Vol. 33 No. 1 Special Issue, vol. I (2025): Oltre il Novecento. Teoria e prassi per il "Restauro del Moderno"
La patrimonializzazione / Heritagization

Il patrimonio moderno di Venezia. Regesto delle architetture tutelate e nuove prospettive / The Moder Heritage of Venice. A survey of Protected Architecture and New Perspectives

PDF
  • Silvia Degan,
  • Marco Comunian,
  • Irene Giustina
Silvia Degan
Soprintendenza Archeologia, Belle Arti e Paesaggio per la città metropolitana di Venezia
Marco Comunian
Dipartimento di Scienze dell’Antichità, Università degli Studi di Roma “La Sapienza”
Irene Giustina
Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile, Architettura, Territorio, Ambiente e di Matematica, Università degli Studi di Brescia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/rar-19023

Published 2025-12-12

Keywords

  • Venice,
  • Modern architecture,
  • Architectural heritage,
  • Heritage protection constraints,
  • Cultural heritage

How to Cite

Degan, S., Comunian, M., & Giustina, I. (2025). Il patrimonio moderno di Venezia. Regesto delle architetture tutelate e nuove prospettive / The Moder Heritage of Venice. A survey of Protected Architecture and New Perspectives . Restauro Archeologico, 33(1 Special Issue, vol. I), 222–227. https://doi.org/10.36253/rar-19023

Copyright (c) 2025 Silvia Degan, Marco Comunian, Irene Giustina

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Within an urban context deeply shaped by a centuries-old monumental tradition, modern architecture in Venice has historically struggled to be recognised as a legitimate and significant component of the city's heritage. The present contribution intends to reconsider this heritage through the compilation of a critical register of the 20th century architecture already subjected to restrictions in the Venetian territory. Starting from an in-depth analysis of these protective actions and the reconnaissance of the main architectural typologies involved, the research aims to outline a coherent framework of the recognition criteria adopted by the competent authorities, highlighting the evolution of the evaluation criteria and of the binding procedures. Considered this, the reflection finally extends to a prospective dimension with the indication of architectures that are currently lacking in protection but deserve attention.

PDF