Just Accepted Manuscripts
Original Research Article

How European consumers value wine credence attributes: a cross-country comparison of France, Greece and Italy

PDF (Just accepted)
  • Raffaele Zanchini,
  • Simone Blanc,
  • Stefanos Theodorakis,
  • Giuseppe Di Vita,
  • Valentina Maria Merlino,
  • Filippo Brun,
  • Stefano Massaglia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/wep-15235

Published 2024-11-07

Keywords

  • wine consumption,
  • organic,
  • geographical indications,
  • biodynamic,
  • conjoint analysis

How to Cite

Zanchini, R., Blanc, S. ., Theodorakis, S., Di Vita, G., Merlino, V. M., Brun, F., & Massaglia, S. (2024). How European consumers value wine credence attributes: a cross-country comparison of France, Greece and Italy. Wine Economics and Policy. https://doi.org/10.36253/wep-15235

Copyright (c) 2024 Raffaele Zanchini, Simone Blanc, Stefanos Theodorakis, Giuseppe Di Vita, Valentina Maria Merlino, Filippo Brun, Stefano Massaglia

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Several attributes can be used to differentiate wine products to meet consumer interest and thus increase producer visibility, attractiveness and revenues. The perception towards the same attribute may depend on various factors that characterise the subjects, such as individual, behavioural and situational characteristics, like their country of origin. This study aims to identify which credence attributes and related levels motivate consumers the most to buying wine, by comparing the results obtained in three different European countries: France, Greece and Italy.

A conjoint experiment based on linear assumption was administered using price, production method, geographical indication and wine origin as product attributes. The conjoint data were analysed in three steps: performing a model with the whole sample; performing three models using national data to compare results between the countries; performing a cluster analysis using the Ward method to associate consumer characteristics with product attributes.

 Results show that origin is the most valued attribute for choosing wine, followed by the production method. Cross-country evaluation reveals several significant differences among the attributes of the production method, geographical indication and origin. The cluster analysis identified three groups named: High price and national wine seekers; Certification seekers and Price-sensitive seekers.

This paper provides several implications for both academicians and enterprises. Indeed, it is the first evaluation comparing the role given by consumers to biodynamic certification in a cross-country evaluation. Several indications are also provided for producers who can help differentiate better wine production by earning a higher income.

PDF (Just accepted)

