Vol. 88 (2026)
Original Articles - Urban, Land, Environmental Appraisal and Economics

Assessing places’ liveability: informational entropy for the construction of a set of criteria and indicators

PDF
  • Fabrizio Battisti,
  • Orazio Campo,
  • Melania Perdonò
Fabrizio Battisti
Department of Architecture, University of Florence, Italy
Orazio Campo
Department of Planning, Design, Architecture Technology, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy
Melania Perdonò
Department of Architecture, University of Florence, Italy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/aestim-17653

Published 2025-10-30

Keywords

  • wellbeing,
  • informationa entropy,
  • liveability

Copyright (c) 2026 Fabrizio Battisti, Orazio Campo, Melania Perdonò

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

The growing interest in well-being as a quality-of-life paradigm has led to a critical revision of its traditional conception. It is no longer limited to indicators of material prosperity and physical health (objective well-being indicators) but also individual perceptions of quality of life and happiness (subjective well-being indicators). In this new conception, the living environment plays a key role. The definition of well-being indicators based on the perceptual assessments of an urban environment crucially requires interdisciplinary skills. Using an investigative approach based on informational entropy, the objective of this paper is to construct a taxonomy that allows for the assessment of the quality of an environment to achieve adequate well-being standards and thus the improvement of quality of life. In detail, the article explains the methodological process to define a structured set of criteria, sub-criteria, and their associated indicators for evaluating the characteristics of an urban environment and the physical and functional variables that contribute to achieving specific well-being thresholds. Through the involvement of a significant sample of 100 subjects, the results of the work consist of a set of 132 sub-criteria for the assessment of liveability.

