Vol. 85 (2024)
Special Issue - Incontro Studio CeSET 2023

Filling the old with new life. Application of original indicators for evaluating ecovillages as village repopulation initiatives

PDF
  • Giovanna Acampa,
  • Alessio Pino
Giovanna Acampa
Department of Architecture DIDA, University of Florence, Italy
Alessio Pino
Department of Engineering and Architecture, University of Enna “Kore”, Italy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/aestim-16404

Published 2025-02-14

Keywords

  • indicators,
  • inner areas,
  • ecovillage

Copyright (c) 2024 Giovanna Acampa, Alessio Pino

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

The recently intensified trend of centripetal movements from small to bigger centres has multiplied the number of inhabitants of large cities. In Italy, this has resulted in worrying figures: more than 70% of Italian Municipalities have less than 5,000 inhabitants. Despite several regional and national policies dedicating programs and funds to counteract this progressive phenomenon fostering the repopulation of abandoned villages, this trend is far from being halted. Though the functional gap between cities and villages is evident, this study and previous research on this theme aim to change the perspective on the possible uses and repopulation processes of villages, pivoting on their potential as places where to enjoy different lifestyles. The focus is on the ecovillage model, developing a set of specific indicators to individuate them through their peculiar aspects and assess their benefits and vulnerabilities. An experimental application is also proposed on 7 ecovillages. This set of indicators is not conceived as completely substitutive of those used in current policies, but rather as a suggestion of possible integrations to avoid demoting this category of villages in policy-related evaluations for funding allocation.