References

  1. Annunziata, A., Agnoli, L., Vecchio, R., Charters, S., Mariani, A., 2019. Health warnings on wine labels: A discrete choice analysis of Italian and French Generation Y consumers. Wine economics and policy 8, 81–90.
  2. Annunziata, A., Pomarici, E., Vecchio, R., Mariani, A., 2016a. Nutritional information and health warnings on wine labels: Exploring consumer interest and preferences. Appetite 106, 58–69.
  3. Annunziata, A., Pomarici, E., Vecchio, R., Mariani, A., 2016b. Do consumers want more nutritional and health information on wine labels? Insights from the EU and USA. Nutrients 8, 416.
  4. Annunziata, A., Vecchio, R., 2013. Consumer perception of functional foods: A conjoint analysis with probiotics. Food Quality and Preference 28, 348–355.
  5. Bernabéu, R., Díaz, M., Oliveira, F., 2016. Consumer preferences for red wine in the Spanish market. Ciência e Técnica Vitivinícola 31, 88–97.
  6. Boncinelli, F., Dominici, A., Gerini, F., Marone, E., 2021. Insights into organic wine consumption: behaviour, segmentation and attribute non-attendance. Agricultural and Food Economics 9, 1–16.
  7. Bridges, J.F., Hauber, A.B., Marshall, D., Lloyd, A., Prosser, L.A., Regier, D.A., Johnson, F.R., Mauskopf, J., 2011. Conjoint analysis applications in health—a checklist: a report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force. Value in health 14, 403–413.
  8. Capitello, R., Agnoli, L., Charters, S., Begalli, D., 2021. Labelling environmental and terroir attributes: Young Italian consumers’ wine preferences. Journal of Cleaner production 304, 126991.
  9. Capitello, R., Sirieix, L., 2019. Consumers’ perceptions of sustainable wine: An exploratory study in France and Italy. Economies 7, 33.
  10. Caracciolo, F., Furno, M., D’Amico, M., Califano, G., Di Vita, G., 2022. Variety seeking behavior in the wine domain: A consumers segmentation using big data. Food Quality and Preference 97, 104481.
  11. Castellini, A., Mauracher, C., Troiano, S., 2017. An overview of the biodynamic wine sector. International Journal of Wine Research 9, 1–11.
  12. Charrad, M., Ghazzali, N., Boiteau, V., Niknafs, A., 2014. NbClust: an R package for determining the relevant number of clusters in a data set. Journal of statistical software 61, 1–36.
  13. Dal Vecchio, A., Massaglia, S., Merlino, V.M., Borra, D., Hao, M., 2018. Italian wines in China’s e-commerce market: focus on Piedmont region products. Italian Journal of Food Science 30.
  14. Demeter international, 2021.
  15. Di Vita, G., Caracciolo, F., Brun, F., D’Amico, M., 2019. Picking out a wine: Consumer motivation behind different quality wines choice. Wine Economics and Policy 8, 16–27.
  16. Di Vita, G., Maesano, G., Zanchini, R., Barbieri, C., Spina, D., Caracciolo, F., D’Amico, M., 2022. The thin line between tradition and well-being: Consumer responds to health and typicality attributes for dry-cured ham. Journal of Cleaner Production 364, 132680.
  17. Di Vita, G., Vecchio, R., Borrello, M., Zanchini, R., Maesano, G., Gulisano, G., Brun, F., D’Amico, M., 2021a. Oh my darling clementine: heterogeneous preferences for sustainable citrus fruits. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 36, 557–568.
  18. Di Vita, G., Zanchini, R., Falcone, G., D’Amico, M., Brun, F., Gulisano, G., 2021b. Local, organic or protected? Detecting the role of different quality signals among Italian olive oil consumers through a hierarchical cluster analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production 290, 125795.
  19. Dias, C., Mendes, L., 2018. Protected designation of origin (PDO), protected geographical indication (PGI) and traditional speciality guaranteed (TSG): A bibiliometric analysis. Food Research International 103, 492–508.
  20. Galati, A., Schifani, G., Crescimanno, M., Migliore, G., 2019. “Natural wine” consumers and interest in label information: An analysis of willingness to pay in a new Italian wine market segment. Journal of Cleaner Production 227, 405–413.
  21. Gallenti, G., Troiano, S., Marangon, F., Bogoni, P., Campisi, B., Cosmina, M., 2019. Environmentally sustainable versus aesthetic values motivating millennials’ preferences for wine purchasing: evidence from an experimental analysis in Italy. Agricultural and Food Economics 7, 1–16.
  22. Hailu, G., Boecker, A., Henson, S., Cranfield, J., 2009. Consumer valuation of functional foods and nutraceuticals in Canada. A conjoint study using probiotics. Appetite 52, 257–265.
  23. Hauber, A.B., González, J.M., Groothuis-Oudshoorn, C.G., Prior, T., Marshall, D.A., Cunningham, C., IJzerman, M.J., Bridges, J.F., 2016. Statistical methods for the analysis of discrete choice experiments: a report of the ISPOR conjoint analysis good research practices task force. Value in health 19, 300–315.
  24. Janssen, M., Schäufele, I., Zander, K., 2020. Target groups for organic wine: The importance of segmentation analysis. Food quality and preference 79, 103785.
  25. Jantzi, H.A., McSweeney, M.B., 2019. An overview of wine consumers in Nova Scotia, Canada: A conjoint analysis study. Journal of wine research 30, 48–61.
