Vol. 15 No. 30 (2025): Teoria queer e scienze sociali: tra sfide e prospettive
Focus Section

The new challenges of anti-racist solidarity between the tightening of the border regime and new political imaginaries: An ethnographic research in the city of Padova

PDF
  • Filomena Gaia Farina,
  • Omid Firouzi Tabar
Filomena Gaia Farina
Università degli Studi di Padova, Italia
Omid Firouzi Tabar
Università degli Studi di Padova, Italia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/cambio-18527

Published 2025-12-22

Keywords

  • anti-racist solidarity,
  • border regime,
  • migration,
  • grassroots initiatives,
  • urban marginalization

How to Cite

Farina, F. G., & Firouzi Tabar, O. (2025). The new challenges of anti-racist solidarity between the tightening of the border regime and new political imaginaries: An ethnographic research in the city of Padova. Cambio. Rivista Sulle Trasformazioni Sociali, 15(30), 189–204. https://doi.org/10.36253/cambio-18527

Copyright (c) 2025 Filomena Gaia Farina, Omid Firouzi Tabar

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

This article explores the new challenges of anti-racist solidarity in the context of increasingly restrictive migration policies and the evolving political landscape. Based on ethnographic research conducted in Padova, Italy, it examines the role of grassroots solidarity initiatives and their ambivalent relationship with the tightening border regime. The research investigates the experiences and daily practices of volunteers, activists, and solidarity participants, focusing particularly on asylum seekers, within a shifting socio-political framework characterized by the convergence of humanitarian and securitarian mechanisms. The analysis draws on the concept of migration autonomy, considering both its potential for resistance and its inherent contradictions. Solidarity practices, particularly in urban contexts where migrants are marginalized and excluded, have become critical in addressing the most severe social consequences of these policies. Despite the transformative potential of grassroots solidarity, these efforts are increasingly exposed to the pressures of the border regime, often resulting in the reproduction of paternalistic and infantilizing dynamics within solidarity networks. The article highlights the difficulties faced by volunteers and activists, including the overwhelming demands from vulnerable individuals and the lack of institutional support, which complicate their ability to challenge the border system effectively. Ultimately, the research raises important questions about the capacity of anti-racist solidarity to disrupt the prevailing border regime, particularly in the absence of the migrant subjectivities it aims to support. Through this reflection, the study examines the limitations and contradictions inherent in solidarity work, suggesting that while grassroots efforts can be subversive, they also risk becomingcomplicit in the very system they seek to oppose.

