Vol. 14 No. 1 (2025)
Original Research Article

How European consumers value wine credence attributes: a cross-country comparison of France, Greece and Italy

PDF
  • Raffaele Zanchini,
  • Simone Blanc,
  • Stefanos Theodorakis,
  • Giuseppe Di Vita,
  • Valentina Maria Merlino,
  • Filippo Brun,
  • Stefano Massaglia
Raffaele Zanchini
Department of Agricultural, Forest and Food Science (DISAFA), University of Turin, Grugliasco, Italy
Simone Blanc
Department of Agricultural, Forest and Food Science (DISAFA), University of Turin, Grugliasco, Italy
Stefanos Theodorakis
Department of Agricultural, Forest and Food Science (DISAFA), University of Turin, Grugliasco, Italy
Giuseppe Di Vita
Department of Agriculture Food and Environment (Di3A), University of Catania, Italy
Valentina Maria Merlino
Department of Agricultural, Forest and Food Science (DISAFA), University of Turin, Grugliasco, Italy
Filippo Brun
Department of Agricultural, Forest and Food Science (DISAFA), University of Turin, Grugliasco, Italy
Stefano Massaglia
Department of Agricultural, Forest and Food Science (DISAFA), University of Turin, Grugliasco, Italy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/wep-15235

Published 2024-11-07

Keywords

  • wine consumption,
  • organic,
  • geographical indications,
  • biodynamic,
  • conjoint analysis

How to Cite

Zanchini, R., Blanc, S., Theodorakis, S., Di Vita, G., Merlino, V. M., Brun, F., & Massaglia, S. (2024). How European consumers value wine credence attributes: a cross-country comparison of France, Greece and Italy. Wine Economics and Policy, 14(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.36253/wep-15235

Copyright (c) 2025 Raffaele Zanchini, Simone Blanc, Stefanos Theodorakis, Giuseppe Di Vita, Valentina Maria Merlino, Filippo Brun, Stefano Massaglia

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Several attributes can be used to differentiate wine products to meet consumer interest and thus increase producer visibility, attractiveness and revenues. Perception of the same attribute may depend on various factors that characterise the subjects, such as individual, behavioural and situational characteristics, like their country of origin. This study aims to identify which credence attributes and related levels motivate consumers the most to buying wine, by comparing the results obtained in three different European countries: France, Greece and Italy. A conjoint experiment based on linear assumption was administered using price, production method, Geographical Indications (GIs) and wine origin as product attributes. The conjoint data were analysed in three steps: performing a model with the whole sample; performing three models using national data to compare results between the countries; and performing a cluster analysis using the Ward method to associate consumer characteristics with product attributes. Results show that wine origin is the most valued attribute for choosing wine, followed by the production method. Cross-country evaluation reveals several significant differences among the attributes of the production method, geographical indication and origin. The cluster analysis identified three groups named: Higher-priced and nation-specific wine seekers; Certification seekers and Price-sensitive consumers. This paper provides several implications for both academicians and enterprises. Indeed, it is the first evaluation comparing the role given by consumers to biodynamic certification in a cross-country evaluation. Several indications are also provided for producers who can help differentiate better wine production by earning a higher income.

