Vol. 15 No. 1 (2026)
Original Research Article

The Influence of Country of Origin on the Perception of Wine Personality

Marcin Adam Antoniak
Poznan University of Economics and Business, Department of Market Research and Services, Al. Niepodległości 10, 61-875 Poznań, Poland
Andrzej Szymkowiak
Poznan University of Economics and Business, Department of Commerce and Marketing, Al. Niepodległości 10, 61-875 Poznań, Poland / Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, Kamýcká 29, 165 00 Praha-Suchdol, Czech Republic
Marija Cerjak
University of Zagreb, Faculty of Agriculture, Svetošimunska cesta 25, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia

Published 2026-04-27

Keywords

  • wine,
  • product personality,
  • wine personality,
  • brand personality framework,
  • country of origin

How to Cite

Antoniak, M. A., Szymkowiak, A., & Cerjak, M. (2026). The Influence of Country of Origin on the Perception of Wine Personality. Wine Economics and Policy, 15(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.36253/wep-19600

Abstract

This study examines how the country of origin (COO) influences consumers’ perceptions of wine product personality, using Aaker’s (1997) five-dimensional framework: Sincerity, Excitement, Competence, Sophistication, and Ruggedness. An online survey of 848 UK consumers assessed perceptions of wines from France, Romania, the United States, and China – countries differing in winemaking tradition, historical depth, production scale, regulatory frameworks, market maturity, and international visibility. Results reveal significant cross-country differences in perceived product personality, showing that COO shapes symbolic and emotional perceptions beyond quality judgments. French wines scored highest on Sophistication, Sincerity, Excitement, and Competence, reflecting prestige and heritage, while Chinese and Romanian wines received lower overall scores, indicating less established identities. U.S. wines held an intermediate position, noted for Competence and Ruggedness. Consumer involvement intensified ratings across all dimensions, yet country rankings remained consistent, underscoring the robustness of COO-based associations. These findings demonstrate that COO influences not only perceived quality but also the products’ symbolic and emotional characteristics. By conceptualizing product personality at the country level, the study provides a framework linking geographical cues to anthropomorphic perceptions. The results offer actionable insights for marketers and producers leveraging COO in international positioning and storytelling strategies.

