Vol. 87 (2025)
Original Articles - Urban, Land, Environmental Appraisal and Economics

Property valuation: a comparative analysis of innovative market approach methods

Francesco Tajani
Department of Architecture and Design, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
Pierfrancesco De Paola
Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
Giuseppe Cerullo
Department of Architecture and Design, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy

Published 2025-10-30

Keywords

  • property valuation methods,
  • real estate market value,
  • similarity coefficients,
  • reliability coefficients,
  • goal programming,
  • maximum entropy principle,
  • Lagrange multipliers
  • ...More
    Less

Abstract

This research aims to illustrate and implement innovative methods for property valuation, by comparing their respective outcomes in terms of statistical accuracy and empirical reliability. In particular, the paper describes and compares three market approach methods through an application to a case study located in the city of Rome (Italy), in order to outline their ability to rationalise the assessment in dynamic contexts and minimise the professional valuer’s subjectivity. This work represents a new reference for valuers, in order to refine their estimates and guarantee transparency in their use, avoiding the risk of black boxes that frequently characterizes mass appraisal techniques (e.g. neural networks, genetic algorithms, multiple regressions, etc.), for which constant updating of the database originating the price functions would be necessary to appropriately describe the current market conditions.

References

  1. Agenzia del Territorio (2011) Manuale Operativo Delle Stime Immobiliari - Agenzia Del Territorio. Milano, Franco Angeli. Available at: https://www.hoepli.it/libro/manuale-operativo-delle-stime-immobiliari/9788856836745.html (Accessed 27 August 2024).
  2. Anselin, L., & Getis, A. (1992). Spatial statistical analysis and geographic information systems. The Annals of Regional Science, 26(1), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01581478. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01581478
  3. Arcuri, N., De Ruggiero, M., Salvo, F., & Zinno, R. (2020). Automated valuation methods through the cost approach in a BIM and GIS integration framework for smart city appraisals. Sustainability, 12(18), 7546. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187546. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187546
  4. Aronsohn, A. (2020). Dealing with valuation uncertainty at times of market unrest. Available at: ire.kyiv.ua (Accessed 10 September 2024).
  5. Associazione Bancaria Italiana (2024). Linee guida per la valutazione degli immobili in garanzia delle esposizioni creditizie. Available at: https://www.abi.it/ (Accessed 25 September 2024).
  6. Berto, R., Stival, C. A., & Rosato, P. (2020). An integrated procedure for ex-ante evaluations of refurbishment costs in healthcare facilities. Sustainability, 12(18), 7387. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187387
  7. Borst, R. A. (1991). Artificial neural networks: the next modeling/calibration technology for the assessment community?’. Property Tax Journal, 10, 69–94.
  8. Borst, R. A., & McCluskey, W. J. (2008). The modified comparable sales method as the basis for a property tax valuations system and its relationship and comparison to spatially autoregressive valuation models. In Kauko, T,. & d’Amato, M. (Eds.). Mass appraisal methods: an international perspective for property valuers. Hoboken, John Wiley & Sons, pp. 49–69. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444301021.ch3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444301021.ch3
  9. Bourassa, S. C., Cantoni, E., & Hoesli, M. (2007). Spatial dependence, housing submarkets, and house price prediction. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 35(2), 143–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-007-9036-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-007-9036-8
  10. Brown, R. J. (2017). Entropy – what kind of bet is real estate – really? Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 35(3), 341–351. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPIF-10-2016-0078. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JPIF-10-2016-0078
  11. Case, B., Clapp, J., Dubin, R., & Rodriguez, M. (2004). Modeling spatial and temporal house price patterns: a comparison of four models. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 29(2), 167–191. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:REAL.0000035309.60607.53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:REAL.0000035309.60607.53
  12. Chen, Y., Cai, Y., & Zheng, C. (2020). Efficiency of Chinese real estate market based on complexity-entropy binary causal plane method. Complexity, 2020(1), 2791352. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/2791352. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/2791352
  13. Chi Man Hui, E., Muk Fai Lau, O., & Kak Keung Lo, T. (2009). Deciphering real estate investment decisions through fuzzy logic systems. Property Management, 27(3), 163–177. https://doi.org/10.1108/02637470910964651. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02637470910964651
  14. Ciuna, M., De Ruggiero, M., Manganelli, B., Salvo, F., & Simonotti, M. (2017). Automated valuation methods in atypical real estate markets using the mono-parametric approach. In Gervasi, O., Murgante, B., Misra, S., Borruso, G., Torre, C. M., Rocha, A. M. A. C., Taniar, D., Apduhan, B. O., Stankova, E., & Cuzzocrea, A. (Eds). Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10406. Cham, Springer International Publishing, pp. 200–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62398-6_14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62398-6_14
