening place-based differentiation [3,4], facilitating direct-to-consumer communication, and enabling adaptive strategies oriented toward local markets rather than scale-driven competition.

By integrating design processes into wine value chain analysis, the paper contributes to wine economics and policy debates by highlighting packaging as an underexplored, yet policy-relevant, mechanism for supporting resilient and locally embedded wine sectors.

References

  1. Manzini E. Design, When Everybody Designs: An Introduction to Design for Social Innovation. MIT Press; 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9873.001.0001
  2. Sanders EB-N, Stappers PJ. Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign. 2008;4(1):5–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068
  3. Barham E. Translating terroir: the global challenge of French AOC labeling. Journal of Rural Studies. 2003;19(1):127–138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0743-0167(02)00052-9
  4. Bowen S, Mutersbaugh T. Local or localized? Exploring the contributions of Franco-Mediterranean agrifood theory to alternative food research. Agric Hum Values. 2014;31(2):201–213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-013-9461-7
  5. Mueller S, Szolnoki G. The relative influence of packaging, labelling, branding and sensory attributes on liking and purchase intent: Consumers differ in their responsiveness. Food Quality and Preference. 2010;21(7):774–783. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.07.011
  6. Orth UR, Malkewitz K. Holistic Package Design and Consumer Brand Impressions. Journal of Marketing. 2008;72(3):64–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1509/JMKG.72.3.064
  7. Anderson K, Pinilla V. Wine’s belated globalization, 1845–2025. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy. 2022;44(2):742–765. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.13174
  8. Vecchio R. Determinants of willingness-to-pay for sustainable wine: Evidence from experimental auctions. Wine Economics and Policy. 2013;2(2):85–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wep.2013.11.002
  9. Banks G, Overton J. Old World, New World, Third World? Reconceptualising the Worlds of Wine. Journal of Wine Research. 2010;21(1):57–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09571264.2010.495854
  10. Giuliani E. Role of Technological Gatekeepers in the Growth of Industrial Clusters: Evidence from Chile. Regional Studies. 2011;45(10):1329–1348. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2011.619973
  11. Giuliani E. Network dynamics in regional clusters: Evidence from Chile. Research Policy. 2013;42(8):1406–1419. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.04.002
  12. Haberla M. Wine market development in Poland and its impact on regional attractiveness. SPSUTOM [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2026 Feb 1];192(2024). DOI: https://doi.org/10.29119/1641-3466.2024.192.21
  13. Maciejewska D, Olewnicki D, Tyminski M, et al. The wine market in Poland and the main determinants of its development – selected aspects. Zeszyty Naukowe Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2026 Feb 1];z. 168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29119/1641-3466.2023.168.20
  14. Gereffi G, Humphrey J, Sturgeon T. The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy. 2005;12(1):78–104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290500049805
  15. Kaplinsky R, Morris M. A handbook for value chain research. University of Sussex, Institute of Development Studies Brighton; 2000.
  16. Anderson K. Agriculture in a more uncertain global trade environment. Agricultural Economics. 2022;53(4):563–579. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12726
  17. del Vecchio P, Malandugno C, Passiante G, et al. Circular economy business model for smart tourism: the case of Ecobnb. EuroMed Journal of Business. 2021;17(1):88–104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EMJB-09-2020-0098
  18. Gilinsky A, Newton SK, Vega RF. Sustainability in the Global Wine Industry: Concepts and Cases. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia. 2016;8:37–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaspro.2016.02.006
  19. Schoormans JPL, Robben HSJ. The effect of new package design on product attention, categorization and evaluation. Journal of Economic Psychology. 1997;18(2):271–287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4870(97)00008-1
  20. Rettie R, Brewer C. The verbal and visual components of package design. Journal of Product & Brand Management. 2000;9(1):56–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/10610420010316339
  21. Bassani F, Rodrigues C, Marques P, et al. Life cycle assessment of pharmaceutical packaging. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2022;27(7):978–992. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-022-02062-9
  22. Frayling C. Research in Art and Design (Royal College of Art Research Papers, Vol 1, No 1, 1993/4). 1994 [cited 2025 Dec 1];
  23. Norman DA. Emotionally centered design. interactions. 2006;13(3):53-ff. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1125864.1125894
  24. Granovetter M. Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness | American Journal of Sociology: Vol 91, No 3. American Journal of Sociology [Internet]. 1985 [cited 2026 Jan 31];91(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/228311
  25. Murdoch PS, Baron JS, Miller TL. Potential Effects of Climate Change on Surface-Water Quality in North America. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association. 2000;36(2):347–366. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2000.tb04273.x
  26. Yin. Case Study Research Design and Methods. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation. 2015;30(1):108–110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.30.1.108
  27. Simonsen J, Robertson T, editors. Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design. London: Routledge; 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203108543
  28. Cross N. Designerly ways of knowing. Design Studies. 1982;3(4):221–227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(82)90040-0
  29. Brown T. Design thinking. Harv Bus Rev. 2008;86(6):84–92, 141.
  30. Waidelich L, Richter A, Kölmel B, et al. Design Thinking Process Model Review. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC) [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2025 Dec 1]. p. 1–9. Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8436281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE.2018.8436281
  31. Akerlof GA. The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Uncertainty in economics. Elsevier; 1978. p. 235–251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-214850-7.50022-X
  32. Mazurkiewicz-Pizlo A, Pizlo W. Determinants of the development of vineyards and wine tourism in Poland. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Oeconomia. 2018;17(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.22630/ASPE.2018.17.4.58
  33. Luhmann N. What is Communication? Communication Theory. 1992;2(3):251–259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1992.tb00042.x
  34. Duszek R, Bierkowski T, Wszołek M. Myślenie wizualne [Internet]. 2025 [cited 2026 Jan 31]. Available from: https://share.swps.edu.pl/handle/swps/1622.