Vol. 15 No. 1 (2026)
Full Research Articles

The social and economic determinants of farm succession in Ireland

PDF Supplementary Materials
  • Mika Wakamatsu Shin,
  • Jason Loughrey,
  • Emma Dillon,
  • Anne Kinsella
Mika Wakamatsu Shin
Currently freelance. Former affiliate: Agricultural Economics and Farm Surveys Department, Teagasc Rural Economy and Development Programme, Teagasc, Athenry, Co. Galway, Ireland
Jason Loughrey
Agricultural Economics and Farm Surveys Department, Teagasc Rural Economy and Development Programme, Teagasc, Athenry, Co. Galway, Ireland
Emma Dillon
Agricultural Economics and Farm Surveys Department, Teagasc Rural Economy and Development Programme, Teagasc, Athenry, Co. Galway, Ireland
Anne Kinsella
Agricultural Economics and Farm Surveys Department, Teagasc Rural Economy and Development Programme, Teagasc, Athenry, Co. Galway, Ireland
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/bae-16403

Published 2025-07-21

Keywords

  • Farm Succession,
  • Social factors,
  • Farmers ageing,
  • Probit model,
  • Endogenous succession cycle

How to Cite

Shin, M. W., Loughrey, J., Dillon, E., & Kinsella, A. (2025). The social and economic determinants of farm succession in Ireland. Bio-Based and Applied Economics, 15(1), 27–41. https://doi.org/10.36253/bae-16403

Copyright (c) 2026 Mika Shin, Jason Loughrey, Emma Dillon

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Funding data

Abstract

This study explores the multifaceted factors influencing farm succession in Ireland, emphasising the interaction among economic, social, and environmental aspects. With an ageing farm population, the need for effective succession strategies is critical to ensuring sustainable agricultural practices. We analyse the impact of drivers and barriers to succession, highlighting the importance of considering social factors along with economic factors using a probit model to examine these relationships. Our findings reveal that while farm size and dairy farming status show complex relationships with the likelihood of presence of a successor, social factors such as excessive workload impact decision-making. Our findings confirm expected relationships while offering new insights into farm succession and the farmer’s life cycle. Beyond profitability, social factors – such as workload and its perception by the next generation – play a crucial role in successor identification. Highlighting these dynamics, our study underscores the importance of social sustainability in securing farming’s future.