References

  1. C. Ferreira, L. Lourenço-Gomes, L.M.C. Pinto, Region of origin and perceived quality of wine: an assimilation-contrast approach, Wine Econ. Policy 10 (2021) 57–71. https://doi.org/10.36253/wep-9418.
  2. A. Spiga, Symbolic representations and wine brands: economics of symbolic production , transfer , and consumption : three multidisciplinary experiences and one model of brand identity analysis for the wine industry, (2025). https://theses.hal.science/tel-05120565v1.
  3. D. Esau, D. Senese, You Taste Who You Are: The Impact of Wine Labeling on The Sensory Taste of Wine, Territ. Du Vin 0 (2021). https://doi.org/10.58335/territoiresduvin.2143.
  4. P.A.P.S. Kumara, K. Canhua, Perceptions of country of origin: An approach to identifying expectations of foreign products, J. Brand Manag. 17 (2010) 343–353. https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.2009.28.
  5. A. Riviezzo, A. Garofano, J. Granata, S. Kakavand, Using terroir to exploit local identity and cultural heritage in marketing strategies: An exploratory study among Italian and French wine producers, Place Brand. Public Dipl. 13 (2017) 136–149. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-016-0036-4.
  6. N. Spielmann, Anything but typical: How consumers evaluate origin products based on their cues, Int. J. Wine Bus. Res. 27 (2015) 23–39. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWBR-07-2014-0031.
  7. A. Guardato, C. Osei, A. Feri, N.C. Tjandra, Message in a Bottle of Wine from Emerging Markets. Is the Country of Origin Still a Relevant Cue in Consumers’ Perceptions?, Transnatl. Bus. Manag. 1 (2023) 1–17. https://doi.org/10.33182/tbm.v1i1.3101.
  8. Y. Zhou, L. Gao, The influence of perceived country of origin image on Chinese consumers’ purchase intention of imported wine, Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 36 (2024) 2870–2886. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-07-2023-1032.
  9. J.L. Aaker, Dimensions of Brand Personality, J. Mark. Res. 34 (1997) 347–357.
  10. P.M.A. Desmet, J.C. Ortíz Nicolás, J.P. Schoormans, Product personality in physical interaction, Des. Stud. 29 (2008) 458–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2008.06.003.
  11. R. Mugge, P.C.M. Govers, J.P.L. Schoormans, The development and testing of a product personality scale, Des. Stud. 30 (2009) 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2008.10.002.
  12. P.C.M. Govers, J.P.L. Schoormans, Product personality and its influence on consumer preference, J. Consum. Mark. 22 (2005) 189–197. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760510605308.
  13. Wine Australia, Market insights – United Kingdom and Europe, (2025). https://www.wineaustralia.com/market-insights/united-kingdom-europe (accessed March 31, 2026).
  14. Imarc, UK Wine Market Size, Share, Trends and Forecast by Product Type, Color, Distribution Channel, and Region, 2026-2034, Imarc.Com (2025). https://www.imarcgroup.com/uk-wine-market (accessed March 31, 2026).
  15. D. Abdelwahab, S. San-Martín, N. Jiménez, Does regional bias matter? Examining the role of regional identification, animosity, and negative emotions as drivers of brand switching: an application in the food and beverage industry, J. Brand Manag. 29 (2022) 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41262-021-00260-8.
  16. S. Oduro, A. De Nisco, L. Petruzzellis, Country-of-origin image and consumer brand evaluation: a meta-analytic review, J. Prod. Brand Manag. 33 (2024) 108–124. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-01-2023-4328.
  17. K. Motoki, S. Iseki, Diversity in gender and age, but not in race, enhances food purchase intentions in Japan, Food Qual. Prefer. 121 (2024) 105263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105263.
  18. A. De Nisco, S. Oduro, Partitioned country of origin effect on consumers behavior: a meta-analytic review of the empirical evidence, in: Proc. Eur. Mark. Acad., Univ Zagreb, Fac Economics & Business, 2020: pp. 179–188.
  19. D.N. Coudounaris, Mediation of product design and moderating effects of reference groups in the context of country-of-origin effect of a luxury Brand, Rev. Int. Bus. Strateg. 28 (2018) 169–205. https://doi.org/10.1108/RIBS-05-2017-0044.
  20. J. Thøgersen, S. Pedersen, J. Aschemann-Witzel, The impact of organic certification and country of origin on consumer food choice in developed and emerging economies, Food Qual. Prefer. 72 (2019) 10–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2018.09.003.
