Vol. 14 No. 28 (2024): Rethinking tourism work: bridging gaps, making connections and exploring new frontiers
Open Essays and Researches

La salute al femminile. Le disuguaglianze di genere nelle campagne di comunicazione sugli screening oncologici e i vaccini degli ultimi 20 anni

PDF
  • Laura Solito,
  • Letizia Materassi,
  • Erika Greco,
  • Ester Macrì
Laura Solito
Università degli Studi di Firenze, Italia
Letizia Materassi
Università degli Studi di Firenze, Italia
Erika Greco
Università degli Studi di Firenze, Italia
Ester Macrì
Università degli Studi di Firenze, Italia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/cambio-16798

Published 2025-02-24

Keywords

  • Health Communication,
  • Gender,
  • Inequalities,
  • Screening,
  • Vaccine

How to Cite

Solito, L., Materassi, L., Greco, E., & Macrì, E. (2025). La salute al femminile. Le disuguaglianze di genere nelle campagne di comunicazione sugli screening oncologici e i vaccini degli ultimi 20 anni. Cambio. Rivista Sulle Trasformazioni Sociali, 14(28), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.36253/cambio-16798

Copyright (c) 2024 Erika Greco, Laura Solito, Letizia Materassi, Ester Macrì

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

The contribution reflects on changes in public health communication, which we observe through the lens of cancer screening and vaccination campaigns over the past 20 years. On the one hand, public communication is, by definition, a form of communication aimed at the general interest, designed to meet the informational needs of the entire population. On the other hand, it must contend with the necessary personalization of content, the differentiation of target audiences according to the topics addressed, and the segmentation of the citizenry based on the prevalence of specific diseases among certain user groups. But how, then, can the pursuit of communicative effectiveness be reconciled with the risk of generating—or reproducing—health inequalities, which are well-documented in the literature? To what extent, and in what ways, is gender represented and narrated in these two specific areas of health prevention? Beyond providing a detailed discussion of the findings, this study explores the representation of women in the collected materials. This representation is closely tied to the perception of women as individuals to be protected and cared for but also, at times, as vulnerable subjects in need of expert guidance. Furthermore, we analyzed gender differences in the campaigns in relation to language use, visual communication, narrative function, and register. This analysis was also conducted from a longitudinal perspective to examine how the portrayal of women and the communication directed toward them have evolved over the past 20 years.

