Just Accepted Manuscripts
Special Issue 14th AIEAA Conference

Information and Preferences for Post-Fire Restoration Techniques in Protective Forests: A Choice Experiment Approach

pdf accepted
suppl mat
  • Silvia Novelli,
  • Vito Frontuto,
  • Azzurra Orlando,
  • Raffaella Marzano
Silvia Novelli
Department of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences (DISAFA), University of Turin
Vito Frontuto
Department of Economics and Statistics - University of Turin
Azzurra Orlando
Department of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences (DISAFA), University of Turin
Raffaella Marzano
Department of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences (DISAFA), University of Turin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/bae-18777

Published 2026-09-14

Keywords

  • Wildfires,
  • Mountain forests,
  • Stated preferences,
  • Willingness to pay,
  • Information treatment

How to Cite

Novelli, S., Frontuto, V., Orlando, A., & Marzano, R. (2026). Information and Preferences for Post-Fire Restoration Techniques in Protective Forests: A Choice Experiment Approach. Bio-Based and Applied Economics. https://doi.org/10.36253/bae-18777

Copyright (c) 2026 Silvia Novelli, Vito Frontuto, Azzurra Orlando, Raffaella Marzano

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

As climate change increases wildfire frequency and intensity, post-fire restoration has become a critical challenge, particularly in protective mountain forests. While ecological literature has addressed the effectiveness of restoration techniques, little is known about public preferences and their responsiveness to information. This study estimates the monetary value attributed to different post-fire management strategies in the Italian Alpine region, using a repeated choice experiment with 1,210 residents. Preferences and willingness to pay (WTP) were measured before and after providing science-based information. Results show an intuitive inclination toward visible, active interventions, especially reforestation and salvage logging, driven by symbolic meanings and common-sense notions of recovery. After receiving information, respondents significantly reduced their WTP for intensive practices, and socio-demographic differences narrowed. These findings highlight the transformative role of targeted information in aligning social preferences with ecologically sound forest management, underscoring the importance of clear, context-sensitive communication strategies in fostering informed and equitable public support for restoration policies.

