Vol. 15 No. 29 (2025): Situare il sapere: sfide epistemologiche e questioni di metodo tra nord e sud
Monographic Section

One hundred years of denialism: banishing asbestos to other’s lungs

PDF HTML
  • Marília De Nardin Budó
Marília De Nardin Budó
Federal University of Santa Catarina, Brazil
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/cambio-17636

Published 2025-12-30

Keywords

  • asbestos industry,
  • denialism,
  • coloniality,
  • Brazil

How to Cite

De Nardin Budó, M. (2025). One hundred years of denialism: banishing asbestos to other’s lungs. Cambio. Rivista Sulle Trasformazioni Sociali, 15(29), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.36253/cambio-17636

Copyright (c) 2025 Marília De Nardin Budó

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Despite being “virtually” banned by the Brazilian Supreme court in 2017, asbestos – a mineral fibre already banned from more than 60 countries in the world because of the diseases it can cause to the ones exposed to its dust - is still mined and exported to other global South countries. From the field of the crimes of the powerful, informed by feminist and decolonial epistemologies, I propose in this article a debate over the more recent judicial and political decisions that allowed Brazil to keep its position as the third major asbestos exporter in the world, in the interest of the mining company Sama. In the first part of the article, I discuss how scientific discourse about asbestos produced in the last one hundred years mostly in the global North has contributed, even when unconsciously, to denialism. In the second part I analyse specific cases in which biased scientific research circulated from global North straight to the pen of the justices of the Brazilian Supreme federal court. By dialoguing with aspects of the novel One Hundred Years of Solitude, by Gabriel García Marquez, I argue that the magical realism behind these decisions, instead of being explained by some kind of backwardness or irrationality, is actually a didactical fulfilment of the values of modern/colonial science: the war against nature, the hierarchy of knowledge, the insistence of keeping the profits of the industry despite the harms it causes. I argue that the virtual ban has actually performed as an asbestos banishment to other’s lungs with the approval of a state law for exporting all asbestos extracted. In the losing votes that in this magic reality are actually performing as winner, the white male businessmen who know for a long time about asbestos harms are thought to be victims of treachery, the current mining workers and the local economy are shields against the accusations of harms and the people affected by asbestos are only narrated as side effects, with the bless of technique in the 100º anniversary of denialism.

