No. 27 (2024): Project and regulation
Research and Experimentation

Win-win cooperation for the value enhancement of confiscated assets

PDF
  • Andrea Campioli,
  • Oscar Eugenio Bellini,
  • Chiara Bernardini,
  • Serena Giorgi,
  • Giancarlo Paganin
Andrea Campioli
Dipartimento di Architettura, Ingegneria delle Costruzioni e Ambiente Costruito, Politecnico di Milano
Oscar Eugenio Bellini
Dipartimento di Architettura, Ingegneria delle Costruzioni e Ambiente Costruito, Politecnico di Milano
Chiara Bernardini
Dipartimento di Architettura, Ingegneria delle Costruzioni e Ambiente Costruito, Politecnico di Milano
Serena Giorgi
Dipartimento di Architettura, Ingegneria delle Costruzioni e Ambiente Costruito, Politecnico di Milano
Giancarlo Paganin
Dipartimento di Architettura e Studi Urbani, Politecnico di Milano
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/techne-15135

Published 2024-06-10

Keywords

  • Multi-stakeholder cooperation,
  • Construction site-schools,
  • Confiscated assets,
  • Social integration,
  • Legal-procedural aspects

How to Cite

Campioli, A., Bellini, O. E., Bernardini, C., Giorgi, S., & Paganin, G. (2024). Win-win cooperation for the value enhancement of confiscated assets. TECHNE - Journal of Technology for Architecture and Environment, (27), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.36253/techne-15135

Copyright (c) 2024 Andrea Campioli, Oscar Eugenio Bellini, Chiara Bernardini, Serena Giorgi, Giancarlo Paganin

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

Nowadays, the transformation processes of the built environment, particularly those with the “common good” as their target, face complex regulatory systems organised in multiple areas, levels and scales. The different legislations often hinder the possibility of achieving the defined objectives due to the inability to interpret and translate the contents of these instruments into practice, and the difficulty of coordinating the tools as a result of different perspectives and goals. The research addresses this critical issue within the redevelopment and value-enhancement processes of properties confiscated from organised crime by proposing an innovative management model, which systematises the rules and roles of multiple subjects, increasing the social impact of requalification actions.

PDF

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Calamunci, F. M. et al. (2023), “Mafia doesn’t live here anymore: Antimafia policies and housing prices”, Journal of Regional Science, Vol. 63, No. 4, pp. 1001-1025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12647
  2. Dalla Chiesa N. (2016), Il riuso sociale dei beni confiscati. Le criticità del modello lombardo. Rivista di studi e ricerche sulla criminalità organizzata, vol. 2/16.
  3. David, P., Ofria, F. (2014), L’economia dei beni confiscati, FrancoAngeli, Milano.
  4. Douma, K., Scott, L., Bulzomi, A. (2017), SDG Investment case, United Nations Principles for Responsible Investment, New York.
  5. Eshun, B.T.B., Chan, A.P.C. and Osei-Kyei, R. (2021), “Conceptualizing a win-win scenario in public-private partnerships: evidence from a systematic literature review”, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, Vol. 28, No. 9, pp. 2712-2735. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-07-2020-0533
  6. Esposito, P. et al. (2014), “Public (dis)value: A case study”, Studies in Public and Non-Profit Governance, Vol. 3, pp. 291 – 300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/S2051-663020140000003012
  7. Ferroni, M.V. (2022), “Urban Regeneration and temporary re-use of the assets: assets confiscated from organized crime; Rigenerazione urbana e riuso temporaneo dei beni: i beni confiscati alla criminalità organizzata”, Sociologia Urbana e Rurale, No. 128, pp. 71-82 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3280/SUR2022-128007
  8. Ferroni, M.V. (2023), “The Re-use of Assets Confiscated from Organized Crime: How to Make the Informal Formal” Urban Informality: A Multidisciplinary Perspective, pp. 67-771 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29827-1_6
  9. Giofrè, F., El Edeisy, M. (2022), “Teaching practices in architectural technology courses. An experiment and future perspectives in the Italian context”, 8th International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAd’22), Universitat Politecnica de Valencia, Valencia, pp. 789-796. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4995/HEAd22.2022.14646
  10. Maestri, M. (2016), “I beni immobili confiscati alla criminalità organizzata in Lombardia”, Rivista di studi e ricerche sulla criminalità organizzata, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 26-53.
  11. Mira, T., Turrisi, A. (2019), Dalle mafie ai cittadini. La vita nuova dei beni confiscati alla criminalità, San Paolo edizioni, Cinisello Balsamo.
  12. Nielsen, R.P. (2009), “Varieties of Win–Win Solutions to Problems with Ethical Dimensions”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 88, pp. 333-349. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9967-x
  13. Pezzullo, C. (2022), “Municipal Regulation and Entrustment in Use in the regulation of property confiscated from organised crime; Regolamento comunale e affidamento in uso nella disciplina sui beni confiscati alla criminalità organizzata”, Federalismi.it, Vol. 2022, No. 31, pp. 68-87.
  14. Polis (2016), Il punto sul tema dei beni confiscati alle mafie in Lombardia. Éupolis. Available at: chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.polis.lombardia.it/wps/wcm/connect/7fe0e944-f290-4379-80fe-097a3a9bb18d/GEN15008RF_edconsiglio_beniconfiscati.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CACHEID=ROOTWORKSPACE-7fe0e944-f290-4379-80fe-097a3a9bb18d-mmGi6YU

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>