PDF

References

  1. Thinknow (2023). Innovation Cities Index. Melbourne: 2Thinknow. Available at: www.2thinknow.com/innovation-cities-index (Accessed 28 February 2025).
  2. Abass, Z. I., & Tucker, R. (2018). Residential satisfaction in low-density Australian suburbs: the impact of social and physical context on neighbourhood contentment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 56, 36–45.
  3. Abu-Ghazzeh, T. M. (1999). Housing layout, social interaction, and the place of contact in Abu-Nuseir, Jordan. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19(1), 41–73.
  4. Acampa, G., & Pino, A. (2023). Optimal computing budget allocation for urban regeneration: An unprecedented match between economic/extra-economic evaluations and urban planning. In: Gervasi, O., Murgante, B., Rocha, A. M. A. C., Garau, C., Scorza, F., Karaca, Y., & Torre, C. M. (Eds.). Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2023 Workshops. ICCSA 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 14112. Cham, Springer, 69–79.
  5. Acampa, G., & Pino, A. (2024). Filling the old with new life. Application of original indicators for evaluating ecovillages as village repopulation initiatives. Aestimum, 85, 73–86.
  6. Acampa, G., Pino, A., Alberti, F., & Rossi, G. (2024). The URGET VADEMECUM 2030–2050 Project: Applying Threshold Theory to Sustainable Urban Mobility. In Calabrò, F., Madureira, L., Morabito, F. C., & Piñeira Mantiñán, M. J. (Eds.). Networks, Markets & People. NMP 2024. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 1186. Cham, Springer, 172–181.
  7. Ahmed, N. O., El-Halafawy, A. M., & Amin, A. M. (2019). A critical review of urban liveability. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 8(1), 165–182.
  8. Amérigo, M., & Aragonés, J. I. (1990). Residential satisfaction in council housing. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 10, 313–325.
  9. Āzena, L., & Keiss, S. (2009). Specifics of territorial marketing strategy planning. European Integration Studies, 2009(3), 162–168.
  10. Babbie, E. (2021). The practice of social research (15th ed.). Boston, Cengage Learning.
  11. Bartolini, S., & Bilancini, E. (2010). If not only GDP, what else? Using relational goods to predict the trends of subjective well-being. International Review of Economics, 57(2), 199–213.
  12. Battisti, F. (2023). SDGs and ESG criteria in housing: defining local evaluation criteria and indicators for verifying project sustainability using Florence metropolitan area as a case study. Sustainability, 15(12), 9372. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129372
  13. Battisti, F., Guarini, M. R., & Chiovitti, A. (2017). The assessment of real estate initiatives to be included in the socially-responsible funds. Sustainability, 9, 973–991. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9060973
  14. Blanchard, O., Amighini, A., & Giavazzi, F. (2016). Macroeconomia. Una prospettiva europea. Bologna, Società Editrice il Mulino.
  15. Bonaiuto, M., & Alves, S. (2012). Residential places and neighborhoods: toward healthy life, social integration, and reputable residence. In Clayton, S. D. (Ed.). The Oxford handbook of environmental and conservation psychology. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 221–247.
  16. Bonaiuto, M., Bilotta, E., & Bonnes, M. (2009). Percezione e valutazione dei luoghi urbani per un progettare e abitare riflessivi. In Amendola, G. (Ed.). Il progettista riflessivo: scienze sociali e progettazione architettonica. Bari, Laterza, 75–95.
  17. Bonaiuto, M., Fornara, F., Ariccio, S., Cancellieri, U. G., & Rahimi, L. (2015). Perceived residential environment quality indicators (PREQIs) relevance for UN-HABITAT City Prosperity Index (CPI). Habitat International, 45, 53–63.
  18. Burton, M. (2014). Quality of place. In Michalos, A.C. (Ed.). Encyclopedia of quality of life and Well-Being research. Dordrecht, Springer, 5312–5314. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_2381
  19. Couper, M. P. (2008). Designing effective web surveys. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  20. Cover, T. M., & Thomas, J. A. (2006). Elements of information theory. Hoboken, John Wiley & Sons.
  21. Cummins, R. A. (2000). Objective and subjective quality of life: an Interactive Model. Social Indicators Research, 52, 55–72. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007027822521
  22. de Chazal, J. D. (2010). A systems approach to livability and sustainability: defining terms and mapping relationships to link desires with ecological opportunities and constraints. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 27(5), 585–597.
  23. De Leeuw, E. D., Hox, J. J., & Dillman, D. A. (2012). International handbook of survey methodology. London, Routledge.
  24. Delli Zotti, G. (2020). Metodi e tecniche della ricerca sociale. Trieste, EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste.
  25. Easterlin, R. A. (2013). Happiness and economic growth: The evidence. In Glatzer, W., Camfield, L., Møller, V., & Rojas, M. (Eds.). Global Handbook of Quality of Life. International Handbooks of Quality-of-Life. Dordrecht, Springer.
  26. Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In David, P. A., & Reder, M. W. (Eds.). Nations and households in economic growth: essays in honor of Moses Abramovitz. New York, Academic Press, 89–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-205050-3.50008-7
  27. Economist Intelligence Unit (2023). THE GLOBAL LIVEABILITY INDEX 2023. London. Available at: https://www.eiu.com/n/campaigns/global-liveability-index-2023/ (Accessed 28 April 2025).
  28. European Commission (2018). Good practices in mental health and well-being. Available at: https://health.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2018-03/2018_goodpractices_en_0.pdf (Accessed 28 February 2025).
  29. European Social Survey (2018). Il benessere personale e sociale degli europei. Principali risultati del Round 6 della European Social Survey. ESS Topline Result Series n. 5. Available at: https://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/docs/findings/TL5_Wellbeing-Italian.pdf (Accessed 28 April 2025).
  30. Evans, G. W. (2003). The built environment and mental health. Journal of Urban Health, 80(4), 536–555.
  31. Evans, G. W., Wells, N. M., & Moch, A. (2003). Housing and mental health: a review of the evidence and a methodological and conceptual critique. Journal of Social Issues, 59(3), 475–500.
  32. Felici, B., Penna, M., Rao, M., Roberto, R., & Zini, A. (2022). Smart Working: prospettive di cambiamento per la sostenibilità urbana. Un’analisi comparata in 4 province italiane. Roma, ENEA. ISBN: 978-88-8286-431-6