PDF Supplementary Materials

References

  1. Abdala, R. G., Binotto, E., and Borges, J. A. R. (2022). Family farm succession: evidence from absorptive capacity, social capital, and socioeconomic aspects. Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural, 60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9479.2021.235777
  2. ADAS (2020). Evaluation of the Green Low-Carbon Agri-Environment Scheme (GLAS) – Synthesis of Evidence.
  3. Adler, P. S., and Kwon, S. W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of management review, 27(1), 17-40.
  4. Banovic, M., Duesberg, S., Renwick, A., Keane, M. T., and Bogue, P.(2015). The Field: Land mobility measures as seen through the eyes of Irish farmers. The Agricultural Economics Society’s 89th Annual Conference, University of Warwick, United Kingdom, 13-15 April 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12125
  5. Barral, S., and Detang-Dessendre, C. (2023). Reforming the Common Agricultural Policy (2023–2027): multidisciplinary views. Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, 1-4.
  6. Bertolozzi-Caredio, D., Bardaji, I., Coopmans, I., Soriano, B., and Garrido, A. (2020). Key steps and dynamics of family farm succession in marginal extensive livestock farming. Journal of Rural Studies, 76, 131-141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.04.030
  7. Bertolozzi-Caredio D. (2024). The farm succession effect on farmers’ management choices. Land Use Policy, Volume 137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.107014
  8. Bertoni, D., and Cavicchioli, D. (2016). Process description, qualitative analysis and causal relationships in farm succession. CAB Reviews, 11(043), 1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.04.030
  9. Bika, Z. (2007). The territorial impact of the farmers’ early retirement scheme. Sociologia Ruralis, 47(3), 246-272. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2007.00436.x
  10. Bradfield, T., Butler, R., Dillon, E. J., Hennessy, T., and Loughrey, J. (2023). Attachment to land and its downfalls: Can policy encourage land mobility? Journal of Rural Studies, 97, 192-201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.12.014
  11. Brennan, M., Hennessy, T., Meredith, D., and Dillon, E. (2021). Weather, Workload and Money: Determining and Evaluating Sources of Stress for Farmers in Ireland. Journal of Agromedicine, 1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1059924X.2021.1988020
  12. Brennan, M., Hennessy, T., Dillon, E., and Meredith, D. (2022). Putting social into agricultural sustainability: Integrating assessments of quality of life and wellbeing into farm sustainability indicators. Sociologia Ruralis. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12417
  13. Breustedt, G., and Glauben, T. (2007). Driving forces behind exiting from farming in Western Europe. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 58(1), 115-127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.2007.00082.x
  14. Calus, M. (2009). Factors explaining farm succession and transfer in Flanders. PhD Thesis, Ghent University.
  15. Calus, M., Van Huylenbroeck, G., and Van Lierde, D. (2008). The relationship between farm succession and farm assets on Belgian farms. Sociologia ruralis, 48(1), 38-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2008.00448.x
  16. Carreira, C., and Teixeira, P. (2011). The shadow of death: analysing the pre-exit productivity of Portuguese manufacturing firms. Small Business Economics, 36, 337-351.con
  17. Cavicchioli, D., Bertoni, D., and Pretolani, R. (2018). Farm succession at a crossroads: The interaction among farm characteristics, labour market conditions, and gender and birth order effects. Journal of Rural Studies, 61, 73-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.06.002
  18. Cavicchioli, D., Bertoni, D., Tesser, F., and Frisio, D. G. (2015). What factors encourage intrafamily farm succession in mountain areas? Mountain Research and Development, 35(2), 152-160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-14-00107.1
  19. Central Statistics Office (2022). Census of Agriculture 2020 - Preliminary Results. Retrieved 1st February 2022 from https://www.cso.ie/en/releasesandpublications/ep/p-coa/censusofagriculture2020-preliminaryresults/kf/
  20. Cofré-Bravo, G., Klerkx, L., and Engler, A. (2019). Combinations of bonding, bridging, and linking social capital for farm innovation: How farmers configure different support networks. Journal of Rural Studies, 69, 53-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.04.004
  21. Contzen, S., and Häberli, I. (2021). Exploring dairy farmers’ quality of life perceptions–A Swiss case study. Journal of Rural Studies, 88, 227-238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.11.007
  22. Contzen, S., Zbinden, K., Neuenschwander, C., and Métrailler, M. (2017). Retirement as a Discrete Life‐Stage of Farming Men and Women’s Biography? Sociologia Ruralis, 57, 730-751. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12154
  23. Conway, S.F., McDonagh, J., Farrell, M., and Kinsella, A.(2016). Cease agricultural activity forever? Underestimating the importance of symbolic capital, Journal of Rural Studies, 44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.01.016.