PDF

References

  1. Marmot M. (2007), Achieving health equity: from root causes to fair outcomes, in “The Lancet”, 370, 9593, 1153-1163.
  2. Bernocchi R., Contri A., Rea A. (2018), Comunicazione sociale e media digitali, Roma: Carocci
  3. Carme V. L. (2008), La medicalización del cuerpo de las mujeres y la normalización de la inferioridad in “Congreso Sare de Emakunde. Innovar para la Igualdad”.
  4. Capua I. (2020), Salute circolare-Nuova edizione: Una rivoluzione necessaria, Milano: EGEA spa
  5. Capparucci S., Pietrosanti (2024), Persone con disabilità per deficit neuro-cognitivi e cancro: quale percorso terapeutico nella pratica clinica, in 16° Rapporto sulla condizione assistenziale dei malati oncologici, Roma: FAVAO
  6. Corradi L. (2017). Specchio delle sue brame. Analisi socio-politica della pubblicità: genere, classe, razza, età ed eterosessismo (pp. 1-224). Ediesse.
  7. Courtenay W. (2011), Dying to be men: Psychosocial, environmental, and biobehavioural directions in promoting the health of men and boys, Londra: Routledge
  8. Cucco E., Pagani R., Pasquali M. (2005), Primo Rapporto sulla comunicazione sociale in Italia, Roma: RAI-ERI
  9. Cucco E., Pagani R., Pasquali M., Soggia A., (2011), Secondo Rapporto sulla comunicazione sociale in Italia, Roma: Carocci
  10. Donadio R., Marchisio C. (2010), Adesione ai programmi di screening ed incidenza di tumori femminili nelle donne con disabilità motoria, in “Family & community health”, 29(1), 35S-43S.
  11. Downie R.S. Fyfe, C. Tannahill (1996), Health promotion: models and values, Oxford: Oxford Medical Publications
  12. Dumas A., Robitaille, J. Jette, S. L. (2014), Lifestyle as a choice of necessity: Young women, health and obesity, in “Social Theory & Health”, 12, 138-158.
  13. Elliott C., Greenberg, J. (2022), Communication and Health. Media, Marketing and Risk, Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan
  14. Faccioli F. (2000), Comunicazione pubblica e cultura del servizio. Modelli, attori, percorsi, Roma: Carocci
  15. Fattori G. (2020), Non solo saponette. Manuale di marketing sociale per la salute e per l’ambiente, Perugia: Cultura e salute editore
  16. Feinberg Y., Pereira J. A., Quach S., Kwong J. C., Crowcroft N. S., Wilson S. E., Understanding public perceptions of the HPV vaccination based on online comments to Canadian news articles. Public Health Agency of Canada/Canadian Institutes of Health Research Influenza Research Network (PCIRN) Program Delivery and Evaluation Group. (2015), in “ PloS one”, 10(6), e0129587.
  17. Gadotti G. (2001), La comunicazione sociale. Soggetti, strumenti e linguaggi, Milano: Arcipelago edizioni
  18. Grandi R. (2001), La comunicazione pubblica. Teorie, casi, profili normativi, Roma: Carocci
  19. Grego S., Pasotti E., Moccetti T., Maggioni A. P. (2020). Sex and gender medicine: Il principio della medicina di genere, in “Giornale Italiano di Cardiologia”, 21, 602-606.
  20. Griglié E., & Romeo, G. (2021). Per soli uomini: il maschilismo dei dati, dalla ricerca scientifica al design. Torino: Codice edizioni
  21. Hannawa A.F., Garcìa-Jiménez L., Candrian C., Rossmann C., Schulz P.J. (2015), Identifying the field of Health Communication, in “Journal of Health Communication: International Perspectives”, 1-10.
  22. Ingrosso M. (2001), Comunicare la salute, Milano: Franco Angeli
  23. Krahn G. L., Hammond L., Turner A. (2006). A cascade of disparities: health and health care access for people with intellectual disabilities in “Mental retardation and developmental disabilities research reviews”, 12(1), 70-82.
  24. Lalli P. (2008), Comunicazione sociale: tracce di un itinerario, in Bertolo C., Comunicazioni sociali, Padova: CLEUP
  25. Lovari A. (2017), Social media e comunicazione della salute. Profili istituzionali e pratiche digitali, Milano: Guerini scientifica
  26. Lovari A., Ducci G. (2022), Comunicazione Pubblica. Istituzioni, pratiche, piattaforme, Milano: Mondadori Università
  27. Mancini P. (1996), Manuale di comunicazione pubblica, Roma-Bari: Laterza
  28. Miller L. R., Marks C., Becker J. B., Hurn P. D., Chen W. J., Woodruff T., Clayton J. A. (2017), Considering sex as a biological variable in preclinical research, in “The FASEB Journal”, 31, 29.
  29. Perez C. C. (2020), Invisibili, Torino: Giulio Einaudi Editore
  30. Rubinelli S., Camerini L., Schulz P.J. (2010), Comunicazione e salute, Milano: Apogeo
  31. Salmi M. (2017). Medicina di genere: È legge in Italia, in “Journal of Sex-and Gender-Specific Medicine”, 3, 89-91.
  32. Simplican S. C. (2017). Feminist disability studies as methodology: life-writing and the abled/disabled binary, in “Feminist Review”, 115, 46-60.
  33. Materassi L. & Solito L. (2021), If a picture is not worth a thousand words. Digital infographics use during the Covid-19 pandemic crisis, in “Sociologia della comunicazione”, (2021/61).
  34. Sumerau J.E., Cragun D. (2016), Frames of reference: applying sociology in interdisciplinary medical settings, in “Journal of Applied Social Sciences”, 10, 113-118.
  35. Tyler C. V., Schramm S, Karafa M., Tang A. S., Jain A. (2010). Electronic health record analysis of the primary care of adults with intellectual and other developmental disabilities, in “Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities”, 7, 204-210.
  36. WHO (1948), Preamble to the Constitution of the World Health Organization as Adopted by the International Health Conference, New York, 19-22 June 1946.
  37. Wisdom J. P., McGee M. G., Horner-Johnson W., Michael Y. L., Adams E., Berlin M. (2010). Health disparities between women with and without disabilities: a review of the research, in “Social work in public health”, 25(3-4), 368-386.