Just Accepted Manuscripts
Original Research Article

Can Geographical Indications foster local development? Evidence from Montefalco Sagrantino DOCG

PDF (Just accepted)
  • Diego Grazia,
  • Stefano Corsi,
  • Chiara Mazzocchi
Diego Grazia
University of Milan
Stefano Corsi
University of Milan
Chiara Mazzocchi
University of Milan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/wep-16016

Published 2024-10-08

Keywords

  • geographical indications,
  • local development,
  • qualitative analysis,
  • stakeholders,
  • wine,
  • Umbria
    • ...More
    Less

How to Cite

Grazia, D., Corsi, S., & Mazzocchi, C. (2024). Can Geographical Indications foster local development? Evidence from Montefalco Sagrantino DOCG. Wine Economics and Policy. https://doi.org/10.36253/wep-16016

Copyright (c) 2024 Diego Grazia, Stefano Corsi, Chiara Mazzocchi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

One of the main goals in the establishment of Geographical Indications (GIs) for European agri-food products was to help fostering development in rural communities. Given the cultural and economic importance of wine production in Italy, this paper aims to understand how a wine GI in the Umbria region may have influenced local socio-economic development and, if so, what is its perceived magnitude among local stakeholders. By conducting semi-structured interviews and carrying out a qualitative analysis through the grounded theory model, results indicate a mirroring ascent, during the last three decades, in the pursuit of a unique identity, for both the territory and the wine product.

PDF (Just accepted)

