Vol. 14 No. 1 (2025)
Full Research Articles

Building sustainable futures: the bio-based fertilizer case-study

PDF
  • Carla Abitabile,
  • Andrea Arzeni,
  • Federica Cisilino,
  • Matteo Orlando
Carla Abitabile
Council for Agricultural Research and Economics - Research Centre for Agricultural Policies and Bioeconomy, Italy
Andrea Arzeni
Council for Agricultural Research and Economics - Research Centre for Agricultural Policies and Bioeconomy, Italy
Federica Cisilino
Council for Agricultural Research and Economics - Research Centre for Agricultural Policies and Bioeconomy, Italy
Matteo Orlando
Council for Agricultural Research and Economics - Research Centre for Agricultural Policies and Bioeconomy, Italy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/bae-15786

Published 2024-07-18

Keywords

  • future scenarios,
  • bio-based fertilizers,
  • circular economy,
  • sustainability,
  • social-ecological transition

How to Cite

Abitabile, C., Arzeni, A., Cisilino, F., & Orlando, M. (2024). Building sustainable futures: the bio-based fertilizer case-study. Bio-Based and Applied Economics, 14(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.36253/bae-15786

Copyright (c) 2025 Andrea Arzeni, Carla Abitabile, Federica Cisilino, Matteo Orlando

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Funding data

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

Bio-based fertilizers (BBFs) can be a solution for converting agricultural waste into new products useful for increasing organic matter in the soil, thus reducing the consumption of mineral fertilizers. This can contribute to the ecological transition launched by the European Commission for the coming decades. Scenario analysis is an effective tool to assess the factors that can affect the development of the agri-food supply chain, evaluating the effects of their possible evolutions. The aim of this work is to draw plausible future scenarios for the BBF supply chain and to strengthen the consistency evaluation process of these scenarios. We built the scenarios considering both the literature and findings from stakeholder consultations. We then verified their consistency by adopting the Cross-Impact Balances (CIB) method, along with other techniques to better evaluate the consistency and plausibility of the narratives. The analysis provides stakeholders with information to evaluate possible future trends in the BBF supply chain. Monitoring the evolution of the identified drivers and maintaining constant and periodic discussions among stakeholders constitute the prerequisites for supporting the desirable future development of BBFs.

