Vol. 15 No. 29 (2025): Situare il sapere: sfide epistemologiche e questioni di metodo tra nord e sud
Monographic Section

In-between: il contributo del femminismo rom alla decolonizzazione delle scienze sociali

PDF
  • Claudia Mantovan
Claudia Mantovan
Università degli Studi di Padova, Italia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/cambio-17285

Published 2025-12-30

Keywords

  • Critical Romani Studies,
  • Romani feminism,
  • intersectionality,
  • decolonization ,
  • in-between

How to Cite

Mantovan, C. (2025). In-between: il contributo del femminismo rom alla decolonizzazione delle scienze sociali. Cambio. Rivista Sulle Trasformazioni Sociali, 15(29), 103–118. https://doi.org/10.36253/cambio-17285

Copyright (c) 2025 Claudia Mantovan

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

This article aims to present the contributions of a number of Romani activists and academics, several of whom explicitly identify as “feminists,” to Romani Studies over the past two decades, promoting a “critical turn,” as well as contributing to the social sciences more broadly. Drawing on critical social theories - such as critical race theory, feminist and intersectional approaches, and postcolonial theory - and focusing on epistemic power relations in Romani Studies, Romani feminism explicitly seeks to decolonize the field. Offering a “meridian” perspective rooted in Europe’s internal margins, Romani feminism provides a unique lens through which to interpret social reality and produce counter-hegemonic discourse. The article is structured in two main parts. The first section reviews contributions that have theorized the condition of Romani people in Europe as “internally colonized.” The second section traces the emergence, contributions, and recent developments of Romani feminism in activism and academia. The conclusion summarizes the main contributions of Romani feminism and the recent field of Critical Romani Studies to the decolonization of the social sciences.

