Vol. 14 No. 2 (2025)
Full Research Articles

Expenditure allocation for Rural Development interventions: main trends and patterns in the choices of the Italian Regions under the CAP 2023-2027

PDF
  • Tobia Minuzzo,
  • Francesco Pagliacci
Tobia Minuzzo
Department of Land, Environment, Agriculture and Forestry, Università di Padova, Italy
Francesco Pagliacci
Department of Land, Environment, Agriculture and Forestry, Università di Padova, Italy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/bae-16754

Published 2025-03-26

Keywords

  • EU Rural Development Policy,
  • Political economy,
  • Cluster analysis,
  • Allocation

How to Cite

Minuzzo, T., & Pagliacci, F. (2025). Expenditure allocation for Rural Development interventions: main trends and patterns in the choices of the Italian Regions under the CAP 2023-2027. Bio-Based and Applied Economics, 14(2), 79–96. https://doi.org/10.36253/bae-16754

Copyright (c) 2025 Francesco Pagliacci, Tobia Minuzzo

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

The introduction of the new delivery model in the 2023-2027 Common Agricultural Policy increased the decision-making and management autonomy of Member States and their regions when implementing Rural Development policies. Thus, understanding the drivers behind allocation choices for rural development funds is crucial. This study analyses the allocation of rural development funds across Italian regions, considering ex-ante share allocation for different types of Rural Development interventions. A cluster analysis is then performed. Different groups of Italian regions are characterised using the indicators developed within the common monitoring and evaluation framework, the allocation of spending in the previous programming period, and other variables. Four clusters of Italian regions are identified: cluster 1 includes rural regions with low urbanisation, prioritising supporting interventions in disadvantaged areas and “environmental” ones; cluster 2 shows large allocation for cooperation interventions; cluster 3 includes regions funding primarily agricultural investments; cluster 4 shows no distinct or unique characteristics. This study is the first one addressing expenditure allocation of the 2023-2027 Common Agricultural Policy. It confirms that expenditure patterns partially couple with geographical and historical similarities, although two main spending priorities (i.e. “environment” and “investments”) persist.

