Vol. 85 (2024)
Special Issue - Incontro Studio CeSET 2023

Filling the old with new life. Application of original indicators for evaluating ecovillages as village repopulation initiatives

PDF
  • Giovanna Acampa,
  • Alessio Pino
Giovanna Acampa
Department of Architecture DIDA, University of Florence, Italy
Alessio Pino
Department of Engineering and Architecture, University of Enna “Kore”, Italy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/aestim-16404

Published 2025-02-14

Keywords

  • indicators,
  • inner areas,
  • ecovillage

Copyright (c) 2024 Giovanna Acampa, Alessio Pino

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

The recently intensified trend of centripetal movements from small to bigger centres has multiplied the number of inhabitants of large cities. In Italy, this has resulted in worrying figures: more than 70% of Italian Municipalities have less than 5,000 inhabitants. Despite several regional and national policies dedicating programs and funds to counteract this progressive phenomenon fostering the repopulation of abandoned villages, this trend is far from being halted. Though the functional gap between cities and villages is evident, this study and previous research on this theme aim to change the perspective on the possible uses and repopulation processes of villages, pivoting on their potential as places where to enjoy different lifestyles. The focus is on the ecovillage model, developing a set of specific indicators to individuate them through their peculiar aspects and assess their benefits and vulnerabilities. An experimental application is also proposed on 7 ecovillages. This set of indicators is not conceived as completely substitutive of those used in current policies, but rather as a suggestion of possible integrations to avoid demoting this category of villages in policy-related evaluations for funding allocation.