  21. M. Chen, Y. Wang, S. Yin, W. Hu, F. Han, Chinese consumer trust and preferences for organic labels from different regions: Evidence from real choice experiment, Br. Food J. 121 (2019) 1521–1535. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-02-2018-0128.
  22. S. van Wyk, J.M. Luiz, The liability of emergingness and country-of-origin effect on South African wine, South African J. Bus. Manag. 55 (2024) 1–12. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajbm.v55i1.4146.
  23. F. Esmaeilpour, M.A. Abdolvand, The impact of country-of-origin image on brand loyalty: evidence from Iran, Asia Pacific J. Mark. Logist. 28 (2016) 709–723. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-09-2015-0143.
  24. J.A. Dakin, S. Carter, Negative image: developing countries and country of origin – an example from Zimbabwe, Int. J. Econ. Bus. Res. 2 (2010) 166–186.
  25. K. Heine, G. Atwal, J. He, Managing country-of-origin affiliations for luxury brand-building in China, Australas. Mark. J. 27 (2019) 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2018.09.001.
  26. R. Johnson, J. Bruwer, Regional brand image and perceived wine quality: The consumer perspective, Int. J. Wine Bus. Res. 19 (2007) 276–297. https://doi.org/10.1108/17511060710837427.
  27. N. Passagem, C.F. Crespo, N. Almeida, The Impact of Country of Origin on Brand Equity: An Analysis of Te Wine Sector, Wine Econ. Policy 9 (2020) 63–81. https://doi.org/10.36253/web-8407.
  28. H. Rodrigues, J. Rolaz, E. Franco-Luesma, M.P. Sáenz-Navajas, J. Behrens, D. Valentin, N. Depetris-Chauvin, How the country-of-origin impacts wine traders’ mental representation about wines: A study in a world wine trade fair, Food Res. Int. 137 (2020) 109480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109480.
  29. J. Beckert, J. Rössel, P. Schenk, Wine as a Cultural Product: Symbolic Capital and Price Formation in the Wine Field, Sociol. Perspect. 60 (2017) 206–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731121416629994.
  30. U.R. Orth, M.M.G. Wolf, T.H. Dodd, Dimensions of wine region equity and their impact on consumer preferences, J. Prod. Brand Manag. 14 (2005) 88–97. https://doi.org/10.1108/10610420510592563.
  31. L. Lockshin, W. Jarvis, F. d’Hauteville, J.P. Perrouty, Using simulations from discrete choice experiments to measure consumer sensitivity to brand, region, price, and awards in wine choice, Food Qual. Prefer. 17 (2006) 166–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2005.03.009.
  32. M. Beverland, The “real thing”: Branding authenticity in the luxury wine trade, J. Bus. Res. 59 (2006) 251–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2005.04.007.
  33. E.C. Villanueva, G. Ferro, An update of the worlds of wine: The emerging countries’ influence, Int. J. Econ. Bus. Res. 23 (2022) 113–129. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEBR.2022.119358.
  34. J. Overton, G. Banks, Conspicuous production: Wine, capital and status, Cap. Cl. 39 (2015) 473–491. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309816815607022.
  35. S. Charters, S. Pettigrew, The dimensions of wine quality, Food Qual. Prefer. 18 (2007) 997–1007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2007.04.003.
  36. S. Forbes, T. De Silva, A. Gilinsky Jr., Social Sustainability in the Global Wine Industry, Palgrave Pivot, Cham, 2020.
  37. D.A. Aaker, Managing Brand Equity: Capitalizing on the Value of a Brand Name, Australas. Mark. J. 27 (1991) 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2018.09.001.
  38. V.A. Vieira, R.L. Liu, V.G. de Mello, The mediating role of Brand Engagement in the Self-Concept (BESC) in explaining consumer response: a meta-analytic review, J. Mark. Theory Pract. 31 (2023) 97–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.2021.2004379.
  39. R. Belk, M. Kniazeva, Morphing anthropomorphism: An update, J. Glob. Sch. Mark. Sci. Bridg. Asia World 28 (2018) 239–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/21639159.2018.1466659.
  40. Y. Sung, S.M. Choi, H. Ahn, Y.-A. Song, Dimensions of Luxury Brand Personality: Scale Development and Validation, Psychol. Mark. 32 (2015) 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20767.
  41. A. d’Astous, L. Boujbel, Positioning countries on personality dimensions: Scale development and implications for country marketing, J. Bus. Res. 60 (2007) 231–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.11.005.
