Vol. 83 (2023)
Special Issue - Visions of the future in real estate appraisal

From appraisal function to Automatic Valuation Method (AVM). The contribution of International Valuation Standards in modern appraisal methodologies

PDF
  • Francesca Salvo
Francesca Salvo
Department of Environmental Engineering (DIAM), University of Calabria
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/aestim-14730

Published 2024-04-22

Keywords

  • value function,
  • market-oriented procedures,
  • monopametric appraisal procedure,
  • appraisal system approach,
  • appraisal division system,
  • automated valuation methods,
  • appraisal reports,
  • market comparison approach
    • ...More
    Less

Copyright (c) 2023 Francesca Salvo

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

In the real estate appraisal, as well as for any other scientific discipline, there is a continuous development of knowledge with related theoretical and applicative evolution that takes place primarily on the doctrinal level. The discipline has been object of regulatory and technological improvement aimed at concretizing and defining theoretical principles and methodologies. The functions of value appraisal, formulated in the different procedures that fall within the Market Oriented Approach indicated by the International Valuation Standard, have undergone a process of evolution that has favoured the introduction of Automated Valuation Methods (AVM). This evolution process represents an improvement of the conventional appraisal models that have improved the techniques of data retrieval and data base access and certify the reliability of the models to build efficient evaluation processes and universally recognized. This article aims at reviewing the methodological evolution in relation to the national market approach that the estimation discipline has recorded in recent years by virtue of the drafting and adoption of the International Valuation Standards.