PDF

References

  1. Acampa, G., & Pino, A. (2023). Optimal computing budget allocation for urban regeneration: an unprecedented match between economic/extra-economic evaluations and urban planning. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 14112, 69–79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37129-5_6
  2. Acampa, G., Grasso, M., Marino, G., & Parisi, C. M. (2020). Tourist flow management: social impact evaluation through social network analysis. Sustainability, 12(2), 731. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020731
  3. Acampa, G., Parisi, C.M. (2021). Management of maintenance costs in cultural heritage. Green Energy and Technology, 195-212.
  4. Acampa, G., Parisi, C.M. (2021). Management of Maintenance Costs in Cultural Heritage. In Morano, P., Oppio, A., Rosato, P., Sdino, L., & Tajani, F. (Eds). Appraisal and Valuation. Green Energy and Technology. Cham, Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49579-4_14
  5. Barani, S., Alibeygi, A.H., & Papzan, A. (2018). A framework to identify and develop potential ecovillages: meta-analysis from the studies of world’s ecovillages. Sustainable Cities and Society, 43, 275–289. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.08.036
  6. Bascherini, E. (2021). Repopulating abandoned villages. New housing strategies for the pandemic. Festival dell’Architettura Magazine, 52–53, 204–209.
  7. Brombin, A. (2019). The ecovillage movement: New ways to experience nature. Environmental Values, 28(2), 191–210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3197/096327119X15515267418520
  8. Bruni, S., & Mazzantini, G. (2018). Gli indicatori del Bes quali strumenti di better regulation per la quantificazione degli impatti nelle Air e nelle Vir. Rivista Italiana di Public Management, 1(2), 101–131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59724/RIPM.2018.2.2
  9. Burns, R. A. (2017). Psychological Well-Being. In Pachana, N. A. (Ed.). Encyclopedia of Geropsychology Singapore, Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-082-7_251
  10. Chelli, F. M., Ciommi, M., Emili, A., Gigliarano, C., & Taralli, S. (2015). Comparing equitable and Sustainable Well-Being (BES) across the Italian provinces. A factor analysis-based approach. Rivista Italiana di Economia, Demografia e Statistica, 69(3), 61–72.
  11. Chisale, E., & Phiri, F. E. (2022). PERMA Model and Mental Health Practice. Asian Journal of Pharmacy Nursing, 10(2), 21–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24203/ajpnms.v10i2.7015
  12. Cisek, E., & Jaglarz, A. (2021). Architectural education in the current of deep ecology and sustainability. Buildings, 11(8), 358. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11080358
  13. de Souza, L. L. D., da Silva Filho, C. F., & Mastrodi, J. (2023). Contributions of rural ecovillages to the United Nations 2030 Agenda: evidence from research applied in the state of São Paulo. Desenvolvimento e Melo Ambiente, 62, 1311–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5380/dma.v62i0.85045
  14. Di Fabio, A., & Svicher, A. (2023). The Eco-Generativity Scale (EGS): a New resource to protect the environment and promote health. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(15), 6474. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20156474
  15. Diener, E., Wirtz, D., & Tov, W. (2009). New measures of well-being: flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 39, 247–266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2354-4_12
  16. Eiroa-Orosa, F. J. (2020). Understanding psychosocial wellbeing in the context of complex and multidimensional problems. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(16), 5937. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17165937
  17. Fiorino, D. R., Melis, C., Pilia, E., Pirisino, M. S., & Porcu, M. (2020). Processes of depopulation in Sardinia. Issues and potentialities of some case studies. ArchHistoR Extra, 7, 187–207.
  18. Germano, L., & Lizzi, R. (2024). The implementation of NRRP policies between politics and policy. An interest group perspective. Contemporary Italian Politics, 16(1), 7–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23248823.2024.2310417
  19. Grinde, B., Nes, R. B., MacDonald, I. F., & Wilson, D. S. (2018). Quality of life in intentional communities. Social Indicators Research, 137(2), 625–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1615-3
  20. Henfrey, T., & Ford, L. (2018). Permacultures of transformation: steps to a cultural ecology of environmental action. Journal of Political Ecology, 25(1), 104–119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2458/v25i1.22758
  21. Ilieva, R. T., & Hernandez, A. (2018). Scaling-up sustainable development initiatives: a comparative case study of agri-food system innovations in Brazil, New York, and Senegal. Sustainability, 10(11), 4057. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10114057
  22. Lauria, M., & La Face, G. (2020). Resilience markers for fragile areas. Innovative approaches and strategies for the villages of Reggio Calabria, Metropolitan City. ArchHistoR Extra, 7, 1410–1439.
  23. Losardo, M. (2016). “New Ways of Living, as Old as the World” Best Practices and Sustainability in the Example of the Italian Ecovillage Network. Studia Ethnologica Croatica, 28, 47–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17234/SEC.28.3
  24. Manuele, G. G. D. (2020). A_R_T_ (A_rtistica R_ivitalizzazione T_erritoriale): a strategy for the revitalization of small centres. ArchHistoR Extra, 7, 1286–1301.
  25. Moravčíková, D., & Fürjészová, T. (2018). Ecovillage as an alternative way of rural life: evidence from Hungary and Slovakia. European Countryside, 10(4), 693–710. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/euco-2018-0038
  26. Napoleone, L. (2020). Abandoned villages in Liguria. Tourist development and transformation of the sense of place. ArchHistoR Extra, 7, 966–981.
  27. Nogueira, C., Marques, J. F., & Pinto, H. (2024). Intentional sustainable communities and sustainable development goals: from micro-scale implementation to scalability of innovative practices. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 67(1), 175–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2022.2106553
  28. Papenfuss, J., & Merritt, E. (2019). Pedagogical laboratories: a case study of transformative sustainability education in an ecovillage context. Sustainability, 11(14), 3880. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11143880
  29. Pignatelli, M., Torabi Moghdadam, S., & Lombardi, P. (2023). Spatial clustering-based method for Italian marginal areas toward the sustainable regeneration. Valori e Valutazioni, 32, 77–89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48264/VVSIEV-20233207
  30. Plottu, E., & Plottu, B. (2007). The concept of Total Economic Value of environment: a reconsideration within a hierarchical rationality. Ecological Economics, 61(1), 52–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.09.027
  31. Rossitti, M., & Torrieri, F. (2022a). Action research for the conservation of architectural heritage in marginal areas: the role of evaluation. Valori e Valutazioni, 30, 3–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48264/VVSIEV-20223002
  32. Rossitti, M., & Torrieri, F. (2022b). The THEMA tool to support heritage-based development strategies for marginal areas: evidence from an Italian inner area in Campania Region. Region, 9(2), 109–129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18335/region.v9i2.394
  33. Rossitti, M., Dell’Ovo, M., Oppio, A., & Torrieri, F. (2021). The Italian National Strategy for Inner Areas (SNAI): a critical analysis of the indicator grid. Sustainability, 13(12), 6927. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126927
  34. Ryff, C.D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069–1081. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.57.6.1069
  35. Schafer, M., Hielscher, S., Haas, W., Hausknost, D., Leitner, M., Kunze, I., & Mandl, S. (2018). Facilitating low-carbon living? A comparison of intervention measures in different community-based initiatives. Sustainability, 10(4), 1047. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041047
  36. Sherry, J. (2019). The impact of community sustainability: a life cycle assessment of three ecovillages. Journal of Cleaner Production, 237, 117830. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117830
  37. Slater, C. L. (2003). Generativity versus stagnation: an elaboration of Erikson’s adult stage of human development. Journal of Adult Development, 10(1), 53–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020790820868
  38. Stoll, S. J., & Pollastri, A. R. (2023). Social and environmental influences. In Halpern-Felsher, B. (Ed.). Encyclopedia of Child and Adolescent Health. London, Academic Press.
  39. Syamsiyah, N., Sulistyowati, L., Noor, T. I., & Setiawan, I. (2023). The sustainability level of an EcoVillage in the Upper Citarum Watershed of West Java province, Indonesia. Sustainability, 15(22), 15951. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su152215951
  40. Temesgen, A. K. (2024). Ecovillage scale-up and its well-being challenges: a case study from Norway. SuStainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 20(1), 2393912. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2024.2393912
  41. Ucok Hughes, M. (2018). Sustainable living in the city: the case of an urban ecovillage. In Dhiman, S., & Marques, J. (Eds.). Handbook of Engaged Sustainability. Cham, Springer, pp. 869–883. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71312-0_30
  42. Ulug, C., Horlings, L., & Trell, E. M. (2021). Collective identity supporting sustainability transformations in ecovillage communities. Sustainability, 13(15), 8148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158148
  43. Weijis-Perrée, M., Van den Berg, P., Arentze, T., & Kemperman, A. (2017). Social networks, social satisfaction and place attachment in the neighborhood. Region, 4(3), 133–151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18335/region.v4i3.194