Vol. 83 (2023)
Special Issue - Visions of the future in real estate appraisal

The Mortgage Lending Value (MLV): proposal for a new calculation procedure

PDF
  • Antonio Benvenuti,
  • Francesca Salvo,
  • Daniela Tavano
Antonio Benvenuti
University of the Republic of San Marino
Francesca Salvo
Department of Environmental Engineering (DIAm), University of Calabria
Daniela Tavano
Department of Environmental Engineering (DIAm), University of Calabria
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/aestim-14725

Published 2024-04-22

Keywords

  • market value,
  • mortgage lending value,
  • market income,
  • income approach,
  • international valuation standards

Copyright (c) 2023 Antonio Benvenuti, Francesca Salvo, Daniela Tavano

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

The mortgage lending value (MLV) is a type of value different from the market value (MV). The MLV appraisal is normally required in loans secured by real estate (collateral) context. In Italy, this appraisal is often made in percentage terms or with subjective criteria that do not consider the reference principles also defined by the valuation standards. This paper, starting from the analysis of the German procedure to appraise the MLV, which is the first country to introduce the concept of a security value in the context of property valuations, aims to propose a more precise procedure than the German one by adopting calculation methodologies typical of the income approach which are based on the principles derived from the definition of mortgage lending value and from market trends. The case is made that the proposed methodology and calculation procedure provide a more objective method to appraise the MLV compared to the current ones, in accordance with both national and international valuation standards, and that it represents a useful tool in the professional field.