PDF

References

  1. H. Kendall, B. Clark, C. Rhymer, S. Kuznesof, J. Hajslova, M. Tomaniova, P. Brereton, L. Frewer, A systematic review of consumer perceptions of food fraud and authenticity: A European perspective, Trends in Food Science & Technology 94 (2019) 79–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2019.10.005
  2. M. Rui, A. Sparacino, V.M. Merlino, F. Brun, S. Massaglia, S. Blanc, Exploring consumer sentiments and opinions in wine E-commerce: A cross-country comparative study, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 82 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.104097. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.104097
  3. D. Vergamini, F. Bartolini, P. Prosperi, G. Brunori, Explaining regional dynamics of marketing strategies: The experience of the Tuscan wine producers, Journal of Rural Studies 72 (2019) 136–152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.10.006
  4. C. Dias, L. Mendes, Protected designation of origin (PDO), protected geographical indication (PGI) and traditional speciality guaranteed (TSG): A bibiliometric analysis, Food Research International 103 (2018) 492–508. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2017.09.059
  5. L.M.-C. Martínez, M.B. Mollá-Bauzá, F.J.D.C. Gomis, Á.M. Poveda, Influence of purchase place and consumption frequency over quality wine preferences, Food Quality and Preference 17 (2006) 315–327. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2005.02.002
  6. R. Capitello, L. Agnoli, S. Charters, D. Begalli, Labelling environmental and terroir attributes: Young Italian consumers’ wine preferences, Journal of Cleaner Production 304 (2021) 126991. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126991
  7. G. Di Vita, F. Caracciolo, F. Brun, M. D’Amico, Picking out a wine: Consumer motivation behind different quality wines choice, Wine Economics and Policy 8 (2019) 16–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wep.2019.02.002
  8. N. Casolani, A. Ciccarelli, M.A. Perito, E. Chiodo, The Importance of Region of Origin in Sparkling Wines: An International Analysis of Consumers’ Perception, Sustainability 16 (2024) 390. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16010390. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16010390
  9. D. Escandon-Barbosa, J. Rialp-Criado, The impact of the content of the label on the buying intention of a wine consumer, Frontiers in Psychology 9 (2019) 426438. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02761
  10. A. Chamorro, J.M. García-Gallego, H. da C. Trindade-Carlos, Study on the importance of wine bottle design on consumer choices, British Food Journal 123 (2021) 577–593. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-03-2020-0244
  11. M. Lanfranchi, A. Zirilli, A. Alibrandi, C. Giannetto, The behaviour of wine consumers towards organic wine: a statistical analysis through the non-parametric combination test, International Journal of Wine Business Research 33 (2021) 275–287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWBR-04-2020-0015
  12. P. Tait, C. Saunders, P. Dalziel, P. Rutherford, T. Driver, M. Guenther, Estimating wine consumer preferences for sustainability attributes: A discrete choice experiment of Californian Sauvignon blanc purchasers, Journal of Cleaner Production 233 (2019) 412–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.076. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.076
  13. S. Sillani, Consumer perceptions and motivations in choice of minimally processed vegetables, British Food Journal 117 (2015) 970–986. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-03-2014-0132
  14. F. Boncinelli, A. Dominici, F. Gerini, E. Marone, Insights into organic wine consumption: behaviour, segmentation and attribute non-attendance, Agricultural and Food Economics 9 (2021) 1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40100-021-00176-6
  15. S. Sillani, A. Miccoli, F. Nassivera, Different preferences for wine communication, Wine Economics and Policy 6 (2017) 28–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wep.2017.03.002
  16. M. Rui, F. Rosa, A. Viberti, F. Brun, S. Massaglia, S. Blanc, Understanding Factors Associated with Interest in Sustainability-Certified Wine among American and Italian Consumers, Foods 13 (2024) 1468. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13101468
  17. Demeter international, (2021). https://demeter.net/biodynamics/biodiversity/ (accessed February 8, 2022).
  18. A. Castellini, C. Mauracher, S. Troiano, An overview of the biodynamic wine sector, International Journal of Wine Research 9 (2017) 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWR.S69126
  19. K. Lewis, S. Cassells, The spiritual dimension of biodynamics: an alternative source of capital in the rural context, in: Exploring Rural Enterprise: New Perspectives on Research, Policy & Practice, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/S2040-724620140000004008
  20. G. Scozzafava, F. Gerini, F. Boncinelli, C. Contini, L. Casini, How much is a bottle of conventional, organic or biodynamic wine worth? Results of an experimental auction, Food Quality and Preference 93 (2021) 104259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104259
  21. R. Veale, P. Quester, Consumer sensory evaluations of wine quality: The respective influence of price and country of origin, Journal of Wine Economics 3 (2008) 10–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1931436100000535
  22. R. Bernabéu, M. Díaz, F. Oliveira, Consumer preferences for red wine in the Spanish market, Ciência e Técnica Vitivinícola 31 (2016) 88–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/ctv/20163102088
  23. G. Gallenti, S. Troiano, F. Marangon, P. Bogoni, B. Campisi, M. Cosmina, Environmentally sustainable versus aesthetic values motivating millennials’ preferences for wine purchasing: evidence from an experimental analysis in Italy, Agricultural and Food Economics 7 (2019) 1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40100-019-0132-x