PDF HTML

References

  1. Agamben G. (2005), State of Exception, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  2. Altopiedi R., Panelli S. (2016), The Great Trial, Asbestos Disease Awareness Organization, http://www.asbestosdiseaseawareness.org/archives/38113.
  3. Amaral A.P. (2019), Com o peito cheio de pó: uma etnografia sobre a negação do adoecimento de trabalhadores do amianto na cidade de Minaçu (GO), 53, 1, https://www.infodesign.org.br/infodesign/article/view/355.
  4. Barak G. (2015), The Crimes of the Powerful and the Globalization of Crime, in «Revista Brasileira de Direito», 11, 2, 104–114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18256/2238-0604/revistadedireito.v11n2p104-114
  5. Bernstein D. (2014), The Health Risk of Chrysotile Asbestos, in «Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine», 20, 4, 366–370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MCP.0000000000000064
  6. Braun L. (2008), Structuring silence: Asbestos and biomedical research in Britain and South Africa, in «Race and Class», 50, 1, 59–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0306396808093301
  7. Banerjee S.B. (2008), Necrocapitalism, in «Organization Studies», 29, 12, 1541–1563. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607096386
  8. Brazil (2017), Supreme Federal Court. Direct Action of Unconstitutionality nº 3937, rapporteur Min. Marco Aurélio Mello, http://redir.stf.jus.br/paginadorpub/paginador.jsp?docTP=TP&docID=749028439.
  9. Brazil (2019), Supreme Federal Court. Direct Action of Unconstitutionality nº 6200, rapporteur Min. Alexandre de Moraes, https://portal.stf.jus.br/processos/detalhe.asp?incidente=5738022.
  10. Budó M. de N. (2019), «Um massacre silencioso que continua»: um olhar criminológico sobre os danos sociais causados pelo amianto, in «Novos Estudos Jurídicos», 24, 2, 483–513. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14210/nej.v24n2.p483-513
  11. Budó M. de N. (2021), Corporate Crime and the Use of Science in the Case of Asbestos: Producing Harm Through Discursive Shields, in «Journal of White Collar and Corporate Crime», 2, 2, 81–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2631309X20978718
  12. Budó M. de N. (2026), Colonial and Patriarchal Dimensions of State-Corporate Harm: Embodying the Powerful in the Global Asbestos Crisis, Bristol: Bristol University Press.
  13. Castleman B.I. (1995), The migration of industrial hazards, in «International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health», 1, 2, 85–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/oeh.1995.1.2.85
  14. Cohen S. (2001), States of Denial: Knowing about Atrocities and Suffering, Cambridge: Cambridge: Polity Press.
  15. Connell R., Pearse R., Collyer F., Maia J., Morrell R. (2018), Remaking the global economy of knowledge: Do new fields of research change the structure of North–South relations?, in «The British Journal of Sociology», 69, 738–757. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12294
  16. Conniff B. (1990), The Dark Side of Magical Realism: Science, Oppression, and Apocalypse in One Hundred Years of Solitude, in «MFS Modern Fiction Studies», 36, 2, 167–179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/mfs.0.0821
  17. Cooke W. E. (1927), Pulmonary Asbestosis, in «The British Medical Journal», 2, 3491, 1024–1025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.2.3491.1024
  18. Danowski D., Viveiros de Castro E. (2016), The Ends of the World, Cambridge: Polity Press.
  19. Federici S. (2017), Calibã e a bruxa: mulheres, corpo e acumulação primitiva, São Paulo: Elefante.
  20. Ferdinand M. (2022), Uma ecologia decolonial: pensar a partir do mundo caribenho, São Paulo: Ubu Editora.
  21. Foucault M. (1980), Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, New York: Pantheon Books.
  22. Foucault M. (1999), Em defesa da sociedade: curso no Collège de France (1975–1976), São Paulo: Martins Fontes.
  23. Frey S. (2013), Breaking Ships into World Systems: An Analysis of Two Ship Breaking Capitals, Alang Sosiya, India and Chittagong, Bangladesh, 84, 1, 487–492.
  24. Furuya S. et al. (2018), Global Asbestos Disaster, in «International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health», 15, 5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15051000
  25. García Márquez G. (1982), The Solitude of Latin America, Nobel Prize of Literature Lecture, https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/literature/1982/marquez/lecture/.
  26. García Márquez G. (1998), One Hundred Years of Solitude, in Literary Geography: an Encyclopedia of Real and Imagined Settings, New York: Avon Books.
  27. Giannasi F. (1995), O uso do amianto no Brasil: um grande desafio, in «Caderno CRH», 8, 23, 128–140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9771/ccrh.v8i23.18723
  28. Greenberg M. (1994), Knowledge of the health hazard of asbestos prior to the Merewether and Price report of 1930, in «Social History of Medicine», 7, 3, 493–516. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/shm/7.3.493
  29. Harding S. (1991), Whose Science? Whose Knowledge?: Thinking from Women’s Lives, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  30. Harding S. (2016), Latin American Decolonial Social Studies of Scientific Knowledge: Alliances and Tensions, in «Science, Technology and Human Values», 41, 6, 1063–1087. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243916656465