References

  1. European Communities Council (EEC), ‘Council Regulation (EEC) No 2081/92 of 14 July 1992 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs’. 1992. [Online]. Available: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/it/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A31992R2081
  2. L. Cei, G. Stefani, E. Defrancesco, and G. V. Lombardi, ‘Geographical indications: A first assessment of the impact on rural development in Italian NUTS3 regions’, Land Use Policy, vol. 75, pp. 620–630, Jun. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.01.023.
  3. R. Crescenzi, F. De Filippis, M. Giua, and C. Vaquero-Piñeiro, ‘Geographical Indications and local development: the strength of territorial embeddedness’, Regional Studies, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 381–393, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1080/00343404.2021.1946499.
  4. A. Tregear, F. Arfini, G. Belletti, and A. Marescotti, ‘Regional foods and rural development: The role of product qualification’, Journal of Rural Studies, vol. 23, pp. 12–22, Jan. 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2006.09.010.
  5. C. Vaquero-Piñeiro, ‘The long-term fortunes of territories as a route for agri-food policies: evidence from Geographical Indications’, BAE, vol. 10, no. 2, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.36253/bae-9429.
  6. M. Martínez-Arnáiz, E. Baraja-Rodríguez, and D. Herrero-Luque, ‘Multifunctional Territorialized Agri-Food Systems, Geographical Quality Marks and Agricultural Landscapes: The Case of Vineyards’, Land, vol. 11, no. 4, 2022, doi: 10.3390/land11040457.
  7. P. A. L. D. Nunes and M. L. Loureiro, ‘Economic valuation of climate-change-induced vinery landscape impacts on tourism flows in Tuscany’, Agricultural Economics, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 365–374, Jul. 2016, doi: 10.1111/agec.12236.
  8. International Organisation of Vine and Wine (OIV), ‘World Wine Production Outlook - OIV First Estimates’, Oct. 2022. Accessed: Jan. 23, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.oiv.int/sites/default/files/documents/EN_OIV_2022_World_Wine_Production_Outlook.pdf
  9. Istituto di Servizi per il Mercato Agricolo Alimentare (ISMEA), ‘L’Italia del vino’, Oct. 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.ismeamercati.it/flex/files/1/2/4/D.3c3fab2db3ec5c6dda33/SchedaVino_2022_Ottobre_1_.pdf
  10. Banca d’Italia, ‘L’economia dell’Umbria’, 10, Jun. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.bancaditalia.it/pubblicazioni/economie-regionali/2023/2023-0010/2310-Umbria.pdf
  11. I. Calboli, ‘Geographical Indications: new perspectives and recent developments’, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, vol. 16, no. 4–5, pp. 289–290, 2021.
  12. G. Belletti, A. Marescotti, and J.-M. Touzard, ‘Geographical Indications, Public Goods, and Sustainable Development: The Roles of Actors’ Strategies and Public Policies’, World Development, vol. 98, pp. 45–57, Oct. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.05.004.
  13. R. Williams and M. Penker, ‘Do geographical indications promote sustainable rural development?’, J. Austrian Soc. Agric. Econ., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 147–156, 2008.
  14. F. Sgroi, ‘Territorial development models: A new strategic vision to analyze the relationship between the environment, public goods and geographical indications’, Science of The Total Environment, vol. 787, p. 147585, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147585.
  15. S. Charters and N. Spielmann, ‘Characteristics of strong territorial brands: The case of champagne’, Journal of Business Research, vol. 67, no. 7, pp. 1461–1467, Jul. 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.07.020.
  16. Consorzio Tutela Vini Montefalco, ‘Montefalco, terra per il vino’. 2022. [Online]. Available: www.consorziomontefalco.it
  17. Consorzio Tutela Vini Montefalco, ‘Dati del Consorzio Tutela Vini Montefalco e dell’Umbria’. 2022. [Online]. Available: www.consorziomontefalco.it
  18. F. Fatichenti, ‘Montefalco. Recupero e valorizzazione di una identità vitivinicola’, Territoires du vin [En ligne], vol. 6, 2014, [Online]. Available: http://preo.u-bourgogne.fr/territoiresduvin/index.php?id=825
  19. J. Gehman, V. L. Glaser, K. M. Eisenhardt, D. Gioia, A. Langley, and K. G. Corley, ‘Finding Theory–Method Fit: A Comparison of Three Qualitative Approaches to Theory Building’, Journal of Management Inquiry, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 284–300, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.1177/1056492617706029.
  20. A. Strauss and J. Corbin, Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, 2nd ed. in Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications, Inc, 1998, pp. xiii, 312.
  21. D. A. Gioia, K. G. Corley, and A. L. Hamilton, ‘Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research: Notes on the Gioia Methodology’, Organizational Research Methods, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 15–31, Jan. 2013, doi: 10.1177/1094428112452151.
  22. D. R. Thomas, ‘A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data’, American Journal of Evaluation, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 237–246, Jun. 2006, doi: 10.1177/1098214005283748.
  23. D. J. Flint and S. L. Golicic, ‘Searching for competitive advantage through sustainability’, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, vol. 39, no. 10, pp. 841–860, Jan. 2009, doi: 10.1108/09600030911011441.
  24. R. Edwards and J. Holland, What is Qualitative Interviewing? in The ‘What is?’ Research Methods Series. Bloomsbury Academic, 2013. doi: 10.5040/9781472545244.
  25. G. Guest, A. Bunce, and L. Johnson, ‘How Many Interviews Are Enough?’, Field Methods - FIELD METHOD, vol. 18, pp. 59–82, Feb. 2006, doi: 10.1177/1525822X05279903.
  26. S. Castriota, S. Corsi, P. Frumento, and G. Ruggeri, ‘Does quality pay off? “Superstar” wines and the uncertain price premium across quality grades’, Journal of Wine Economics, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 141–158, 2022, doi: 10.1017/jwe.2022.21.
  27. A. Cavicchi, B. Torquati, C. Taglioni, C. Seghieri, and C. Santini, ‘Building Wine Reputation: An Explorative Study in Umbria’, Enometrica, vol. 6, no. 1, Mar. 2013.
  28. E. Oczkowski and H. Doucouliagos, ‘Wine Prices and Quality Ratings: A Meta-regression Analysis’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 103–121, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.1093/ajae/aau057.
  29. R. Sims, ‘Food, place and authenticity: local food and the sustainable tourism experience’, Journal of Sustainable Tourism, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 321–336, May 2009, doi: 10.1080/09669580802359293.
  30. T. López-Guzmán Guzmán and S. Sánchez Cañizares, ‘La creación de productos turísticos utilizando rutas enológicas’, Pasos: Revista de turismo y patrimonio cultural, ISSN 1695-7121, Vol. 6, No. 2, 2008 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Gastronoma y Enoturismo), pags. 159-171, vol. 6, Apr. 2008, doi: 10.25145/j.pasos.2008.06.013.
  31. A. Di Bella, G. Petino, and L. Scrofani, ‘The Etna macro-region between peripheralization and innovation: Towards a smart territorial system based on tourism’, Regional Science Policy & Practice, vol. 11, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1111/rsp3.12176.
  32. F. G. Santeramo, A. Seccia, and G. Nardone, ‘The synergies of the Italian wine and tourism sectors’, Wine Economics and Policy, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 71–74, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.wep.2016.11.004.
  33. L. V. Elías Pastor, El turismo del vino: Otra experiencia de Ocio. in Documentos de Estudios de Ocio. Universidad de Deusto, 2006. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.it/books?id=p9pgNQAACAAJ
  34. A. Maghssudipour, L. Lazzeretti, and F. Capone, ‘The role of multiple ties in knowledge networks: Complementarity in the Montefalco wine cluster’, Industrial Marketing Management, vol. 90, pp. 667–678, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.03.021.
  35. G. Schamel, ‘Dynamic Analysis of Brand and Regional Reputation: The Case of Wine’, Journal of Wine Economics, vol. 4, Mar. 2009, doi: 10.1017/S1931436100000687.
  36. W. Van Caenegem and K. Nakano, ‘Standard trade marks, geographical indications and provenance branding in Australia: What we can learn from King Island’, The Journal of World Intellectual Property, vol. 23, no. 5–6, pp. 632–657, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1111/jwip.12166.
  37. M. Rivera, K. Knickel, J. María Díaz-Puente, and A. Afonso, ‘The Role of Social Capital in Agricultural and Rural Development:Lessons Learnt from Case Studies in Seven Countries’, Sociologia Ruralis, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 66–91, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1111/soru.12218.
  38. E. Neethling, T. Petitjean, H. Quénol, and G. Barbeau, ‘Assessing local climate vulnerability and winegrowers’ adaptive processes in the context of climate change’, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 777–803, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.1007/s11027-015-9698-0.

Most read articles by the same author(s)