Vol. 15 No. 2 (2026)
Full Research Articles

Addressing needs for the diffusion of digital greenhouse farming. Insights from Living Labs in the Mediterranean basin

PDF HTML Suppl. Mat.
  • Oriana Gava,
  • Sara Sturiale,
  • Marisa Gallardo,
  • Dolores Buendía Guerrero,
  • Dursun Buyuktas,
  • Gulcin Ece Aslan,
  • Asma Laarif,
  • Thameur Bouslama,
  • Alejandra Navarro,
  • Luca Incrocci,
  • Fabio Bartolini
Oriana Gava
Research Centre for Agricultural Policies and Bioeconomy, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Viale della Toscana 21, 50127 Firenze, Italy
Sara Sturiale
Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Pisa, Via del Borghetto 80, 56124 Pisa, Italy
Marisa Gallardo
Department of Agronomy, University of Almería, Carretera de Sacramento s/n, La Cañada de San Urbano, 04120 Almería, Spain
Dolores Buendía Guerrero
Research Station of the Cajamar, Paraje Las Palmerillas 25, 04710 El Ejido, Spain
Dursun Buyuktas
Department of Agricultural Structures and Irrigation, Faculty of Agriculture, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey
Gulcin Ece Aslan
Department of Agricultural Structures and Irrigation, Faculty of Agriculture, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey
Asma Laarif
University of Sousse, LR21AGR03, Regional Research Centre on Horticulture and Organic Agriculture (CRRHAB), 57, Chott Mariem, TN-4042 Sousse, Tunisia
Thameur Bouslama
University of Sousse, LR21AGR03, Regional Research Centre on Horticulture and Organic Agriculture (CRRHAB), 57, Chott Mariem, TN-4042 Sousse, Tunisia
Alejandra Navarro
Research Centre for Vegetable and Ornamental Crops, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Via Cavalleggeri 51, 84098 Pontecagnano – Faiano, Italy
Luca Incrocci
Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Pisa, Via del Borghetto 80, 56124 Pisa, Italy
Fabio Bartolini
Department of Chemical, Pharmaceutical and Agricultural Sciences, University of Ferrara, Via L. Borsari 46, 44121 Ferrara, Italy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/bae-17755

Published 2025-09-16

Keywords

  • Decision Support System,
  • agricultural digitalisation,
  • qualitative research,
  • multi-actor engagement,
  • actor needs,
  • enabling conditions
    • ...More
    Less

How to Cite

Gava, O., Sturiale, S., Gallardo, M., Buendía Guerrero, D., Buyuktas, D., Ece Aslan, G., Laarif, A., Bouslama, T., Navarro, A., Incrocci, L., & Bartolini, F. (2025). Addressing needs for the diffusion of digital greenhouse farming. Insights from Living Labs in the Mediterranean basin. Bio-Based and Applied Economics, 15(2), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.36253/bae-17755

Copyright (c) 2026 Oriana Gava, Sara Sturiale, Marisa Gallardo, Dolores Buendía Guerrero, Dursun Buyuktas, Gulcin Ece Aslan, Asma Laarif, Thameur Bouslama, Alejandra Navarro, Luca Incrocci, Fabio Bartolini

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

Agriculture 4.0 represents a huge opportunity for the transformation of agrifood sectors. However, its adoption (and diffusion) in real-world farming contexts faces multiple challenges. This study focuses on greenhouse farming within the Mediterranean basin. It aims to assess the needs of actors involved in the uptake of Agriculture 4.0 and define enabling conditions to support achieving these needs, focusing on the introduction of an innovative decision support system in real-world greenhouses for tomato production. A qualitative and comparative approach is implemented, using participatory data collection methods with cross-disciplinary experts from four case studies across the Mediterranean Basin. Data are collected through one-to-one open discussions, supported using context and SWOT analyses to stimulate reflection and recall. The findings highlight the need to improve digital literacy among farmers and advisors, build trust through tailored education conditions and mentorship, and support young farmers with financial incentives and training. Market dynamics are relevant as well, pinpointing the need for stronger product images and increasing consumer awareness through certification and labelling. Great interest and technology potential emerges from the possibility to enable (partial) remote work thereby benefiting a work-life balance. Simplifying bureaucratic processes and enhancing policy support for cooperation and farmer unions are also essential for encouraging farmers to adopt digital technology.