PDF

References

  1. Anderson, K., Rausser, G., Swinnen, J. (2013). Political economy of public policies: Insights from distortions to agricultural and food markets. Journal of Economic Literature 51, 423–477. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.51.2.423
  2. Barral, S., Detang-Dessendre, C. (2023). Reforming the Common Agricultural Policy (2023–2027): multidisciplinary views. Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies 104, 47–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41130-023-00191-9
  3. Bellemare, M.F., Carnes, N. (2015). Why do members of congress support agricultural protection? Food Policy 50, 20–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.10.010
  4. Bolli, M., Cagliero, R., Camaioni, B., Carta, V., Cristiano, S., Licciardo, F., Varia, F. (2021). La valutazione dello sviluppo rurale: un processo di crescita tra opportunità e vincoli. PianetaPSR numero 104 luglio/agosto 2021.
  5. Bonfiglio, A., Camaioni, B., Coderoni, S., Esposti, R., Pagliacci, F., & Sotte, F. (2017). Are rural regions prioritizing knowledge transfer and innovation? Evidence from Rural Development Policy expenditure across the EU space. Journal of Rural Studies, 53, 78-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.05.005
  6. Bourget, B. (2021). The Common Agricultural Policy 2023-2027: change and continuity. Foundation Robert Schuman. European issues n°607 21st September 2021.
  7. Camaioni, B., Esposti, R., Lobianco, A., Pagliacci, F., & Sotte, F. (2013). How rural is the EU RDP? An analysis through spatial fund allocation. Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, 2(3), 277-300. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.162075
  8. Camaioni, B., Esposti, R., Pagliacci, F., & Sotte, F. (2016). How does space affect the allocation of the EU Rural Development Policy expenditure? A spatial econometric assessment. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 43(3), 433-473. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbv024
  9. Carey, M. (2019). The Common Agricultural Policy’s New Delivery Model Post‐2020: National Administration Perspective. EuroChoices, 18(1), 11-17. https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692X.12218
  10. Charron, N., Lapuente, V., & Bauhr, M. (2021). Sub-national quality of government in EU member states: presenting the 2021 European quality of government index and its relationship with Covid-19 indicators (Working Papers N. 2021:4). Department of Political Science, University of Gothenburg. http://hdl.handle.net/2077/68410
  11. Coderoni, S. (2023). Key policy objectives for European agricultural policies: Some reflections on policy coherence and governance issues. Bio-based and Applied Economics 12(2), 85 -101. https://doi.org/10.36253/bae-13971
  12. Copus, A., & Dax, T. (2010). Conceptual background and priorities of European rural development policy. Deliverable D1, 2, 1-76.
  13. Crescenzi, R., De Filippis, F., & Pierangeli, F. (2015). In tandem for cohesion? Synergies and conflicts between regional and agricultural policies of the European Union. Regional Studies, 49(4), 681-704. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.946401
  14. De Castro, P., Miglietta, P.P., Vecchio, Y. (2020) The Common Agricultural Policy 2021-2027: a new history for European agriculture. Italian Review of Agricultural Economics 75(3), 5-12. https://doi.org/10.13128/rea-12703
  15. De Filippis, F., & Henke, R. (2010). La Pac tra primo e secondo pilastro: una lettura della spesa agricola dell’UE. QA Rivista dell’Associazione Rossi-Doria, (2010/3).
  16. Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development (2023). Annual Activity Report 2022. Ref. Ares(2023)2921885. 25/04/2023.
  17. Dwyer, J., Ward, N., Lowe, P., & Baldock, D. (2007). European rural development under the Common Agricultural Policy’s ‘Second Pillar’: Institutional conservatism and innovation. Regional Studies, 41(7), 873–888. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400601142795
  18. Esposti, R. (2007). Regional growth and policies in the European Union: Does the Common Agricultural Policy have a counter‐treatment effect? American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 89(1), 116-134. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2007.00967.x
  19. Esposti, R., (2011). Reforming the CAP: an agenda for regional growth. In: Sorrentino, S., Henke, R., Severini, S. (Eds.), The Common Agricultural Policy after the Fischler Reform. National Implementations, Impact Assessment and the Agenda for Future Reforms. Ashgate, Farnham, pp. 29e52.
  20. European Commission (2020a). “Farm to Fork” strategy for a fair, healthy, and environmentally friendly food system.” COM(2020) 381 final. Brussels, 25.5.2020.
  21. European Commission (2020b). “EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030. Bringing nature back into our lives”. COM(2020) 380 final. Brussels, 20/05/2020.
  22. European Commission (2022). COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION of 2.12.2022 approving the 2023-2027 CAP Strategic Plan of Italy for Union support financed by the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund and the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development CCI: 2023IT06AFSP001EU. COM(2022) 8645 final. Brussels, 2.12.2022
  23. European Commission: Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, Chartier, O., Krüger, T., Folkeson Lillo, C., Valli, C., Jongeneel, R., Selten, M., van Asseldonk, M., Avis, K., Rouillard, J., Underwood, E., Parissaki, M., Bertolozzi, D., & Devot, A. (2023). Mapping and analysis of CAP strategic plans: assessment of joint efforts for 2023-2027, Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2762/71556
