Vol. 15 No. 29 (2025): Situare il sapere: sfide epistemologiche e questioni di metodo tra nord e sud
Open Essays and Researches

Network Impresa 4.0: continuità o riconfigurazione dei sistemi regionali dell’innovazione?

PDF
  • Gianluca Scarano,
  • Gianmaria Luigi Pessina,
  • Marco Di Gregorio,
  • Lorenzo Bazzano
Gianluca Scarano
Università degli Studi di Torino, Italia
Gianmaria Luigi Pessina
Università degli Studi di Torino, Italia
Marco Di Gregorio
Università degli Studi di Salerno, Italia
Lorenzo Bazzano
Università degli Studi di Torino, Italia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/cambio-16111

Published 2025-07-21

Keywords

  • Industry 4.0,
  • SME,
  • local development,
  • Italian Regions

How to Cite

Scarano, G., Pessina, G. L., Di Gregorio, M., & Bazzano, L. (2025). Network Impresa 4.0: continuità o riconfigurazione dei sistemi regionali dell’innovazione?. Cambio. Rivista Sulle Trasformazioni Sociali, 15(29), 179–197. https://doi.org/10.36253/cambio-16111

Copyright (c) 2025 Gianluca Scarano, Lorenzo Bazzano, Marco Di Gregorio, Gianmaria Luigi Pessina

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

The public and scientific debate regarding the Italian Industry 4.0 policy has so far been captured by incentive-based measures, overshadowing measures to support the dissemination and transfer of knowledge. The Impresa 4.0 Network, from 2017, aims to create network infrastructures based on (semi-)public organizations to foster information dissemination and collaboration. In the context of a highly regionalized development model such as the Italian one, it seems reasonable to ask to what extent the composition and structure of formal networks attributable to this policy have entailed a substantial continuity or discontinuity with respect to the peculiarities of a given regional innovation system and may, as a result, vary in relation to the characteristics of a specific local institutional structure. The objective of this contribution is to map the networks formed from the intermediaries identified by the Impresa 4.0 Network project in the regions of Veneto and Emilia-Romagna. Where the choice of these two regions comes from the tradition that identifies limited firm size as a characteristic of north-central regions. Thanks to the techniques of social network analysis, it was possible to derive some useful evidence for interpreting the territorial configuration of networks, further supported by the documentary analysis regarding the most recent regional policies on the subject. Each region seems to have selected a particular level of intermediaries envisaged by the policy to elaborate a new institutional layer, on which to invest in order to preserve the distinctive features of its regional governance.

