Vol. 14 No. 3 (2025)
Special Issue 13th AIEAA Conference

Promoting natural capital conservation: a bet for socioeconomic development of marginal areas

PDF
  • Angelo Martella,
  • Francesca Pietrangeli,
  • Elisa Biagetti,
  • Barbara Pancino,
  • Silvio Franco
Angelo Martella
Università degli studi della Tuscia, Italy
Francesca Pietrangeli
Università degli studi della Tuscia, Italy
Elisa Biagetti
Università degli studi della Tuscia, Italy
Barbara Pancino
Università degli studi della Tuscia, Italy
Silvio Franco
Università degli studi della Tuscia, Italy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/bae-16911

Published 2025-06-05

Keywords

  • sustainability,
  • marginality,
  • ecological balance,
  • agriculture,
  • rural policy

How to Cite

Martella, A., Pietrangeli, F., Biagetti, E., Pancino, B., & Franco, S. (2025). Promoting natural capital conservation: a bet for socioeconomic development of marginal areas. Bio-Based and Applied Economics, 14(3), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.36253/bae-16911

Copyright (c) 2025 Angelo Martella, Francesca Pietrangeli, Elisa Biagetti, Barbara Pancino, Silvio Franco

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to enhance the well-being of marginalized areas by improving their local economy, considering the correlation between socioeconomic marginalization and environmental sustainability. These two objectives are at the core of the international and European policy agenda, but they are not often merged in one action. Within this study, we selected a marginal area in central Italy and assessed its environmental sustainability, using the method of the ecological balance. The results show that this territory has the capacity to provide an amount of natural capital greater than the ecological footprint generated by local production activities, thus the value of the ecological balance is positive. Then, we discussed how local policies can favor processes focused on agricultural products coming from areas recognized as sustainable. Environmental sustainability can be work as a branding strategy, which can raise the market value of the products and the farmers’ income, thus supporting the economic development of marginal areas and promoting the protection of their natural capital.

