Public and Corporate socio-territorial policies. CSR as strategy for a new and enlarged social sustainability
Published 2024-12-16
Keywords
- private-public network,
- corporate social responsibility,
- socio-territorial sustainability,
- communities,
- territories
- quality of life ...More
Copyright (c) 2024 Letizia Carrera
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abstract
The paper emphasizes the growing importance of public-private partnerships in fostering socio-territorial sustainability. It highlights a shift away from the traditional view of businesses as “irresponsible” and driven by predatory motives, toward seeing them as active partners in public policy and governance. Corporate social responsibility is positioned as a key driver of this change, with a focus on engaging businesses in collaborative efforts with public institutions. The study reviews international literature and conducts empirical research involving 100 small and medium-sized enterprises in Bari, examining their corporate welfare practices and engagement with local communities. The findings underscore the importance of business-public sector collaboration in promoting sustainability, revealing both the potential and limitations of corporate social sustainability as not only a cultural paradigm but also a practical tool for business decision-making and territorial governance. This approach aligns with the quintuple helix model, which integrates various sectors in addressing societal challenges.
References
- Amin, A., Charles, D. R., & Howells, J. (1992). Corporate restructuring and cohesion in the new Europe. Regional Studies, 26(4), 319–331.
- Argyris C., Schön D. A. (1978). Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Boston: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
- Aslaksen, H. M., Hildebrandt, C., & Johnsen, H. C. G. (2021). The long-term transformation of the concept of CSR: towards a more comprehensive emphasis on sustainability. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 6, 11.
- Auld, G., Bernstein, S., & Cashore, B. (2008). The new corporate social responsability. Annual Review Environronment, 33, 413–435.
- Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.
- Brown T. (2016). Sustainability as empty signifier: Its rise, fall and radical potential. Antipode 59(1), 115–133.
- Carrera, L. (2005). Gli intricati percorsi della responsabilità sociale di impresa. Studi di Sociologia, (4), 421–438. ISSN 1827-7896
- Carrera, L. (2022). Corporate Social Responsability. A strategy for social and territorial sustainability. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility.
- Carrera, L., (2021), Complessità e innovazione. Le sfide del buon governo delle città. In G. Dioguardi, L. Carrera, F., Maggiore (a cura di). City School Bari. Il governo della città complessa. Franco Angeli Milano.
- Carroll (2021). Corporate social responsibility: Perspectives on the CSR construct’s development and future. Business & Society.
- Carroll, A. B. (2015). Corporate social responsibility: The centerpiece of competing and complementary frameworks. Organizational Dynamics, 44(2), 87–96.
- Cesareo, V. (2017). Il welfare responsabile. Milano: Vita e Pensiero.
- Cesareo, V., Pavesi, N. (eds.) (2019). Il welfare responsabile alla prova. Una proposta per la società italiana. Milano: Vita e Pensiero.
- Colleoni, M. (2019). PeriUrbanization. In A. M. Orum (Ed.), The Wiley Blackwell encyclopedia of urban and regional studies, (pp. 1–5). JohnWiley & Sons Ltd.
- Colleoni, M., Caiello, S. (2013). Il peri-urbano e i suoi caratteri socio-territoriali. Una proposta analitica e empirica in Lombardia. Sociologia Urbana e Rurale, 102, 97–115.
- Conzelmann, T. (2008). Efficient and legitimate? Reflections on multi-level governance. In T. Conzelmann, & R. Smith (Eds.), Multilevel governance in the European Union: taking stock and looking ahead, (pp. 11–30). Baden Baden: Nomos.
- Coulmont, M., Berthelot, S., & Gagné, V. (2022). Sustainability performance indicator trends: a Canadian industry-based analysis. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 7, 2.
- Davoudi, S. (2005). Understanding territorial cohesion. Planning, Practice & Research, 20(4), 433–441.
- de Cambourg, P. (2019). Ensuring the relevance and reliability of non-fnancial corporate information: An ambition and a competitive advantage for a sustainable Europe, (p. 289). http://www.anc.gouv.fr/fes/live/sites/anc/fes/contributed/ANC/4.%20Qui%20sommes-nous/Communique_de_presse/Report-de-Cambourg_extra-fnancial-informations_May2019:EN.pdf.
- Faludi, AKF. (2009). Territorial cohesion under the looking glass: synthesis paper about the history of the concept and policy background to territorial cohesion. European Commission, Regional Policy, Inforegio.
- Faludi, A. (2010). Cohesion, coherence, cooperation: European spatial planning coming of age? London: Routledge.
- Faludi, A. (2013). Territorial cohesion, territorialism, territoriality, and soft planning: a critical review. Environment and Planning, 45(6), 1302–1317.
- Freeman, E. R., Velamuri, R. S., & Moriarty, B. (2006). Company stakeholders responsibility: a new approach to CSR. Business roundtable Institute for Corporate Ethics, Bridge Papers.
- Gallino, L. (2005). L’impresa irresponsabile. Torino: Einaudi.
- Giaretta, E. (2000). Business ethics e scelte di prodotto. Padova: CEDAM.
