Vol. 38 No. 3 (2024): Advances in Horticultural Science
Articles

Pruning date and hydrogen cyanamide effects on growth and yield of grapevine var. Cabernet Sauvignon

N. Ghimire
Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science, Tribhuvan University Kathmandu, Nepal.
P. Sapkota
Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science, Tribhuvan University Kathmandu, Nepal.
P. Poudel
Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science, Tribhuvan University Kathmandu, Nepal.
R. Sapkota
Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science, Tribhuvan University Kathmandu, Nepal.
K.C. Dahal
Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science, Tribhuvan University Kathmandu, Nepal.

Published 2024-10-23

Keywords

  • Budbreaker,
  • budburst,
  • hydrogen cyanamide,
  • pruning,
  • viticulture

How to Cite

Ghimire, N., Sapkota, P., Poudel, P., Sapkota, R., & Dahal, K. C. (2024). Pruning date and hydrogen cyanamide effects on growth and yield of grapevine var. Cabernet Sauvignon. Advances in Horticultural Science, 38(3), 273–279. https://doi.org/10.36253/ahsc-16128

Abstract

Harvesting the grapes before the monsoon season is crucial to ensure the quality of berry and bunches. This study aims to identify the optimal window for pruning and hydrogen cyanamide (HC) application to prepone the berry harvesting. The experiment was conducted in randomized complete block design with five treatments and four replications. Treatments were five different pruning dates in 2021: Jan. 17, Jan. 24, Jan. 31, Feb. 7 and Feb. 14, followed by 5% HC application one week after pruning. Annual growth stages of grapevine were recorded by using modified E-L growth stage; reproductive attributes recorded during flowering; and vine yield and berry quality attributes recorded at harvesting. The earlier pruning resulted earlier budburst compared to late pruning. Vines prunefed after Feb. 7 had <50% budburst, while vines pruned before Feb. 7 reached 50% budburst, exhibiting no differences in number of days needed to achieve it. Jan. 17 pruning had the highest budburst (%) and bud fruitfulness (%), where pruning on Feb. 7 had lower values. Average bunch weight did not differ while berry quality attributes differed between treatments for the same day harvest. The negative responses in late pruned and HC treated vines, potentially attributed to the phytotoxic effect of HC on tender buds near the natural time of dormancy break. The early pruning and subsequent application of HC triggered earlier budburst, and advances flowering and harvesting of berries in grapevine. This research demonstrated a potential techniques for advancing harvesting time (2-3 weeks) in grapevine.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...