PDF HTML Suppl. Mat.

References

  1. Bocean, C.G. (2024). A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the Relationship between Digital Technology Use and Agricultural Productivity in EU Countries. Agriculture, 14: 519. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14040519 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14040519
  2. Campos, I., and Marín-González, E. (2023). Renewable energy Living Labs through the lenses of responsible innovation: building an inclusive, reflexive, and sustainable energy transition. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 10 (1): 2213145. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2023.2213145 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2023.2213145
  3. Carolan, M. (2024). Who and what gets recognized in digital agriculture: agriculture 4.0 at the intersectionality of (Dis)Ableism, labor, and recognition justice. Agriculture and Human Values, 41: 1465–1480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-024-10560-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-024-10560-9
  4. Coderoni, S. (2023). Key policy objectives for European agricultural policies: Some reflections on policy coherence and governance issues. Bio-based and Applied Economics, 12(2), 85–101. https://doi.org/10.36253/bae-13971 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/bae-13971
  5. da Silveira, F., Barbedo, J.G.A., da Silva, S.L.C., and Amaral, F.G. (2023a). Proposal for a framework to manage the barriers that hinder the development of agriculture 4.0 in the agricultural production chain. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 214: 108281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2023.108281 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2023.108281
  6. da Silveira, F., da Silva, S.L.C., Machado, F.M., Barbedo, J.G.A., and Amaral, F.G. (2023b). Farmers’ perception of the barriers that hinder the implementation of agriculture 4.0. Agricultural Systems, 208: 103656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2023.103656 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2023.103656
  7. da Silveira, F., Lermen, F.H., and Amaral, F.G. (2021). An overview of agriculture 4.0 development: Systematic review of descriptions, technologies, barriers, advantages, and disadvantages. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 189: 106405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2021.106405 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2021.106405
  8. Derakhti, A., Santibanez Gonzalez, E.D.R., and Mardani, A. (2023). Industry 4.0 and Beyond: A Review of the Literature on the Challenges and Barriers Facing the Agri-Food Supply Chain. Sustainability, 15: 5078. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065078 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065078
  9. Dibbern, T., Romani, L.A.S., and Massruhá, S.M.F.S. (2024). Main drivers and barriers to the adoption of Digital Agriculture technologies. Smart Agricultural Technology, 8: 100459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2024.100459 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2024.100459
  10. Eastwood, C., Klerkx, L., Ayre, M., and Dela Rue, B. (2019). Managing Socio-Ethical Challenges in the Development of Smart Farming: From a Fragmented to a Comprehensive Approach for Responsible Research and Innovation. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 32: 741–768. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-017-9704-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-017-9704-5
  11. Eastwood, C., Klerkx, L., and Nettle, R. (2017). Dynamics and distribution of public and private research and extension roles for technological innovation and diffusion: Case studies of the implementation and adaptation of precision farming technologies. Journal of Rural Studies, 49: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.11.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.11.008
  12. Ehlers, M.-H., El Benni, N., and Douziech, M. (2025). Implementing responsible research and innovation and sustainability assessment in research projects: A framework and application. Research Policy, 54: 105164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2024.105164 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2024.105164
  13. Feng, Y., Gao, G., Wang, P., and Zhang, Z. (2024). Integrating stakeholder value network with strategic issue management for multi-stakeholder needs and requirements analysis of vertical farming systems. Agricultural Systems, 221: 104133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104133 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104133
  14. Finger, R. (2023). Digital innovations for sustainable and resilient agricultural systems. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 50: 1277–1309. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbad021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbad021
  15. Fragomeli, R., Annunziata, A., and Punzo, G. (2024). Promoting the Transition towards Agriculture 4.0: A Systematic Literature Review on Drivers and Barriers. Sustainability, 16: 2425. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16062425 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16062425