PDF

References

  1. Aiginger K., Rodrik D. (2020), Rebirth of industrial policy and an agenda for the twenty-first century, in «Journal of industry, competition and trade», 20, 189-207.
  2. Bagnasco A. (1988), La costruzione sociale del mercato, Bologna: Il Mulino.
  3. Bagnasco A. (2009), The Governance of Industrial Districts, in: Beccatini G., Bellandi M., De Propris C. (eds.), A Handbook of Industrial Districts, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  4. Bailey D., De Propris L. (2020), Industry 4.0 and transformative regional industrial policy, in: Bailey D. (ed.), Industry 4.0 and Regional Transformation, Londra: Routledge.
  5. Bessant J., Rush H. (1995), Building bridges for innovation: the role of consultants in technology transfer, in «Research Policy», 24, 1, 97-114.
  6. Bianchi P., Butera F., De Michelis G., Perulli P., Seghezzi F., Scarano G. (2020, cur.), Coesione e innovazione. Il Patto per il Lavoro dell’Emilia-Romagna, Bologna: il Mulino.
  7. Bianchi P., Labory S. (2018), Industrial Policy for the Manufacturing Revolution: Perspectives on Digital Globalisation, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  8. Borgatti S. P., Everett M. G. (1997), Network analysis of 2-mode data. In «Social networks», 19, 243-269.
  9. Borgatti S.P., Everett M.G., Freeman L.C. (2002), Ucinet 6 for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis, Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
  10. Boschma R., Frenken K. (2010), The spatial evolution of innovation networks: A proximity perspective, in R. A. Boschma, R. Martin (eds.), The handbook of evolutionary economic geography, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  11. Bougrain F., Haudeville B. (2002), Innovation, Collaboration and SMEs Internal Research Capacities, in «Research Policy», 31, 5, 735-747.
  12. Bubbico D. (2022), Il Pnrr italiano e l’industria nazionale: alla ricerca di una politica industriale, in: «Autonomie locali e servizi sociali», 45, 2, 309-329.
  13. Burroni L., Trigilia C. (2009), Italy: rise, decline and restructuring of a regionalized capitalism; in «Economy and Society», 38, 4, 630-653.
  14. Calabrò M., Carnazza P. (2019), Le nuove sfide tecnologiche e le principali risposte della politica industriale, in «Argomenti», 13, 26-62.
  15. Cirillo V., Mina A., Ricci A. (2022), Digital technologies, labor market flows and investment in training: Evidence from Italian employer-employee data, Working Paper n.79, Roma: INAPP.
  16. Cooke P. (1992), Regional Innovation Systems: Competitive Regulation in the New Europe, in «Geoforum», 23, 3, 365-382.
  17. Crouch C. (2004), Changing Governance of Local Economies. Responses of European Local Production Systems, Oxford: Oxford University Press
  18. Crupi A., Del Sarto N., Di Minin A., Gregori G.L., Lepore D., Marinelli L., Spigarelli F. (2020), The digital transformation of SMEs -a new knowledge broker called the digital innovation hub, in «Journal of Knowledge Management», 26, 4, 1263-1288
  19. De Marchi V., Gereffi G., Grandinetti R. (2017), Distretti che evolvono nelle catene globali del valore: lezioni di resilienza dal Veneto, in «Economia e Società Regionale», 35, 2, 34-43.
  20. Domorenok E., Graziano P., Polverari L. (2021), Policy integration, policy design and administrative capacities. Evidence from EU cohesion policy, in «Policy and Society», 40, 1, 58-78.
  21. Fruchterman, T. M. J., Reingold, E. M. (1991), Graph Drawing by Force-Directed Placement, in «Software: Practice and Experience», 21, 11.
  22. Gherardini A., Pessina G. (2020), Cavalcare l’onda del cambiamento. Il Piano Impresa 4.0 alla prova dei distretti, in «L’Industria», 2, 191-214.
  23. Giannetti R., Rapaccini M., Cinquini L. (2021), La valutazione degli investimenti in industria 4.0: oltre l’old wine in new bottles, in «Management Control», 2, 65-90.
  24. Giordano A. (2020), PIDMed. Dall’esperienza del Punto Impresa Digitale di Salerno e Caserta alla definizione di un modello mediterraneo di innovazione tecnologica e sociale, in «Rivista economica del Mezzogiorno», 4, 757-780.
  25. Gould R.V., Fernandez R.M. (1989), Structures of Mediation: A Formal Approach to Brokerage in Transaction Networks, in «Sociological Methodology», 19, 89-126.
  26. Hagerstrand T. (1952), The propagation of innovation waves, Lund Studies in Human Geography Series-B No. 4: Royal University of Lund
  27. Howells J. (2006), Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation, in «Research Policy», 35: 715–728.
  28. Jacomy M., Venturini T., Heymann S., Bastian M. (2014), ForceAtlas2, a Continuous Graph Layout Algorithm for Handy Network Visualization Designed for the Gephi Software, in «PLoS ONE», 9,6.
  29. Kergroach S. (2021), SMEs Going Digital: Policy challenges and recommendations, OECD Going Digital Toolkit Notes No. 15, Parigi: OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2021/08/smes-going-digital_3b1e76c1/c91088a4-en.pdf
  30. Kiese M. (2012), Regional cluster policies in Germany-A multi-level governance perspective on policy learning. European Review of Industrial Economics and Policy, in «European Review of Industrial Economics and Policy», 5.
  31. Klerkx L., Leeuwis C., (2009), Establishment and embedding of innovation brokers at different innovation system levels: insights from the Dutch agricultural sector, in «Technological Forecasting and Social Change», 76, 849-860.
  32. Kudic M. (2015), Innovation networks in the German laser industry. Evolutionary Change, Strategic Positioning, and Firm Innovativeness, Berlin: Springer.