pdf accepted
suppl mat

References

  1. Alló, M., & Loureiro, M. L. (2020). Assessing preferences for wildfire prevention policies in Spain. Forest Policy and Economics, 115, 102145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102145
  2. Báliková, K., Dobšinská, Z., Balážová, E., Valent, P., & Šálka, J. (2021). Forest land tax reductions – an effective payment for forest ecosystem services in Slovakia? Central European Forestry Journal, 67(4), 167–176. https://doi.org/10.2478/forj-2021-0010
  3. Beghin, R., Lingua, E., Garbarino, M., Lonati, M., Bovio, G., Motta, R., & Marzano, R. (2010). Pinus sylvestris forest regeneration under different post-fire restoration practices in the northwestern Italian Alps. Ecological Engineering, 36(10), 1365–1372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.06.014
  4. Burton, K., Becker, D., Hovardas, T., Wardropper, C. B., & Maas, A. (2024). Assessing policy preferences for preventing and managing wildfire in Greece. Forest Policy and Economics, 163, 103209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103209
  5. Callaway, R. M. (2007). Positive interactions and interdependence in plant communities. Springer.
  6. Carson, R. T., & Czajkowski, M. (2019). A new baseline model for estimating willingness to pay from discrete choice models. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 95, 57–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2019.03.003
  7. Castro, J., Allen, C. D., Molina‐Morales, M., Marañón‐Jiménez, S., Sánchez‐Miranda, Á., & Zamora, R. (2011). Salvage Logging Versus the Use of Burnt Wood as a Nurse Object to Promote Post‐Fire Tree Seedling Establishment. Restoration Ecology, 19(4), 537–544. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2009.00619.x
  8. Costa, M., Marchi, N., Bettella, F., Bolzon, P., Berger, F., & Lingua, E. (2021). Biological Legacies and Rockfall: The Protective Effect of a Windthrown Forest. Forests, 12(9), 1141. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12091141
  9. Cyr, D., Splawinski, T. B., Pascual Puigdevall, J., Valeria, O., Leduc, A., Thiffault, N., Bergeron, Y., & Gauthier, S. (2022). Mitigating post-fire regeneration failure in boreal landscapes with reforestation and variable retention harvesting: At what cost? Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 52(4), 568–581. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2021-0180
  10. Czajkowski, M., Bartczak, A., Giergiczny, M., Navrud, S., & Żylicz, T. (2014). Providing preference-based support for forest ecosystem service management. Forest Policy and Economics, 39, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2013.11.002
  11. Czajkowski, M., Budziński, W., Campbell, D., Giergiczny, M., & Hanley, N. (2017). Spatial Heterogeneity of Willingness to Pay for Forest Management. Environmental and Resource Economics, 68(3), 705–727. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-016-0044-0
  12. Czajkowski, M., Hanley, N., & LaRiviere, J. (2016). Controlling for the Effects of Information in a Public Goods Discrete Choice Model. Environmental and Resource Economics, 63(3), 523–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-014-9847-z
  13. Di Sacco, A., Hardwick, K. A., Blakesley, D., Brancalion, P. H. S., Breman, E., Cecilio Rebola, L., Chomba, S., Dixon, K., Elliott, S., Ruyonga, G., Shaw, K., Smith, P., Smith, R. J., & Antonelli, A. (2021). Ten golden rules for reforestation to optimize carbon sequestration, biodiversity recovery and livelihood benefits. Global Change Biology, 27(7), 1328–1348. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15498
  14. Diendéré, A. A., & Kaboré, D. (2023). Preferences for a payment for ecosystem services program to control forest fires in Burkina Faso: A choice experiment. Forest Policy and Economics, 151, 102973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2023.102973
  15. Donato, D. C., Fontaine, J. B., Campbell, J. L., Robinson, W. D., Kauffman, J. B., & Law, B. E. (2006). Post-Wildfire Logging Hinders Regeneration and Increases Fire Risk. Science, 311(5759), 352–352. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1122855
  16. Farreras, V., & Mavsar, R. (2012). Burned forest area or dead tres? A discrete choice experiment for Catalan citizens. Economia Agraria y Recursos Naturales, 12(2), 137–153. https://doi.org/10.7201/earn.2012.02.06
  17. Fox, D. M., Carrega, P., Ren, Y., Caillouet, P., Bouillon, C., & Robert, S. (2018). How wildfire risk is related to urban planning and Fire Weather Index in SE France (1990–2013). Science of The Total Environment, 621, 120–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.174
  18. Frings, O., Abildtrup, J., Montagné-Huck, C., Gorel, S., & Stenger, A. (2023). Do individual PES buyers care about additionality and free-riding? A choice experiment. Ecological Economics, 213, 107944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107944