  33. Fowler, F. J. (2014). Survey research methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications.
  34. Francis, J., Giles-Corti, B., Wood, L., & Knuiman, M. (2012). Creating sense of community: the role of public space. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(4), 401–409.
  35. Freeman, H. L. (1984). Housing. In Freeman, H. L. (Ed.). Mental health and the environment. London, Churchill Livingstone, 197–225.
  36. Gössling, S., Hall, C. M., & Scott, D. (2012). Tourism and climate change: impacts, adaptation and mitigation. London, Routledge.
  37. Groves, R. M., Fowler, F. J., Couper, M. P., Lepkowski, J. M., Singer, E., & Tourangeau, R. (2009). Survey methodology (2nd ed.). Hoboken, Wiley.
  38. Guarini, M. R., & Battisti, F. (2014). Evaluation and management of land-development processes based on the public-private partnership. Advanced Materials Research, 869-870, 154–161. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.869-870.154
  39. Guarini, M. R., Battisti, F., & Buccarini, C. (2014). Rome: Re-qualification program for the street markets in public-private partnership. A further proposal for the Flaminio II street market. Advanced Materials Research, 838–841, 2928–2933. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.838-841.2928
  40. Helliwell, J. F. (2007). Well-being and social capital: Does suicide pose a puzzle? Social Indicators Research, 81(3), 455–496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-006-0022-y
  41. IMD (2023). IMD Smart City Index 2023. Lausanne, IMD. Available at: www.imd.org/smart-city-index (Accessed 10 November 2024).
  42. Inglehart, R., & Klingemann, H. D. (2000). Gender and Well-Being. In Diener, E., & Suh, E. M. (Eds.). Culture and subjective well-being. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
  43. International Labour Organization (2019). The centenary declaration for the future of work. Available at: https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/@ed_norm/@relconf/documents/meetingdocument/wcms_711674.pdf (Accessed 28 February 2025).
  44. ISTAT (2021). Annuario statistico italiano 2021. Available at: https://www.istat.it/it/archivio/annuario+statistico+italiano (Accessed 28 February 2025).
  45. ISTAT (2024). Relazione sul Benessere Equo e Sostenibile (BES) 2024. Available at: https://www.dt.mef.gov.it/export/sites/sitodt/modules/documenti_it/analisi_progammazione/documenti_programmatici/Relazione-BES-2024_finale.pdf (Accessed 28 April 2025).
  46. Jeffrey, K., Abdallah, S., & Quick, A. (2018). Il benessere personale e sociale degli europei: principali risultati del Round 6 della European Social Survey. City, University of London, European Social Survey ERIC.
  47. Larson, R. (1978). Thirty years of research on the subjective well-being of older Americans. Journal of Gerontology, 33, 109–125.
  48. Layard, R. (2005a). Rethinking public economics: the implications of rivalry and habit. Economics and Happiness, 1(1), 147–170.
  49. Layard, R. (2005b). Happiness: lessons from a new science. New York, Penguin.
  50. Lyndhurst, B. (2004). Liveability & sustainable development: bad habits & hard choices. Final report for the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, London.
  51. Maas, J., Verheij, R. A., Groenewegen, P. P., de Vries, S., & Spreeuwenberg, P. (2006). Green space, urbanity, and health: How strong is the relation? Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 60(7), 587-592. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2005.043125
  52. Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and Personality. New York, Harper & Row.
  53. Melluso, N., Bonaccorsi, A., Chiarello, F., & Fantoni, G. (2020). Rapid detection of fast innovation under the pressure of COVID-19. PLOS ONE, 15(12), e0244175. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244175
  54. Merriam-Webster (2018). Available at: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/liveability (Accessed 28 April 2025).
  55. OECD (2019). How’s life in the digital age? Opportunities and risks of the digital transformation for people’s well-being. Paris, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264311800-en
  56. OECD (2021). Economic Policy Reforms 2021. Going for growth: shaping a vibrant recovery. Paris, OECD Publishing.
  57. Okulicz-Kozaryn, A., & Valente, R. R. (2018). Livability and subjective well-being across Europe. Applied Research Quality Life, 14, 197–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-017-9587-7
  58. Pacione, M. (1990). Urban liveability: a review. Urban Geography, 11(1), 1–30.
  59. Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  60. Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal, 27(3), 379–423.
  61. Speroni, D. (2019). “Stiglitz due”: la mancata attenzione agli indicatori “oltre il Pil” ha aggravato la crisi economica. Corriere della Sera. Available at: https://numerus.corriere.it/2019/01/02/stiglitz-due-la-mancata-attenzione-agli-indicatori-oltre-il-pil-ha-aggravato-la-crisi-economica/ (Accessed 28 April 2025).
  62. Syamili, M. S., Takala, T., Korrensalo, A., & Tuittila, E. S. (2023). Happiness in urban green spaces: a systematic literature review. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, vol. 86, art. 128042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2023.128042
  63. The Mori Memorial Foundation (2023). Global Power City Index 2023. Tokyo, Mori Memorial Foundation. Available at: https://mori-m-foundation.or.jp/english/ius2/gpci2/2023.shtml (Accessed 10 November 2024).
  64. United Nations (2015). Risoluzione adottata dall’Assemblea Generale il 25 settembre 2015, 70/1. Trasformare il nostro mondo: l’Agenda 2030 per lo Sviluppo Sostenibile. Available at: https://unric.org/it/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2019/11/Agenda-2030-Onu-italia.pdf (Accessed 28 February 2025).
  65. Varotto, M. (2019). L’economia del benessere: prospettive europee dopo la strategia Europa 2020. Available at: https://maurovarottoblog.com/2019/12/20/leconomia-del-benessere-prospettive-europee-dopo-la-strategia-europa-2020/ (Accessed 28 February 2025).
  66. Veenhoven, R. (2000). The four qualities of life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1, 1–39.
  67. Veenhoven, R., & Ehrhardt, J. (1995). The cross-national pattern of happiness: test of predictions implied in three theories of happiness. Social Indicators Research, 34, 33–68.
  68. Viviani, S. (2016). L’Italia dei piccoli comuni e l’urbanistica del cambiamento. Testimonianze, 507/508.
  69. World Bank Group (2019). The World Development Report (WDR) 2019: The Changing Nature of Work. Available at: https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/816281518818814423/2019-WDR-Report.pdf (Accessed 28 February 2025).