PDF

References

  1. ABI – Associazione Bancaria Italiana (2022). Linee Guida per la Valutazione degli Immobili in Garanzia delle Esposizioni Creditizie.
  2. Agarwal, S., Ambrose, B. W., Yildirim, Y., & Zhang, J. (2021). Risk Retention Rules and the Issuance of Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 1–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-021-09837-1
  3. Agenzia delle Entrate (2011). Manuale Operativo delle Stime Immobiliari – MOSI.
  4. Arcuri, N., De Ruggiero, M., Salvo, F., & Zinno, R. (2020). Automated valuation methods through the cost approach in a BIM and GIS integration framework for smart city appraisals. Sustainability, 12(18), 7546. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187546
  5. Bikdeli, S. (2020). Redevelopment modeling for land suitability evaluation of the suburb brown-fields using fuzzy logic and GIS, northeastern Iran. Environment, Development, and Sustainability, 22(7), 6213–6232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-019-00473-7
  6. Brunauer, W. A., Weberndorfer, R. S., & Feilmayr, W. (2017). A statistically founded sales comparison approach (No. eres2017_197). European Real Estate Society (ERES).
  7. Cannaday, R. E. (1989). How should you estimate and provide market support for adjustments in single family appraisals. Real Estate Appraiser and Analyst, 55(4), 43–54.
  8. Ciuna, M., Salvo, F., & Simonotti, M. (2017a). An estimative model of automated valuation method in Italy. In d’Amato, M., & Kauko, T. (Eds.). Advances in Automated Valuation Modeling: AVM After the Non-Agency Mortgage Crisis. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol. 86, pp. 85–112. Cham, Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49746-4_5
  9. Ciuna, M., De Ruggiero, M., Manganelli, B., Salvo, F., & Simonotti, M. (2017b). Automated Valuation Methods in atypical real estate markets using the mono-parametric approach. In Computational Science and Its Applications–ICCSA 2017: 17th International Conference. July 3-6, 2017, Trieste, Italy. Proceedings, Part III 17 (pp. 200–209). Springer International Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62398-6_14
  10. Ciuna, M., Ruggiero, M., Salvo, F., Simonotti, M. (2017c). Automated procedures based on market comparison approach in Italy. In d’Amato, M., & Kauko, T. (Eds.). Advances in Automated Valuation Modeling: AVM After the Non-Agency Mortgage Crisis. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol. 86, pp. 381–400. Cham, Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49746-4_21
  11. Ciuna, M., Salvo, F., & Simonotti, M. (2017d). The multilevel model in the computer-generated appraisal: a case in Palermo. In d’Amato, M., & Kauko, T. (Eds.). Advances in Automated Valuation Modeling: AVM After the Non-Agency Mortgage Crisis. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol. 86, pp. 225–261. Cham, Springer . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49746-4_14
  12. Ciuna, M., Ruggiero, M., Salvo, F., & Simonotti, M. (2017e). Automatic research of the capitalization rate for the residential automated valuation: an experimental study in Cosenza (Italy). In d’Amato, M., & Kauko, T. (Eds.). Advances in Automated Valuation Modeling: AVM After the Non-Agency Mortgage Crisis. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol. 86, pp. 361–380. Cham, Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49746-4_20
  13. De Ruggiero, M., Manganelli, B., Marchianò, S., Salvo, F., & Tavano, D. (2020). Comparative and evaluative economic analysis of ground mounted photovoltaic plants. Values and Functions for Future Cities, 181–199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23786-8_10
  14. De Ruggiero, M., & Salvo, F. (2011). Misure di similarità negli adjustment grid methods. Aestimum, 58, 47–58.
  15. Del Giudice, V., De Paola, P., & Cantisani, G. B. (2017). Valuation of real estate investments through Fuzzy Logic. Buildings, 7(1), 26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings7010026
  16. Direzione Centrale Osservatorio del Mercato immobiliare e Servizi Estimativi dell’Agenzia del Territorio (2011). Manuale Operativo delle Stime Immobiliari. Milano, Franco Angeli.
  17. Glumac, B., & Des Rosiers, F. (2021). Practice briefing–Automated valuation models (AVMs): their role, their advantages, and their limitations. Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 39(5), 481–491. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JPIF-07-2020-0086
  18. Herath, S., & Maier, G. (2010). The hedonic price method in real estate and housing market research. A review of the literature, SRE-Discussion Papers 2010/03, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
  19. Hordijk, A. (2012). Real Estate Appraisal and International Valuation Standards. In Appraisals. Evolving proceedings in global change. XLI CeSET meetings proceedings, November 14-15, 2011, Rome, Italy (pp. 397–401). Firenze University Press, Aestimum.
  20. IVSC (2022). The International Valuations Standards. London, UK, International Valuation Standards Council.
  21. Kim, Y., Choi, S., & Yi, M. Y. (2020). Applying comparable sales method to the automated estimation of real estate prices. Sustainability, 12(14), 5679. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145679
  22. Larraz, B., Alfaro-Navarro, J. L., L Cano, E., Alfaro-Cortes, E., Garcia, N., & Gamez, M. (2021). A computer-assisted expert algorithm for real estate valuation in Spanish cities. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 48(6), 1712–1727. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808320947729