PDF

References

  1. Aguilera-Cora, E., Fernández-Cavia, J., Codina, L. (2024). Place branding and sustainable development: a scoping review. Place Brand Public Diplomacy.
  2. Ahmadzai, H., Tutundjian, S., Elouafi, I. (2021). Policies for Sustainable Agriculture and Livelihood in Marginal Lands: A Review. Sustainability, 13, 8692.
  3. Arshad, M.N., Donnison, I., Rowe, R.L. (2021). Marginal lands: Concept, classification criteria and management, Supergen Bioenergy Hub report no. 02/2021.
  4. Balzan, M.V., Caruana, J., Zammit, A. (2018). Assessing the capacity and flow of ecosystem services in multifunctional landscapes: Evidence of a rural-urban gradient in a Mediterranean small island state. Land Use Policy, 75, 711-725.
  5. Banini, T.; Pollice, F. (2015). Territorial identity as a strategic resource for the development of rural areas. In Semestrale di Studi e Ricerche di Geografia XXVII; Sapienza University: Rome, Italy ; Volume 1.
  6. Barbier, E.B. (2010). Poverty, development, and environment. Environment and Development Economics, 15(6), 635-660.
  7. Basile, G., Cavallo, A. (2020). Rural Identity, Authenticity, and Sustainability in Italian Inner Areas. Sustainability, 12(3), 1272.
  8. Biagetti, E., Gislon, G., Martella, A., Zucali, M., Bava, L., Franco, S., Sandrucci, A. (2023a). Comparison of the use of life cycle assessment and ecological footprint methods for evaluating environmental performances in dairy production. Science of The Total Environment, 905, 166845.
  9. Biagetti, E., Pancino, B., Martella, A., La Porta, I.M., Cicatiello, C., De Gregorio, T., Franco, S. (2023b). Is Hazelnut Farming Sustainable? An Analysis in the Specialized Production Area of Viterbo. Sustainability, 15, 10702.
  10. Borucke, M., Moore, D., Cranston, G., Gracey K., Iha, K., Larson. J., Lazarus, E., Morales, J.C., Wackernagel, M., Galli, A. (2013). Accounting for demand and supply of the biosphere’s regenerative capacity: the National Footprint Accounts’ underlying methodology and framework. Ecological Indicators, 24, 518-533
  11. Carrosio, G., Osti, G. (2017). Le aree marginali, Barbera, F., Pais I., Fondamenti di sociologia economica, Egea, Milano, 303-316.
  12. Cerutti, A.K., Beccaro, G.L., Bagliani, M., Donno, D., Bounous, G. (2013). Multifunctional Ecological Footprint Analysis for assessing eco-efficiency: a case study of fruit production systems in Northern Italy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 40, 108-117.
  13. Coderoni, S., Bonati, G., Longhitano, D., Papaleo, A., Vanino, S. (2013). Impronta carbonica aziende agricole italiane. Aspetti orizzontali.
  14. Covino, R. (2017). Aree interne: una “marginalità” che parla al futuro. Geotema, 55, 89-91.
  15. Csikós, N., Tóth, G. (2023). Concepts of agricultural marginal lands and their utilisation: A review. Agricultural Systems, 204, 103560.
  16. De Toni, A., Vizzarri, M., Di Febbraro, M., Lasserre, B., Noguera, J., Di Martino, P. (2021). Aligning Inner Peripheries with rural development in Italy: Territorial evidence to support policy contextualization. Land Use Policy, 100, 104899.
  17. FADN (2024). Italian FADN database (available on https://bancadatirica.crea.gov.it (accessed in June 2024).
  18. FAO STAT Database (2024). Available online: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data
  19. Fisher, G., Van Velthuizen, H.T., Shah, M.M., Nachtergaele, F.O. (2002). Global agro-ecological assessment for agriculture in the 21st century: methodology and results. IIASA, FAO.
  20. Franco, S. (2021a). La sostenibilità ambientale in agricoltura: l’approccio dell’economia ecologica. Agriregionieuropa, 2.
  21. Franco S. (2021b). Assessing the environmental sustainability of local agricultural systems: How and why. Current Research in Environmental Sustainability, 3, 100028.
  22. Franco, S., Cicatiello, C. (2018). The Role of Food Marketing in Increasing Awareness of Food Security and Sustainability: Food Sustainability Branding in Encyclopedia of Food Security and Sustainability, 3, 27-31.
  23. Galli, A., (2015). On the rationale and policy usefulness of ecological footprint accounting: the case of Morocco. Environmental Science & Policy, 48, 210-224.
  24. Galli, A., Wackernagel, M., Iha, K., Lazarus, E. (2014). Ecological footprint: Implications for biodiversity. Biological Conservation, 173, 121-132.
  25. GFN Global Footprint Network, Open Data Platform (2024). Available online: https://www.footprintnetwork
  26. Hazell P., Wood S. (2008). Drivers of change in global agriculture. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 363 (1491) 495–515.
  27. ISTAT (2024a). Istat Censimento popolazione residente (2024). Available online: https://esploradati.istat.it/databrowser/#/it/dw/categories/IT1,POP,1.0/POP_POPULATION/DCIS_POPRES1/IT1,22_289_DF_DCIS_POPRES1_24,1.0.
