Just Accepted Manuscripts
Original Research Article

Consumer Knowledge and Perception of Wine Certifications: A Regional Analysis in Italy

(Just Accepted)
  • Sofiia Samarets,
  • Stefano Massaglia,
  • Francesco Bozzo,
  • Emanuela Tria,
  • Emanuela Vassallo,
  • Filippo Brun,
  • Mingze Rui
Sofiia Samarets
Independent researcher
Stefano Massaglia
Department of Agricultural, Forest, and Food Sciences, University of Turin, 10095 Grugliasco, Italy
Francesco Bozzo
Department of Soil, Plant and Food Science (Di.S.S.P.A.), University of Bari Aldo Moro, Via G. Amendola, 165/a, 70126 Bari, Italy
Emanuela Tria
Department of Soil, Plant and Food Science (Di.S.S.P.A.), University of Bari Aldo Moro, Via G. Amendola, 165/a, 70126 Bari, Italy
Emanuela Vassallo
Studio Vassallo, Via Vivaro 21 / B 12051 Alba CN
Filippo Brun
Department of Agricultural, Forest, and Food Sciences, University of Turin, 10095 Grugliasco, Italy
Mingze Rui
Department of Agricultural, Forest, and Food Sciences, University of Turin, 10095 Grugliasco, Italy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36253/wep-20791

Published 2026-10-28

Keywords

  • Wine certifications,
  • PDO/PGI,
  • Organic wine,
  • Sustainability,
  • Consumer perception

How to Cite

Samarets, S., Massaglia, S., Bozzo, F., Tria, E., Vassallo, E., Brun, F., & Rui, M. (2026). Consumer Knowledge and Perception of Wine Certifications: A Regional Analysis in Italy. Wine Economics and Policy. https://doi.org/10.36253/wep-20791

Copyright (c) 2024 Sofiia Samarets, Stefano Massaglia, Francesco Bozzo, Emanuela Tria, Emanuela Vassallo, Filippo Brun, Mingze Rui

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Italian wine consumers encounter multiple certification labels, yet their self-reported understanding and perceived importance of these labels vary across certification categories and consumer groups. This study examined self-reported knowledge and perceived importanceof three certification categories among Italian wine consumers: Protected Designation of Origin/Protected Geographical Indication (PDO/PGI, assessed jointly), organic certification, and sustainability certification (represented by the VIVA, Equalitas and SOStain schemes, assessed jointly). Data were collected through online surveys conducted in the first quarter of 2023, 2024, and 2025 (N = 3,550). Regional differences were examined using Kruskal–Wallis tests with post hoc comparisons, while cumulative-link proportional-odds logistic regression models were used to assess associations with age, gender, income, macro-region, survey wave, and, for importance outcomes, self-reported knowledge. The PDO/PGI category showed the highest self-reported knowledge and the sustainability category the lowest, although comparisons between categories are limited by the different numbers of logos presented for each. Self-reported knowledge was positively associated with perceived importance for all three certification categories and significantly improved model fit. Moving from Level 1 to Level 3 of self-reported knowledge was associated with an increase of 8.4 to 12.8 percentage points in the predicted probability of rating certification importance as high (≥ 4). Sociodemographic and regional associations varied by certification category: macro-region was associated with Organic and Sustainability importance but not PDO/PGI importance. The findings indicate that self-reported certification knowledge and valuation are related but category-specific, highlighting the importance of clear communication about the meaning and requirements of different certification schemes.

(Just Accepted)