  16. Gabriel, A., and Gandorfer, M. (2023). Adoption of digital technologies in agriculture—an inventory in a european small-scale farming region. Precision Agriculture, 24: 68–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-022-09931-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-022-09931-1
  17. Ganeshkumar, C., Singh, N.K., Mor, R.S., and Panghal, A. (2023). Investigating the Adoption Barriers to Industry 4.0 Technologies in Farmer Producer Organisations. International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness (JGBC), 18: 162–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42943-023-00083-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42943-023-00083-1
  18. Gava, O., Sturiale, S., Gallardo, M., Buendía Guerrero, D., Buyuktas, D., Aslan, G. E., Laarif, A., Bouslama, T., Navarro, A., Incrocci, L., & Bartolini, F. (2025). Social expectations for Agriculture 4.0. Evidence from Living Labs in the Mediterranean greenhouse sector. Journal of Rural Studies, 120, 103855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103855 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103855
  19. Giagnocavo, C., Gerez, S., and Campos i Climent, V. (2014). Paths to Cooperative Survival: Structure, Strategy and Regeneration of Fruit and Vegetables Cooperatives in Almería and Valencia, Spain. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 85: 617–639. https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.12054 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.12054
  20. Gong, Y., Tan, R. (2021). Emergence of local collective action for land adjustment in land consolidation in China: An archetype analysis. Landscape and Urban Planning, 214: 104160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104160 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104160
  21. Gouroubera, M.W., Adechian, S.A., Segnon, A.C., Moumouni-Moussa, I., and Zougmoré, R.B. (2025). Drivers and impacts of mobile phone-mediated scaling of agricultural technologies: a meta-analysis. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 8: 1514546. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2024.1514546 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2024.1514546
  22. Helms, M.M., and Nixon, J. (2010). Exploring SWOT analysis – where are we now? Journal of Strategy and Management, 3: 215–251. https://doi.org/10.1108/17554251011064837 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/17554251011064837
  23. Huber-Stearns, H.R., Bennett, D.E., Posner, S., Richards, R.C., Fair, J.H., Cousins, S.J.M., and Romulo, C.L., (2017). Social-ecological enabling conditions for payments for ecosystem services. Ecology and Society, 22(1): 18. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08979-220118 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08979-220118
  24. Ingram, J., Maye, D., Bailye, C., Barnes, A., Bear, C., Bell, M., Cutress, D., Davies, L., de Boon, A., Dinnie, L., Gairdner, J., Hafferty, C., Holloway, L., Kindred, D., Kirby, D., Leake, B., Manning, L., Marchant, B., Morse, A., Oxley, S., Phillips, M., Regan, Á., Rial-Lovera, K., Rose, D.C., Schillings, J., Williams, F., Williams, H., and Wilson, L. (2022). What are the priority research questions for digital agriculture? Land Use Policy, 114: 105962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105962 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105962
  25. Klerkx, L., Jakku, E., and Labarthe, P. (2019). A review of social science on digital agriculture, smart farming and agriculture 4.0: New contributions and a future research agenda. NJAS: Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 90–91: 100315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2019.100315 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2019.100315
  26. Klerkx, L., and Rose, D. (2020). Dealing with the game-changing technologies of Agriculture 4.0: How do we manage diversity and responsibility in food system transition pathways? Global Food Security, 24: 100347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2019.100347 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2019.100347
  27. Kroupová, Z.Ž., Aulová, R., Rumánková, L., Bajan, B., Čechura, L., Šimek, P., and Jarolímek, J. (2024). Drivers and barriers to precision agriculture technology and digitalization adoption: Meta-analysis of decision choice models. Precision Agriculture, 26: 17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-024-10213-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-024-10213-1
  28. Lajoie-O’Malley, A., Bronson, K., van der Burg, S., and Klerkx, L. (2020). The future(s) of digital agriculture and sustainable food systems: An analysis of high-level policy documents. Ecosystem Services, 45: 101183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101183 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101183