PDF

References

  1. Abu-Lughod L. (1991), Writing Against Culture in Fox R.G. (ed.), Recapturing Anthropology: Working in the Present, Santa Fe: School of American Research Press, 137-162.
  2. Bello B.G. (2017), Camminare per tre lune nelle scarpe dell’Altra, in «Jura Gentium», XIV, 2, 128-159.
  3. Bello B.G. (2020), Intersezionalità. Teorie e pratiche tra diritto e società, Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  4. Bello B.G., Scudieri L. (2022), Praticare l’intersezionalità: un metodo per la ricerca e per la trasformazione sociale. Intervista a Laura Corradi, in «About Gender», 11, 22, 589-607.
  5. Bernardini M.G., La Spina E., Taramundi D.M., Parolari P. (2021), (Un)doing gender and migration stereotypes. Per un’analisi critica degli stereotipi nel rapporto tra genere e migrazioni, in «About Gender», 10, 20, I-XXXVIII.
  6. Bhabha H.K., Spivak G.C., Barker F. (1984), Europe and Its Others, Colchester: University of Essex Press.
  7. Biţu N., Vincze E. (2012), Personal Encounters and Parallel Paths toward Romani Feminism, in «Signs», 38, 1, 44-46.
  8. Bogdan M., Dunajeva J., Junghaus T., Kóczé A., Rostas I., Rövid M., Szilvasi M. (2018), Introducing the New Journal of Critical Romani Studies, in «Critical Romani Studies», 1, 1, 2-7.
  9. Brearley M. (2001), The Persecution of Gypsies in Europe, in «American Behavioral Scientist», 45, 4, 588-599.
  10. Brooks E.C. (2012), The Possibilities of Romani Feminism, in «Signs», 38, 1, 1-11.
  11. Brooks E.C. (2015), The Importance of Feminists and “Halfies” in Romani Studies: New Epistemological Possibilities, in «Roma Rights. Journal of the European Roma Rights Centre», 2, 57-61.
  12. Brooks E.C., Clark C., Rostas I. (2022), Engaging with Decolonisation, Tackling Antigypsyism: Lessons from Teaching Romani Studies at the Central European University in Hungary, in «Social Policy & Society», 21, 1, 68-79.
  13. Carbado, D.W., Crenshaw, K.W., Mays, V.M., Tomlinson B. (2013), Intersectionality: Mapping the Movements of a Theory, in «Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race», 10, 2, 303-312.
  14. Cayetano F. (2021), The Roma Collective Memory and the Epistemological Limits of Western Historiography, in De Sousa Santos B., Martins B. (eds), The Pluriverse of Human Rights: The Diversity of Struggles for Dignity, New York: Routledge, 205-217.
  15. Cassano F. (1996), Il pensiero meridiano, Roma-Bari: Laterza.
  16. Castells M. (2010), Chapter 2: The Rise of the Fourth World: Informational Capitalism, Poverty and Social Exclusion, in Castells M., End of Millennium: with a New Preface, vol. III, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
  17. Ceneda S. (2002), Romani Women from Central and Eastern Europe: A “Fourth World”, or Experience of Multiple Discrimination, https://www.refworld.org/pdfid/478e3c9c1a.pdf.
  18. Cho S., Crenshaw K.W., McCall L. (2013), Toward a Field of Intersectionality Studies: Theory, Applications, and Praxis, in «Signs», 38, 4, 785-809.
  19. Corradi L. (2018), Il femminismo delle zingare. Intersezionalità, alleanze, attivismo di genere e queer, Milano: Mimesis.
  20. Crenshaw K.W. (1989), Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics, in «University of Chicago Legal Forum», 1, 139-167.
  21. Crenshaw K.W. (1991), Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color, in «Stanford Law Review», 43, 6, 1241-1299.
  22. Crenshaw, K.W. (2011), “Post Scriptum”, in Lutz H., Herrera Vivar M.T., Supik L. (eds), Framing Intersectionality. Debate on a Multi-Faceted Concept in Gender Studies, Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate.
  23. D’Agostino S. (2019), (In)visible mobilizations. Romani women’s intersectional activisms in Romania and Bulgaria, in «Politics, Groups, and Identities», 9, 1, 170-189.
  24. Fejzula S. (2019), The anti-Roma Europe: Modern ways of disciplining the Roma body in urban spaces, in «Revista Direito e Praxis», 10, 3, 2097-2116.
  25. Fremlovà L., McGarry A. (2018), Negotiating the Identity Dilemma: Crosscurrents across the Romani, Romani Women’s and Romani LGBTIQ Movements, in Kóczé A., Magyari-Vincze E., Zentai V., Jovanović J. (eds), The Romani Women’s Movement: Struggles and Debates in Central and Eastern Europe, London: Routledge, 51-68.