PDF

References

  1. Bock, A.K., Krzysztofowicz, M., Rudkin J. and Winthagen V. (2020). Farmers of the Future. EUR 30464 EN. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. https://doi.org/10.2760/680650. JRC122308.
  2. Borch, K. and Merida, F. (2013). Dialogue in foresight: consensus, conflict and negotiation. In: Borch, K., Dingli, S.M. and Jorgensen, M.S. (eds.). Participation and Interaction in Foresight: dialogue, dissemination and visions. Edward Elgar, Cheltenbaro.
  3. Börjeson, L., Höjer, M., Dreborg, K.H., Ekvall, T. and Finnveden G. (2006). Scenario types and techniques: Towards a user’s guide. Futures 38(7): 723-739.
  4. Boschetti, F., Walker, I. and Price J. (2016). Modelling and attitudes towards the future. Ecological Modelling 322: 71-81.
  5. Burgelman, J.C., Chloupková, J. and Wobbe W. (2014). Foresight in support of European research and innovation policies: The European Commission is preparing the funding of grand societal challenges. European Journal of Futures Research 2: 55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40309-014-0055-4.
  6. Chen, G., Li, X., Liu, X., Chen, Y., Liang, X., Leng, J., Xu, X., Liao, W., Aiu, Y., Wu, Q. and Huang, K. (2020). Global projections of future urban land expansion under shared socioeconomic pathways. Nature Communications 11: 537. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-14386-x.
  7. Chojnacka, K., Moustakas, K. and Witek-Krowiak, A. (2020). Biobased fertilizers: a practical approach towards circular economy. Bioresource Technology 295: 122223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122223.
  8. European Commission. (2015). Closing the loop - An EU action plan for the Circular Economy. COM/2015/0614 final. Brussels.
  9. European Commission. (2019). Regulation (EU) 2019/1009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 June 2019 laying down rules on the making available on the market of EU fertilising products and amending Regulations (EC) No 1069/2009 and (EC) No 1107/2009 and repealing Regula. Official Journal European Union 2019: 1-114.
  10. European Commission. 2020. A new Circular Economy Action Plan For a cleaner and more competitive Europe. COM/2020/98 final. Brussels.
  11. European Environment Agency. 2020. Bio-waste in Europe — turning challenges into opportunities. Report No 4/2020. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
  12. Egas, D., Azarkamand, S., Casals, C., Ponsá, S., Llenas, L. and Colón, J. 2023. Life cycle assessment of bio‑based fertilizers production systems: where are we and where should we be heading? The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 28: 626-650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-023-02168-8.
  13. ESPP - European Sustainable Phosphorus Platform 2023, Regulatory Activities, Proposal on the definitions of “Bio-Based Fertiliser” or “Bio-Based Nutrient” (30_09_2023), https://www.phosphorusplatform.eu/images/Regulatory%20activities/ESPP%20propsals%20Bio-Based%20Fertilisers%20v30_9_23.pdf.
  14. Fauré, E., Arushanyan, Y., Ekener, E., Miliutenko, S. and Finnveden G. 2017. Methods for assessing future scenarios from a sustainability perspective. European Journal of Futures Research 5: 17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40309-017-0121-9.
  15. FAO 2022. The future of food and agriculture – Drivers and triggers for transformation. The Future of Food and Agriculture, no. 3. Rome. https://doi.org/10.4060/cc0959en.
  16. Fertilizers Europe asbl 2021. Forecast of Food, Farming and Fertilizer use in the European Union 2021-2031, Available at https://www.fertilizerseurope.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Forecast-2021-31-Studio-final-web.pdf.
  17. Fritsche, U., Brunori, G., Chiaramonti, D., Galanakis, C., Matthews, R. and Panoutsou, C. 2021. Future transitions for the Bioeconomy towards Sustainable Development and a Climate-Neutral Economy - Foresight Scenarios for the EU bioeconomy in 2050. Borzacchiello, M.T., Stoermer, E. and Avraamides, M. (eds). Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. https://doi.org/10.2760/763277, JRC123532.
  18. Guivarch, C., Lempert, R. and Trutnevyte, E. (2017). Scenario techniques for energy and environmental research: An overview of recent developments to broaden the capacity to deal with complexity and uncertainty. Environmental Modelling & Software 97: 201-210.
  19. Hariri, R.H., Fredericks, E.M. & Bowers, K.M. (2019) Uncertainty in big data analytics: survey, opportunities, and challenges. J Big Data 6: 44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-019-0206-3.
  20. Hunt, D.V.L., Lombardi, D.R., Atkinson, S., Barber, A.R.G., Barnes, M., Boyko, C.T., Brown, J., Bryson, J., Butler, D., Caputo, S., Caserio, M., Coles, R., Cooper, R.F.D., Farmani, R., Gaterell, M., Hale, J., Hales, C., Hewitt, C.N., Jankovic, L., Jefferson, I., Leach, J., MacKenzie, A.R., Memon, F.A., Sadler, J.P., Weingaertner, C., Whyatt, J.D. and Rogers, C.D.F. (2012). Scenario Archetypes: Converging Rather than Diverging Themes. Sustainability 4: 740-772.
  21. Kurniawati, A., Stankovics, P., Hilmi Y.S., Toth, G., Smol, M., Toth, Z. (2023). Understanding the future of bio-based fertilisers: The EU’s policy and implementation. Sustainable Chemistry for Climate Action 3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scca.2023.100033.
  22. Kurniawati, A., Toth, G., Ylivainio, K. and Toth, Z. (2023). Opportunities and challenges of bio‑based fertilizers utilization for improving soil health. Organic Agriculture 13: 335-350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-023-00432-7.
  23. Kurniawan, J.H. (2020). Assessing Consistency of Scenarios Across Scales. Developing globally linked internally consistent scenarios under the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways framework. Dissertation. University of Waterloo, Canada.
  24. IPCC-The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2014). Climate change (2014): Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part 8: Regional Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the intergovernal Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.
  25. Lassaletta, L., Estellés, F., Beusen, A.H.W., Bouwman, L., Calvet, S., van Grinsven, H.J.M., Doelman, J.C. Stehfest, E., Uwizeye, A. and Westhoek, H. (2019). Future global pig production systems according to the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. Science of The Total Environment 665: 739-751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.079.