  19. Frontuto, V., Corsi, A., Novelli, S., Gullino, P., & Larcher, F. (2020). The visual impact of agricultural sheds on rural landscapes: The willingness to pay for mitigation solutions and treatment effects. Land Use Policy, 91, 104337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104337
  20. Fuhr, M., Bourrier, F., & Cordonnier, T. (2015). Protection against rockfall along a maturity gradient in mountain forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 354, 224–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2015.06.012
  21. Gülci, N. (2021). Estimating costs of salvage logging for large-scale burned forest lands: A case study on Turkey’s Mediterranean coast. Journal of Forestry Research, 32(5), 1899–1909. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-020-01255-y
  22. Hanemann, W. M. (1984). Discrete/Continuous Models of Consumer Demand. Econometrica, 52(3), 541. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913464
  23. He, Y., Zhou, Z., Im, E.-S., & Kwon, H.-H. (2025). Wildfire risk in a changing climate: Evaluating fire weather indices and their global patterns with CMIP6 multi-model projections. Weather and Climate Extremes, 48, 100751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2025.100751
  24. Hjerpe, E. E., Colavito, M. M., Waltz, A. E. M., & Meador, A. S. (2024). Return on investments in restoration and fuel treatments in frequent-fire forests of the American west: A meta-analysis. Ecological Economics, 223, 108244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108244
  25. Holl, K. D., Reid, J. L., Zahawi, R. A., De Siqueira, L. P., & Brancalion, P. H. S. (2024). A call for practical spatially patterned forest restoration methods. Restoration Ecology, 32(8), e14266. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.14266
  26. Holmes, T. P., Adamowicz, W. L., & Carlsson, F. (2017). Choice Experiments. In P. A. Champ, K. J. Boyle, & T. C. Brown (A c. Di), A Primer on Nonmarket Valuation (Vol. 13, pp. 133–186). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7104-8_5
  27. Jiang, N., Ao, C., Xu, L., Wei, Y., & Long, Y. (2023). Will information interventions affect public preferences and willingness to pay for air quality improvement? An empirical study based on deliberative choice experiment. Science of The Total Environment, 868, 161436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161436
  28. Jones, M. W., Kelley, D. I., Burton, C. A., Di Giuseppe, F., Barbosa, M. L. F., Brambleby, E., Hartley, A. J., Lombardi, A., Mataveli, G., McNorton, J. R., Spuler, F. R., Wessel, J. B., Abatzoglou, J. T., Anderson, L. O., Andela, N., Archibald, S., Armenteras, D., Burke, E., Carmenta, R., … Xanthopoulos, G. (2024). State of Wildfires 2023–2024. Earth System Science Data, 16(8), 3601–3685. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-3601-2024
  29. Jorgensen, B. S., Syme, G. J., Bishop, B. J., & Nancarrow, B. E. (1999). Protest Responses in Contingent Valuation. Environmental and Resource Economics, 14(1), 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008372522243
  30. Juutinen, A., Kosenius, A.-K., & Ovaskainen, V. (2014). Estimating the benefits of recreation-oriented management in state-owned commercial forests in Finland: A choice experiment. Journal of Forest Economics, 20(4), 396–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfe.2014.10.003
  31. Krinsky, I., & Robb, A. L. (1986). On Approximating the Statistical Properties of Elasticities. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 68(4), 715. https://doi.org/10.2307/1924536
  32. Leverkus, A. B., Gustafsson, L., Lindenmayer, D. B., Castro, J., Rey Benayas, J. M., Ranius, T., & Thorn, S. (2020). Salvage logging effects on regulating ecosystem services and fuel loads. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 18(7), 391–400. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2219
  33. Leverkus, A. B., Lindenmayer, D. B., Thorn, S., & Gustafsson, L. (2018). Salvage logging in the world’s forests: Interactions between natural disturbance and logging need recognition. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 27(10), 1140–1154. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12772
  34. Leverkus, A. B., Puerta-Piñero, C., Guzmán-Álvarez, J. R., Navarro, J., & Castro, J. (2012). Post-fire salvage logging increases restoration costs in a Mediterranean mountain ecosystem. New Forests, 43(5–6), 601–613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-012-9327-7
  35. Liebe, U., Meyerhoff, J., & Hartje, V. (2012). Test–Retest Reliability of Choice Experiments in Environmental Valuation. Environmental and Resource Economics, 53(3), 389–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-012-9567-1