  15. Colwell, P. F., Cannaday, R. E., & Wu, C. (1983). The analytical foundations of adjustment grid methods. Real Estate Economics, 11(1), 11–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6229.00277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6229.00277
  16. Copiello, S., Cecchinato, F., & Salih, M. H. (2021). The effect of hybrid attributes on property prices. Real Estate Management and Valuation, 29(4), 36–52. https://doi.org/10.2478/remav-2021-0028. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/remav-2021-0028
  17. Curto, R. A. (2005). L’uso delle tecniche multicriteri come procedimenti pluriparametrici. In Roscelli, R. (Ed.). Misurare nell’incertezza. Valutazioni e trasformazioni territoriali. Torino, CELID. 91–108.
  18. De Paola, P. (2024). real estate valuations with small dataset: a novel method based on the maximum entropy principle and lagrange multipliers. Real Estate, 1(1), 26–40. https://doi.org/10.3390/realestate1010003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/realestate1010003
  19. Domian, D., Wolf, R., & Yang, H. F. (2015). An assessment of the risk and return of residential real estate. Managerial Finance, 41(6), 591–599. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-07-2013-0195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-07-2013-0195
  20. Festa, M. (2021). Data mining e Machine learning: la nuova frontiera dei Big data nel settore immobiliare. Territorio Italia 2021, 65–87. https://doi.org/10.14609/Ti_1_21_3i.
  21. Forte, C., & Rossi, B. D. (1979). Principi di economia ed estimo. Seconda edizione. Milano, Rizzoli.
  22. French, N., & Gabrielli, L. (2004). The uncertainty of valuation. Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 22(6), 484–500. https://doi.org/10.1108/14635780410569470. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14635780410569470
  23. Gabrielli, L., & French, N. (2021). Pricing to market: property valuation methods – a practical review. Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 39(5), 464–480. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPIF-09-2020-0101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JPIF-09-2020-0101
  24. Gau, G.W., Lai, T. Y., & Wang, K. (1992). Optimal comparable selection and weighting in real property valuation: an extension. Real Estate Economics, 20(1), 107–123. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6229.00574. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6229.00574
  25. Gau, G.W., Lai, T. Y., & Wang, K. (1994). A further discussion of optimal comparable selection and weighting, and a response to green. Real Estate Economics, 22(4), 655–663. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6229.00654
  26. Glumac, B., & Rosiers, F. D. (2020). Practice briefing – Automated valuation models (AVMs): their role, their advantages and their limitations. Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 39(5), 481–491. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JPIF-07-2020-0086
  27. Goodman, A. C., & Thibodeau, T. (2003). Housing market segmentation and hedonic prediction accuracy. Journal of Housing Economics, 12(3), 181–201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1051-1377(03)00031-7
  28. Iovine, R. (2015). Metodologie statistiche per la stima immobiliare. Padova, EXEO Edizioni.
  29. Isakson, H. (2002). The linear algebra of the sales comparison approach. Journal of Real Estate Research, 24(2), 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/10835547.2002.12091090. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10835547.2002.12091090
  30. Isakson, H. R. (1986). The nearest neighbors appraisal technique: an alternative to the adjustment grid methods. Real Estate Economics, 14(2), 274–286. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6229.00387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6229.00387
  31. Isakson, H. R. (1988). Valuation Analysis of commercial real estate using the nearest neighbors appraisal technique. Growth and Change, 19(2), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2257.1988.tb00466.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2257.1988.tb00466.x
  32. IVSC (2021). International valuation standards: Effective 31 January 2022. London, International Valuation Standards Council.
  33. Jaynes, E. T. (1957). Information theory and statistical mechanics. Physical Review, 106(4), 620–630. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.106.620. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.106.620
  34. Kang, H. B., & Reichert, A. K. (1991). An empirical analysis of hedonic regression and grid-adjustment techniques in real estate appraisal. Real Estate Economics, 19(1), 70–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6229.00541. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6229.00541
  35. Kroll (2024) Ieri, Oggi, Domani. Sentiment sul Mercato Immobiliare Italiano. Available at: https://www.kroll.com/it-it/-/media/kroll-images/pdfs/ieri-oggi-domani-sentiment-sul-mercato-immobiliare-italiano-2024.pdf (Accessed 13 September 2024).
  36. LaCour-Little, M., & Green, R. K. (1998). Are minorities or minority neighborhoods more likely to get low appraisals?’. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 16(3), 301–315. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007727716513. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007727716513
  37. Lin, T., & Chang, H. (2012). How do appraisers absorb market information in property valuation? Some experimental evidence. Property Management, 30(2), 190–206. https://doi.org/10.1108/02637471211213424. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02637471211213424
