Vol. 83 (2023)
Special Issue - Visions of the future in real estate appraisal

Discounted Cash Flow Analysis and Prudential Value DCFA Formula

PDF
  • Maurizio d'Amato,
  • Giampiero Bambagioni
Maurizio d'Amato
Department of Civil, Environmental, Land, Construction and Chemistry (DICATECh), Polytechnic University of Bari
Giampiero Bambagioni
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering (DICA), University of Perugia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/aestim-14037

Published 2024-04-22

Keywords

  • Discounted Cash Flow Analysis (DCFA),
  • IVS,
  • Prudential Value,
  • Property Valuation,
  • Simonotti DCFA Model,
  • Long-Term Sustainable Value,
  • Loan-to-Value (LTV) ratio,
  • Agricultural value
    • ...More
    Less

Copyright (c) 2023 Maurizio d'Amato, Giampiero Bambagioni

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

According to IVS 2023 the terminal value of a DCFA can be calculated in respect of the three fundamental appraisal approach: market, income and cost. Specifically, “Where the asset is expected to continue beyond the explicit forecast period, valuers must estimate the value of the asset at the end of that period. The terminal value is then discounted back to the valuation date, normally using the same discount rate as applied to the forecast cash flow” (IVS 105 Valuation Approaches and Methods, para 50.20). Although academic and professional normally refer to direct capitalization to calculate the exit value (scrap value, going out value) different approaches are possible. In particular it is possible to calculate the exit value using the market approach. The present work starts from an original model of Discounted Cash Flow Analysis proposed by Simonotti (2006) to propose possible alternative to the original formula. The model proposed, as defined for the paper “Prudential Value DCFA Formula (PVF)” provides methodological alternatives to the original model in order to apply the method in different property market conditions allowing the appraiser to represent even property market in recovery or falling market phase, or prudential assessment of worth and opinion of value. In particular the proposed model replace the compound growth of the property value included in the traditional Simonotti’s model, with a linear growth or even a combination of both. The paper emphasize how property valuation standards can not be considered as immutable but they may be considered in constant evolution. In delivering an opinion of value for mortgage lending purposes the approach of professional academician and real estate analyst need to be able to respond to change of external conditions, in consideration of the sustainability of the cash flows in the long term, for the entire duration of the loan (and therefore for the purpose of identifying the long-term sustainable value of the asset). The approach is functional, inter alia, for the purpose of identifying the “prudential value” as defined by the innovative banking regulation (Basel 3) according to the definition of loan-to-value (LTV) ratio for loan origination and monitoring.