PDF

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. Adair, A., & Hutchison, N. (2005). The reporting of risk in real estate appraisal property risk scoring. Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 23, 254–268.
  2. Adolf, W. (2005). Der nachhaltige erzielbare Ertrag ‐ein veralteter Begriff? Grundstücksmarkt‐ und Grundstückswert, 4, S193‐S197.
  3. Benvenuti, A. (2013). Financial and estimating indicators for assessment of mortgage lending value. In Appraisals. Evolving proceedings in global change. XLI Meetings CeSET Proceedings, November 14-15, 2013, Rome, pp. 621–628.
  4. Bienert, S. (2005). Projektfinanzierung in der Immobilienwirtschajt. Deutscher Universitätsverlag, Wiesbaden.
  5. Bienert, S., & Brunauer, W. (2007). The mortgage lending value: prospects for development within Europe. Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 25(6), 542–578.
  6. Bretten, J., & Wyatt, P. (2001). Variance in commercial property valuations for lending purposes: an empirical study. Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 19(3), S267–S282.
  7. Ciuna, M., De Ruggiero, M., Salvo, F., & Simonotti, M. (2016). Measurements of rationality for a scientific approach to the market‐oriented methods. Journal of Real Estate Literature, 24(2), 403–427.
  8. Crosby, N., Hughes, C., & Murdoch, J. (2004). Influences on secured lending property valuations in the UK. European Real Estate Society Conference (ERES), June 2-5, 2004, Milan.
  9. Crosby, N., & French, N. (1999). Bank lending on business property—How do valuations aid the process? In Proceedings of the 19th ERES Conference, June 22-25, 1999, Athens, Greece.
  10. European Banking Authority (2015). Opinion of the European banking authority on mortgage lending value (MLV). Available at: www.eba.europa.eu (accessed 20 April 2023).
  11. European Court of Auditors (2023). Special report 12/2023: EU supervision of banks’ credit risk – The ECB stepped up its efforts, but more is needed to increase assurance that credit risk is properly managed and covered. Luxembourg, European Union.
  12. European Parliament and Council of The European Union Industry (2006). Directive 2006/48/EC. Luxembourg, European Union.
  13. Ferreira, F. A. F., Santos, S. P., & Dias, V. M. C. (2014). An AHP-based approach to credit risk evaluation of mortgage loans. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 18, 38–55.
  14. Ferreira, F. A. F., & Santos, S. P. (2016). Comparing trade-off adjustments in credit risk analysis of mortgage loans using AHP, Delphi and MACBETH. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 20, 44–63.
  15. French, N., & Gabrielli, L. (2006). Uncertainty and feasibility studies: an Italian case study. Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 24(1), 49–67.
  16. Gondring, H., & Lorenz, T. (2001). Basel II ‐ Auswirkungen auf die lmmobilienwirtschaft. Akademie der Immobilienwirtschaft (ADI), Stuttgart.
  17. Jorion, P. (2000). Value at Risk. 2nd ed. New York, NY, McGraw‐Hill.
  18. Joslin, A. (2005). An investigation into the expression of uncertainty in property valuation. Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 23, 269–285.
  19. Kierig, J. (2006). Zumneuen Pfandbriefgesetz und dem Entwurf der Beleihungswertermittlungsverordnung (BelWertV). Vortrag auf dem 14, Werterrnittlungsforurn, Jahreskongress.
  20. Locurcio, M., Tajani, F., Morano, P., Anelli, D., & Manganelli, B. (2021). Credit risk management of property investments through multi-criteria indicators. Risks, 9(6), 106.
  21. Low, S., Sebag‐Montefiore, M., & Dübel, A. (2003). Study on the financial integration of European mortgage markets. Working paper, Mercer Oliver Wyman, London, October 2003.
  22. Maier, K. M. (1999). Risiko management immobilienwesen ‐ LeitfadenfürTheorie und Praxis. 1st ed. Frankfurt am Main, Fritz Knapp Verlag.
  23. Metzner, S. (2005). Einflussfaktoren auf Zwangsversteigerungserlöse bei Eigentumswohnungen. Grundstücksmarkt‐ und Grundstückswert, 4, S214–S220.
  24. Milleker, D.F. (2005). International housing markets: how difficult a return to normal? Working Paper No. 37. Frankfurt am Main, Allianz Group,.
  25. Paschedag, H. (2002). Darlehens und Hypothekenfìnanzierung. In Schulte, K. W., Achleitner, A. K. & Knobloch, B. (Eds.). Handbuch lmmobilien‐Banking ‐ Vor der Traditionellen lmmobilien-Finanzierung zum lmmobilien‐Investmentbanking. Koln, Immobilien Informationsverlag Rudolf Müller GmbH & Co., pp 69–87.
  26. Pfnür, A., & Armonat, S. (2001). Immobilienkapitalanlage institutioneller Investoren–Risikomanagement und Portfolioplanung (No. 35586). Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
  27. Pitschke, C. (2004). Die Finanzierunggewerblicher lmmobilien-Projektentwicklungen unter Basel II. Köln, Immobilien Informationsverlag Rudolf Müller.
  28. Poppensieker, T. (1997). Strategisches Risikomanagement in deutschen Groβbanken. Wiesbaden, DeutscherUniversitätsverlag.
  29. PWC. VI (2004). European house prices. In: European Economic Outlook, PricewaterhouseCoopers, Oktober, S25–S30.
  30. Renaud, B. (1995). The 1985 to 1994 Global Real Estate 685 Cycle ‐Its Causes and Consequence. In The World Bank ‐ Financial Sector Development Department (Ed.), Policy Research Working Paper No. 1452, Washington, DC, The World Bank.
  31. Rode, D. (1993). Grundzlige des Hypothekarkredits. In Konrad, R. (Ed.). Handbuch des Hypothekarkredits ‐ lmmobilienfinanzierung in Deutschland unf Europa, 3rd ed. Frankfurt am Main, Fritz Knapp Verlag GmbH, pp. S23–101.
  32. Ropeter, S. (1998). Investitionsanalyse für Gewerbeimmobilien. Köln, ImmobilienInformationsverlag Rudolf Müller.
  33. Rössler, R., & Langner, J. (2004). Schützung und Ermittlung von Grundstückswerten. 8th ed. Munchen, Luchterland Fachverlag, pp. S65–S78.
  34. Ross, F., Brachmann, R., Renner, U., & Holzner, P. (2005). Ermittlung des Verkehrswertes von Grundstücken und des Wertesbaulicher Anlagen. Isernhagen, OppermannVerlag.
  35. Rüchardt, K. (1993). Bewertung und Krediturtei. In Konrad, R. (Ed.). Handbuch des Hypothekarkredits ‐ lmmobilienfinanzierung in Deutschland und Europa. Frankfurt am Main, Fritz Knapp Verlag GmbH, pp. 143–261.
  36. Rüchardt, K. (2001). Der Beleihungswert. Frankfurt am Main, Fritz Knapp Verlag.
  37. Salvo, F., De Ruggiero, M., Tavano, D., De Paola, P., & Del Giudice, F.P. (2022). Analytical implications of mortgage lending value and bottom value. Buildings, 12, 799.
  38. Salvo, F., Tavano, D., & De Ruggiero, M. (2021). Hedonic price of the built-up area appraisal in the market comparison approach. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, 178, 696–704.
  39. Serret, A., & Trello, J. (2004). Reducing house prices, reducing mortgage risks. A methodology for measuring mortgage risk. In Proceedings of the ENHR Conference, July 2–6, 2004, Cambridge, UK.
  40. Simonotti, M. (2019). Valutazione Immobiliare Standard – Nuovi Metodi. Mantova, STIMATRIX.
  41. Sommer, G. & Kröll, R. (2005). Lehrbuch zur Grundstückswertermittlung. Wiesbaden, Luchterhand Verlag.
  42. Steffan, F., & Scholz, H. (1993). Finanzierungsanfragen, Objekte und Partner des Hypothekarkredits. In Konrad, R. (Ed.). Handbuch des Hypothekarkredits: lmmobilienfinanzierung in Deutschland und Europa, 3rd ed. Frankfurt am Main, Fritz Knapp Verlag GmbH, pp. 101–43.
  43. Stöcker, O.M. (2004). Realkredit und Pfandsicherheit ‐ Der Beleihungswert im Bankenaufsichtsrecht. Frankfurt am Main, Fritz Knapp Verlag.
  44. Süchting, P. (1995). Theorie und Politik der Unternehmensfinanzierung. 6th ed. Wiesbaden, Betriebswirtschaftlicher Verlag Dr. Th. Gabler GmbH.
  45. Tajani, F., & Morano, P. (2018). An empirical-deductive model for the assessment of the mortgage lending value of properties as securities for credit exposures. Journal of European Real Estate Research, 11(1), 44–70.
  46. TEGOVA (2020). European Valuation Standards. 9th ed. ISBN 9789081906050.
  47. Tsatsaronis, K., & Zhu, H. (2004). What drives housing price dynamics: cross‐country evidence. BIS Quarterly Review, March, 65–78.
  48. Werth, A. (1998). Vom Verkehrswert unabhängige Beleihungswert eimBlcikfeld der Europäischen Union. Grundstöcksmarkt‐ und Grundstückswert, 5, S257–S266.
  49. White, D., & Turner, J. (1999). Immobilienbewertung: Internationale Märkte verlangen internationale Verfahren–Beleihungsobjekte können Stichtagsbewertung ‘sprengen’. Immob.-Ztg.
  50. Wüstefeld, H. (2000). Risiko und Rendite von Immobilieninvestments. 1st ed. Frankfurt am Main, Fritz Knapp Verlag, pp. 51–228.