Just Accepted Manuscripts
Original Research Article

Transforming the Italian Wine Sector: Firms’ Perceptions of Dealcoholised Wine Innovation, Regulation, and Market Positioning: "Transforming wine value chains – Adapting to a changing world"

(Just Accepted)
  • Annalisa Angeloni,
  • Francesca Passarini,
  • Roberta Sardone,
  • Luca Cacchiarelli
Annalisa Angeloni
CREA-PB
Francesca Passarini
Università La Sapienza
Roberta Sardone
CREA Council for Agricultural Research, Agricultural Policies and Bioeconomy, Rome, Italy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/wep-19981

Published 2026-07-17

Keywords

  • Dealcoholised wine,
  • Wine innovation,
  • Regulatory design,
  • Market segmentation

How to Cite

Angeloni, A., Passarini, F., Sardone, R., & Cacchiarelli, L. (2026). Transforming the Italian Wine Sector: Firms’ Perceptions of Dealcoholised Wine Innovation, Regulation, and Market Positioning: "Transforming wine value chains – Adapting to a changing world". Wine Economics and Policy. https://doi.org/10.36253/wep-19981

Copyright (c) 2024 Annalisa Angeloni, Francesca Passarini, Roberta Sardone, Luca Cacchiarelli

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

The rapid expansion of the no- and low-alcohol (NoLo) segment is reshaping dynamics in mature wine markets. Within this context, dealcoholised wines might represent an emerging strategic opportunity for traditional wine-producing countries. This study examines how Italian wineries respond to the development of the dealcoholised segment, focusing on the interaction between technological constraints, regulatory design, and market positioning.

The analysis is based on semi-structured interviews with three geographically diverse wineries operating in Northern, Central, and Southern Italy. Using a qualitative multiple case-study approach, the study identifies convergent patterns in technological adoption, strategic diversification, and perceived regulatory barriers.

This study pursues two analytical levels: general objectives integrate regulatory, technological, and sustainability analyses to assess NoLo development amid health-driven demand; specific case-study objectives are: a) firm motivations, perceptions, and expectations; b) regional strategy/technology variations (North-Centre-South); c) producer-identified barriers/prospects. Key questions address Italy-EU regulatory gaps, preferred techniques/satisfaction, communication to overcome cultural resistance, regional differences, and sector evolution drivers.

The findings indicate that membrane-based dealcoholisation technologies have reached operational feasibility, yet high capital intensity limits widespread internal adoption. Firms frame entry into the segment as a proactive diversification strategy, targeting moderation-oriented consumers, particularly younger cohorts. Regulatory constraints, especially the prohibition of dealcoholisation for Protected Designation of Origin (PDO)/Protected Geographical Indication (PGI) wines, emerge as a critical factor shaping competitive positioning. Sustainability considerations introduce additional trade-offs, given the higher energy and water intensity of current processes. The study contributes to the economic analysis of innovation in mature wine sectors and highlights the role of institutional design in influencing competitive dynamics within emerging product categories.

(Just Accepted)