PDF

References

  1. Acampa, G., & Pino, A. (2023). Optimal computing budget allocation for urban regeneration: an unprecedented match between economic/extra-economic evaluations and urban planning. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 14112, 69–79.
  2. Acampa, G., Grasso, M., Marino, G., & Parisi, C. M. (2020). Tourist flow management: social impact evaluation through social network analysis. Sustainability, 12(2), 731.
  3. Acampa, G., Parisi, C.M. (2021). Management of maintenance costs in cultural heritage. Green Energy and Technology, 195-212.
  4. Acampa, G., Parisi, C.M. (2021). Management of Maintenance Costs in Cultural Heritage. In Morano, P., Oppio, A., Rosato, P., Sdino, L., & Tajani, F. (Eds). Appraisal and Valuation. Green Energy and Technology. Cham, Springer.
  5. Barani, S., Alibeygi, A.H., & Papzan, A. (2018). A framework to identify and develop potential ecovillages: meta-analysis from the studies of world’s ecovillages. Sustainable Cities and Society, 43, 275–289.
  6. Bascherini, E. (2021). Repopulating abandoned villages. New housing strategies for the pandemic. Festival dell’Architettura Magazine, 52–53, 204–209.
  7. Brombin, A. (2019). The ecovillage movement: New ways to experience nature. Environmental Values, 28(2), 191–210.
  8. Bruni, S., & Mazzantini, G. (2018). Gli indicatori del Bes quali strumenti di better regulation per la quantificazione degli impatti nelle Air e nelle Vir. Rivista Italiana di Public Management, 1(2), 101–131.
  9. Burns, R. A. (2017). Psychological Well-Being. In Pachana, N. A. (Ed.). Encyclopedia of Geropsychology Singapore, Springer.
  10. Chelli, F. M., Ciommi, M., Emili, A., Gigliarano, C., & Taralli, S. (2015). Comparing equitable and Sustainable Well-Being (BES) across the Italian provinces. A factor analysis-based approach. Rivista Italiana di Economia, Demografia e Statistica, 69(3), 61–72.
  11. Chisale, E., & Phiri, F. E. (2022). PERMA Model and Mental Health Practice. Asian Journal of Pharmacy Nursing, 10(2), 21–24.
  12. Cisek, E., & Jaglarz, A. (2021). Architectural education in the current of deep ecology and sustainability. Buildings, 11(8), 358.
  13. de Souza, L. L. D., da Silva Filho, C. F., & Mastrodi, J. (2023). Contributions of rural ecovillages to the United Nations 2030 Agenda: evidence from research applied in the state of São Paulo. Desenvolvimento e Melo Ambiente, 62, 1311–32.
  14. Di Fabio, A., & Svicher, A. (2023). The Eco-Generativity Scale (EGS): a New resource to protect the environment and promote health. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(15), 6474.
  15. Diener, E., Wirtz, D., & Tov, W. (2009). New measures of well-being: flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 39, 247–266.
  16. Eiroa-Orosa, F. J. (2020). Understanding psychosocial wellbeing in the context of complex and multidimensional problems. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(16), 5937.
  17. Fiorino, D. R., Melis, C., Pilia, E., Pirisino, M. S., & Porcu, M. (2020). Processes of depopulation in Sardinia. Issues and potentialities of some case studies. ArchHistoR Extra, 7, 187–207.
  18. Germano, L., & Lizzi, R. (2024). The implementation of NRRP policies between politics and policy. An interest group perspective. Contemporary Italian Politics, 16(1), 7–20.
  19. Grinde, B., Nes, R. B., MacDonald, I. F., & Wilson, D. S. (2018). Quality of life in intentional communities. Social Indicators Research, 137(2), 625–40.
  20. Henfrey, T., & Ford, L. (2018). Permacultures of transformation: steps to a cultural ecology of environmental action. Journal of Political Ecology, 25(1), 104–119.
  21. Ilieva, R. T., & Hernandez, A. (2018). Scaling-up sustainable development initiatives: a comparative case study of agri-food system innovations in Brazil, New York, and Senegal. Sustainability, 10(11), 4057.
  22. Lauria, M., & La Face, G. (2020). Resilience markers for fragile areas. Innovative approaches and strategies for the villages of Reggio Calabria, Metropolitan City. ArchHistoR Extra, 7, 1410–1439.
  23. Losardo, M. (2016). “New Ways of Living, as Old as the World” Best Practices and Sustainability in the Example of the Italian Ecovillage Network. Studia Ethnologica Croatica, 28, 47–70.
  24. Manuele, G. G. D. (2020). A_R_T_ (A_rtistica R_ivitalizzazione T_erritoriale): a strategy for the revitalization of small centres. ArchHistoR Extra, 7, 1286–1301.
  25. Moravčíková, D., & Fürjészová, T. (2018). Ecovillage as an alternative way of rural life: evidence from Hungary and Slovakia. European Countryside, 10(4), 693–710.
  26. Napoleone, L. (2020). Abandoned villages in Liguria. Tourist development and transformation of the sense of place. ArchHistoR Extra, 7, 966–981.
  27. Nogueira, C., Marques, J. F., & Pinto, H. (2024). Intentional sustainable communities and sustainable development goals: from micro-scale implementation to scalability of innovative practices. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 67(1), 175–96.
  28. Papenfuss, J., & Merritt, E. (2019). Pedagogical laboratories: a case study of transformative sustainability education in an ecovillage context. Sustainability, 11(14), 3880.
  29. Pignatelli, M., Torabi Moghdadam, S., & Lombardi, P. (2023). Spatial clustering-based method for Italian marginal areas toward the sustainable regeneration. Valori e Valutazioni, 32, 77–89.
  30. Plottu, E., & Plottu, B. (2007). The concept of Total Economic Value of environment: a reconsideration within a hierarchical rationality. Ecological Economics, 61(1), 52–61.
  31. Rossitti, M., & Torrieri, F. (2022a). Action research for the conservation of architectural heritage in marginal areas: the role of evaluation. Valori e Valutazioni, 30, 3–42.
  32. Rossitti, M., & Torrieri, F. (2022b). The THEMA tool to support heritage-based development strategies for marginal areas: evidence from an Italian inner area in Campania Region. Region, 9(2), 109–129.
  33. Rossitti, M., Dell’Ovo, M., Oppio, A., & Torrieri, F. (2021). The Italian National Strategy for Inner Areas (SNAI): a critical analysis of the indicator grid. Sustainability, 13(12), 6927.
  34. Ryff, C.D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069–1081.
  35. Schafer, M., Hielscher, S., Haas, W., Hausknost, D., Leitner, M., Kunze, I., & Mandl, S. (2018). Facilitating low-carbon living? A comparison of intervention measures in different community-based initiatives. Sustainability, 10(4), 1047.
  36. Sherry, J. (2019). The impact of community sustainability: a life cycle assessment of three ecovillages. Journal of Cleaner Production, 237, 117830.
  37. Slater, C. L. (2003). Generativity versus stagnation: an elaboration of Erikson’s adult stage of human development. Journal of Adult Development, 10(1), 53–65.
  38. Stoll, S. J., & Pollastri, A. R. (2023). Social and environmental influences. In Halpern-Felsher, B. (Ed.). Encyclopedia of Child and Adolescent Health. London, Academic Press.
  39. Syamsiyah, N., Sulistyowati, L., Noor, T. I., & Setiawan, I. (2023). The sustainability level of an EcoVillage in the Upper Citarum Watershed of West Java province, Indonesia. Sustainability, 15(22), 15951.
  40. Temesgen, A. K. (2024). Ecovillage scale-up and its well-being challenges: a case study from Norway. SuStainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 20(1), 2393912.
  41. Ucok Hughes, M. (2018). Sustainable living in the city: the case of an urban ecovillage. In Dhiman, S., & Marques, J. (Eds.). Handbook of Engaged Sustainability. Cham, Springer, pp. 869–883.
  42. Ulug, C., Horlings, L., & Trell, E. M. (2021). Collective identity supporting sustainability transformations in ecovillage communities. Sustainability, 13(15), 8148.
  43. Weijis-Perrée, M., Van den Berg, P., Arentze, T., & Kemperman, A. (2017). Social networks, social satisfaction and place attachment in the neighborhood. Region, 4(3), 133–151.