  28. ISTAT (2024b). Istat 7° Censimento Generale dell’agricoltura (2020). Available online: https://esploradati.istat.it/databrowser/#/it/censimentoagricoltura (accessed in June 2024).
  29. Kang, S., Post, W.M., Nichols, J.A., Wang, D., West, T.O., Bandaru, V., Izaurralde, R.C. (2013a) Marginal Lands: Concept, Assessment and Management. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 5(5), 129-139.
  30. Kang, S., Post W.M., Wang D., Nichols J., Bandaru V., West T. (2013b). Hierarchical marginal land assessment for land use planning. Land Use Policy, 30(1), 106-113.
  31. Kanianska, R. (2016). Agriculture and its impact on land-use, environment, and ecosystem services. Landscape ecology - The influences of land use and anthropogenic impacts of landscape creation, 1-26.
  32. Kitzes, J., Wackernagel, M. (2009). Answer to common questions in Ecological Footprint accounting. Ecological Indicators, 9, 812-817.
  33. Lipper, L., Pingali, P., Zurek, M. (2006). Less-favoured areas: looking beyond agriculture towards ecosystem services. Sustainable poverty reduction in less-favoured areas. Wallingford UK: CABI, 442-460.
  34. Lucas, K. (2012). Transport and social exclusion: Where are we now? Transport Policy, 20, 105-113.
  35. Malikova, L., Farrel, M., McDonagh, J. (2016). Perception of marginality and peripherality in an irish rural context. Quaestiones geographicae, 35(4), 93-105.
  36. Mancini, M. S., Galli, A., Niccolucci, V., Lin, D., Bastianoni, S., Wackernagel, M., & Marchettini, N. (2016). Ecological footprint: refining the carbon footprint calculation. Ecological Indicators, 61, 390-403.
  37. Martella, A., La Porta, I. M., Nicastro, M., Biagetti, E., Franco, S. (2023). Ecological Balance of Agri-Food Supply Chains—The Case of the Industrial Tomato. Sustainability, 15(10), 7846.
  38. Meini, M., Di Felice, G., Nocera, R. (2017). Mappare le risorse delle aree interne: potenzialità e criticità per la fruizione turistica, Bollettino dell’Associazione Italiana di Cartografia, EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste.
  39. Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze (2024). Redditi e principali variabili Irpef su base comunale. Available online: https://www1.finanze.gov.it/finanze/analisi_stat/public/index.php?search_class%5b0%5d=cCOMUNE&opendata=yes.
  40. Moldan, B.; Janoušková, S.; Hák, T. (2012). How to Understand and Measure Environmental Sustainability: Indicators and Targets. Ecological Indicators, 17, 4-13.
  41. Nakaishi, T., Chapman, A. (2024). Eco-labels as a communication and policy tool: a comprehensive review of academic literature and global label initiatives. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 202, 114708.
  42. Neumayer, E. (2013). Weak Versus Strong Sustainability: Exploring the Limits of Two Opposing Paradigms, 4th ed.; Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, UK.
  43. Niccolucci, V., Galli, A., Kitzes, J., Pulselli, R.M., Borsa, S., Marchettini, N. (2008). Ecological Footprint Analysis Applied to the Production of Two Italian Wines. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 128, 162-166.
  44. O’ Connor, G.A., Elliott, H.A., Basta, N.T., Bastian, R.K., Pierzynski, G.M., Sims, R.C., Smith, J.E. (2005). Sustainable land application: An overview. Journal of Environmental Quality, 34(1), 7-17.
  45. OECD/European Commission (2020). Cities in the World: A New Perspective on Urbanisation, OECD Urban Studies, OECD Publishing, Paris.
  46. Passeri, N., Borucke, M., Blasi, E., Franco, S., Lazarus, E. (2013). The influence of farming technique on cropland: a new approach for the Ecological Footprint. Ecological Indicators, 29, 1-5.
  47. Peterson, G.M., Galbraith, J.K. (1932). The concept of marginal land. Journal of Farm Economics, 14(2), 295-310.
  48. Pingali, P., Schneider K., Zurek, M. (2014). Poverty, Agriculture and the Environment: The Case of Sub-Saharan Africa. Von Braun, J., Gatzweiler, F., W., (Eds) Marginality: Addressing the Nexus of Poverty, Exclusion and Ecology, Springer Open, 151-168.
  49. Sallustio, L., Pettenella, D., Merlini, P., Romano, R., Salvati, L., Marchetti, M., Corona, P. (2018). Assessing the economic marginality of agricultural lands in Italy to support land use planning. Land Use Policy, 76, 526-534.
  50. Searchinger, T., Heimlich, R., Houghton, R.A., Dong, F., Elobeid, A., Fabiosa, J., Yu, T.H. (2008). Use of US croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change. Science, 319(5867), 1238-1240.
  51. Sotte, F. (2016). Scenari evolutivi del concetto di ruralità, in Paesaggi del Cibo, Atti della Summer School Emilio Sereni 2015, Gattatico.
  52. Vendemmia, B., Pucci, P., Beria, P. (2021). An institutional periphery in discussion. Rethinking the inner areas in Italy. Applied Geography, 135, 102537.
  53. Wackernagel, M., Rees, W.E., (1996). Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth. New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island, Canada.