Vol. 88 (2026)
Original Articles - Urban, Land, Environmental Appraisal and Economics

Metabolic approach and Life Cycle Assessment in building an energy community: the case of the Mondeggi Estate in the Municipality of Bagno a Ripoli

PDF
  • Fabrizio Battisti,
  • Carlo Pisano,
  • Orazio Campo,
  • Melania Perdonò,
  • Domenico Mele
Fabrizio Battisti
Department of Architecture, University of Florence, Italy
Carlo Pisano
Department of Architecture, University of Florence, Italy
Orazio Campo
Department of Planning, Design, Architecture Technology, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy
Melania Perdonò
Department of Architecture, University of Florence, Italy
Domenico Mele
School of Architecture, University of Florence, Italy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/aestim-17761

Published 2025-10-30

Keywords

  • Landscape,
  • Environment,
  • Metabolism,
  • Life Cycle Assessment,
  • Energy community

Copyright (c) 2026 Fabrizio Battisti, Carlo Pisano, Orazio Campo, Melania Perdonò, Domenico Mele

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

The “urban and territorial metabolism” refers to the construction of urban systems by analyzing the directions of energy, water, nutrients, materials, and waste flows in an urban system, with the aim of quantifying the inputs, outputs, and stored parts of the system. In short, it is an evaluative-design approach to the stability and impact of a production system, with the aim of verifying its results in terms of sustainability. The transition from linear production-consumption approaches to circular systems, now accepted by various European public administrations, represents a new direction in the processes of regeneration and transformation of the territory, in order to improve the quality impact of urban and peri-urban areas and meet the environmental objectives set out in the European agenda. On this basis, in developing the meta-project for the eco-sustainable restructuring and functionalization of the Mondeggi Public Estate, this article aims to use a metabolic approach to define the conditions for achieving the overall environmental, social, and economic sustainability of the Mondeggi Estate’s systems. Specifically, the metabolic approach defined to safeguard and maintain natural and ecosystem resources over time, without producing irreversible alterations, is evaluated through a Life Cycle Assessment considering the relationship between the flows of resources (firstly energy, even considering water) that the ‘Tenuta di Mondeggi’ system absorbs and produces.