PDF

References

  1. Bambagioni, G. (2011). Sostenibilità del valore nel finanziamento immobiliare. Santarcangelo di Romagna, Maggioli Politecnica. ISBN 978-88-916-4638-5.
  2. Bienert, S., & Wolfgang Brunauer, W. (2007). The mortgage lending value: prospects for development within Europe. Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 25(6) 542–578. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14635780710829289
  3. Crosby, N. (2021). Prudent or “long-term” property valuations: concepts, definitions and methods. Housing Finance International, 36(2), 31–39.
  4. Crosby, N., & Hordijk, A. (2021). Approaches for prudent property valuations across Europe. Research Report submitted to the EU. University of Reading. Available at: https://centaur.reading.ac.uk/98271/ (accessed 15 December 2023).
  5. Crosby, N., & Hughes, C. (2011). The basis of valuations for secured commercial property lending in the UK. Journal of European Real Estate Research, 4(3), 225–242. https://doi.org/10.1108/17539261111183425 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/17539261111183425
  6. D’Amato, M., Cucuzza, G., & Bambagioni, G. (2023). Appraising forced sale value by the method of short table market comparison approach. Aestimum, 82, 39–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/aestim-13808
  7. D’Amato, M., Zrobek, S., Renigier Bilozor, M., Walacik, M., & Mercadante, G. (2019). Valuing the effect of the change of zoning on underdeveloped land using fuzzy real option approach. Land Use Policy, 86, 365–374. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.04.042
  8. D’Amato, M., & Kauko, T. (2009). Property market classification and mass appraisal methodology. In Kauko, T., & D’Amato, M. (Eds.). Mass appraisal methods: an international perspective for property valuers. pp. 280–303. Oxford, Wiley. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444301021.ch13
  9. D’Amato, M., & Siniak, N. (2009). Using Fuzzy Numbers in Mass Appraisal: The Cas of Belarusian Property Market. In Kauko, T., & D’Amato, M. (Eds.). Mass appraisal methods: an international perspective for property valuers. pp. 91–107. Oxford, Wiley. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444301021.ch5
  10. Dilmore, G. (1971). The New Approach to Real Estate Appraising. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
  11. Downs, A. (1996). Characteristics of various economic studies. The Appraisal Journal, 34(3), 329–338.
  12. European Banking Authority (2015). Opinion of the European Banking Authority on Mortgage Lending Value (MLV). Available at: www.eba.europa.eu (accessed 15 December 2023).
  13. European Banking Autority (2020). Guidelines on loan origination and monitoring (EBA/GL/2020/06). Available at: https://www.eba.europa.eu/legacy/regulation-and-policy/regulatory-activities/credit-risk/guidelines-loan-origination-and (accessed 15 December 2023).
  14. Farragher, E. J. (1982). Investment decision making practices of equity investors in real estate. The Real Estate Appraiser and Analyst, 48(2), 36–40.
  15. French, N., & Cooper, R. (2000). Investment Valuation Models. Journal of Property Investment and Finance, 18(2), 225–238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14635780010324493
  16. Graaskamp, J. A. (1969). A practical computer service for the Income Approach. The Appraisal Journal, 37(1) , 50–57.
  17. Gondring, H., & Lorenz, T. (2001). Basel II – Auswirkungen auf die Immobilienwirtschaft. Stuttgart, Akademie der Immobilienwirtschaft (ADI).
  18. Gordon, M. (1962). The investment, financing and valuation of the corporation. Homewood, Irwin. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1926621
  19. Gordon, M., & Shapiro, E. (1956). Capital equipment analysis: the required rate of profit. Management Science, 3(1), 102–110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.3.1.102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.3.1.102
  20. Hendershott, P. H., & Hendershott, R. J. (2002). On Measuring Real Estate Risk, Real Estate Finance, 18, 35–40.
  21. Hordijk, A., & Van de Ridder, W. (2005). Valuation model uniformity and consistency in real estate indices: the case of the Netherland. Journal of Property Investment and Finance, 23(2), 165–181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14635780510584355
  22. International Valuation Standards Council - IVSC (2022). International Valuation Standards (IVS). London, IVSC.
  23. Long-term Value Working Group of the Property Industry Alliance Debt Group (2017). Long-term Value Methodologies and Real Estate Lending, Property Investment Alliance.
  24. Louargand, M. (1992). A survey of pension fund real estate portfolio risk management practices. Journal of Real Estate Research, 7(4), 361–373. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10835547.1992.12090689
  25. Lusht, K. (1997). Real Estate Valuation, Principles and Applications. Homewood, Irwin.
  26. Marshall, P. (1976). Equated yield analysis. Estates Gazette, 239, 493–497.
  27. McIntosh, W., Davidson, W. N., & Albert, J. D. (1987). Capital budgeting practice of corporate real estate executives. The Appraisal Journal, January, 125–137.
  28. Millington, A. F. (2000). An Introduction to Property Valuation, 5th Edition. London, Estates Gazzette.
  29. Nordlund, B. (2008). Valuation Performance Reporting in Property Companies According to IFRS. Doctoral thesis in Building and Real Estate Economics, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm.
  30. Page, D. (1983). Criterion for investment decision making: an empirical study. The Appraisal Journal, 52(4), 498–508.
  31. Quentin, J. (2009). The subprime crisis--implications for property valuation? The revival of mortgage lending value. Appraisal Journal, 77(4), 312–318.
  32. Rabianski, J. G. (2002). Vacancy in market analysis and valuation. The Appraisal Journal, 70(2), 191–199.
  33. Ratcliff, R. U. (1972). Valuation for Real Estate Decisions. Santa Cruz, Democrat Press.
  34. Ruchardt, K. (2001). Der Beleihungswert. Frankfurt am Main, Fritz Knapp Verlag.
  35. Scarrett, D. (2000) Property Valuation. The 5 Method. London, Spon Press.
  36. Simonotti, M. (2006). Metodi di Stima Immobiliare. Palermo, Dario Flaccovio Editore.
  37. Simonotti, M., & Bambagioni, G. (2018). Codice delle Valutazioni Immobiliari | Italian Property Valuation Standard (Quinta Edizione). Roma, Tecnoborsa Editore.
  38. Webb, J. (1984). Real estate investment acquisition rules for life insurance companies and pension funds: a survey. Real Estate Economics, 12(4), 495–520. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6229.00335
  39. Werth, A. (1998). Vom Verkehrswert unabhangige Beleihungswerte im Blcikfeld der Europaischen Union. Grundstucksmarkt- und Grundstuckswert, 5, S257–S266.
  40. Wiley, R. J. (1976). Real estate investment analysis: an empirical study. Appraisal Journal, 44(4), 586–592.
  41. Willison, D. L. (1999). Towards a more reliable cash flow analysis. The Appraisal Journal, 67(1), 75–82.
  42. Millington (2000). An Introduction to Property Valuation. London, Estates Gazette.
  43. Tajani, F., & Morano P. (2017). An empirical-deductive model for the assessment of the mortgage lending value of properties as securities for credit exposures. Journal of European Real Estate Research, 11(1), 44–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JERER-01-2017-0007
  44. Taylor, M. A., & Rubin, G. (2002). Raising the bar: simulation as a tool for assessing risk for real estate properties and portfolios. Real Estate Finance, 18(4), 18–34.
  45. Wheaton, W. C., Torto, R. G., Sivitanides, P. S., Southard, J. A., Hopkins, R. E., & Costello, J. M. (2001). Real estate risk: a forward-looking approach. Real Estate Finance, 18(3), 20–28.

Most read articles by the same author(s)