  24. A. Dal Vecchio, S. Massaglia, V.M. Merlino, D. Borra, M. Hao, Italian wines in China’s e-commerce market: focus on Piedmont region products, Italian Journal of Food Science 30 (2018).
  25. A. Annunziata, E. Pomarici, R. Vecchio, A. Mariani, Do consumers want more nutritional and health information on wine labels? Insights from the EU and USA, Nutrients 8 (2016) 416. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu8070416
  26. H.A. Jantzi, M.B. McSweeney, An overview of wine consumers in Nova Scotia, Canada: A conjoint analysis study, Journal of Wine Research 30 (2019) 48–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09571264.2019.1573356
  27. J.P. Perrouty, F. d’Hauteville, L. Lockshin, The influence of wine attributes on region of origin equity: An analysis of the moderating effect of consumer’s perceived expertise, Agribusiness 22 (2006) 323–341. https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.20089. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.20089
  28. C. Mauracher, I. Procidano, M. Valentini, How product attributes and consumer characteristics influence the WTP, resulting in a higher price premium for organic wine, Sustainability 11 (2019) 1428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11051428
  29. G. Di Vita, R. Zanchini, G. Falcone, M. D’Amico, F. Brun, G. Gulisano, Local, organic or protected? Detecting the role of different quality signals among Italian olive oil consumers through a hierarchical cluster analysis, Journal of Cleaner Production 290 (2021) 125795. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125795
  30. A. Annunziata, E. Pomarici, R. Vecchio, A. Mariani, Nutritional information and health warnings on wine labels: Exploring consumer interest and preferences, Appetite 106 (2016) 58–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2016.02.152
  31. A. Annunziata, R. Vecchio, Consumer perception of functional foods: A conjoint analysis with probiotics, Food Quality and Preference 28 (2013) 348–355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.10.009
  32. J.F. Bridges, A.B. Hauber, D. Marshall, A. Lloyd, L.A. Prosser, D.A. Regier, F.R. Johnson, J. Mauskopf, Conjoint analysis applications in health—a checklist: a report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force, Value in Health 14 (2011) 403–413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2010.11.013
  33. G. Di Vita, R. Zanchini, D. Spina, G. Pappalardo, E. Schimmenti, M. D’Amico, The Hierarchical Utility of Credence Attributes of Orange Marmalade: What do ConsumerS Look for in a Multi-Claim Food Product?, Journal of Marketing Communications (2023) 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2023.2273539. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2023.2273539
  34. G. Di Vita, R. Vecchio, M. Borrello, R. Zanchini, G. Maesano, G. Gulisano, F. Brun, M. D’Amico, Oh my darling clementine: heterogeneous preferences for sustainable citrus fruits, Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 36 (2021) 557–568. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S174217052100017X
  35. A.B. Hauber, J.M. González, C.G. Groothuis-Oudshoorn, T. Prior, D.A. Marshall, C. Cunningham, M.J. IJzerman, J.F. Bridges, Statistical methods for the analysis of discrete choice experiments: a report of the ISPOR conjoint analysis good research practices task force, Value in Health 19 (2016) 300–315. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2016.04.004
  36. E. Pelzer, The Potential of Conjoint Analysis for Communication Research, Communication Research Reports 36 (2019) 136–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2018.1559138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2018.1559138
  37. T. Mancuso, R. De Cianni, G.A. Di Vita, E. Spada, F. Brun, D.C. Spadaro, R. Zanchini, Understanding Italian consumers’ perceptions of tomato agricultural innovation: Exploring the nexus between sustainability, health and consumer beliefs, Journal of Cleaner Production 435 (2024) 140528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140528. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140528
  38. D. McCullough, A User’s Guide to Conjoint Analysis, Marketing Research 14 (2002) 18–23.
  39. K.E. Stanovich, R.F. West, On the relative independence of thinking biases and cognitive ability., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 94 (2008) 672. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.672
  40. E. Mazaheri, M.-O. Richard, M. Laroche, The role of emotions in online consumer behavior: a comparison of search, experience, and credence services, Journal of Services Marketing 26 (2012) 535–550. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/08876041211266503
  41. L.C. Shan, A. De Brún, M. Henchion, C. Li, C. Murrin, P.G. Wall, F.J. Monahan, Consumer evaluations of processed meat products reformulated to be healthier–A conjoint analysis study, Meat Science 131 (2017) 82–89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.04.239
  42. T. Strauss, M.J. von Maltitz, Generalising Ward’s method for use with Manhattan distances, PloS One 12 (2017) e0168288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168288
  43. G. Hailu, A. Boecker, S. Henson, J. Cranfield, Consumer valuation of functional foods and nutraceuticals in Canada. A conjoint study using probiotics, Appetite 52 (2009) 257–265. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2008.10.002
  44. S. Wajrock, N. Antille, A. Rytz, N. Pineau, C. Hager, Partitioning methods outperform hierarchical methods for clustering consumers in preference mapping, Food Quality and Preference 19 (2008) 662–669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2008.06.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2008.06.002
  45. M. Miraballes, A. Gámbaro, Influence of Images on the Evaluation of Jams Using Conjoint Analysis Combined with Check-All-That-Apply (CATA) Questions, Journal of Food Science 83 (2018) 167–174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.13982
  46. M. Charrad, N. Ghazzali, V. Boiteau, A. Niknafs, NbClust: an R package for determining the relevant number of clusters in a data set, Journal of Statistical Software 61 (2014) 1–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v061.i06