  24. Conway, S. F., Farrell, M., McDonagh, J., and Kinsella, A. (2022). ‘Farmers Don’t Retire’: Re-Evaluating How We Engage with and Understand the ‘Older’Farmer’s Perspective. Sustainability, 14(5), 2533. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.01.016
  25. Conway, S. F., McDonagh, J., Farrell, M., and Kinsella, A. (2021). Going against the grain: Unravelling the habitus of older farmers to help facilitate generational renewal in agriculture. Sociologia Ruralis, 61(3), 602-622. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12355
  26. Cullen, P., Hynes, S., Ryan, M., and O’Donoghue, C. (2021). More than two decades of Agri-Environment schemes: Has the profile of participating farms changed? Journal of Environmental Management, 292, 112826. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112826
  27. Cullen, P., Ryan, M., O’Donoghue, C., Hynes, S., and Sheridan, H. (2020). Impact of farmer self-identity and attitudes on participation in agri-environment schemes. Land Use Policy, 95, 104660. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104660
  28. Darnhofer, I. (2020). Farm resilience in the face of the unexpected: Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic. Agriculture and Human Values, 37(3), 605-606.
  29. Deming, J., Macken-Walsh, Á., O’Brien, B., and Kinsella, J. (2019). Entering the occupational category of ‘Farmer’: new pathways through professional agricultural education in Ireland. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 25(1), 63-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2018.1529605
  30. Dudek, M. (2016). A matter of family? An analysis of determinants of farm succession in Polish agriculture. Studies in Agricultural Economics, 118(2), 61-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.246256
  31. Dudek, M., and Pawłowska, A. (2022). Can succession improve the economic situation of family farms in the short term? Evidence from Poland based on panel data. Land Use Policy, 112, 105852. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105852
  32. Duesberg, S., Bogue, P., and Renwick, A. (2017). Retirement farming or sustainable growth–land transfer choices for farmers without a successor. Land Use Policy, 61, 526-535. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.12.007
  33. Dillon, E., Donnellan, T., Moran, B., and Lennon, J. (2021). Agricultural Economics and Farm Surveys Department, Rural Economy Development Programme, Teagasc.
  34. https://www.teagasc.ie/media/website/publications/2021/Teagasc-National-Farm-Survey-2020.pdf
  35. Donnellan, T., Moran, B., Lennon, J., and Dillon, E. (2020). Teagasc national farm survey 2019 preliminary results, Teagasc. https://www.teagasc.ie/media/website/publications/2020/Teagasc-National-Farm-Survey-2019.pdf
  36. Eistrup, M., Sanches, A. R., Muñoz-Rojas, J., and Pinto-Correia, T. (2019). A “young farmer problem”? Opportunities and constraints for generational renewal in farm management: an example from Southern Europe. Land, 8(4), 70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land8040070
  37. Errington, A. (2002). Handing Over the Reins: A Comparative Study of Intergenerational Farm Transfers in England, France and Canada. (No. 723-2016-48847). Conference paper, European Association of Agricultural Economists (EAAE) 2002 International Congress, August 28-31, 2002, Zaragoza, Spain. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.24905
  38. Falzoi, S., Gleeson, E., Lambkin, K., Zimmermann, J., Marwaha, R., O’Hara, R. and Fratianni, S. (2019). Analysis of the severe drought in Ireland in 2018. Weather, 74(11), 368-373. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wea.3587
  39. Farrell, M., Murtagh, A., Weir, L., Conway, S. F., McDonagh, J., and Mahon, M. (2022). Irish Organics, Innovation and Farm Collaboration: A Pathway to Farm Viability and Generational Renewal. Sustainability, 14(1), 93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010093
  40. Ferjani, A., Zimmermann, A., and Roesch, A. (2015). Determining factors of farm exit in agriculture in Switzerland. Agricultural Economics Review, 16(389-2016-23517), 59-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.253691
  41. Fischer, H., and Burton, R. J. (2014). Understanding farm succession as socially constructed endogenous cycles. Sociologia ruralis, 54(4), 417-438. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12055
  42. Garibaldi, P. (2006). Personnel economics in imperfect labor markets. Oxford, England: Oxford Press.
  43. Geoghegan, C., and O’Donoghue, C. (2018). Socioeconomic drivers of land mobility in Irish agriculture. International Journal of Agricultural Management, 7(1029-2020-362), 26-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.301162
  44. Geoghegan, C., Kinsella, A., and O’Donoghue, C. (2021). The effect of farmer attitudes on openness to land transactions: evidence for Ireland. Bio-based and Applied Economics, 10(2), 153-168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/bae-9746
  45. Gilmore, D. A., (1999). The Scheme of Early Retirement from Farming in the Republic of Ireland. Irish Geography, 32(2), 78-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00750779909478602