  29. Littau, P., Jujagiri, N.J., and Adlbrecht, G. (2010). 25 Years of Stakeholder Theory in Project Management Literature (1984-2009). Project Management Journal, 41: 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.20195 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.20195
  30. MacPherson, J., Voglhuber-Slavinsky, A., Olbrisch, M., Schöbel, P., Dönitz, E., Mouratiadou, I., and Helming, K. (2022). Future agricultural systems and the role of digitalization for achieving sustainability goals. A review. Agronomy for a Sustainable Development, 42: 70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-022-00792-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-022-00792-6
  31. Maffezzoli, F., Ardolino, M., Bacchetti, A., Perona, M., and Renga, F. (2022). Agriculture 4.0: A systematic literature review on the paradigm, technologies and benefits. Futures, 142: 102998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2022.102998 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2022.102998
  32. Martens, K., and Zscheischler, J. (2022). The Digital Transformation of the Agricultural Value Chain: Discourses on Opportunities, Challenges and Controversial Perspectives on Governance Approaches. Sustainability, 14: 3905. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14073905 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14073905
  33. Matthews, A. (2021). The contribution of research to agricultural policy in Europe. Bio-based and Applied Economics, 10(3), 185–205. https://doi.org/10.36253/bae-12322 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/bae-12322
  34. McFadden, J., Casalini, F., Griffin, T., and Antón, J. (2022). The digitalisation of agriculture: A literature review and emerging policy issues. OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers, n. 176. Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/285cc27d-en DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/285cc27d-en
  35. McGrath, K., Brown, C., Regan, Á., and Russell, T. (2023). Investigating narratives and trends in digital agriculture: A scoping study of social and behavioural science studies. Agricultural Systems, 207: 103616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2023.103616 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2023.103616
  36. Metta, M., Ciliberti, S., Obi, C., Bartolini, F., Klerkx, L., and Brunori, G. (2022). An integrated socio-cyber-physical system framework to assess responsible digitalisation in agriculture: A first application with Living Labs in Europe. Agricultural Systems, 203: 103533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2022.103533 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2022.103533
  37. Mgendi, G., (2024). Unlocking the potential of precision agriculture for sustainable farming. Discover Agriculture, 2: 87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44279-024-00078-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44279-024-00078-3
  38. Mondejar, M.E., Avtar, R., Diaz, H.L.B., Dubey, R.K., Esteban, J., Gómez-Morales, A., Hallam, B., Mbungu, N.T., Okolo, C.C., Prasad, K.A., She, Q., and Garcia-Segura, S. (2021). Digitalization to achieve sustainable development goals: Steps towards a Smart Green Planet. Science of The Total Environment, 794: 148539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148539 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148539
  39. Ogunyiola, A., Stock, R., and Gardezi, M. (2024). Precision agriculture and the future of agrarian labor in the US food system. Agriculture and Human Values, 42: 383–403 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-024-10615-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-024-10615-x
  40. Owen, R., Macnaghten, P., and Stilgoe, J. (2012). Responsible research and innovation: From science in society to science for society, with society. Science and Public Policy, 39, 751–760. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scs093 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scs093
  41. Pagot, G., and Andrighetto, N. (2024). Fuel for collective action: A SWOT analysis to identify social barriers and drivers for a local woody biomass supply chain in an Italian alpine valley. Heliyon, 10(19): e38170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38170 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38170
  42. Patton, M.Q. (2023). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice. SAGE Publications.
  43. Petraki, D., Gazoulis, I., Kokkini, M., Danaskos, M., Kanatas, P., Rekkas, A., and Travlos, I. (2025). Digital Tools and Decision Support Systems in Agroecology: Benefits, Challenges, and Practical Implementations. Agronomy 15, 236. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15010236 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15010236
  44. Potters, J., Collins, K., Schoorlemmer, H., Stræte, E.P., Kilis, E., Lane, A., and Leloup, H. (2022). Living Labs as an Approach to Strengthen Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation Systems. EuroChoices, 21: 23–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692X.12342 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692X.12342