  47. M.-P. Sáenz-Navajas, J. Ballester, D. Peyron, D. Valentin, Extrinsic attributes responsible for red wine quality perception: A cross-cultural study between France and Spain, Food Quality and Preference 35 (2014) 70–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.02.005
  48. G. Maesano, G. Di Vita, G. Chinnici, P. Gioacchino, M. D’Amico, What’s in organic wine consumer mind? A review on purchasing drivers of organic wines, Wine Economics and Policy 10 (2021) 3–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/wep-9101
  49. A. Galati, G. Schifani, M. Crescimanno, G. Migliore, “Natural wine” consumers and interest in label information: An analysis of willingness to pay in a new Italian wine market segment, Journal of Cleaner Production 227 (2019) 405–413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.219
  50. R. Mehta, N. Bhanja, Consumer preferences for wine attributes in an emerging market, International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management (2017). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-04-2017-0073
  51. N.-H. Le, H.-M.T. Nguyen, T. Van Nguyen, National identity and the perceived values of foreign products with local brands: The case of local wine in Vietnam, Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics (2013).
  52. M. Janssen, I. Schäufele, K. Zander, Target groups for organic wine: The importance of segmentation analysis, Food Quality and Preference 79 (2020) 103785. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.103785
  53. V.M. Merlino, S. Massaglia, D. Borra, A. Mimosi, P. Cornale, Which Factors Drive Consumer Decisions during Milk Purchase? New Individuals’ Profiles Considering Fresh Pasteurized and UHT Treated Milk, Foods 11 (2021) 77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11010077
  54. J. Mota-Gutierrez, A. Sparacino, V.M. Merlino, S. Blanc, F. Brun, F. Massimelli, E. Vassallo, D. Borra, S. Massaglia, Socio-demographic and cross-country differences in attention to sustainable certifications and changes in food consumption, Npj Science of Food 8 (2024) 31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41538-024-00274-x
  55. F. Caracciolo, M. D’Amico, G. Di Vita, E. Pomarici, A. Dal Bianco, L. Cembalo, Private vs. collective wine reputation, International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 19 (2016) 191–210.
  56. B.-H. Ling, L. Lockshin, Components of wine prices for Australian wine: How winery reputation, wine quality, region, vintage, and winery size contribute to the price of varietal wines, Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ) 11 (2003) 19–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1441-3582(03)70132-3
  57. F. Caracciolo, M. Furno, M. D’Amico, G. Califano, G. Di Vita, Variety seeking behavior in the wine domain: A consumers segmentation using big data, Food Quality and Preference 97 (2022) 104481. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104481
  58. V.M. Merlino, D. Borra, V. Girgenti, A. Dal Vecchio, S. Massaglia, Beef meat preferences of consumers from Northwest Italy: Analysis of choice attributes, Meat Science 143 (2018) 119–128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.04.023
  59. A. Annunziata, L. Agnoli, R. Vecchio, S. Charters, A. Mariani, Health warnings on wine labels: A discrete choice analysis of Italian and French Generation Y consumers, Wine Economics and Policy 8 (2019) 81–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wep.2019.03.001
  60. R. Capitello, L. Sirieix, Consumers’ perceptions of sustainable wine: An exploratory study in France and Italy, Economies 7 (2019) 33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/economies7020033
  61. A. Krystallis, P. Chrysochou, An exploration of loyalty determinants in Greek wine varieties, EuroMed Journal of Business (2010). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14502191011065473
  62. M. Stanco, M. Lerro, G. Marotta, Consumers’ preferences for wine attributes: A best-worst scaling analysis, Sustainability 12 (2020) 2819. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072819
  63. N. Palmieri, M.A. Perito, Consumers’willingness to consume sustainable and local wine in Italy, Italian Journal of Food Science 32 (2020).
  64. A. Hertzberg, G. Malorgio, Wine demand in Italy: an analysis of consumer preferences, New Medit 7 (2008) 40–46.
  65. I. Schäufele, U. Hamm, Organic wine purchase behaviour in Germany: Exploring the attitude-behaviour-gap with data from a household panel, Food Quality and Preference 63 (2018) 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.07.010
  66. V.A. Vlachos, A macroeconomic estimation of wine production in Greece, Wine Economics and Policy 6 (2017) 3–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wep.2017.03.001
  67. G. Migliore, A. Thrassou, M. Crescimanno, G. Schifani, A. Galati, Factors affecting consumer preferences for “natural wine”: An exploratory study in the Italian market, British Food Journal (2020). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-07-2019-0474
  68. C. Aqueveque, Consumers’ preferences for low-priced wines’ packaging alternatives: the influence of consumption occasion, gender, and age, British Food Journal 125 (2022) 781–793. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-09-2021-1040. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-09-2021-1040
  69. G. Di Vita, G. Maesano, R. Zanchini, C. Barbieri, D. Spina, F. Caracciolo, M. D’Amico, The thin line between tradition and well-being: Consumer responds to health and typicality attributes for dry-cured ham, Journal of Cleaner Production 364 (2022) 132680. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132680
  70. S. Massaglia, D. Borra, C. Peano, F. Sottile, V.M. Merlino, Consumer Preference Heterogeneity Evaluation in Fruit and Vegetable Purchasing Decisions Using the Best–Worst Approach, Foods 8 (2019) 266 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/foods8070266

Most read articles by the same author(s)