PDF

References

  1. ActionAid & OpenPolis (2024), Report on the Italian reception system 2024, Roma: ActionAid/OpenPolis.
  2. Agier M. (2005), Ordine e disordini dell’umanitario. Dalla vittima al soggetto politico, in «Rifugiati», 5, pp. 49–65.
  3. Ambrosini M. (2008), Irregular immigration, in «Transfer», 14(4), pp. 557–572.
  4. Ambrosini M. (2022), Humanitarian help and refugees: De-Bordering Solidarity as a Contentious Issue, in «Journal of Immigrant and Refugee Studies», 22(3), pp. 517–530.
  5. Balibar É. (2010), At the borders of citizenship, in «European Journal of Social Theory», 13(3), pp. 315–332.
  6. Bauder H. (2017), Sanctuary cities, in «International Migration», 55(2), pp. 174–187.
  7. Belloni M. (2016), Learning How to Squat: Cooperation and Conflict between Refugees and Natives in Rome, in «Journal of Refugee Studies», 29(4), pp. 506–527.
  8. Belloni M., Fravega E., Giudici D. (2020). Fuori dall’accoglienza. Insediamenti informali di rifugiati tra marginalità e autonomia. in «Politiche Sociali», 2, pp. 225-244.
  9. Bonazzoni P. (2023), Impegnati ad accogliere, Milano: Ledizioni.
  10. Burawoy M. (2005), For public sociology, in «American Sociological Review», 70(1), pp. 4–28.
  11. Cabot H. (2012), The Governance of Things: Documenting Limbo in the Greek Asylum Procedure, in «PoLAR», 35(1), pp. 11–29.
  12. Campesi G. (2014), Confinati sulla soglia: Etnografia dei centri per richiedenti asilo in Puglia, in Pannarale L. (a cura di), Passaggi di frontiera, Pisa: Pacini, pp. 37–72.
  13. Campesi G. (2021), Policing mobility regimes, London: Routledge.
  14. Cantat C., Feischmidt M. (2019), Conclusion, in Cantat C. et al. (eds.), Refugee protection and civil society in Europe, Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 379–399.
  15. Cappiali T. (2016), “Whoever decides for you without you, s/he is against you!”: immigrant activism and the role of the left in political racialization, in «Ethnic and Racial Studies», 40(6), pp. 969–987.
  16. Cutitta P. (2016), Mandatory integration measures and differential inclusion: The Italian case, in «Journal of International Migration and Integration», 17(1), pp. 289–302.
  17. Dadusc D., Mudu P. (2020), Care Without Control: The Humanitarian Industrial Complex and the Criminalisation of Solidarity, in «Geopolitics», 27(4), pp. 1205–1230.
  18. Della Porta D. (2013), Can democracy be saved?, Cambridge: Polity.
  19. Della Porta D., Steinhilper E. (2020), Solidarity in motion. Hybridity and Change in Migrant Support Practices, in «Critical Sociology», 47(2), pp. 175–185.
  20. Denaro C. (2024), La “battaglia legale” nel Mediterraneo centrale: Dal “reato di solidarietà” alla (de)criminalizzazione della disobbedienza civile, in «Studi sulla questione criminale», 1, pp. 79-104.
  21. Derrida J. (2006), The politics of friendship, London: Verso.
  22. De Genova N., Garelli G., Tazzioli M. (2018). Autonomy of Asylum? The Autonomy of Migration Undoing the Refugees Crisis Script, in «The South Atlantic Quarterly», 117(2), pp. 239-265.
  23. Fabini G., Firouzi Tabar O., Vianello F. (2019), Lungo i confini dell’accoglienza. Migranti e territori tra resistenze e dispositive di controllo, Manifestolibri.
  24. Fabini G., Firouzi Tabar, O. (2023). Governing Immobility in the Covid-19 Crisis in Italy: Non-conforming Behaviour of Migrants Confronting the New Old Processes of Othering, in «Critical Criminology», 31, pp. 307-325.
  25. Fassin D. (2005), Compassion and repression, in «Cultural Anthropology», 20(3), pp. 362–387.
  26. Fassin D. (2012), Humanitarian reason, Berkeley: University of California Press.
  27. Fleischmann L., Steinhilper E. (2017), The myth of apolitical volunteering, in «Social Inclusion», 5(3), pp. 17–27.
  28. Firouzi Tabar O. (2020), Inclusione sociale delle/dei richiedenti asilo, forza e ambivalenza delle “buone pratiche” autorganizzate, in «Welfare e Ergonomia», 6(2), pp. 31–49.
  29. Firouzi Tabar O. (2021), Una ricerca etnografica sui sistemi di accoglienza: La “giusta distanza” e i confini tra ricerca e attivismo, in Pellegrino V., Massari M. (a cura di), Ricerca sociale ed emancipazione, Genova: Genova University Press, pp. 47–52.
  30. Firouzi Tabar O. (2024), From the “Reception Trap” to “Denied Reception”. The Tightening of Migration Policies and the Centrality of Informal Settlements Between Segregation and Resistance, in «Fuoriluogo», pp. 93–106.
  31. Fontanari E., Pinelli B. (2017), Refugee experiences in Europe. Subjectivity, Surveillance and Control, in «Etnografia e ricerca qualitativa», 1, 2017.
  32. Fontanari E., Borri G. (2018), Civil society on the edge, in «Mondi Migranti», 11(3), pp. 23–51.
  33. Fontanari E., Gaiaschi C., Borri G. (2019), Precarious escapes, in «Quaderni di teoria sociale», 1, pp. 131–156.
  34. Fraser N. (2013), Fortunes of feminism, London: Verso.