  46. Glauben, T., Tietje, H., and Weiss, C. (2006). Agriculture on the move: Exploring regional differences in farm exit rates in Western Germany. Jahrbuch für regionalwissenschaft, 26(1), 103-118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10037-004-0062-1
  47. Glauben, T., Petrick, M., Tietje, H., and Weiss, C. (2009). Probability and timing of succession or closure in family firms: a switching regression analysis of farm households in Germany. Applied Economics, 41(1), 45-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840601131722
  48. Góngora, R., Milán, M.J., and López-i-Gelats, F. (2019). Pathways of incorporation of young farmers into livestock farming. Land Use Policy, 85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.03.052
  49. Garcia-Covarrubias, L., Läpple, D., Dillon, E., and Thorne, F. (2023). Automation and efficiency: a latent class analysis of Irish dairy farms. Q Open, qoad015, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/qopen/qoad015.
  50. Gráda, C. Ó., 1980. Primogeniture and ultimogeniture in rural Ireland. The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 10(3), 491-497. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/203190
  51. Hartarska, V., Nadolnyak, D., and Sehrawat, N. (2022). Beginning farmers’ entry and exit: evidence from county level data. Agricultural Finance Review, 82(3), 577-596.
  52. Hayden, M. T., McNally, B., and Kinsella, A. (2021). Exploring state pension provision policy for the farming community. Journal of Rural Studies, 86, 262-269.
  53. Hennessy, T. C., and Rehman, T.(2007). An investigation into factors affecting the occupational choices of nominated farm heirs in Ireland. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 58(1), 61-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.2007.00078.x
  54. Ingram, J., Gaskell, P., Mills, J., and Short, C. (2013). Incorporating agri-environment schemes into farm development pathways: A temporal analysis of farmer motivations. Land use policy, 31, 267-279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.07.007
  55. Jack, C., Miller, A. C., Ashfield, A., and Anderson, D. (2019). New entrants and succession into farming: A Northern Ireland perspective. International Journal of Agricultural Management, 8(2), 56-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5836/ijam/2019-08-56
  56. Jeanneaux, P., Desjeux, Y., Enjolras, G., and Latruffe, L. (2022). Farm valuation: A comparison of methods for French farms. Agribusiness, 38(4), 786-809.
  57. Kennedy, L., (1991). Farm succession in modern Ireland: elements of a theory of inheritance 1. The Economic History Review, 44(3), 477-499. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0289.1991.tb01275.x
  58. Kimhi, A., and Bollman, R. (1999). Family farm dynamics in Canada and Israel: the case of farm exits. Agricultural Economics, 21(1), 69-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.1999.tb00584.x
  59. Kimhi, A., and Lopez, R. (1999). A note on farmers’ retirement and succession considerations: Evidence from a household survey. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 50(1), 154-162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.1999.tb00802.x
  60. Loughrey, J., Shin, M., Dillon, E., and Kinsella, A. (2025). Generational Renewal and Farm Succession: Insights from Ireland. EuroChoices, 24(1), 27-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692X.12456
  61. Läpple, D., Hennessy, T., and Newman, C. (2013). Quantifying the economic return to participatory extension programmes in Ireland: an endogenous switching regression analysis. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 64(2), 467-482. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12000
  62. Läpple, D., and Kelley, H. (2015). Spatial dependence in the adoption of organic drystock farming in Ireland. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 42(2), 315-337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbu024
  63. Leonard, B., Farrell, M., Mahon, M., Kinsella, A., and O’Donoghue, C. (2020). Risky (farm) business: Perceptions of economic risk in farm succession and inheritance. Journal of Rural Studies. 75, 57-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.12.007
  64. Leonard, B., Kinsella, A., O’Donoghue, C., Farrell, M., Mahon, M., 2017a. Policy drivers of farm succession and inheritance, Land Use Policy, 61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.09.006.
  65. Leonard, B., Mahon, M., Kinsella, A., O’Donoghue, C., Farrell, M., Curran, T., and Hennessy, T.(2017b). The potential of farm partnerships to facilitate farm succession and inheritance. International Journal of Agricultural Management, Volume 6 Issue 1. DOI: 10.5836/ijam/2017-06-04 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.287266
  66. Lobley, M., Baker, J. R., and Whitehead, I.(2010). Farm succession and retirement: some international comparisons. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, 1(1), 49-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5304/jafscd.2010.011.009
  67. Mann, S. (2007). Understanding farm succession by the objective hermeneutics method. Sociologia Ruralis, 47(4), 369-383. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2007.00442.x