  26. Kendall, H., Clark, B., Rhymer, C., Kuznesof, S., Hajslova, J., Tomaniova, M., Brereton, P., Frewer, L., 2019. A systematic review of consumer perceptions of food fraud and authenticity: A European perspective. Trends in Food Science & Technology 94, 79–90.
  27. Krystallis, A., Chrysochou, P., 2010. An exploration of loyalty determinants in Greek wine varieties. EuroMed Journal of Business.
  28. Le, N.-H., Nguyen, H.-M.T., Van Nguyen, T., 2013. National identity and the perceived values of foreign products with local brands: The case of local wine in Vietnam. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics.
  29. Lewis, K., Cassells, S., 2014. The spiritual dimension of biodynamics: an alternative source of capital in the rural context, in: Exploring Rural Enterprise: New Perspectives on Research, Policy & Practice. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  30. Maesano, G., Di Vita, G., Chinnici, G., Gioacchino, P., D’Amico, M., 2021. What’s in organic wine consumer mind? A review on purchasing drivers of organic wines. Wine Economics and Policy 10, 3–21.
  31. Martínez, L.M.-C., Mollá-Bauzá, M.B., Gomis, F.J.D.C., Poveda, Á.M., 2006. Influence of purchase place and consumption frequency over quality wine preferences. Food Quality and Preference 17, 315–327.
  32. Massaglia, S., Borra, D., Peano, C., Sottile, F., Merlino, V.M., 2019. Consumer Preference Heterogeneity Evaluation in Fruit and Vegetable Purchasing Decisions Using the Best–Worst Approach. Foods 8, 266.
  33. Mauracher, C., Procidano, I., Valentini, M., 2019. How product attributes and consumer characteristics influence the WTP, resulting in a higher price premium for organic wine. Sustainability 11, 1428.
  34. Mehta, R., Bhanja, N., 2017. Consumer preferences for wine attributes in an emerging market. International journal of retail & distribution management.
  35. Merlino, V.M., Borra, D., Girgenti, V., Dal Vecchio, A., Massaglia, S., 2018. Beef meat preferences of consumers from Northwest Italy: Analysis of choice attributes. Meat science 143, 119–128.
  36. Merlino, V.M., Massaglia, S., Borra, D., Mimosi, A., Cornale, P., 2021. Which Factors Drive Consumer Decisions during Milk Purchase? New Individuals’ Profiles Considering Fresh Pasteurized and UHT Treated Milk. Foods 11, 77.
  37. Migliore, G., Thrassou, A., Crescimanno, M., Schifani, G., Galati, A., 2020. Factors affecting consumer preferences for “natural wine”: An exploratory study in the Italian market. British Food Journal.
  38. Miraballes, M., Gámbaro, A., 2018. Influence of Images on the Evaluation of Jams Using Conjoint Analysis Combined with Check-All-That-Apply (CATA) Questions. Journal of food science 83, 167–174.
  39. Palmieri, N., Perito, M.A., 2020. CONSUMERS’WILLINGNESS TO CONSUME SUSTAINABLE AND LOCAL WINE IN ITALY. Italian Journal of Food Science 32.
  40. Sáenz-Navajas, M.-P., Ballester, J., Peyron, D., Valentin, D., 2014. Extrinsic attributes responsible for red wine quality perception: A cross-cultural study between France and Spain. Food Quality and Preference 35, 70–85.
  41. Schäufele, I., Hamm, U., 2018. Organic wine purchase behaviour in Germany: Exploring the attitude-behaviour-gap with data from a household panel. Food Quality and Preference 63, 1–11.
  42. Scozzafava, G., Gerini, F., Boncinelli, F., Contini, C., Casini, L., 2021. How much is a bottle of conventional, organic or biodynamic wine worth? Results of an experimental auction. Food Quality and Preference 93, 104259.
  43. Shan, L.C., De Brún, A., Henchion, M., Li, C., Murrin, C., Wall, P.G., Monahan, F.J., 2017. Consumer evaluations of processed meat products reformulated to be healthier–A conjoint analysis study. Meat Science 131, 82–89.
  44. Sillani, S., 2015. Consumer perceptions and motivations in choice of minimally processed vegetables. British Food Journal 117, 970–986.
  45. Stanco, M., Lerro, M., Marotta, G., 2020. Consumers’ preferences for wine attributes: A best-worst scaling analysis. Sustainability 12, 2819.
  46. Strauss, T., von Maltitz, M.J., 2017. Generalising Ward’s method for use with Manhattan distances. PloS one 12, e0168288.
  47. Tait, P., Saunders, C., Dalziel, P., Rutherford, P., Driver, T., Guenther, M., 2019. Estimating wine consumer preferences for sustainability attributes: A discrete choice experiment of Californian Sauvignon blanc purchasers. Journal of Cleaner Production 233, 412–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.076
  48. Veale, R., Quester, P., 2008. Consumer sensory evaluations of wine quality: The respective influence of price and country of origin. Journal of wine economics 3, 10–29.
  49. Vergamini, D., Bartolini, F., Prosperi, P., Brunori, G., 2019. Explaining regional dynamics of marketing strategies: The experience of the Tuscan wine producers. Journal of Rural Studies 72, 136–152.
  50. Vlachos, V.A., 2017. A macroeconomic estimation of wine production in Greece. Wine Economics and Policy 6, 3–13.
  51. Wajrock, S., Antille, N., Rytz, A., Pineau, N., Hager, C., 2008. Partitioning methods outperform hierarchical methods for clustering consumers in preference mapping. Food Quality and Preference 19, 662–669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2008.06.002

Most read articles by the same author(s)