  36. Lindenmayer, D., Burton, P. J., & Franklin, J. F. (2008). Salvage Logging and Its Ecological Consequences. UBC Press.
  37. Lindenmayer, D., Hobbs, R. J., Montague‐Drake, R., Alexandra, J., Bennett, A., Burgman, M., Cale, P., Calhoun, A., Cramer, V., Cullen, P., Driscoll, D., Fahrig, L., Fischer, J., Franklin, J., Haila, Y., Hunter, M., Gibbons, P., Lake, S., Luck, G., … Zavaleta, E. (2008). A checklist for ecological management of landscapes for conservation. Ecology Letters, 11(1), 78–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01114.x
  38. Lingua, E., Bettella, F., Pividori, M., Marzano, R., Garbarino, M., Piras, M., Kobal, M., & Berger, F. (2020). The Protective Role of Forests to Reduce Rockfall Risks and Impacts in the Alps Under a Climate Change Perspective. In W. Leal Filho, G. J. Nagy, M. Borga, P. D. Chávez Muñoz, & A. Magnuszewski (A c. Di), Climate Change, Hazards and Adaptation Options (pp. 333–347). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37425-9_18
  39. Lingua, E., Marques, G., Marchi, N., Garbarino, M., Marangon, D., Taccaliti, F., & Marzano, R. (2023). Post-Fire Restoration and Deadwood Management: Microsite Dynamics and Their Impact on Natural Regeneration. Forests, 14(9), 1820. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14091820
  40. Livingston, F. (2022). Planting trees as a bridge between material and spiritual responses to environmental crisis. Agriculture and Human Values, 39(1), 487–495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-021-10260-8
  41. Mantero, G., Anselmetto, N., Morresi, D., Meloni, F., Bolzon, P., Lingua, E., Garbarino, M., & Marzano, R. (2024). Modeling post-fire regeneration patterns under different restoration scenarios to improve forest recovery in degraded ecosystems. Forest Ecology and Management, 551, 121520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2023.121520
  42. Marangon, D., Marchi, N., & Lingua, E. (2022). Windthrown elements: A key point improving microsite amelioration and browsing protection to transplanted seedlings. Forest Ecology and Management, 508, 120050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120050
  43. Mariel, P., Hoyos, D., Meyerhoff, J., Czajkowski, M., Dekker, T., Glenk, K., Jacobsen, J. B., Liebe, U., Olsen, S. B., Sagebiel, J., & Thiene, M. (2021). Environmental Valuation with Discrete Choice Experiments: Guidance on Design, Implementation and Data Analysis. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62669-3
  44. Marzano, R., Garbarino, M., & Lingua, E. (2018). Gestione post-incendio dei boschi alpini. Sherwood.
  45. Marzano, R., Garbarino, M., Marcolin, E., Pividori, M., & Lingua, E. (2013). Deadwood anisotropic facilitation on seedling establishment after a stand-replacing wildfire in Aosta Valley (NW Italy). Ecological Engineering, 51, 117–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.12.030
  46. McFadden, D. (1974). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. 105–142.
  47. Meyerhoff, J., & Liebe, U. (2006). Protest beliefs in contingent valuation: Explaining their motivation. Ecological Economics, 57(4), 583–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04.021
  48. Misal, H., Varela, E., Voulgarakis, A., Rovithakis, A., Grillakis, M., & Kountouris, Y. (2023). Assessing public preferences for a wildfire mitigation policy in Crete, Greece. Forest Policy and Economics, 153, 102976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2023.102976
  49. Moos, C., Stritih, A., Teich, M., & Bottero, A. (2023). Mountain protective forests under threat? An in-depth review of global change impacts on their protective effect against natural hazards. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, 6, 1223934. https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2023.1223934
  50. Moreira, F., Arianoutsou, M., Corona, P., & De Las Heras, J. (A c. Di). (2012). Post-Fire Management and Restoration of Southern European Forests (Vol. 24). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2208-8
  51. Morresi, D., Marzano, R., Lingua, E., Motta, R., & Garbarino, M. (2022). Mapping burn severity in the western Italian Alps through phenologically coherent reflectance composites derived from Sentinel-2 imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment, 269, 112800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2021.112800
  52. Müller, A., Olschewski, R., Unterberger, C., & Knoke, T. (2020). The valuation of forest ecosystem services as a tool for management planning – A choice experiment. Journal of Environmental Management, 271, 111008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111008
  53. Müller, J., Noss, R. F., Thorn, S., Bässler, C., Leverkus, A. B., & Lindenmayer, D. (2019). Increasing disturbance demands new policies to conserve intact forest. Conservation Letters, 12(1), e12449. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12449