  26. Gelbart P. (2012), Either Sing or Go Get the Beer: Contradictions of (Romani) Female Power in Central Europe, in «Signs», 38, 1, 22-29.
  27. Giuliani G. (2025), Gli studi critici sulla razza e l’eredità coloniale e razzista contemporanea, in Ricotta G., Ruocco G. (cur.), Pensare, classificare e costruire l’alterità. Percorsi di critica postcoloniale, Roma: Castelvecchi, 247-274.
  28. Goldberg D.T. (2002), The Racial State, Oxford-Cambridge: Blackwell.
  29. Grellmann H. (1783), Historischer Versuch über die Zigeuner, betreffend die Lebensart und Verfassung, Sitten und Schicksale dieses Volkes seit seiner Erscheinung in Europa und dessen Ursprung, Göttingen: Dietrich.
  30. Hänel H.C. (2024), Epistemic (de-)colonization in the midst of Europe, in «Inquiry», 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2024.2377415.
  31. Harari Y.N. (2014), Sapiens. Da animali a dèi. Breve storia dell’umanità, Milano: Bompiani.
  32. hooks b. (2000), Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center, London: Pluto Press.
  33. Izsàk R. (2008), The European Romani Women’s Movement - International Roma Women’s Network, in Batliwala S. (ed.), Changing Their World: Concepts and Practices of Women’s Movements, 1st Edition, Toronto: Association for Women’s Rights in Development.
  34. Izsàk R. (2009), The European Romani Women’s Movement: The Struggle for Human Rights, in «Development», 52, 2, 200-207.
  35. Jovanović J., Kóczé A., Balogh L. (2015), Intersections of Gender, Ethnicity, and Class. History and Future of the Romani Women’s Movement, Budapest: Center for Policy Studies.
  36. Kóczé A. (2015), Speaking from the Margins, in «Roma Rights. Journal of the European Roma Rights Centre», 2, 83-86.
  37. Kóczé A. (2018a), Transgressing Borders: Challenging Racist and Sexist Epistemology, in Beck S., Ivasiuc A. (eds.), Roma Activism. Reimagining Power and Knowledge, Oxford, NY: Berghahn Books.
  38. Kóczé A. (2018b), recensione del libro: Picker G. (2017), Racial Cities: Governance and the Segregation of Romani People in Urban Europe, London: Routledge, in «Critical Romani Studies», 1, 2, 176-180.
  39. Lackey J. (2022), Epistemic Reparations and the Right to be Known, Presidential Address, APA Central Division, February 25, https://philarchive.org/archive/LACQRA.
  40. Lee K. (2000), Orientalism and Gypsylorism, in «Social Analysis: The International Journal of Anthropology», 44, 2, 129-156.
  41. Lukacs M. (2016), The Critical Ones: Another Tale of Slavery, in «Analize. Journal of Gender and Feminist Studies», New Series, 7, 67-80.
  42. Maldonado-Torres N. (2016), The U.S. Elections, Ethnic Studies, and the University : A View from the Historically Disenfranchised, https://fondation-frantzfanon.com/the-u-s-elections-ethnic-studies-and-the-university-a-view-from-the-historically-disenfranchised/.
  43. Mamdani M. (2004), Good Muslim, Bad Muslim: America, the Cold War, and the Roots of Terror, New York: Pantheon.
  44. Mantovan C. (2025), Roma women serving community sentences in Italy: an analysis through the lens of Critical Criminology and Critical Romani Studies, in «Ethnic and Racial Studies», 48, 16, 3340-3364.
  45. Mayall D. (2004), Gypsy Identities 1500-2000: From Egipcyans and Moon-men to the Ethnic Romany, London: Routledge.
  46. McGarry A. (2017), Romaphobia: The Last Acceptable Form of Racism, London: Zed Books.
  47. Moltchanova A. (2009), National Self-Determination and Justice in Multinational States, Dordrecht: Springer.
  48. Okely J. (1983), The Traveller-Gypsies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  49. Oprea A. (2009a), Intersectionality Backlash: A Romani Feminist’s Response, in «Roma Rights Quarterly», 2, 21-23.
  50. Oprea A. (2009b), The Erasure of Romani Women in Statistical Data. Limits of the Race-versus-Gender approach, New York: Open Society Institute.
  51. Oprea A. (2012), Romani Feminism in Reactionary Times, in «Signs», 38, 1, 11-21.
  52. Pellegrino V., Ricotta G. (2020), Global social science. Dislocation of the abyssal line and post abyssal epistemologies and practices, in «Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia», LXI, 4, 803-828.
  53. Persano P. (2025), Femminismi black, postcoloniali e intersezionalità, in Ricotta G. e Ruocco G. (cur.), Pensare, classificare e costruire l’alterità. Percorsi di critica postcoloniale, Roma: Castelvecchi, 275-299