References

  1. Anderson, P., O’Donnell, A., Kaner, E., Llopis, E., Impact of alcohol policy on consumption: evidence from European countries, Lancet Public Health 6 (2021) e213–e222. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00020-1
  2. Euromonitor International, No- and low-alcohol drinks in global markets, Euromonitor Report, 2023.
  3. World Health Organization (WHO), Global status report on alcohol and health 2018, WHO Press, Geneva, 2018
  4. Bucher, T., Collins, C., Rollo, M.E., McCaffrey, T.A., De Vlieger, N., Van der Bend, D., Truby, H., Perez-Cueto, F.J.A., Consumer perception and preferences for healthier beverages: a systematic review, Food Qual. Prefer. 67 (2018) 188–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2018.02.008
  5. IWSR, No- and low-alcohol strategic study 2024, IWSR Drinks Market Analysis, London, 2024.
  6. Thach, L., Wine consumption trends and the millennial generation, Wine Econ. Policy 9 (2020) 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wep.2019.10.001
  7. Vecchio, R., Annunziata, A., Mariani, A., Exploring determinants of wine consumption among young adults, Br. Food J. 124 (2022) 1862–1878. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-07-2021-0784
  8. Pickering, G.J., Low- and reduced-alcohol wine: a review, J. Wine Res. 11 (2000) 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571260020001575
  9. Sam, F.E., Ma, T., Saliba, A.J., A review of dealcoholisation techniques for wine and their impact on sensory properties, Foods 10 (2021) 2534. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10112534
  10. Shaw, C.L., Dolan, R., Corsi, A.M., Goodman, S., Pearson, W., Exploring the barriers and triggers towards the adoption of low- and no-alcohol (NOLO) wines, Food Qual. Prefer. 110 (2023) 104932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.104932
  11. DEWINE Project, Prot. n. 2022HYXBFK, PRIN Project of great national interest under NextGenerationEU funding. https://dewine.it (accessed 26 February 2026)
  12. Ronksley, P.E., Brien, S.E., Turner, B.J., Mukamal, K.J., Ghali, W.A., Association of alcohol consumption with selected cardiovascular disease outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis, BMJ 342 (2011) d671. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d671
  13. GBD 2020 Alcohol Collaborators, Population-level risks of alcohol consumption by amount, geography, age, sex, and year: a systematic analysis, Lancet 400 (2022) 185–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00847-9
  14. Ford, H., Dolan, R., Goodman, S., Bastian, S., Pearson, W., Corsi, A.M., Exploring consumers’ drinking behaviour regarding no-, low- and mid-alcohol wines: a systematic scoping review and guiding framework, J. Mark. Manag. 41 (2025) 703–733.
  15. Moreno-Olivares, J.D., Giménez-Bañón, M.J., Ruiz-García, L., Cebrián-Pérez, A., Bleda-Sánchez, J.A., Gil-Muñoz, R., New wines characterised by their low alcohol and extraordinary polyphenolic content, Eur. Food Res. Technol. 251 (2025) 233–246.
  16. Kumar, Y., Ricci, A., Parpinello, G.P., Versari, A., Dealcoholized wine: a scoping review of volatile and non-volatile profiles, consumer perception, and health benefits, Food Bioprocess Technol. 17 (2024) 3525–3545.
  17. Coppola, F., Testa, B., Succi, M., Paventi, G., Di Martino, C., Iorizzo, M., Viticultural and pre-fermentation strategies to reduce alcohol levels in wines, Foods 14 (2025) 2647.
  18. Rui, M., Blanc, S., Brun, F., Sparacino, A., Mastromonaco, G., Massaglia, S., A cross-country analysis on satisfaction and perception of non-alcoholic wine, Food Qual. Prefer. (2025) 105774.
  19. Pagès, A.R., Zaragoza, B.D., López, M.P., Sipping a sustainable life: exploring drivers and barriers in consumer attitudes toward non or low alcoholic spirits, Appetite 197 (2024) 107308.
  20. Day, I., Deroover, K., Kavanagh, M., Beckett, E., Akanbi, T., Pirinen, M., Bucher, T., Australian consumer perception of non-alcoholic beer, white wine, red wine, and spirits, Int. J. Gastron. Food Sci. 35 (2024) 100886.
  21. UIV-Vinitaly Observatory, Dealcoholized wine: an opportunity to be grabed with quality and vision, 2025.
  22. Yin, R.K., Case study research and applications: design and methods, 6th ed., Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, 2018.
  23. Eisenhardt, K.M., Building theories from case study research, Acad. Manage. Rev. 14 (1989) 532–550. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308385
  24. Gioia, D.A., Corley, K.G., Hamilton, A.L., Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: notes on the Gioia methodology, Organ. Res. Methods 16 (2013) 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151
  25. Capitanio, F., Coppola, A., Pascucci, S., Product and process innovation in the Italian food industry, Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 37 (2010) 529–550. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbq024
  26. Triguero, A., Córcoles, D., Cuerva, M.C., Drivers of innovation in agri-food firms, J. Technol. Transf. 38 (2013) 189–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-012-9261-3
  27. Ménard, C., The economics of hybrid organizations, J. Inst. Theor. Econ. 160 (2004) 345–376.
  28. Sutton, J., Sunk costs and market structure: price competition, advertising, and the evolution of concentration, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1991.
  29. Charters, S., Wine and society: the social and cultural context of a drink, Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 2006.
  30. Belletti, G., Marescotti, A., Touzard, J.M., Geographical indications, public goods and sustainable development: the roles of actors’ strategies and public policies, World Dev. 98 (2017) 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.05.004
  31. Stiletto, A., Vecchio, R., Cembalo, L., Trestini, S., The impact of nutri-score on consumers’ preferences for geographical indications: evidence from a non-hypothetical experiment, Appetite 199 (2024) 107400.
  32. North, D.C., Institutions, institutional change and economic performance, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990.
  33. Notarnicola, B., Tassielli, G., Renzulli, P.A., Castellani, V., Sala, S., Environmental impacts of food consumption in Europe, J. Clean. Prod. 140 (2017) 753–765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.080
  34. Clark, M., Springmann, M., Hill, J., Tilman, D., Multiple health and environmental impacts of foods, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 116 (2019) 23357–23362. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1906908116
  35. Smith Maguire, J., The sociology of wine: practices, consumption and culture, Bloomsbury Publishing, London, 2018.
  36. Rogers, E.M., Diffusion of innovations, 5th ed., Free Press, New York, 2003.