- Grandi, (2014). Introduzione in Adriano Olivetti. L’ordine politico delle comunità. Roma: Edizioni di Comunità.
- GREEN PAPER Promoting a European framework for Corporate Social Responsibility (2001). Responsibility. Retrieved from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/EN/legal-content/summary/green-paper-on-corporate-social-responsibility.html
- GRI & USB, (2020). Carrots & sticks-sustainability reporting policy: global trends in disclosure as the ESG agenda goes mainstream. Retrieved from https:// www.carrotsandsticks.net/.
- Idowu, S. O., Vertigans, S., & Burlea A. S. (2017). Corporate Social Responsibility in Times of Crisis. Practices and Cases from Europe, Africa and the World. Springer Cham.
- IFRS Foundation. (2020). Consultation paper on sustainability reporting. Retrieved from: https://www.ifrs.org/projects/completed-projects/2021/ sustainability-reporting/consultation-paper-and-comment-letters/
- KPMG (2017). The KPMG survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2017. Swiss: KPMG International Cooperative.
- Latapí Agudelo, M. A., Jóhannsdóttir, L., & Davídsdóttir, B. (2019). A literature review of the history and evolution of corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 4(1).
- Luhmann, N. (1996). Sociologia del rischio. Milano: Mondadori.
- Mac Luhan, M. (1964) (trad.it 1967). Gli strumenti del comunicare. Milano: Bompiani.
- Magatti, M. (2020). Sicurezza/insicurezza: come si resiste alla città?, in P. Piscitelli (ed.), Atlante delle città. Nove (ri)tratti per un viaggio planetario, (pp. 85–98). Milano: Feltrinelli.
- Mark-Ungericht, B., & Weiskopf, R. (2007). Filling the empty shell. The public debate on CSR in Austria as a paradigmatic example of a political discourse. Journal of Business Ethics, 70(3), 285–297.
- Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2020). Reflections on the 2018 decade award: The meaning and dynamics of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 45(1), 7–28.
- Medeiros, E. (2014). Assessing territorial impact on the EU question policy at regional level: the case of Algarve. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 32(3), 198–212.
- Medeiros, E. (2016). Territorial cohesion: an EU concept. European Journal of Spatial Development, 14(1), 1–30. 10.5281/zenodo.5141339
- Medeiros, E. (2019). Territorial cohesion. The urban dimension. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
- Mirwaldt, K., Mmaster, I., & Bahtler, J. (2009). Reconsidering cohesion policy: The contested debate on territorial cohesion, in European policy research paper, number 66, march 2009. Glasgow: European Policy Research Center.
- Molteni, M. (2008) (ed). Responsabilità sociale d’impresa. Come le PMI possono migliorare le performance aziendali mediante politiche di CSR. Logiche, strumenti, benefici. IlSole24Ore.
- Moreno, L. (2010). Welfare mix, CSR and social citizenship. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 30(11/12), 683–696.
- Moro, G. (1998). La formazione nelle società post-industriali. Modelli e criteri di valutazione. Roma: Carocci.
- Nyssen Guillén, V. I., & Deckert, C. (2021). Cultural influence on innovativeness - links between “the culture map” and the “global innovation index”. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 6(7).
- Paul, K., Parra, C. M. (2021). Corporate social responsibility in international business literature: Results from text data mining of the journal of international business studies. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsability, 6(12), 1-14.
- Pavolini, E. (2016). Welfare aziendale e conciliazione. Proposte esperienze dal mondo cooperativo. Bologna: il Mulino.
- Pelanda, C., & Savona, P. (2005). Sovranità & fiducia. Milano: Sperling & Kupfer.
- Perrini, F. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility: Nuovi equilibri nella gestione d’impresa. Economics and Management, 2.
- Perrini, F. (2007). Social Entrepreneurship: Imprese innovative per il cambiamento sociale. Milano: Egea.
- Perrini, F., Tencati, A. (2008). Corporate Social Responsibility – Un approccio strategico alla gestione d’impresa. Milano: Egea.
- Pichierri, A. (2002). La regolazione dei sistemi sociali. Attori, strategie, strutture. Bologna: il Mulino.
- Sandercook, L. (2003), Cosmopolis II: Mongrel Cities of the 21st Century. London: A&C.
- Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (4th ed.). U.S: A., John Wiley & Sons.
- Tessema, M., Ready, K., Embaye, A. (2013). The Effects of Employee Recognition, Pay and Benefts on Job Satisfaction: Cross Country Evidence.
- Trigilia C., Crouch C., Le Gales P., Voelzkow H. (2004), I sistemi di produzione locale in Europa, il Mulino, Bologna.
- Windsor, D. (2021). Political and ethical challenges of 2025: Utopian and dystopian views. In S. H. Park, M. A. Gonzalez-Perez, & D. Floriani (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of corporate sustainability in the digital era, (pp. 13–236). Palgrave Macmillan.
- Zamagni, S. (1994). Economia ed etica: saggi sul fondamento etico del discorso. Roma: Edizioni AVE.
- Zamagni S. (2003). La responsabilità sociale dell’impresa: presupposti etici e ragioni economiche, www.mi.camcom.it.