  54. Picker G. (2017), Racial Cities: Governance and the Segregation of Romani People in Urban Europe, London: Routledge.
  55. Powell R., van Baar H. (2019), The Invisibilization of Anti-Roma Racisms, in van Baar H., Ivasiuc A., e Kreide R. (eds), The Securitization of the Roma in Europe, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 91-113.
  56. Rizzin E. (2020), Attraversare Auschwitz. Storie di rom e sinti: identità, memorie, antiziganismo, Roma: Gangemi Editore.
  57. Ruíz E., Berenstain N. (2021), Epistemic Oppression, Resistance, and Resurgence, in «Contemporary Political Theory», 21, 283-314.
  58. Ryder A.R. (2019), A Game of Thrones: Power Struggles and Contestation in Romani Studies, in «International Journal of Roma Studies», 1, 2, 120-143.
  59. Said E.W. (2001), Orientalismo. L’immagine europea dell’Oriente, Milano: Feltrinelli.
  60. Sali S. (2015), Colonialism and Postcolonialism. The Roma as Postcolonial Subjects: Romani Orientalist Representation in Europe, Budapest: Central European University.
  61. Sbraccia A. (2018), Criminologia post-coloniale, in Rinaldi C. e Saitta P. (cur.), Criminologie critiche contemporanee, Milano: Giuffrè.
  62. Sbraccia A. (2021), Criminologie critiche, in Dino A. e Rinaldi C. (a cura di), Sociologia della devianza e del crimine, Milano: Mondadori.
  63. Schultz D.L. (2020), Intersectional Intricacies: Romani Women’s Activists at the Croassroad of Race and Gender, in van Baar H. e Kóczé A. (eds), The Roma and Their Struggle for Identity in Contemporary Europe, New York: Berghahn Books, 205-229.
  64. Selling J. (2018), Assessing the Historical Irresponsibility of the Gypsy Lore Society in Light of Romani Subaltern Challenges, in «Critical Romani Studies», 1, 1, 44-61.
  65. Sigona N., Trehan N. (2011), The (re)Criminalization of Roma Communities in a Neoliberal Europe, in Palidda S. (ed.), Racial Criminalization of Migrants in the 21st Century, Surrey: Ashgate, 119-132
  66. Simoni A. (2019), Rom, antiziganismo e cultura giuridica. Prospettive di analisi, Roma: Cisu.
  67. Sordé T., Serradell O., Puigvert L., Munté A. (2014), Solidarity Networks that Challenge Racialized Discourses: The Case of Romani Immigrant Women in Spain, in «European Journal of Women’s Studies», 21, 1, 87-102.
  68. Spivak G.C. (1988), Can the Subaltern Speak?, in Nelson C., Grossberg L. (eds.), Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, Basingstoke: Macmillan, 271-313.
  69. Stewart M. (2012) (ed.), The Gypsy “Menace”: Populism and the New Anti-Gypsy Politics, London: Hurst.
  70. Tavagnutti V. (2023), The Romanì Ethnic Mobilization in Italy: An Intersectional and Generational Perspective, Tesi di dottorato, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca.
  71. Trehan N., Kóczé A. (2009), Racism, (Neo)Colonialism, and Social Justice: The Struggle for the Soul of the Romani Movement in Post-socialist Europe, in Huggan G., Law I. (eds), Racism Postcolonialism Europe, Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
  72. Tuck E., Yang K.W. (2012), Decolonization is not a metaphor, in «Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society», 1, 1, 1-40.
  73. van Baar H. (2018), Contained Mobility and the Racialization of Poverty in Europe: The Roma at the Development-Security Nexus, in «Social Identities», 24, 4, 442-458.
  74. van Baar H, Ivasiuc A., Kreide R. (2019), The European Roma and Their Securitization: Contexts, Junctures, Challenges, in van Baar H., Ivasiuc A., Kreide R. (eds), The Securitization of the Roma in Europe, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 1-25.
  75. Vida S. (2017), La critica al diritto (neo)coloniale: i Post-Colonial Studies, in Bernardini M.G., Giolo O. (cur.), Le teorie critiche del diritto, Pisa: Pacini.
  76. Vincze E. (2014), The Racialization of Roma in the “New” Europe and the Political Potential of Romani Women, in «European Journal of Women’s Studies», 21, 4, 435-442.
  77. Zentai V. (2020), Can the Tables Be Turned with New Strategic Alliance? The Struggle of the Romani Women’s Movement in Central and Eastern Europe, in van Baar H., Kóczé A. (eds), The Roma and Their Struggle for Identity in Contemporary Europe, New York: Berghahn Books, 230-253.