  31. Latour B. (2004), Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  32. Le Roux H. (2022), Circulating Asbestos: The International AC Review, 1956–1985, in Förster K. (ed.), Environmental Histories of Architecture, Montreal: Canadian Centre for Architecture, 6–1–6–17.
  33. Maines R. (2005), Asbestos & Fire: Technological Trade-offs and the Body at Risk, New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
  34. Mazzeo A. (2020), Dust Inside, New York: Berghahn. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3167/9781789209310
  35. Mbembe A. (2003), Necropolitics, in «Public Culture», 15, 1, 11–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-15-1-11
  36. McCulloch J. (2002), Asbestos Blues: Labour, Capital, Physicians & the State in South Africa, Oxford: James Currey & Indiana University Press.
  37. McCulloch J., Tweedale G. (2008), Defending the Indefensible: The Global Asbestos Industry and Its Fight for Survival, Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199534852.001.0001
  38. McDonald S. (1927), Histology of Pulmonary Asbestosis, in «The British Medical Journal», 2, 3491, 1025–1026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.2.3491.1025
  39. Mendes R. (2001), Asbesto (amianto) e doença: revisão do conhecimento científico e fundamentação para uma urgente mudança da atual política brasileira sobre a questão, in «Cadernos de Saúde Pública», 17, 1, 7–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2001000100002
  40. Menéndez Navarro A. (2002), Shaping Industrial Health: The Debate on Asbestos Dust Hazards in the UK, 1928–39, in Rodríguez-Ocaña E. (ed.), The Politics of the Healthy Life: An International Perspective, Granada: European Association for the History of Medicine and Health Publications, 63–87.
  41. Merchant C. (1980), The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology and the Scientific Revolution, New York: Harper & Row.
  42. Merewether E. R. A., Price C. W. (1930), Report on Effects of Asbestos Dust on the Lungs and Dust Suppression in the Asbestos Industry, London.
  43. Michaels D. (2008), Doubt is Their Product: How Industry’s Assault on Science Threatens Your Health, New York: Oxford University Press.
  44. Michaels D., Monforton C. (2005), Manufacturing Uncertainty: Contested Science and the Protection of the Public’s Health and Environment, in «American Journal of Public Health», 95, suppl. 1, 39–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2004.043059
  45. Mies M., Shiva V. (2014), Ecofeminism, London: Zed Books.
  46. Mignolo W.D. (2018), The Decolonial Option, in Mignolo W., Walsh C., On Decoloniality: Concepts, Analytics, Praxis, Durham: Duke University Press, 105–244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822371779
  47. Petrillo A. (a cura di) (2015), Il silenzio della polvere: Capitale, verità e morte in una storia meridionale d’amianto, Milano: Mimesis.
  48. Proctor R.N. (1999), The Nazi War on Cancer, Princeton: Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691187815
  49. Quijano A. (2000), Coloniality of Power and Eurocentrism in Latin America, in «International Sociology», 15, 2, 215–232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580900015002005
  50. Rose A. (2022), Asbestos: The Last Modernist Object, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474482448
  51. Roselli M. (2014), The Asbestos Lie: The Past and Present of an Industrial Catastrophe, Brussels: European Trade Union Institute.
  52. Rosenberg C.E. (2002), The Tyranny of Diagnosis: Specific Entities and Individual Experience, in «The Milbank Quarterly», 80, 2, 237–260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.t01-1-00003
  53. Ruers B. (2012), Eternit and the SAIAC Cartel, in Allen D., Kazan-Allen L. (eds.), Eternit and the Great Asbestos Trial, London: IBAS, 15–20.
  54. Ruff K. (2008), Exporting Harm: How Canada Markets Asbestos to the Developing World, Ottawa: Rideau Institute.
  55. Rushton P., Morgan G. (2013), Banishment in the Early Atlantic World: Convicts, Rebels and Slaves, London: Bloomsbury Academic.
  56. Scavone L., Giannasi F., Thébaud-Mony A. (1999), Cidadania e doenças profissionais: o caso do amianto, in «Perspectivas», 22, 115–128.
  57. Silveira A. M. (2018), Dano social estatal-corporativo e a vitimização ocasionada pela exposição ao amianto na cidade de Osasco-SP: um estudo criminológico a partir da representação das vítimas, Faculdade Meridional.
  58. Silveira A. M., Budó M. de N. (2021), Nuvem de poeira: a experiência das vítimas ocupacionais e ambientais da indústria do amianto em Osasco-SP, in «Revista Brasileira de Ciências Criminais», 182, 229–260.
  59. Simson F.W. (1928), Pulmonary Asbestosis in South Africa, in «British Medical Journal», 1, 3516, 885–887. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.1.3516.885
  60. Spurgeon A. (2012), The Contribution of the Women’s Factory Inspectorate to Improvements in Women’s Occupational Health and Safety, Worcester: University of Worcester, https://eprints.worc.ac.uk/id/eprint/2334.
  61. Toma M. (2009), Punição e razão de estado: o degredo no império colonial português, in «ANPUH – XXV Simpósio Nacional de História», 1–30.
  62. Tombs S. (2012), State-Corporate Symbiosis in the Production of Harm and Crime, in «State Crime Journal», 1, 2, 170–195.
  63. Tweedale G. (2000), Magic Mineral to Killer Dust: Turner & Newall and the Asbestos Hazard, Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199243990.001.0001
  64. Zaffaroni E.R. (1991), Em busca das penas perdidas: a perda de legitimidade do sistema penal, Rio de Janeiro: Revan.