PDF

References

  1. ARSIA (2009). Estimating the production potential of agrienergy in Tuscany. Florence, Italy, Regional Agency for Development and Innovation in Agriculture and Forestry.
  2. Aura, C. (2022). Circular economy and energy transition: the new challenges for SMEs. Milan, Italy, Franco Angeli.
  3. Battisti, F. (2022). ELECTRE III for strategic environmental assessment: a “Phantom” approach. Sustainability, 14, 6221. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106221
  4. Battisti, F., & Pisano, C. (2022). Common property in Italy. Unresolved issues and an appraisal approach: towards a definition of environmental-economic civic value. Land, 11, 1927. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11111927
  5. Baumann, H., & Tillman, A. M. (2004). The Hitch Hiker’s Guide to LCA: an orientation in Life Cycle Assessment methodology and application. Lund, Sweden, Studentlitteratur.
  6. Bernetti, I., Fagarazzi, C., Sacchelli, S., & Ciampi, C. (2009). Forestry and primary wood processing compartments. Florence, Italy, Interdepartmental research centre for alternative and renewable energies.
  7. Biggeri, M., De Luca, G., Ferrannini, A., & Pisano, C. (2023). Mondeggi: rigenerazione sociale, culturale e agricola per una Città Metropolitana sostenibile. Firenze, Firenze University Press. DOI: 10.36253/979-12-215-0195-7.
  8. Bolognesi, M. (2018). For an integrated energy policy with territorial enhancement: the case of Valdera. In Saragosa, C., & Rossi, M. (Eds.). Territories of contemporaneity. Multidisciplinary research paths. Florence, Italy, Firenze University Press.
  9. Bolognesi, M., & Magnaghi, A. (2020). Verso le comunità energetiche. Scienze del Territorio, 142–150.
  10. Bortolotti, A., Verga, G. C., & Khan, A. Z. (2023). Which circularity for urban design and planning? A compass to navigate circular economy research, knowledge, and methods. Planning Practice & Research, 41(2), 265-284. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2023.2262128
  11. Brown, J., Soderbaum, P., & Dereniowska, M. (2017). Positional analysis for sustainable development: reconsidering policy, economics and accounting. London, UK, Taylor & Francis.
  12. Castán Broto, V., Allen, A., & Rapoport, E. (2012). Interdisciplinary perspectives on urban metabolism. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 16(6), 851–861.
  13. Cinquepalmi, F. (2019). La città fragile. Dalla Smart alla (R) Evolving City. Firenze, Didapress.
  14. Conde, J. J., & Takano-Rojas, H. (2025). Rethinking energy transition: approaches from social representations theory. Energy Research & Social Science, 122, 104001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2025.104001
  15. ENEA (2011). Energy dependence and energy security. Rome, Italy.
  16. ENEA (2021). The energy community: vademecum 2021. Rome, Italy.
  17. European Commission (2014). The 2030 climate and energy framework. Available at: https://climate.ec.europa.eu/eu-action/climate-strategies-targets/2030-climate-targets_it (Accessed 15 April 2025).
  18. European Commission (2018). A long-term strategy for a prosperous, modern, competitive and climate-neutral economy by 2050. Available at: https://climate.ec.europa.eu/eu-action/climate-strategies-targets/2050-long-term-strategy_it (Accessed 15 April 2025).
  19. Fernandes, J., & Ferrão, P. (2023). Urban metabolism-based approaches for promoting circular economy in buildings refurbishment. Environments, 10(1), 13.
  20. Galán-Cano, L., Cámara-Aceituno, J., Hermoso-Orzáez, M. J., Mena-Nieto, Á., & Terrados-Cepeda, J. (2025). Urban metabolism, sustainability and energy transition in cities: a comprehensive review. Results in Engineering, 25, 104278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.104278
  21. Global Energy Assessment (GEA) (2012). Toward a sustainable future. Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press & IIASA, Laxenburg.
  22. Government Office for Science (GOfS) (2017). Future of cities: foresight for cities. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/future-of-cities-foresight-for-cities (Accessed 15 April 2025).
  23. Gross, C. (2007). Community perspectives of wind energy in Australia: the application of a justice and community fairness framework to increase social acceptance. Energy Policy, 35(5), 2727–2736.
  24. Gross, M., & Mautz, R. (2015). Renewable energies. London, UK, Routledge.
  25. Guarini, M. R., Battisti, F., & Buccarini, C. (2014). Rome: Re-qualification program for the street markets in public-private partnership. A further proposal for the Flaminio II street market. Advanced Materials Research, 838–841, 2928–2933. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.838-841.2928
  26. Guarini, M. R., Buccarini, C., & Battisti, F. (2017). Technical and economic evaluation of a building recovery by public-private partnership in Rome (Italy). In Stanghellini, S., Morano, P., Bottero, M., & Oppio, A. (Eds.). Appraisal: From Theory to Practice. Results of SIEV 2015. Green Energy and Technology. Cham, Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49676-4_8
  27. Guetlein, M. C., & Schleich, J. (2023). Understanding citizen investment in renewable energy communities. Ecological Economics, 211, 107895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107895
  28. Ibañez, D., & Katsikis, N. (2014). Grounding metabolism. Cambridge, Massachusetts, Harvard GSD.
  29. ISO (2006). ISO 14040:2006. Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Principles and framework. Geneva, International Organization for Standardization.
  30. Kennedy, C. (2007). The changing metabolism of cities. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 11(2), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1162/jiec.2007.1236
  31. Kennedy, C., Pincetl, S., & Bunje, P. (2011). The study of urban metabolism and its applications to urban planning and design. Environmental Pollution, 159, 1965–1973.
  32. Khan, M. A. (1995). Sustainable development: the key concepts, issues and implications. Sustainable Development, 3, 63–69.
  33. Magnaghi, A., Sala, F., Bolognesi, M., Fagarazzi, C., & Garofalo, E. (2013). The territory energy factory. Milan, Italy, Wolters Kluwer.
  34. Magnani, N. (2018). Energy transition and society. Themes and perspectives of sociological analysis. Milan, Italy, Franco Angeli.
  35. Muñoz, E., & Navia, R. (2018). Urban metabolism as a key method to assess sustainability of cities. Waste Management & Research, 36(8), 661-662.
  36. Mushafiq, M., Arisar, M. M. K., Tariq, H., & Czapp, S. (2023). Energy efficiency and economic policy: comprehensive theoretical, empirical, and policy review. Energies, 16(5), 2381. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16052381
  37. Neves, C., Oliveira, T., & Santini, F. (2024). Citizen participation in local energy communities: a meta and weight analysis. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 20(1), 2366628. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2024.2366628
  38. Paoli, F., & Pirlone, F. (2024). Closing the city cycle: an approach for defining cross-sectoral circular actions to be included in a circular urban plan. Sustainability, 16(17), 7747.
  39. Perrotti, D., & Stremke, S. (2017). Urban metabolism planning and designing approaches between quantitative analysis and urban landscape. City, Territory and Architecture, 4(1), 1–11.
  40. Pisano, C. (2021). Brussels and Paris: the application of the metabolic approach. In Cinquepalmi, F. (Ed.). La città fragile. Dalla Smart alla (R) Evolving City. Firenze, Didapress. pp. 257–269. ISBN: 9788833381374.
  41. Pisano, C., & Lingua, V. (2021). The impact of regional design on river agreements: the case of the Ombrone river in Tuscany. Planning Practice & Research, 39(1), 32–53.
  42. Pluchino, P. (2019). The living city. Catania, Italy, Malcor D’Edizioni.
  43. Sijmons, D. F., Hugtenburg, J., Feddes, F. M., & Hoorn, A. (2014). Landschap en energie: ontwerpen voor transitie. Rotterdam, nai010 Uitgevers.
  44. Sorgenia (2022). Energy efficiency and energy saving. Milan, Italy.
  45. TERNA (2021). Electricity statistics data. Available at: https://www.terna.it/it/sistema-elettrico/statistiche/pubblicazioni-statistiche (Accessed 15 April 2025).
  46. Tucci, F., Altamura, P., & Turchetti, G. (2024). Il progetto tecnologico-ambientale di comunità energetiche e circolari: Strumento per la rigenerazione urbana nell’orizzonte della neutralità climatica. In Monticelli, S., & Bonafede, A. (Eds.). Comunità Energetiche 2.0. L’autoconsumo alla luce dei recenti aggiornamenti normativi. Napoli, Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane, 13–21.
  47. Tuscany Region (2015). Territorial Address Plan with the value of Landscape Plan (PIT-PPR). Approved by Regional Council Resolution No. 37 of March 27, 2015. Florence, Tuscany Region. Available at: https://www.regione.toscana.it/-/piano-di-indirizzo-territoriale-con-valenza-di-piano-paesaggistico (Accessed 15 April 2025).
  48. Van Bueren, E., Van Bohemen, H., Itard, L., & Visscher, H. (2012). Sustainable urban environments: an ecosystems approach. Dordrecht, Netherlands, Springer.
  49. Wolman, A. (1965). The metabolism of cities. Scientific American, 213(3), 178–190. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0965-178