  26. Mathijs, E., Deckers, J., Kopainsky, B., Nitzko, S. and Spiller A. (2017). Report on scenarios for EU farming. D1.2 of the European Project Sure Farm. https://www.surefarmproject.eu/.
  27. Mitter, H., Techen, A.K., Sinabell, F., Helming, K., Schmid, E., Bodirsky, B.L., Holman, I., Kok, K., Lehtonen, H., Leip, A., Le Mouël, C., Mathijs, E., Mehdi, B., Mittenzwei, K., Mora, O., Øistad, K., Øygarden, L., Priess, J.A., Reidsma, P., Schaldach, R. and Schönhart, M. (2020). A protocol to develop Shared Socio-economic Pathways for European agriculture. Journal of Environmental Management 252: 15.
  28. Nagesh, P., Edelenbosch, O.Y., Dekker, S.C., de Boer, H.J., Mitter, H. and van Vuuren, D.P. (2023). Extending shared socio-economic pathways for pesticide use in Europe: Pest-Agri-SSPs. Journal of Environmental Management 342: 118078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118078.
  29. O’Neill, B.C., Kriegler, E., Ebi, K.L., Kemp-Benedict, E., Riahi, K., Rothman, D.S., van Ruijven, B.J., van Vuuren, D.P., Birkmann, J., Kok, K., Levy, M. and Soleckim, W. (2017). The roads ahead: Narratives for shared socioeconomic pathways describing world futures in the 21st century. Global Environmental Change 42: 169-180.
  30. O’Neill, B.C., Kriegler, E., Riahi, K., Ebi, K.L., Hallegatte, S., Carter, T.R., Mathur, R. and van Vuuren, D.P. (2014). A new scenario framework for climate change research: the concept of shared socioeconomic pathways. Climatic Change 122: 387-400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0905-2.
  31. Pernaa, H.K. (2017). Deliberative future visioning: utilizing the deliberative democracy theory and practice in futures research. European Journal of Futures Research 5: 13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40309-017-0129-1.
  32. Puglia, D., Pezzolla, D., Gigliotti, G., Torre, L., Bartucca, M.L. and Del Buono D. (2021). The opportunity of valorizing agricultural waste through its conversion into biostimulants, biofertilizers, and biopolymers. Sustainability 13: 2710. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052710.
  33. Puy A., Beneventano P., Lo Piano S., Portaluri T., and Saltelli A. (2022), Models with higher effective dimensions tend to produce more uncertain estimates. Science Advances 8. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abn9450.
  34. Quist, J. and Vergragt, P. (2006). Past and future of backcasting: The shift to stakeholder participation and a proposal for a methodological framework. Futures 38(9): 1027-1045.
  35. Reed, M.S., Kenter, J., Bonn, A., Broad, K., Burt, T.P., Fazey, I.R., Fraser, E.D.G., Hubacek, K., Nainggolan, D., Quinn, C.H., Stringer, L.C. and Ravera F. (2013). Participatory scenario development for environmental management: a methodological framework illustrated with experience from UK uplands. Journal of Environment Management 128: 345-362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.05.016.
  36. Rhydderch, A. (2017). Scenario Building: The 2x2 Matrix Technique. Futuribles International 11. Paris.
  37. Schoemaker, P.J.H. (1995). Scenario Planning: A Tool for Strategic Thinking. MIT Sloan Management Review 36: 2.
  38. Störmer, E., Bontoux, L., Krzysztofowicz, M., Florescu, E., Bock, A. and Scapolo, S. (2020). Foresight – Using Science and Evidence to Anticipate and Shape the Future. In: Šucha, V. and Sienkiewicz, M. (eds.). Science for Policy Handbook. European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC). Brussels/Belgium.
  39. Swart, R.J., Raskin, P. and Robinson, J. (2004). The problem of the future: sustainability science and scenario analysis. Global Environmental Change 14: 137-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2003.10.002.
  40. Tur-Cardona, J., Bonnichsen, O., Speelman, S., Verspecht, A., Carpentier, L., Debruyne, L., Marchand, F., Jacobsen, B.H. and Buysse, J. (2018). Farmers’ reasons to accept bio-based fertilizers: a choice experiment in seven different European countries. Journal of Cleaner Production 197: 406-416. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2018.06.172.
  41. van Ruijven, B. J., Levy, M. A., Agrawal, A., Biermann, F., Birkmann, J., Carter, T. R., Ebi, K.L., Garschagen, M., Jones, B., Jones, R., Kemp-Benedict, E., Kok, M., Kok, K., Lemos, M.C., … Lucas, P.L., Orlove, B., Pachauri, S., Parris, T.M., Patwardhan, A., Petersen, A., Preston, B.L., Ribot, J., Rothman, D.S. and Schweizer, V. J. (2014). Enhancing the relevance of Shared Socioeconomic Pathways for climate change impacts, adaptation and vulnerability research. Climatic Change 122(3): 481-494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0931-0.
  42. Vervoort, J.M., Thornton, P.K., Kristjanson, P., Förch, W., Ericksen, P.J., Kok, K., Ingram, J.S.I., Herrero, M., Palazzo, A., Helfgott, A.E.S., Wilkinson, A., Havlík, P., MasonD’Croz, D. and Jost, C. (2014). Challenges to scenario-guided adaptive action on food security under climate change. Global Environmental Change 28: 383–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.03.001.
  43. Weimer-Jehle, W. (2006). Cross-impact balances: A system-theoretical approach to cross-impact analysis. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 73: 334-361. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.techfore.2005.06.005.
  44. Weimer-Jehle, W. (2023). Cross-Impact Balances WEB site, ZIRIUS - Centre for Interdisciplinary, Risk and Innovation Studies University of Stuttgart. https://www.cross-impact.org/english/CIB_e.htm
  45. Wester-Larsen, L., Müller-Stöver, D.S., Salo, T. and Jensen L.S. (2022). Potential ammonia volatilization from 39 different novel biobased fertilizers on the European market – A laboratory study using 5 European soils. Journal of Environmental Management 323: 116249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116249.
  46. Zawalińska, K., Smyrniotopoulou, A., Balazs, K., Böhm, M., Chitea, M., Florian, V., Fratila, M., Gradziuk, P., Henderson, S., Irvine, K., Konstantidelli, V., Krupin, V., Latruffe, L., Mikšytė, E., Miller, D., Monteleone, D., Polaschegg, M., Schwarz, G., Tzanopoulos, J., Tzouramani, I., Vlahos, G. and Wojciechowska, A. (2022), Advancing the contributions of european stakeholders in farming systems to transitions to agroecology. EuroChoices 21: 50-63. https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692X.12378.