  35. Garelli G., Tazzioli M. (2013), Challenging the discipline of migration, in «Postcolonial Studies», 16(3), pp. 245–249.
  36. Gatta G., Massari M., Miceli S. (2024), Affectivity, embodied knowledge and reflexivity in creative biographical research on migration in the mediterranean context, in «Ethnic and Racial Studies», pp. 1–21.
  37. Gauditz L. (2017), The noborders movement, in «Social Inclusion», 5(3), pp. 49–57.
  38. Gennari L., Ferri F., Caprioglio C. (2021), Dopo lo sbarco, Border Criminologies Blog.
  39. Hamann U., Karakayali S. (2015), Practicing Willkommenskultur, in «Intersections», 2(4), pp. 69–86.
  40. Heller, C., Pezzani, L., Stierl, M. (2023), Migration: Security and Humanitarianism across the Mediterranean Border. In Peters, K., Anderson, J., Davies, A., Steinberg, P. (eds.), Routledge Handbook to Ocean Space, pp. 247-260, London: Routledge.
  41. Hess S., Kasparek B. (2017), Under control? Or Border (as) Conflict: Reflections on the European Border Regime, in «Social Inclusion», 5(3), pp. 58–68.
  42. Hess S., Nagel A.K. (2021), Paternalism and control, in «Diva-Portal».
  43. Huysmans J. (2000), The European Union and the securitization of migration, in «Journal of Common Market Studies», 38(5), pp. 751–777.
  44. Karakayali S. (2017), Feeling the scope of solidarity, in «Social Inclusion», 5(3), pp. 7–16.
  45. King N. (2016), No borders, London: Zed Books.
  46. Kirchhoff M. (2020), Differential solidarity, in «Citizenship Studies», 24(4), pp. 568–586.
  47. Malkki L. (1996), Speechless emissaries, in «Cultural Anthropology», 11(3), pp. 377–404.
  48. Manocchi M. (2014), Richiedenti asilo e rifugiati, in «Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia», 2, pp. 385–409.
  49. Manocchi M., Marchetti C. (2015), Introduzione. Rifugiati in transito attraverso l’Europa, in «Mondi Migranti», 1, pp. 21-38
  50. Marchetti C. (2020), Cities of exclusion, in Ambrosini M., Cinalli M., Jacobson D. (eds.), Migration, border and citizenship, Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 237–263.
  51. Marchetti S. Palumbo L. (Eds) (2012), Vulnerability in the Asylum and Protection System in Italy: Legal and Policy Frameworks and Implementing Practices, VULNER Research report 1.
  52. Mellino M. (2018), Governare la crisi dei rifugiati, in «Mondi Migranti», 2, pp. 193–220.
  53. Mezzadra S., Neilson B. (2013), Border as method, Durham: Duke University Press.
  54. Palmas L.Q., Rahola F. (2022), Underground Europe, Milano: Meltemi.
  55. Pallister-Wilkins P. (2020), Hotspots and the Geographies of Humanitarianism, in «Environment and Planning D: Society and Space», 38(6), pp. 991–1008.
  56. Papadopoulos D., Stephenson N., Tsianos V. (2008), Escape Routes: Control and Subversion in the Twenty-First Century, Pluto Press.
  57. Pellegrino V., Massari M. (a cura di) (2020), Emancipatory social science, Napoli: Orthotes.
  58. Rozakou K. (2016), Socialities of Solidarity: revisiting the gift taboo in times of crises, in «Social Anthropology», 24(2), pp. 185-199
  59. Siapera E. (2019), Refugee solidarity in Europe: Shifting the Discourse, in «European Journal of Cultural Studies», 22(2), pp. 245-266.
  60. Sanò G., Firouzi Tabar O. (2021), The ‘Double Emergency’ and the Securitization of the Humanitarian Approach in the Italian Reception System within the Pandemic Crisis, in «Dve Domovini/Two Homelands», 54, pp. 155–170.
  61. Sinatti G. (2019), Humanitarianism as Politics: Civil Support Initiatives for Migrants in Milan’s Hub, in «Social Inclusion», 7(2), pp. 139-148.
  62. Sözer H. (2020), Humanitarianism with a neo-liberal face: Vulnerability intervention as vulnerability distribution, in «Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies», 46(11), pp. 2163-2180.
  63. Stierl, M., Dadusc D. (2021), The “Covid Excuse”: European Border Violence in the Mediterranean Sea, in «Ethnic and Racial Studies», 45(8), 1453-1474
  64. Tazzioli M., Stierl, M. (2021), We Closed the Ports to Protect Refugees. Hygienic Borders and Deterrence Humanitarian ism During Covid-19, in «International Political Sociology», 15(4), 539-558
  65. Ticktin M. (2011), Casualties of care, Berkeley: University of California Press.
  66. Vandervoordt R., Verschraegen G. (2019), Subversive Humanitarianism and its challenges: Notes on the political ambiguities of civil support, in Feischmidt M., Pries L., Cantat C. (Eds), Refugee protection and civil society in Europe, Springer, pp. 101-128.
  67. Vaughan-Williams N. (2015), Europe’s Border Crisis: Biopolitical Security and Beyond, Oxford University Press.
  68. Walters W. (2011), Foucault and frontiers, in Bröckling U. et al. (eds.), Governmentality, London: Routledge.
  69. Wodak R. (2015), The politics of fear, London: Sage.
  70. Zamponi L. (2018), Practices of solidarity: Direct social action, politicisation and refugee solidarity activism in Italy, in «Mondi Migranti», 11(3), pp. 97-117.