  54. Müller, M. M., Vilardell, L. V., Vacik, H., Mayer, C., Mayr, S., Carrega, P., Duche, Y., Sebastatien Lahaye, Böttcher, F., Maier, H., Schunk, C., Zimmermann, L., Ascoli, D., Cotterchio, A., Fiorucci, P., Gottero, F., Pirone, S., Rizzolo, R., Vacchiano, G., … Sautter, M. (2020). Forest fires in the Alps—State of knowledge, future challenges and options for an integrated fire management—White Paper for policy makers. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.15609.42081
  55. Poe, G. L., Giraud, K. L., & Loomis, J. B. (2005). Computational Methods for Measuring the Difference of Empirical Distributions. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 87(2), 353–365. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2005.00727.x
  56. Richter, P., Sgarbossa, A., Fait, S., & Lingua, E. (2025). Mitigare il rischio di caduta massi nei boschi colpiti da bostrico. Approfondimenti in provincia di Trento su cantieri con tagli direzionati. Sherwood, foreste ed alberi oggi, 11–14.
  57. Riegel, S., Kuhfuss, L., & Stojanovic, T. (2023). Nature-based solutions for climate change mitigation: Assessing the Scottish Public’s preferences for saltmarsh carbon storage. Ecological Economics, 211, 107863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107863
  58. Rival, L. (1998). The Social Life of Trees: Anthropological Perspectives on Tree Symbolism. Taylor & Francis Group.
  59. Ryan, R. L., & Hamin, E. (2008). Wildfires, Communities, and Agencies: Stakeholders’ Perceptions of Postfire Forest Restoration and Rehabilitation. Journal of Forestry, 106(7), 370–379. https://doi.org/10.1093/jof/106.7.370
  60. Scheufele, G., & Bennett, J. (2012). Response Strategies and Learning in Discrete Choice Experiments. Environmental and Resource Economics, 52(3), 435–453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-011-9537-z
  61. Shindler, B., & Cramer, L. A. (1999). Shifting Public Values for Forest Management: Making Sense of Wicked Problems. Western Journal of Applied Forestry, 14(1), 28–34. https://doi.org/10.1093/wjaf/14.1.28
  62. Singh, H., & Kumar, N. (A c. Di). (2025). Forest Fire and Climate Change: Insights into Science. Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-89967-6
  63. Stein, A., Gerstner, K., & Kreft, H. (2014). Environmental heterogeneity as a universal driver of species richness across taxa, biomes and spatial scales. Ecology Letters, 17(7), 866–880. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12277
  64. Swanson, M. E., Magee, M. I., Nelson, A. S., Engstrom, R., & Adams, H. D. (2023). Experimental downed woody debris-created microsites enhance tree survival and growth in extreme summer heat. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, 6, 1224624. https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2023.1224624
  65. Taccaliti, F., Marzano, R., Bell, T. L., & Lingua, E. (2023). Wildland–Urban Interface: Definition and Physical Fire Risk Mitigation Measures, a Systematic Review. Fire, 6(9), 343. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire6090343
  66. Tidball, K. G. (2014). Seeing the forest for the trees: Hybridity and social-ecological symbols, rituals and resilience in postdisaster contexts. Ecology and Society, 19(4), art25. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06903-190425
  67. Train, K. (2009). Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation (2nd edition). Cambridge University Press.
  68. Train, K., & Weeks, M. (2005). Discrete Choice Models in Preference Space and Willingness-to-Pay Space. In R. Scarpa & A. Alberini (A c. Di), Applications of Simulation Methods in Environmental and Resource Economics (Vol. 6, pp. 1–16). Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3684-1_1
  69. Vanermen, I., Kessels, R., Verheyen, K., Muys, B., & Vranken, L. (2021). The effect of information transfer related to soil biodiversity on Flemish citizens’ preferences for forest management. Science of The Total Environment, 776, 145791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145791
  70. Varela, E., Jacobsen, J. B., & Soliño, M. (2014). Understanding the heterogeneity of social preferences for fire prevention management. Ecological Economics, 106, 91–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.07.014
  71. Wohlgemuth, T., Schwitter, R., Bebi, P., Sutter, F., & Brang, P. (2017). Post-windthrow management in protection forests of the Swiss Alps. European Journal of Forest Research, 136(5–6), 1029–1040. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-017-1031-x
  72. Zahawi, R. A., Reid, J. L., & Holl, K. D. (2014). Hidden Costs of Passive Restoration. Restoration Ecology, 22(3), 284–287. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12098

Most read articles by the same author(s)