  23. Lee, K., & Whitacre, B. (2021). A study on the impact of unconventional (and conventional) drilling on housing prices in Central Oklahoma. Sustainability, 13(24), 13880. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413880
  24. Manganelli, B. (2017). A proposal for a synopsis in real estate appraisal between the Italian doctrine and international valuation standards. Valori e Valutazioni, 18, 9–16.
  25. McCluskey, W., & Anand, S. (1999). The application of intelligent hybrid techniques for the mass appraisal of residential properties. Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 17(3), 218–239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14635789910270495
  26. Morano, P., Locurcio, M., Tajani, F., & Guarini, M. R. (2015). Fuzzy logic and coherence control in multi-criteria evaluation of urban redevelopment projects. International Journal of Business Intelligence and Data Mining 14, 10(1), 73–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIDM.2015.069041
  27. Morano, P., Tajani, F., Salvo, F., & De Ruggiero, M. (2019). Weight coefficients in the appraisal system approach. In Computational Science and Its Applications–ICCSA 2019: 19th International Conference, July 1–4, 2019, Saint Petersburg, Russia. Proceedings, Part IV 19 (pp. 3-12). Springer International Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24305-0_1
  28. OIV (2015). Principi italiani di valutazione. Milano, Egea.
  29. Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (2022). RICS Valuation – Global Standards. London.
  30. Salvo, F., Romita, T., De Ruggiero, M., & Tavano, D. (2020). Residential tourism and real estate appraisal. Valori e Valutazioni, 25, 53–58.
  31. Salvo, F., Dell’Ovo, M., Tavano, D., & Sdino, L. (2021). Valuation approaches to assess the cultural heritage. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, 178, 1746–1754. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48279-4_165
  32. Salvo, F., De Ruggiero, M., & Tavano, D. (2022). Smart Redevelopment of Existing Buildings. Use of BIM in Economic Value Judgments. In Abastante, F. (Ed.). Urban Regeneration Through Valuation Systems for Innovation. Green Energy and Technology. Cham, Springer International Publishing, pp. 291–301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12814-1_18
  33. Salvo, F., Tavano, D., & De Ruggiero, M. (2021). Hedonic price of the built-up area appraisal in the market comparison approach. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, 178, 696–704. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48279-4_65
  34. Salvo, F., & De Ruggiero, M. (2012). Market Comparison Approach between tradition and innovation. A simplifying approach. In Appraisals. Evolving proceedings in global change. XLI CeSET meetings proceedings, November 14-15, 2011, Rome, Italy (pp. 585–594). Firenze University Press, Aestimum.
  35. Salvo, F., & De Ruggiero, M. (2011). Gestione dei dati immobiliari e analisi estimative in ambiente GIS. In Cristiano, D., Mendicino. G., & Salerno, G. (Eds.). GIS Day Calabria 2017 – VIII Edition. Rende, Map Design Project, pp. 93–101.
  36. Schulte, K. W., Rottke, N., & Pitschke, C. (2005). Transparency in the German real estate market. Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 23(1), 90–108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14635780510575111
  37. Simonotti, M. (1989). Applicazioni del sistema generale di stima. Rivista di Economia Agraria, 3, 505–512.
  38. Simonotti, M. (1994). I sistemi lineari nelle valutazioni estimative. Genio Rurale, 9, 13–20.
  39. Simonotti, M. (1997). La stima immobiliare. Con principi di economia e applicazioni estimative. Milano, UTET Libreria.
  40. Simonotti, M. (2001). I rapporti estimativi e le funzioni di stima. Estimo e Territorio, 9, 16–23.
  41. Simonotti, M. (2006). Metodi di stima immobiliare. Applicazione degli standard internazionali. Trattato teorico-pratico. Palermo, Dario Flaccovio Editore.
  42. Simonotti, M., Salvo, F., Ciuna, M., & De Ruggiero, M. (2016). Measurements of rationality for a scientific approach to the market-oriented methods. Journal of Real Estate Literature, 24(2), 403–427. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10835547.2016.12090435
  43. Stang, M., Krämer, B., Nagl, C., & Schäfers, W. (2022). From human business to machine learning—methods for automating real estate appraisals and their practical implications. Zeitschrift Für Immobilienökonomie, 9(2), 81–108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1365/s41056-022-00063-1
  44. Thompson, J. F., & Gordon, J. F. (1987). Constrained regression modeling and the multiple regression analysis-comparable sales approach. Property Tax Journal, 6(4), 251–262.
  45. Tajani, F., Morano, P., Salvo, F., & De Ruggiero, M. (2020). Property valuation: the market approach optimized by a weighted appraisal model. Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 38(5), 399–418. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JPIF-07-2019-0094
  46. Tecnoborsa (2020). Codice delle Valutazioni Immobiliari - Italian Property Valuation Standard, V edizione.
  47. TEGoVA, (2020). European Valuation Standards - 9th ed. ISBN 9789081906050.
  48. The Appraisal Foundation (2023). Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP). Belgium.
  49. Todora, J., & Whiterell, D. (2002). Automating the sales comparison approach. Assessment Journal, 9(1), 25–33.
  50. Underwood, W. E., & Moesch, J. R. (1982). The second generation of CAMA in New York State. In First World Congress on Computer Assisted Valuation, Cambridge, MA.
  51. UNI 11612 (2015). Stima del valore di mercato degli immobili.
  52. UNI 11558 (2014). Valutatore immobiliare. Requisiti di conoscenza, abilità e competenza.