  24. Fałkowski, J., Olper, A. (2014). Political competition and policy choices: the evidence from agricultural protection. Agricultural Economics 45, 143–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12018.
  25. Fredriksson, P.G., Svensson, J. (2003). Political instability, corruption, and policy formation: the case of environmental policy. Journal of Public Economics 87, 1383–1405. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(02)00036-1
  26. Fusco, G. (2021). Twenty Years of Common Agricultural Policy in Europe: A Bibliometric Analysis- Sustainability 2021, 13(19), 10650; https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910650
  27. Greer, A. (2013). The Common Agricultural Policy and the EU budget: stasis or change? European Journal of Government and Economics 2 (2): 119-136. https://doi.org/10.17979/ejge.2013.2.2.4291
  28. Groupe de Bruges (1996). Cultiver l’Europe: éléments de réflexion sur l’avenir de la politique agricole en Europe. Fondation pour le progrès de l’homme.
  29. Hennig, C. (2024). _fpc: Flexible Procedures for Clustering_. R package version 2.2-13, <https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=fpc>.
  30. Iagatti, M., & Sorrentino, A. (2007). La path dependency nel processo di riforma della PAC. http://hdl.handle.net/2067/35925
  31. Langlais, A. (2023). The new Common Agricultural Policy: reflecting an agro-ecological transition. The legal perspective. Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies 104, 51–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41130-022-00183-1
  32. Matthews, A. (2017). ’Why further reform?’. In: Buckwell, A., Matthews, A., Baldock, D. and Mathijs, E. CAP (Eds.), Thinking Out of the Box Further modernisation of the CAP – why, what and how?. The RISE Foundation: Bruxelles.
  33. Matthews, A. (2021). Improving governance of the future CAP. Cap Reform. Avialable at: http://capreform.eu/improving-governance-of-the-future-cap/
  34. Metta, M. (2020). CAP Performance Monitoring and Evaluation Framework: What’s Cooking? Agricultural and Rural Convention 2020. Available at: https://www.arc2020.eu/cap-performance-monitoring-and-evaluation-framework-whats-cooking/
  35. Moyer, W. Josling, T. (2002). Agricultural policy reform: politics and process in the EU and US in the 1990s. Ashgate, Aldershot.
  36. Murtagh, F. & Legendre, P. (2014). Ward’s hierarchical agglomerative clustering method: which algorithms implement Ward’s criterion? Journal of Classification, 31, 274–295.
  37. Olper, A., Fałkowski, J., Swinnen, J. (2014). Political reforms and public policy: Evidence from agricultural and food policies. The World Bank Economic Review 28, 21–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lht003
  38. Pagliacci F. & Zavalloni, M. (2024). The political economy determinants of agri-environmental funds in the European Rural Development Programmes. Bio-based and Applied Economics, 13(2), 14-160. https://doi.org/10.36253/bae-13482
  39. Pelucha, M., Kveton, V., & Safr, K. (2017). Theory and reality of the EU’s rural development policy application in the context of territorial cohesion perspective-The case of the Czech Republic in the long-term period of 2004–2013. Land use policy, 62, 13-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.11.036
  40. Piorr, A., & Viaggi, D. (2015). The spatial dimension of Public Payments for Rural Development: Evidence on allocation practices, impact mechanisms, CMEF indicators, and scope for improvement. Ecological indicators, 59, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.05.060
  41. QGIS Development Team (2024). QGIS Geographic Information System. Open Source Geospatial Foundation. http://qgis.org
  42. Rac, I., Erjavec, K, & Erjavec, E. (2020). Does the proposed CAP reform allow for a paradigm shift towards a greener policy? Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 18(3), e0111. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2020183-16447
  43. R Core Team (2024). _R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing_. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. <https://www.R-project.org/>.
  44. Shucksmith, M., Thomson, K. J., & Roberts, D. (2005). The CAP and the regions: the territorial impact of the Common Agricultural Policy. CABI publishing. https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851990552.0000
  45. Sotte, F. (2023). La politica agricola europea: storia e analisi. Firenze University Press, 1-259.
  46. UNFCCC. Adoption of the Paris Agreement FCCC/CP/2015/L.9/Rev.1 (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, 2015); https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/l09r01.pdf.
  47. Uthes, S., Li, F., & Kelly, E. (2017). Does EU rural expenditure correspond to regional development needs? Land Use Policy, 60, 267-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.10.016
  48. von Cramon-Taubadel S, 2017. The common agricultural policy and the next EU budget. Federal Foreign Office, Berlin, 30 Mar 2017.
  49. Ward Jr, J. H. (1963). Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58(301), 236-244.
  50. Yandell, B. S. (1997) Practical Data Analysis for Designed Experiments. Chapman & Hall.
  51. Zasada, I., Weltin, M., Reutter, M., Verburg, P. H., & Piorr, A. (2018). EU’s rural development policy at the regional level – Are expenditures for natural capital linked with territorial needs?. Land use policy, 77, 344-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.05.053
  52. Zezza, A. (2023). CAP, Farm to Fork and Green Deal: policy coherence, governance, and future challenges. Bio-Based and Applied Economics, 12(2), 83–84. https://doi.org/10.36253/bae-14794