  42. M. Geuens, B. Weijters, K. De Wulf, A new measure of brand personality, Int. J. Res. Mark. 26 (2009) 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2008.12.002.
  43. J.C. Sweeney, C. Brandon, Brand Personality: Exploring the Potential to Move from Factor Analytical to Circumplex Models, Psychol. Mark. 23 (2006) 639–663. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20122.
  44. L.Y. Lin, The relationship of consumer personality trait, brand personality and brand loyalty: An empirical study of toys and video games buyers, J. Prod. Brand Manag. 16 (2009) 290–301.
  45. K.L. Keller, Managing the growth tradeoff: Challenges and opportunities in luxury branding, J. Brand Manag. 16 (2009) 290–301. https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.2008.47.
  46. A. Azoulay, Azoulay2003, J. Brand Manag. 11 (2003) 143–155.
  47. N. Hennigs, K.-P. Wiedmann, C. Klarmann, S. Strehlau, B. Godey, D. Pederzoli, A. Neulinger, K. Dave, G. Aiello, R. Donvito, K. Taro, J. Táborecká-Petrovičová, C.R. Santos, J. Jung, H. Oh, What is the Value of Luxury? A Cross-Cultural Consumer Perspective, Psychol. Mark. 29 (2012) 1018–1034. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20583.
  48. S.M.C. Loureiro, J. Jiménez-Barreto, J. Romero, Enhancing brand coolness through perceived luxury values: Insight from luxury fashion brands, J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 57 (2020) 102211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102211.
  49. L.L. (Luke) Chiang, C.S. Yang, Does country-of-origin brand personality generate retail customer lifetime value? A Big Data analytics approach, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 130 (2018) 177–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.06.034.
  50. P. Shukla, Impact of interpersonal influences, brand origin and brand image on luxury purchase intentions: Measuring interfunctional interactions and a cross-national comparison, J. World Bus. 46 (2011) 242–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2010.11.002.
  51. A. Japutra, S. Molinillo, Responsible and active brand personality: On the relationships with brand experience and key relationship constructs, J. Bus. Res. 99 (2019) 464–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.08.027.
  52. F. Huber, A. Eisele, F. Meyer, The role of actual, ideal, and ought self-congruence in the consumption of hedonic versus utilitarian brands, Psychol. Mark. 35 (2018) 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21070.
  53. S. Mandal, A. Sahay, A. Terron, K. Mahto, How implicit self-theories and dual-brand personalities enhance word-of-mouth, Eur. J. Mark. 55 (2020) 1489–1515. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-07-2019-0591.
  54. J.K. Lee, S.S. Hansen, S.Y. Lee, The effect of brand personality self-congruity on brand engagement and purchase intention: The moderating role of self-esteem in Facebook, Curr. Psychol. 39 (2020) 2116–2128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-9898-3.
  55. T.A. Holmes, Effects of self-brand congruity and ad duration on online in-stream video advertising, J. Consum. Mark. 38 (2021) 374–385. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-07-2019-3333.
  56. B. Godey, D. Pederzoli, G. Aiello, R. Donvito, P. Chan, H. Oh, R. Singh, I.I. Skorobogatykh, J. Tsuchiya, B. Weitz, Brand and country-of-origin effect on consumers’ decision to purchase luxury products, J. Bus. Res. 65 (2012) 1461–1470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.10.012.
  57. I. Cheah, Z. Zainol, I. Phau, Conceptualizing country-of-ingredient authenticity of luxury brands, J. Bus. Res. 69 (2016) 5819–5826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.179.
  58. D. Valentin, C. Valente, J. Ballester, R. Symoneaux, I. Smith, F.F. Bauer, H. Nieuwoudt, The impact of “wine country of origin” on the perception of wines by south african and french wine consumers: A cross-cultural comparison, Foods 10 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10081710.
  59. V. Swaminathan, K.L. Page, Z. Gürhan-Canli, “My” brand or “our” brand: The effects of brand relationship dimensions and self-construal on brand evaluations, J. Consum. Res. 34 (2007) 248–259. https://doi.org/10.1086/518539.