  68. May, D., Arancibia, S., Behrendt, K., and Adams, J.(2019). Preventing young farmers from leaving the farm: Investigating the effectiveness of the young farmer payment using a behavioural approach. Land Use Policy, 82, 317-327. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.12.019
  69. Meredith, D., and Crowley, C. (2018). Continuity and Change: The geo-demographic structure of Ireland’s population of farmers. Irish Geography, 50(2), 111-136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2014/igj.v50i2.1318
  70. Morais, M., Borges, J. A. R., and Binotto, E. (2018). Using the reasoned action approach to understand Brazilian successors’ intention to take over the farm. Land Use Policy, 71, 445-452. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.11.002
  71. Nuthall, P.L. and Old, K.M. (2017). Farm owners’ reluctance to embrace family succession and the implications for extension: the case of family farms in New Zealand, The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 23:1, 39-60, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2016.1200992
  72. Paroissien,E., Latruffe, L., Piet, L. (2021). Early exit from business, performance and neighbours’ influence: a study of farmers in France, European Review of Agricultural Economics, 48 (5) 1132–1161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbab008
  73. Pitson, C., Bijttebier, J., Appel, F. and Balmann, A. (2020). How much farm succession is needed to ensure resilience of farming systems? EuroChoices, 19(2): 37–44.
  74. Potter, C., and Lobley, M.(1996). The farm family life cycle, succession paths and environmental change in Britain’s countryside. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 47(1‐4), 172-190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.1996.tb00683.x
  75. Rech, L.R., Binotto, E., Cremon, T. and Bunsit, T.(2021). What are the options for farm succession? Models for farm business continuity, Journal of Rural Studies, 88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.09.022
  76. Riley, M. (2006). Reconsidering conceptualisations of farm conservation activity: the case of conserving hay meadows. Journal of Rural Studies, 22(3), 337-353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2005.10.005
  77. Russell, T., Breen, J., Gorman, M., and Heanue, K. (2020). Advisors perceptions of their role in supporting farm succession and inheritance, The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 26:5, 485-496. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2020.1773284
  78. Schlesser, H., Stuttgen, S., Binversie, L., and Kirkpatrick, J. (2021). Insights into Barriers and Educational Needs for Farm Succession Programming. Journal of Extension, 59(4), 4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34068/joe.59.04.04
  79. Shin, M. W., Kinsella, A., Hayden, M. T. and McNally, B. (2023). The role of collaborative farming in generational renewal and farm succession. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 27(1): 94–116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22434/IFAMR2023.0070
  80. Shortall, S. (2008). Are rural development programmes socially inclusive? Social inclusion, civic engagement, participation, and social capital: Exploring the differences. Journal of Rural Studies, 24(4), 450-457. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2008.01.001
  81. Špička J. and Berg S. (2022). The impact of human values on the chance of farming continuity. International Journal of Agricultural sustainability, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2022.2047469
  82. Stiglbauer, A. M., and Weiss, C. R. (2000). Family and non-family succession in the Upper-Austrian farm sector. Cahiers d’Economie et de Sociologie Rurales, 54, 5-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.206182
  83. Tan, E., (2014). Human capital theory: A holistic criticism. Review of educational research, 84(3), 411-445. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314532696
  84. Uchiyama, T., Lobley, M., Errington, A., and Yanagimura, S. (2008). Dimensions of intergenerational farm business transfers in Canada, England, the USA and Japan. The Japanese Journal of Rural Economics, 10, 33-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18480/jjre.10.33
  85. Väre, M. (2006). Spousal effect and timing of retirement. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 57(1), 65-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.2006.00032.x
  86. Wheeler, S., Bjornlund, H., Zuo, A., and Edwards, J. (2012). Handing down the farm? The increasing uncertainty of irrigated farm succession in Australia. Journal of Rural Studies, 28(3), 266-275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2012.04.001
  87. Zagata, L., Hrabák, J., Lošťák, M., Bavorová, M., Ratinger, T., Sutherland, L.-A., and McKee, A. (2017). Research for AGRI Committee-Young farmers-Policy implementation after the 2013 CAP reform. Retrieved from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/IPOL_STU(2017)602006 on 09 May 2023.
  88. Zagata, L., and Sutherland, L.-A. (2015). Deconstructing the ‘young farmer problem in Europe’: Towards a research agenda. Journal of Rural Studies, 38, 39-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.01.003