References

  1. C. Bazzani, G. Maesano, D. Begalli, and R. Capitello, “Exploring the effect of naturalness on consumer wine choices: Evidence from a survey in Italy,” Food Quality and Preference, vol. 113, pp. 105062, 2024.
  2. A. Dominici, F. Boncinelli, E. Marone, and L. Casini, “Territorial brand equity in the wine market and the role of the organic label: A consumer perspective,” Food Quality and Preference, vol. 126, pp. 105419, 2025.
  3. M. Ankiel, M. Halagarda, A. Piekara, S. Sady, P. Żmijowska, S. Popek, B. Pachołek, B. Jefmański, M. Kucia, and M. Krzywonos, “Role of Certifications and Labelling in Ensuring Authenticity and Sustainability of Fermented Milk Products,” Sustainability, vol. 17, no. 18, pp. 8398, 2025.
  4. E. Pomarici, A. Corsi, S. Mazzarino, and R. Sardone, “The Italian Wine Sector: Evolution, Structure, Competitiveness and Future Challenges of an Enduring Leader,” Italian Economic Journal, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 259–295, 2021.
  5. M. Stanco, M. Lerro, and G. Marotta, “Consumers’ Preferences for Wine Attributes: A Best-Worst Scaling Analysis,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 2819, 2020.
  6. “Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007,” 2013.
  7. “Regulation (EU) 2018/848 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 on organic production and labelling of organic products and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007,” 2018.
  8. “Decreto 16 marzo 2022, n. 0124900. Approvazione del disciplinare del sistema di certificazione della sostenibilità della filiera vitivinicola,” 2022.
  9. G. Capanna Piscè, L. Olivari, G. Pierli, and F. Murmura, “The Value of Semantics in Food and Wine Labeling: Research on Italian Wine Consumers,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 14, pp. 8867, 2022.
  10. F. Boncinelli, A. Dominici, F. Gerini, and E. Marone, “Insights into organic wine consumption: behaviour, segmentation and attribute non-attendance,” Agricultural and Food Economics, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2021.
  11. R. Vecchio, E. Parga-Dans, P. Alonso González, and A. Annunziata, “Why consumers drink natural wine? Consumer perception and information about natural wine,” Agricultural and Food Economics, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 22, 2021.
  12. Statista, “Italy: PDO & PGI leading wines by production value 2022,” 2025, https://www.statista.com/statistics/1446359/value-of-leading-pdo-and-pgi-wines-in-italy/?srsltid=AfmBOooysPmnwyO_08jWOQCr5zYisJNEUPIQrFH8m8twecVUunHD78gc.
  13. L. Balafoutas and R. Kerschbamer, “Credence goods in the literature: What the past fifteen years have taught us about fraud, incentives, and the role of institutions,” Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, vol. 26, pp. 100285, 2020.
  14. P. Fanasch and B. Frick, “The value of signals: Do self-declaration and certification generate price premiums for organic and biodynamic wines?,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 249, pp. 119415, 2020.
  15. M. Corduas, L. Cinquanta, and C. Ievoli, “The importance of wine attributes for purchase decisions: A study of Italian consumers’ perception,” Food Quality and Preference, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 407–418, 2013.
  16. M. Sapienza, “Studio delle preferenze del consumatore di vino con tecniche di neuro marketing,” 2025, https://thesis.unipd.it/handle/20.500.12608/77939.
  17. A. Annunziata, L. Agnoli, R. Vecchio, S. Charters, and A. Mariani, “Health warnings on wine labels: a discrete choice analysis of Italian and French Generation Y consumers,” Wine Economics and Policy, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 81–90, 2019.
  18. M. Giacomarra, A. Galati, M. Crescimanno, and S. Tinervia, “The integration of quality and safety concerns in the wine industry: the role of third-party voluntary certifications,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 112, pp. 267–274, 2016.
  19. G. Pierli, F. Musso, F. Murmura, and L. Bravi, “Exploring Italian Wine Companies: A Study of Supply Chain Dynamics, Quality, and Promotion Strategies through Semi-Structured Interviews,” Foods, vol. 12, no. 24, pp. 4429, 2023.
  20. M. Brucks, “The Effects of Product Class Knowledge on Information Search Behavior,” Journal of Consumer Research, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1, 1985.
  21. C.W. Park, D.L. Mothersbaugh, and L. Feick, “Consumer Knowledge Assessment,” Journal of Consumer Research, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 71, 1994.
  22. L.R. Flynn and R.E. Goldsmith, “A Short, Reliable Measure of Subjective Knowledge,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 57–66, 1999.