  33. Lakaniemi I., Mattauch W. (2019), Intelligent tools driving the next great transformation: How the European Union and the EU Member States are addressing digital transformation, Ministry of Science, Technology, Innovation and Communications: Brasilia.
  34. Lichtenthaler U. (2013), The collaboration of innovation intermediaries and manufacturing firms in the markets for technology, in «Journal of Product Innovation Management», 30, 142–158.
  35. Mahoney J., Thelen K. (2009, eds.), Explaining Institutional Change. Ambiguity, Agency, and Power, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  36. Meeus M.T.H., Oerlemans L.A.G. (1999), Unpacking the link between Innovation Systems and Institutions, ECIS: Eindhoven, Working Paper.
  37. Messina P. (2012), Modi di regolazione dello sviluppo locale. Una comparazione per contesti di Veneto ed Emilia Romagna, Padova: Padova University Press.
  38. Moss T. (2009), Intermediaries and the governance of sociotechnical networks in transition, in «Environment and Planning», 41, 6: 1480-1495.
  39. Muscio A., Ciffolilli A. (2020), What drives the capacity to integrate Industry 4.0 technologies? Evidence from European R&D projects, in «Economics of Innovation and New Technology», 29,2, 169-183.
  40. Neal Z. P. (2015), Making Big Communities Small: Using Network Science to Understand the Ecological and Behavioral Requirements for Community Social Capital, in «American Journal of Community Psychology», 55, 369-380.
  41. Neal Z. P. (2017), How small is it? Comparing indices of small worldliness, in «Network Science», 5, 1, 30-44.
  42. Nelson R.R. (1998), The Co-evolution of Industry of Technology, Industrial Structure, and Supporting Institutions, in Dosi G., Teece D.J., Chytry J. (eds.), Technology, Organization, and Competitiveness, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  43. OCSE (2017), Key Issues for Digital Transformation in the G20, Parigi: OECD Publishing.
  44. Orazi F., Sofritti F. (2023), Politiche di innovazione e Industria 4.0 in Italia: il caso dei Competence Center, in «PRISMA», 12, 1, 24-37.
  45. Orazi F., Sofritti F. (2024), Innovation 4.0 Policies in Italy: Strengths and Weaknesses of the Innovation Ecosystem of the “Transition 4.0” Plan from an International Perspective, in «Societies», 14(3).
  46. Pichierri, A. (2001), Concertazione e sviluppo locale, in «Stato e mercato», 21(2): 237-266.
  47. Podolny, J. M. (2001), Networks as the pipes and prisms of the market, in «American journal of sociology», 107, 1, 33-60.
  48. Prodi E., Tassinari M., Ferrannini A., Rubini L. (2021), Industry 4.0 policy from a sociotechnical perspective: the case of German competence centers, in «Technological Forecasting and Social Change», 175.
  49. Ramella F. (2013), Sociologia dell’innovazione economica, Bologna: Il Mulino.
  50. Rinaldi A., Solinas G. (2023), Visione, governance e politica industriale in Emilia-Romagna: un’analisi di lungo periodo, in «L’Industria», 44, 1, 3-25.
  51. Rissola G., Sörvik J. (2018), Digital Innovation Hubs in Smart Specialisation Strategies. Lussemburgo: Publications Office of the European Union.
  52. Rogers E.M. (1962), Diffusion of Innovations, New York: The Free Press.
  53. Russo A (2013), Cooperazione e regolazione nelle politiche per l’innovazione, in «Polis», 27, 3, 333-362.
  54. Scherrer W. (2021), Industry 4.0 as a ‘sudden change’: the relevance of long waves of economic development for the regional level, in «European Planning Studies», 29, 9, 1723-1737.
  55. Scott J. (1991), Social Network Analysis: A Handbook, Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
  56. Seidman S. (1983), Network structure and minimum degree, in «Social Networks», 5, 269-287.
  57. Streeck W., Thelen K. (2005, eds), Beyond continuity: Institutional change in advanced political economies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  58. Teixeira J.E., Tavares-Lehman A.T.C.P. (2022), Industry 4.0 in the European union: Policies and national strategies, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, in «Technological Forecasting and Social Change», 180, 121664.
  59. Tödtling F., Trippl M. (2021), Regional innovation policies for new path development–beyond neo-liberal and traditional systemic views, in Cooke P. (ed.), Dislocation: Awkward Spatial Transition, Londra: Routledge: 79-95.
  60. Trippl M., Grillitsch M., Isaksen A. (2017), Exogenous sources of regional industrial change, in «Progress in Human Geography», 42: 687–705.
  61. Uyarra E. (2011), Regional innovation systems revisited: networks, institutions, policy and complexity, in Herrschelt T., Tallberg P. (eds.), The Role of Regions? Network, Scale, Territory, Gothenburg: Region Skane.
  62. Van Lente H., Hekkert M., Smits R., van Waveren B. (2003), Roles of Systemic Intermediaries in Transition Processes, in «International Journal of Innovation Management», 7: 247–279.
  63. Warwick K. (2013), Beyond Industrial Policy: Emerging Issues and New Trends, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers No. 2.: OECD Publishing, Parigi.
  64. Yang F., Gu S. (2021), Industry 4.0, a revolution that requires technology and national strategies, in «Complex & Intelligent Systems», 7: 1311-1325.
  65. Wasserman S., Faust K. (1994), Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  66. Whittington K. B., Owen-Smith J., Powell W. W. (2009), Networks, propinquity, and innovation in knowledge-intensive industries, in «Administrative science quarterly», 54, 1, 90-122.