  60. R.H. Barcelos, D.C. Dantas, S. Sénécal, Watch Your Tone: How a Brand’s Tone of Voice on Social Media Influences Consumer Responses, J. Interact. Mark. 41 (2018) 60–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2017.10.001.
  61. K. Anderson, S. Nelgen, Global wine markets, 1961 to 2009: a statistical compendium, Glob. Wine Mark. 1961 to 2009 a Stat. Compend. (2012). https://doi.org/10.1017/upo9780987073013.
  62. K. Anderson, S. Nelgen, V. Pinilla, Global wine markets, 1860 to 2016: a statistical compendium, Glob. Wine Mark. 1860 to 2016 a Stat. Compend. (2017). https://doi.org/10.20851/global-wine-markets.
  63. J. Bruwer, R. Johnson, Place-based marketing and regional branding strategy perspectives in the California wine industry, J. Consum. Mark. 27 (2010) 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363761011012903.
  64. R. Fuentes-Fernández, A. Gilinsky, Coopetition as improvisation: an exploratory comparative case study investigation into Spain’s natural wine industry, Int. J. Wine Bus. Res. 34 (2022) 308–328. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWBR-12-2020-0062.
  65. P. Alonso González, E. Parga Dans, R. Fuentes Fernández, Certification of Natural Wine: Policy Controversies and Future Prospects, Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 6 (2022) 1–5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2022.875427.
  66. J.L. Zaichkowsky, Measuring the Involvement Construct, J. Consum. Res. 12 (1985) 131–352. https://doi.org/10.1300/j047v06n04_05.
  67. L.A. Heslop, D. Cray, A. Armenakyan, Brand and Country-of-Origin Effects in Wine Decision Making: Is Incongruity a Problem in a Wine World Turned Upside Down?, in: ASAC, Niagara Falls, 2016.
  68. P. Magnusson, S. Zdravkovic, S.A. Westjohn, A longitudinal analysis of country image and brand origin effects, Int. Mark. Rev. 39 (2022) 912–930. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-07-2021-0228.
  69. A. Diamantopoulos, I. Szőcs, A. Florack, Ž. Kolbl, M. Egger, The bond between country and brand stereotypes: insights on the role of brand typicality and utilitarian/hedonic nature in enhancing stereotype content transfer, Int. Mark. Rev. 38 (2021) 1143–1165. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-09-2020-0209.
  70. M.F. Herz, A. Diamantopoulos, Activation of country stereotypes: Automaticity, consonance, and impact, J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 41 (2013) 400–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-012-0318-1.
  71. F. Leclerc, B.H. Schmitt, L. Dube, Foreign Branding and Its Effects on Product Perceptions and Attitudes, J. Mark. Res. 31 (1994) 263. https://doi.org/10.2307/3152198.
  72. S. Candiago, S. Tscholl, L. Bassani, H. Fraga, L. Egarter Vigl, Quality wines in Italy and France: A dataset of protected designation of origin specifications, Data Br. 54 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2024.110408.
  73. S. Fairbairn, J. Brand, A.S. Ferreira, D. Valentin, F. Bauer, Cultural differences in wine conceptualization among consumers in France, Portugal and South Africa, Sci. Rep. 14 (2024) 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-66636-3.
  74. D.M. Micu, G.A. Arghiroiu, S. Beciu, The Perception of Romania as a Wine Producing Country – a Perspective of International Wine Specialists, Sci. Pap. Ser. Manag. Econ. Eng. Agric. Rural Dev. 25 (2025) 635–644.
  75. J.I. Rojas-Méndez, M.J. Hine, M. Rod, Brand Personalities of Global Wine Exporters: A Collective Reputation Theory Perspective, J. Int. Food Agribus. Mark. 30 (2018) 88–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/08974438.2017.1387884.
  76. G. Itzchakov, G. Haddock, Attitude strength as a novel predictor of willful ignorance, Curr. Opin. Psychol. 67 (2026) 102182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102182.
  77. P.J. Palla, E. Kyriacou, A. Zarkada, The effect of involvement on attitude formation and strength in the digital domain, J. Mark. Commun. 29 (2023) 137–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2022.2154062.
  78. R.E. Petty, J.J. Siev, P. Briñol, Attitude Strength: What’s New?, Span. J. Psychol. 26 (2023) 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1017/SJP.2023.7.
  79. Statista, Wine in the UK - Statistics & Facts, Statista (2025). https://www.statista.com/topics/8241/wine-in-the-united-kingdom/?utm_source=chatgpt.com#topicOverview (accessed October 4, 2025).
  80. J. Dwyer, N.L. Key, Study on the competitiveness of European wines: executive summary, 2014.