  23. P.S. Raju, S.C. Lonial, and W. Glynn Mangold, “Differential Effects of Subjective Knowledge, Objective Knowledge, and Usage Experience on Decision Making: An Exploratory Investigation,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 153–180, 1995.
  24. J.P. Carlson, L.H. Vincent, D.M. Hardesty, and W.O. Bearden, “Objective and Subjective Knowledge Relationships: A Quantitative Analysis of Consumer Research Findings,” Journal of Consumer Research, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 864–876, 2009.
  25. T.H. Dodd, D.A. Laverie, J.F. Wilcox, and D.F. Duhan, “Differential Effects of Experience, Subjective Knowledge, and Objective Knowledge on Sources of Information used in Consumer Wine Purchasing,” Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 3–19, 2005.
  26. D. Vigar-Ellis, L. Pitt, and A. Caruana, “Knowledge effects on the exploratory acquisition of wine,” International Journal of Wine Business Research, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 84–102, 2015.
  27. F. Sgroi, L. Maenza, and F. Modica, “Exploring consumer behavior and willingness to pay regarding sustainable wine certification,” Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, vol. 14, 2023.
  28. D. Moscovici, J. Gow, A. Ugaglia, R. Rezwanul, L. Valenzuela, and R. Mihailescu, “Consumer preferences for organic wine—Global analysis of people and place,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 368, pp. 133215, 2022.
  29. G. Scozzafava, F. Gerini, F. Boncinelli, C. Contini, and L. Casini, “How much is a bottle of conventional, organic or biodynamic wine worth? Results of an experimental auction,” Food Quality and Preference, vol. 93, pp. 104259, 2021.
  30. E. Anagnostou, T. Tsiakis, and I. Zervas, “Highlighting Wine Labels: A Systematic Literature Review of Dominant Informational Parameters as Communicative Elements,” Beverages, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 12, 2025.
  31. T. Fantechi, C. Contini, N. Marinelli, M. Moriondo, and S. Costafreda-Aumedes, “Sustainable wine – for whom? Consumer preferences for different environmental labels,” Wine Economics and Policy, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 17–29, 2025.
  32. A. Sparacino, S. Ollani, L. Baima, M. Oliviero, D. Borra, M. Rui, and G. Mastromonaco, “Analyzing Strawberry Preferences: Best–Worst Scaling Methodology and Purchase Styles,” Foods, vol. 13, no. 10, 2024.
  33. M. Alyahya, G. Agag, M. Aliedan, and Z.H. Abdelmoety, “Understanding the factors affecting consumers’ behaviour when purchasing refurbished products: A chaordic perspective,” Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, vol. 75, pp. 103492, 2023.
  34. R. Vecchio and A. Annunziata, “The role of PDO/PGI labelling in Italian consumers’ food choices,” Greek Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 12, no. 2, 2011.
  35. G. Di Vita, F. Caracciolo, F. Brun, and M. D’Amico, “Picking out a wine: Consumer motivation behind different quality wines choice,” Wine Economics and Policy, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 16–27, 2019.
  36. A. Ceccacci, L. Camanzi, C. Rota, R. Fiorentini, and G. Malorgio, “Enhancing wineries’ sustainability through territorial certifications: a case study in Emilia-Romagna, Italy,” International Journal of Wine Business Research, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 87–112, 2025.
  37. T.A. DiPrete and D.B. Grusky, “The Multilevel Analysis of Trends with Repeated Cross-Sectional Data,” Sociological Methodology, vol. 20, pp. 337, 1990.
  38. M.J. Lebo and C. Weber, “An Effective Approach to the Repeated Cross-Sectional Design,” American Journal of Political Science, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 242–258, 2015.
  39. G. Szolnoki, “WINE CONSUMER REPORT GERMANY 2026 Representative survey on wine purchasing and consumption behaviour,” 2026.
  40. C. Avalos, N. Shryane, and Y. Wang, “Food Label Readability and Consumption Frequency: Isolating Content-Specific Effects via a Non-Equivalent Dependent Variable Design,” Nutrients, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 197, 2026.
  41. ISTAT, “Descrizione dei dati geografici dei confini delle unità amministrative a fini statistici,” 2020, https://www.istat.it/it/files/2018/10/Descrizione-dei-dati-geografici-2020-03-19.pdf.
  42. A. Sparacino, J. Mota-Gutierrez, M. Rui, S. Indelicati, and V.M. Merlino, “Exploring consumers’ knowledge and level of importance of sustainable agri-food certifications in purchasing behavior,” Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, vol. 22, pp. 102127, 2025.

Most read articles by the same author(s)