  38. Lipscomb, J., & Gray, B. (1990). An empirical investigation of four market-derived adjustment methods. Journal of Real Estate Research, 5(1), 53–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/10835547.1990.12090602. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10835547.1990.12090602
  39. Morano, P., Tajani, F., & Locurcio, M. (2018). Multicriteria analysis and genetic algorithms for mass appraisals in the Italian property market. International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, 11(2), 229–262. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHMA-04-2017-0034. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHMA-04-2017-0034
  40. Organismo Italiano di Valutazione (2015). Principi italiani di valutazione. Milano, Egea.
  41. Özdilek, Ü. (2023). The role of thermodynamic and informational entropy in improving real estate valuation methods. Entropy, 25(6), 907. https://doi.org/10.3390/e25060907. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/e25060907
  42. Pace, K. (1998). Total grid estimation. Journal of Real Estate Research, 15(1), 101–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/10835547.1998.12090914. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10835547.1998.12090914
  43. Pace, R. K., & Gilley, O. W. (1998). Generalizing the OLS and grid estimators. Real Estate Economics, 26(2), 331–347. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6229.00748. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6229.00748
  44. Pagourtzi, E., Assimakopoulos, V., Hatzichristos, T., & French, N. (2003). Real estate appraisal: a review of valuation methods. Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 21(4), 383–401. https://doi.org/10.1108/14635780310483656. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14635780310483656
  45. Piccolo, D., & Vitale, C. (1984). Metodi statistici per l’analisi economica. Statistica e modelli lineari. 2° edizione. Bologna, Il Mulino.
  46. Roscelli, R. (2014) Manuale di estimo. Valutazioni economiche ed esercizio della professione. Milano, UTET Università.
  47. Rossini, P. (2000). Improving the Results of Artificial Neural Network Models for Residential Valuation. In Fourth Annual Pacific-Rim Real Estate Society Conference, Perth, Western Australia (pp. 19-21).
  48. Ruggiero, M. D., and Salvo, F. (2011). Misure di similarità negli adjustment grid methods. Aestimum, 58, 47–58. https://doi.org/10.13128/Aestimum-9561. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13128/Aestimum-9561
  49. Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27(3), 379–423. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x
  50. Simonotti, M. (2006). Metodi di stima immobiliare - Applicazione degli standard internazionali. Palermo, Dario Flaccovio Editore.
  51. Simonotti, M., Salvo, F., Ciuna, M., & De Ruggiero, M. (2016). Measurements of rationality for a scientific approach to the market-oriented methods. Journal of Real Estate Literature, 24(2), 403–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/10835547.2016.12090435. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10835547.2016.12090435
  52. Sun, Y. (2019). Real estate evaluation model based on genetic algorithm optimized neural network. Data Science Journal, 18, 36. https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2019-036. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2019-036
  53. Tajani, F., Morano, P., Locurcio, M., & D’Addabbo, N. (2015). Property valuations in times of crisis: artificial neural networks and evolutionary algorithms in comparison. In Gervasi, O., Murgante, B., Misra, S., Borruso, G., Torre, C. M., Rocha, A. M. A. C., Taniar, D., Apduhan, B. O., Stankova, E., & Cuzzocrea, A. (Eds). Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10406. Cham, Springer International Publishing, pp. 194–209. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21470-2_14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21470-2_14
  54. Tajani, F., Morano, P., Locurcio, M., & Torre, C.M. (2016). Data-driven techniques for mass appraisals. Applications to the residential market of the city of Bari (Italy). International Journal of Business Intelligence and Data Mining, 11(2), 109–129. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIDM.2016.081604. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIDM.2016.081604
  55. Tajani, F., Morano, P., Salvo, F., & De Ruggiero, M. (2020). Property valuation: the market approach optimised by a weighted appraisal model. Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 38(5), 399–418. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPIF-07-2019-0094. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JPIF-07-2019-0094
  56. Tajani, F., & Morano, P. (2018). An empirical-deductive model for the assessment of the mortgage lending value of properties as securities for credit exposures. Journal of European Real Estate Research, 11(1), 44–70. https://doi.org/10.1108/JERER-01-2017-0007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JERER-01-2017-0007
  57. Tecnoborsa (2018). Codice delle valutazioni immobiliari 2018 - Italian property valuation standard. Roma, Tecnoborsa SCpA.
  58. Todora, J., & Whiterell, D. (2002). Automating the sales comparison approach. Assessment Journal, 9(1), 25–33.
  59. Vandell, K. D. (1991). Optimal comparable selection and weighting in real property valuation. Real Estate Economics, 19(2), 213–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6229.00550. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6229.00550
  60. Yalpir, S., Özkan, G., & Tezel, G. (2006). The investigation of usability of artificial neural networks in the determination of residential real-estate prices. The Association for Modeling and Simulation in Enterprises AMSE, Turkey.