  45. Rijswijk, K., Klerkx, L., Bacco, M., Bartolini, F., Bulten, E., Debruyne, L., Dessein, J., Scotti, I., and Brunori, G. (2021). Digital transformation of agriculture and rural areas: A socio-cyber-physical system framework to support responsibilisation. Journal of Rural Studies, 85: 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.05.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.05.003
  46. Rose, D.C., Wheeler, R., Winter, M., Lobley, M., and Chivers, C.A. (2021). Agriculture 4.0: Making it work for people, production, and the planet. Land Use Policy, 100: 104933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104933 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104933
  47. Rotz, S., Gravely, E., Mosby, I., Duncan, E., Finnis, E., Horgan, M., LeBlanc, J., Martin, R., Neufeld, H.T., Nixon, A., Pant, L., Shalla, V., and Fraser, E. (2019). Automated pastures and the digital divide: How agricultural technologies are shaping labour and rural communities. Journal of Rural Studies, 68: 112–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.01.023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.01.023
  48. Soriano, B., Garrido, A., Bertolozzi-Caredio, D., Accatino, F., Antonioli, F., Krupin, V., Meuwissen, M.P.M., Ollendorf, F., Rommel, J., Spiegel, A., Tudor, M., Urquhart, J., Vigani, M., and Bardají, I. (2023). Actors and their roles for improving resilience of farming systems in Europe. Journal of Rural Studies, 98: 134–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2023.02.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2023.02.003
  49. Sovacool, B.K. (2011). An international comparison of four polycentric approaches to climate and energy governance. Energy Policy, 39: 3832–3844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.04.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.04.014
  50. Spee, A.P., and Jarzabkowski, P. (2009). Strategy tools as boundary objects. Strategic Organization, 7: 223–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127009102674 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127009102674
  51. Stilgoe, J., Owen, R., and Macnaghten, P. (2013). Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Research Policy, 42: 1568–1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008
  52. Sturiale, S., Gava, O., Gallardo, M., Buendía Guerrero, D., Buyuktas, D., Aslan, G.E., Laarif, A., Bouslama, T., Navarro, A., Incrocci, L., and Bartolini, F. (2024). Environmental and Economic Performance of Greenhouse Cropping in the Mediterranean Basin: Lessons Learnt from a Cross-Country Comparison. Sustainability, 16: 4491. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16114491 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16114491
  53. Sturiale, S., Gava, O., Incrocci, L., and Bartolini, F. (2025a). Deliverable 4.2 - Protocol for living labs creation. https://www.iguessmed.com/_files/ugd/4b1614_995eaa54f104468889e9f48c0a8167de.pdf.
  54. Sturiale, S., Gava, O., Incrocci, L., Buendía Guerrero, D., Gallardo, M., Aslan, G.E., Laarif, A., Bouslama, T., Navarro, A., and Bartolini, F. (2025b). Deliverable 4.3 - Feasibility and sustainability assessment document. https://www.iguessmed.com/_files/ugd/4b1614_a35e59c8b9444e89b8b212f5306b0767.pdf.
  55. Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., and Craig, J. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19: 349–357. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
  56. Wang, W., Wang, J., Liu, K., and Wu, Y.J. (2020). Overcoming Barriers to Agriculture Green Technology Diffusion through Stakeholders in China: A Social Network Analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17: 6976. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17196976 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17196976
  57. Wolfert, S., Ge, L., Verdouw, C., and Bogaardt, M.J. (2017). Big Data in Smart Farming – A review. Agriculture Systems ,153: 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2017.01.023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2017.01.023
  58. Xu, J., Li, Y., Zhang, M., and Zhang, S. (2024). Sustainable agriculture in the digital era: Past, present, and future trends by bibliometric analysis. Heliyon, 10: e34612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34612 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34612
  59. Yang, C., Ji, X., Cheng, C., Liao, S., Obuobi, B., and Zhang, Y. (2024). Digital economy empowers sustainable agriculture: Implications for farmers’ adoption of ecological agricultural technologies. Ecological Indicators, 159: 111723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.111723 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.111723
  60. Yin, R.K., (2014. Case study research: design and methods, Fifth edition. ed. SAGE, Los Angeles.
  61. Yuan, Y., and Sun, Y. (2024). Practices, Challenges, and Future of Digital Transformation in Smallholder Agriculture: Insights from a Literature Review. Agriculture, 14: 2193. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14122193 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14122193

Most read articles by the same author(s)